Tunicamycin inhibition of N-glycosylation of alpha-glucosidase from Aspergillus niveus: partial influence on biochemical properties

Treatment of Aspergillus niveus with 30 mu g tunicamycin/ml did not interfere with alpha-glucosidase production, secretion, or its catalytic properties. Fully- and under-glycosylated forms of the enzyme had similar molecular masses, similar to 56 kDa. Moreover, the absence of N-glycans did not affect either pH optimum (6.0) or temperature optimum (65A degrees C). The K(m) and V(max) values of under- and fully-glycosylated forms of alpha-glucosidase were similar when assessed for hydrolysis of starch (similar to 0.6 mg/ml, similar to 350 mu mol glucose per min per ml), maltose (similar to 0.54 mu mol, similar to 330 mu mol glucose per min per ml) and p-nitrophenyl-alpha-d-glucopyranoside (similar to 0.54 mu mol, similar to 8.28 mu mol p-nitrophenol per min per ml). However, the under-glycosylated form was sensitive to high temperatures probably because, in addition to stabilizing the protein conformation, glycosylation may also prevent unfolded or partially folded proteins from aggregating. Binding assays clearly showed that the under-glycosylated protein did not bind to concanavalin A but has conserve its jacalin-binding property, suggesting that only O-glycans might be intact on the tunicamycin treated form of the enzyme.

History and nomenclature of the theropod dinosaur tracks Bueckeburgichnus and Megalosauripus

The most recent account of Bueckeburgichnus maximus Kuhn 1958, a distinctive theropod dinosaur track from the Lower Cretaceous of Germany, is shown to be based on a referred specimen mistakenly identified as the holotype and the correct name of this taxon is deemed to be Megalosauripus maximus (Kuhn 1958). This minor revision has important consequences for nomenclature of the many European, Asian, North American and Australian dinosaur tracks attributed to megalosaurian theropods. Many of those tracks were named Megalosauripus, but that name has a confusing multiplicity of meanings and it should be restricted to the highly characteristic dinosaur track formerly identified as Bueckeburgichnus. Other tracks named "Megalosauripus”; (in its several other senses) will require new nomenclature, despite their extensive and repeated revision since 1996. It is recommended that future revision should adopt conventions of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Although previous revisions expressed an intention to adhere to those conventions, these were not put into practice, with the unfortunate result of multiplying the problems that surround the nomenclature of megalosaur tracks. Introduction of the name Megalosauripus maximus (Kuhn 1958) eliminates those burgeoning problems and permits the introduction of new and objective nomenclature for presumed megalosaur tracks.