Le contrôle européen des concentrations et les leçons à tirer de la crise financière et économique = European merger control and the lessons of the financial and economic crisis. Research Papers in Law, 06/2013

No abstract.

Classifications and standards of quality and purity for fresh surface waters of the Finger Lakes drainage basin, assigned and adopted by New York State Water Pollution Control Board pursuant to Article 12, Public health law.

Cover title: The Finger Lakes drainage basin: official classifications.

Final report to Congress, The Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974, Section 32, Public Law 93-251 : Main report, supplemented by appendices A-H in separate volumes /

Main report -- Appendix A. Literature survey -- Appendix B. Hydraulic research -- Appendix C. Geotechnical research -- Appendix D. Ohio River demonstration projects -- Appendix F. Missouri River demonstration projects (2 v.) -- Appendix F. Yazoo River Basin demonstration projects -- Appendix G. Demonstration projects on other streams, nationwide (2 v.) -- Appendix H. Evaluation of existing projects (2 v.).

A study of alternative methods for controlling marketings of burley tobacco. Letter from the Secretary of Agriculture transmitting a report on the study of the various methods of marketing control which have been or could be made applicable to burley tobacco, pursuant to Public law 96, 84th Congress, November 2, 1955.

At head of title: Committee print.

Gila River flood control : letter from the Secretary of the Interior transmitting, pursuant to law a report on flood control of the Gila River in Graham County, Arizona /

Mode of access: Internet.

The law of zoning. A review of the constitutionality of zoning regulations which control buildings in accordance with a general plan of municipal development.

Mode of access: Internet.

Noxious weeds in Illinois; description and control. Illinois noxious weed law 2, 4-D and related Herbicide act.

Revisions in 1963 and 1970.

Federal water pollution control act, Public Law 84-660, as amended by the Federal water pollution control act amendments of 1961 (PL 87-88), the Water quality act of 1965 (PL 89-234), and the Clean water restoration act of 1966 (PL 89-753) Appendices: Reorganization plan no. 2 of 1966, Executive order 11288, Prevention, control and abatement of water pollution by Federal activities. Oil pollution act, 1924 as amended by the Clean water restoration act of 1966 (PL 89-753)

Cover title.

Report of the Subcommittee on Legislation of the Committee on Un-American Activites on proposed legislation to control subversive communist activites in the United States. Investigation of un-American activites in the United States, Committee on Un-American Activites, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, second session, Public law 601, section 121, subsection Q(2).

At head of title: Committee print.

The Toxic Substances Control Act : Public law 94-469 : questions and answers to help persons report for the revised inventory of chemical substances /

Mode of access: Internet.

Acting on impulse: using the neuroscience of impulse control to improve the law

This thesis investigates the potential legal utility of neurotechnologies which measure correlates of impulsive behaviors. Chapter 1 explains my philosophical position and how this position compares to others in the field. Chapter 2 explores some of the technical concepts which must be understood for the discussion of neurotechnologies and their applications to be fruitful. These chapters will be important for both explaining the capabilities of a neuroscientific approach to neural abnormalities as well as how they relate to the kind of regulation in which the law is engaged. The purpose of Chapter 3 will be a descriptive account of Canadian law where I will begin to explore how to apply ideas and experiments from neuroscience to specific areas of law. Chapter 3 will look at actual examples of Canadian criminal law and will span topics from the creation of law to the construction of appropriate sentences. Chapter 4 will debate if and how we should apply the neuroscientific perspective to the law given the ethical concerns surrounding the applications described in Chapter 3. The thrust of the chapter is that the development of the law does not occur in a vacuum and any alteration either to the laws themselves, how they are interpreted, or the technologies used to provide evidence, must have an ethical justification, that is, a way in which the proposed change will better meet the needs of society and the ethical objectives of the law. Sometimes these justifications can be drawn directly from constitutional documents, such as the Charter, or from the Criminal Code, while at other times these justifications depend upon arguments about furthering meaningful responsibility and therapeutic outcomes.

Unpacking insanity defence standards: an experimental study of rationality and control tests in criminal law

The present study investigated the impact of different legal standards on mock juror decisions concerning whether a defendant was guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity. Undergraduate students (N = 477) read a simulated case summary involving a murder case and were asked to make an insanity determination. The cases differed in terms of the condition of the defendant (rationality deficit or control deficit) and the legal standard given to the jurors to make the determination (Model Penal Code, McNaughten or McNaughten plus a separate control determination). The effects of these variables on the insanity determination were investigated. Jurors also completed questionnaires measuring individualism and hierarchy attitudes and perceptions of facts in the case. Results indicate that under current insanity standards jurors do not distinguish between defendants with rationality deficits and defendants with control deficits regardless of whether the legal standard requires them to do so. Even defendants who lacked control were found guilty at equal rates under a legal standard excusing rationality deficits only and a legal standard excluding control and rationality deficits. This was improved by adding a control test as a partial defence, to be determined after a rationality determination. Implications for the insanity defence in the Criminal Justice System are discussed.