Primera Casa

Florida International University Primera Casa (PC) Building built in 1969. View from the water fountain at the main campus, University Park that was renamed the Modesto Maidique Campus (MMC) in 2009. The campus encompasses 344 acres (1.4 km²) in the Miami neighborhood of University Park.

9-11 Memorial: Commemoration and Reflection

Ceremony held at the fountain outside the Maidique Campus to commemorate the events of September 11, 2011. Community leaders in attendance include Miami-Dade County Mayor Carlos Gimenez.

Apple Pollination: Demand Depends on Variety and Supply Depends on Pollinator Identity

Insect pollination underpins apple production but the extent to which different pollinator guilds supply this service, particularly across different apple varieties, is unknown. Such information is essential if appropriate orchard management practices are to be targeted and proportional to the potential benefits pollinator species may provide. Here we use a novel combination of pollinator effectiveness assays (floral visit effectiveness), orchard field surveys (flower visitation rate) and pollinator dependence manipulations (pollinator exclusion experiments) to quantify the supply of pollination services provided by four different pollinator guilds to the production of four commercial varieties of apple. We show that not all pollinators are equally effective at pollinating apples, with hoverflies being less effective than solitary bees and bumblebees, and the relative abundance of different pollinator guilds visiting apple flowers of different varieties varies significantly. Based on this, the taxa specific economic benefits to UK apple production have been established. The contribution of insect pollinators to the economic output in all varieties was estimated to be £92.1M across the UK, with contributions varying widely across taxa: solitary bees (£51.4M), honeybees (£21.4M), bumblebees (£18.6M) and hoverflies (£0.7M). This research highlights the differences in the economic benefits of four insect pollinator guilds to four major apple varieties in the UK. This information is essential to underpin appropriate investment in pollination services management and provides a model that can be used in other entomolophilous crops to improve our understanding of crop pollination ecology.

Le tableau numérique interactif: une intégration dans une communauté coopérative Freinet

Dans cette étude, nous nous sommes intéressé à l’utilisation des TIC, plus précisément du Tableau Numérique Interactif (TNI), en géométrie, par des groupes d’élèves de deux classes du primaire en pédagogie Freinet. S’inspirant d’une revue de littérature concernant la pédagogie dialogique, qui se rapproche de la pédagogie Freinet, trois unités d’observation, qui se rapportent aux trois types de discussion (cumulatif, disputationnel et exploratoire) au sein des groupes, ont été analysées. Le but de l’étude est de comprendre en quoi les discussions des groupes d’élèves autour du TNI, dans un contexte dit dialogique, peuvent être exploratoires (un type de discussion qui favoriserait les apprentissages). Pour cela, une activité d’apprentissage, appelée situation-problème, impliquant six groupes d’élèves autour du TNI, a été créée en collaboration avec les enseignants en géométrie. Nos résultats indiquent, entres autres, que les aspects pédagogiques de la technologie en question, ici le TNI, sont à différencier des aspects pédagogiques du logiciel utilisé, ici Tinkercad en mathématiques. Ce mémoire remet en relief toute la complexité de prendre en compte un unique facteur (l’analyse des discussions) pour discuter des apprentissages des élèves autour du TNI.

Learning Sustainability with EPS@ISEP – Development of an Insectarium

8th International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education (PAEE)

Relations among Topic Knowledge, Individual Interest, and Relational Reasoning, and Critical Thinking in Maternity Nursing

Critical thinking in learners is a goal of educators and professional organizations in nursing as well as other professions. However, few studies in nursing have examined the role of the important individual difference factors topic knowledge, individual interest, and general relational reasoning strategies in predicting critical thinking. In addition, most previous studies have used domain-general, standardized measures, with inconsistent results. Moreover, few studies have investigated critical thinking across multiple levels of experience. The major purpose of this study was to examine the degree to which topic knowledge, individual interest, and relational reasoning predict critical thinking in maternity nurses. For this study, 182 maternity nurses were recruited from national nursing listservs explicitly chosen to capture multiple levels of experience from prelicensure to very experienced nurses. The three independent measures included a domain-specific Topic Knowledge Assessment (TKA), consisting of 24 short-answer questions, a Professed and Engaged Interest Measure (PEIM), with 20 questions indicating level of interest and engagement in maternity nursing topics and activities, and the Test of Relational Reasoning (TORR), a graphical selected response measure with 32 items organized in scales corresponding to four forms of relational reasoning: analogy, anomaly, antithesis, and antinomy. The dependent measure was the Critical Thinking Task in Maternity Nursing (CT2MN), composed of a clinical case study providing cues with follow-up questions relating to nursing care. These questions align with the cognitive processes identified in a commonly-used definition of critical thinking in nursing. Reliable coding schemes for the measures were developed for this study. Key findings included a significant correlation between topic knowledge and individual interest. Further, the three individual difference factors explained a significant proportion of the variance in critical thinking with a large effect size. While topic knowledge was the strongest predictor of critical thinking performance, individual interest had a moderate significant effect, and relational reasoning had a small but significant effect. The findings suggest that these individual difference factors should be included in future studies of critical thinking in nursing. Implications for nursing education, research, and practice are discussed.