Intramolecular electronic energy transfer in bichromophoric macrocyclic complexes

Efficient intramolecular electronic energy transfer (EET) has been demonstrated for three novel bichromophoric compounds utilizing a macrocyclic spacer as the bridge between the electronic energy donor and acceptor fragments. As their free base forms, emission from the electronically excited donor is absent and the acceptor emission is reductively quenched via photoinduced oxidation of proximate amine lone pairs. As their Zn(II) complexes, excitation of the donor results in sensitization of the electronic acceptor emission.

Model-based clustering in gene expression microarrays: An application to breast cancer data

In microarray studies, the application of clustering techniques is often used to derive meaningful insights into the data. In the past, hierarchical methods have been the primary clustering tool employed to perform this task. The hierarchical algorithms have been mainly applied heuristically to these cluster analysis problems. Further, a major limitation of these methods is their inability to determine the number of clusters. Thus there is a need for a model-based approach to these. clustering problems. To this end, McLachlan et al. [7] developed a mixture model-based algorithm (EMMIX-GENE) for the clustering of tissue samples. To further investigate the EMMIX-GENE procedure as a model-based -approach, we present a case study involving the application of EMMIX-GENE to the breast cancer data as studied recently in van 't Veer et al. [10]. Our analysis considers the problem of clustering the tissue samples on the basis of the genes which is a non-standard problem because the number of genes greatly exceed the number of tissue samples. We demonstrate how EMMIX-GENE can be useful in reducing the initial set of genes down to a more computationally manageable size. The results from this analysis also emphasise the difficulty associated with the task of separating two tissue groups on the basis of a particular subset of genes. These results also shed light on why supervised methods have such a high misallocation error rate for the breast cancer data.