Hand-held 3D light field photography and applications

We propose a method to acquire 3D light fields using a hand-held camera, and describe several computational photography applications facilitated by our approach. As our input we take an image sequence from a camera translating along an approximately linear path with limited camera rotations. Users can acquire such data easily in a few seconds by moving a hand-held camera. We include a novel approach to resample the input into regularly sampled 3D light fields by aligning them in the spatio-temporal domain, and a technique for high-quality disparity estimation from light fields. We show applications including digital refocusing and synthetic aperture blur, foreground removal, selective colorization, and others.

3D documentation and visualization of external injury findings by integration of simple photography in CT/MRI data sets (IprojeCT).

This study evaluated the feasibility of documenting patterned injury using three dimensions and true colour photography without complex 3D surface documentation methods. This method is based on a generated 3D surface model using radiologic slice images (CT) while the colour information is derived from photographs taken with commercially available cameras. The external patterned injuries were documented in 16 cases using digital photography as well as highly precise photogrammetry-supported 3D structured light scanning. The internal findings of these deceased were recorded using CT and MRI. For registration of the internal with the external data, two different types of radiographic markers were used and compared. The 3D surface model generated from CT slice images was linked with the photographs, and thereby digital true-colour 3D models of the patterned injuries could be created (Image projection onto CT/IprojeCT). In addition, these external models were merged with the models of the somatic interior. We demonstrated that 3D documentation and visualization of external injury findings by integration of digital photography in CT/MRI data sets is suitable for the 3D documentation of individual patterned injuries to a body. Nevertheless, this documentation method is not a substitution for photogrammetry and surface scanning, especially when the entire bodily surface is to be recorded in three dimensions including all external findings, and when precise data is required for comparing highly detailed injury features with the injury-inflicting tool.

Computational Tools for Stereo and Light Field Photography

This thesis covers a broad part of the field of computational photography, including video stabilization and image warping techniques, introductions to light field photography and the conversion of monocular images and videos into stereoscopic 3D content. We present a user assisted technique for stereoscopic 3D conversion from 2D images. Our approach exploits the geometric structure of perspective images including vanishing points. We allow a user to indicate lines, planes, and vanishing points in the input image, and directly employ these as guides of an image warp that produces a stereo image pair. Our method is most suitable for scenes with large scale structures such as buildings and is able to skip the step of constructing a depth map. Further, we propose a method to acquire 3D light fields using a hand-held camera, and describe several computational photography applications facilitated by our approach. As the input we take an image sequence from a camera translating along an approximately linear path with limited camera rotations. Users can acquire such data easily in a few seconds by moving a hand-held camera. We convert the input into a regularly sampled 3D light field by resampling and aligning them in the spatio-temporal domain. We also present a novel technique for high-quality disparity estimation from light fields. Finally, we show applications including digital refocusing and synthetic aperture blur, foreground removal, selective colorization, and others.

"Amateur-Landwirtschaft"

Ben David

Notable College Experiences Through Original Still Photography

http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/carver_narratives/1000/thumbnail.jpg

Comparación de variables fisiológicas y rendimiento alcanzado entre un ejercicio continuo vs. un ejercicio intermitente en futbolista amateur

El objetivo del presente trabajo es determinar si existen diferencias entre los promedios de frecuencia cardíaca intra, final, post esfuerzo, veloci-dad final de desplazamiento y tiempo de permanencia dentro de cada patrón de ejercicio realizado: Continuo, Yo-Yo Endurance Test nivel 1(ETN1) r = 0,84 vs. Intermitente, Yo-Yo Recovery Test nivel 1(RTN1) r = 0,90. Se seleccionaron 9 jugadores amateur. Se diseño un estudio intrasujetos, experimental. El primer patrón de ejercicio denominado ETN1 que nos infiere datos sobre el Consumo Máximo de Oxígeno valorado de forma indi-recta, y el RTN1 que nos informa aspectos relacionados con la resistencia a realizar esfuerzos intermitentes, muy utilizados en el fútbol. (BANGSBO, 1994) En ambos test se monitoreó la FC cada 5 segundos, al final y en los instantes de recuperación post-esfuerzo (3, 5 y 7 minuto). Se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significati-vas en la velocidad final de carrera (RTN1 15.9 Km/h. vs. ETN1 14.1 Km/h. p < 0.001), en el tiempo de per-manencia en las pruebas (RTN1 17,0 minutos vs. ETN1 13,0 minutos p < 0.01), FC (RTN1 190.5 latidos por minuto vs. ETN1 196.1 latidos por minuto p < 0.001) son significativamente diferentes, arrojando menores valores en el protocolo intermitente

Comparación de variables fisiológicas y rendimiento alcanzado entre un ejercicio continuo vs. un ejercicio intermitente en futbolista amateur

El objetivo del presente trabajo es determinar si existen diferencias entre los promedios de frecuencia cardíaca intra, final, post esfuerzo, veloci-dad final de desplazamiento y tiempo de permanencia dentro de cada patrón de ejercicio realizado: Continuo, Yo-Yo Endurance Test nivel 1(ETN1) r = 0,84 vs. Intermitente, Yo-Yo Recovery Test nivel 1(RTN1) r = 0,90. Se seleccionaron 9 jugadores amateur. Se diseño un estudio intrasujetos, experimental. El primer patrón de ejercicio denominado ETN1 que nos infiere datos sobre el Consumo Máximo de Oxígeno valorado de forma indi-recta, y el RTN1 que nos informa aspectos relacionados con la resistencia a realizar esfuerzos intermitentes, muy utilizados en el fútbol. (BANGSBO, 1994) En ambos test se monitoreó la FC cada 5 segundos, al final y en los instantes de recuperación post-esfuerzo (3, 5 y 7 minuto). Se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significati-vas en la velocidad final de carrera (RTN1 15.9 Km/h. vs. ETN1 14.1 Km/h. p < 0.001), en el tiempo de per-manencia en las pruebas (RTN1 17,0 minutos vs. ETN1 13,0 minutos p < 0.01), FC (RTN1 190.5 latidos por minuto vs. ETN1 196.1 latidos por minuto p < 0.001) son significativamente diferentes, arrojando menores valores en el protocolo intermitente

Comparación de variables fisiológicas y rendimiento alcanzado entre un ejercicio continuo vs. un ejercicio intermitente en futbolista amateur

El objetivo del presente trabajo es determinar si existen diferencias entre los promedios de frecuencia cardíaca intra, final, post esfuerzo, veloci-dad final de desplazamiento y tiempo de permanencia dentro de cada patrón de ejercicio realizado: Continuo, Yo-Yo Endurance Test nivel 1(ETN1) r = 0,84 vs. Intermitente, Yo-Yo Recovery Test nivel 1(RTN1) r = 0,90. Se seleccionaron 9 jugadores amateur. Se diseño un estudio intrasujetos, experimental. El primer patrón de ejercicio denominado ETN1 que nos infiere datos sobre el Consumo Máximo de Oxígeno valorado de forma indi-recta, y el RTN1 que nos informa aspectos relacionados con la resistencia a realizar esfuerzos intermitentes, muy utilizados en el fútbol. (BANGSBO, 1994) En ambos test se monitoreó la FC cada 5 segundos, al final y en los instantes de recuperación post-esfuerzo (3, 5 y 7 minuto). Se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significati-vas en la velocidad final de carrera (RTN1 15.9 Km/h. vs. ETN1 14.1 Km/h. p < 0.001), en el tiempo de per-manencia en las pruebas (RTN1 17,0 minutos vs. ETN1 13,0 minutos p < 0.01), FC (RTN1 190.5 latidos por minuto vs. ETN1 196.1 latidos por minuto p < 0.001) son significativamente diferentes, arrojando menores valores en el protocolo intermitente