Collective decision making in a heterogeneous environment: Lasius niger colonies preferentially forage at easy to learn locations

Many ants forage in complex environments and use a combination of trail pheromone information and route memory to navigate between food sources and the nest. Previous research has shown that foraging routes differ in how easily they are learned. In particular, it is easier to learn feeding locations that are reached by repeating (e.g. left-left or right-right) than alternating choices (left-right or right-left) along a route with two T-bifurcations. This raises the hypothesis that the learnability of the feeding sites may influence overall colony foraging patterns. We studied this in the mass-recruiting ant Lasius niger. We used mazes with two T-bifurcations, and allowed colonies to exploit two equidistant food sources that differed in how easily their locations were learned. In experiment 1, learnability was manipulated by using repeating versus alternating routes from nest to feeder. In experiment 2, we added visual landmarks along the route to one food source. Our results suggest that colonies preferentially exploited the feeding site that was easier to learn. This was the case even if the more difficult to learn feeding site was discovered first. Furthermore, we show that these preferences were at least partly caused by lower error rates (experiment 1) and greater foraging speeds (experiment 2) of foragers visiting the more easily learned feeder locations. Our results indicate that the learnability of feeding sites is an important factor influencing collective foraging patterns of ant colonies under more natural conditions, given that in natural environments foragers often face multiple bifurcations on their way to food sources.

Evolutionary dynamics of collective action in spatially structured populations.

Many models proposed to study the evolution of collective action rely on a formalism that represents social interactions as n-player games between individuals adopting discrete actions such as cooperate and defect. Despite the importance of spatial structure in biological collective action, the analysis of n-player games games in spatially structured populations has so far proved elusive. We address this problem by considering mixed strategies and by integrating discrete-action n-player games into the direct fitness approach of social evolution theory. This allows to conveniently identify convergence stable strategies and to capture the effect of population structure by a single structure coefficient, namely, the pairwise (scaled) relatedness among interacting individuals. As an application, we use our mathematical framework to investigate collective action problems associated with the provision of three different kinds of collective goods, paradigmatic of a vast array of helping traits in nature: "public goods" (both providers and shirkers can use the good, e.g., alarm calls), "club goods" (only providers can use the good, e.g., participation in collective hunting), and "charity goods" (only shirkers can use the good, e.g., altruistic sacrifice). We show that relatedness promotes the evolution of collective action in different ways depending on the kind of collective good and its economies of scale. Our findings highlight the importance of explicitly accounting for relatedness, the kind of collective good, and the economies of scale in theoretical and empirical studies of the evolution of collective action.

Analyse rétrospective et création d'un modèle prédictif des réadmissions précoces dans le Service de Médecine Interne du CHUV

Le taux de réadmission à 30 jours de la sortie de l'hôpital est un indicateur de la qualité de prise en charge hospitalière pouvant refléter des soins suboptimaux ou une coordination insuffisante avec les intervenants ambulatoires. Il existe un algorithme informatisé validé dénommé SQLape® qui, basé sur des données administratives suisses, les codes diagnostiques et les codes d'interventions, permet d'identifier rétrospectivement les réadmissions potentiellement évitables (REAPE), avec une haute sensibilité (96%) et spécificité (96%). Sont considérées REAPE, les réadmissions précoces (< 30 jours), non planifiées à la sortie du séjour index et dues à un diagnostic déjà actif lors du précédent séjour ou dues à une complication d'un traitement. Le but de notre étude a été d'analyser rétrospectivement tous les séjours des patients admis dans le service de Médecine Interne du CHUV entre le 1 janvier 2009 et le 31 décembre 2011, afin de quantifier la proportion de REAPE, puis d'identifier des facteurs de risques afin d'en dériver un modèle prédictif. Nous avons analysé 11'074 séjours. L'âge moyen était de 72 +/- 16,8 ans et 50,3 % étaient des femmes. Nous avons comptabilisé 8,4 % décès durant les séjours et 14,2 % réadmissions à 30 jours de la sortie, dont la moitié (7,0 %) considérées potentiellement évitables selon SQLape®. Les facteurs de risques de REAPE que nous avons mis en évidence étaient les suivants : au moins une hospitalisation antérieure à l'admission index, un score de comorbidité de Charlson > 1, la présence d'un cancer actif, une hyponatrémie, une durée de séjour > 11 jours ou encore la prescription d'au moins 15 médicaments différents durant le séjour. Ces variables ont été utilisées pour en dériver un modèle prédictif de REAPE de bonne qualité (aire sous la courbe ROC de 0,70), plus performant pour notre population qu'un autre modèle prédictif développé et validé au Canada, dénommé score de LACE. Dans une perspective d'amélioration de la qualité des soins et d'une réduction des coûts, la capacité à identifier précocement les patients à risque élevé de REAPE permettrait d'implémenter rapidement des mesures préventives ciblées (par exemple un plan de sortie détaillé impliquant le patient, son entourage et son médecin traitant) en plus des mesures préventives générales (par exemple la réconciliation médicamenteuse)

Transnational private authority, regulatory space and workers' collective competences: Bringing local contexts and worker agency back in

The impact of transnational private regulation on labour standards remains in dispute. While studies have provided some limited evidence of positive effects on 'outcome standards' such as wages or occupational health and safety, the literature gives little reason to believe that there has been any significant effect on 'process rights' relating primarily to collective workers' voice and social dialogue. This paper probes this assumption by bringing local contexts and worker agency more fully into the picture. It outlines an analytical framework that emphasizes workers' potential to act collectively for change in the regulatory space surrounding the employment relationship. It argues that while transnational private regulation on labour standards may marginally improve workers access to regulatory spaces and their capacity to require the inclusion of enterprises in them, it does little to increase union leverage. The findings are based on empirical research work conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa.