Clinical trial designs for rare diseases: studies developed and discussed by the International Rare Cancers Initiative.

BACKGROUND: The past three decades have seen rapid improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of most cancers and the most important contributor has been research. Progress in rare cancers has been slower, not least because of the challenges of undertaking research. SETTINGS: The International Rare Cancers Initiative (IRCI) is a partnership which aims to stimulate and facilitate the development of international clinical trials for patients with rare cancers. It is focused on interventional--usually randomized--clinical trials with the clear goal of improving outcomes for patients. The key challenges are organisational and methodological. A multi-disciplinary workshop to review the methods used in ICRI portfolio trials was held in Amsterdam in September 2013. Other as-yet unrealised methods were also discussed. RESULTS: The IRCI trials are each presented to exemplify possible approaches to designing credible trials in rare cancers. Researchers may consider these for use in future trials and understand the choices made for each design. INTERPRETATION: Trials can be designed using a wide array of possibilities. There is no 'one size fits all' solution. In order to make progress in the rare diseases, decisions to change practice will have to be based on less direct evidence from clinical trials than in more common diseases.

L'ultrasonographie endorectale dans les cancers du rectum [Endorectal ultrasound of rectal cancers].

Endorectal ultrasonography has become the preferred exam to assess the local extent of rectal cancers. From 1990 to 1992, we have examined 28 patients with a rectal cancer. The tumours were classified according to the TNM. The objective of this exam is to identify patients whose tumours have invaded the perirectal fat. These patients are first treated in our clinic by an accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy and then operated. The preoperative staging made with the endorectal ultrasound was then compared with the anatomopathologic staging. The depth of the invasion was assessed precisely in 78.5% of cases. The exam's sensitivity to detect the invasion of the perirectal fat was 96% and its specificity 75%. Lymph node involvement was accurately identified in 67.8% of cases with a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 50%. This short retrospective study confirms that endorectal ultrasonography is a highly accurate tool for the staging of rectal carcinoma prior to operation and hence to select the patients that can benefit from preoperative irradiation.

Incidence des cancers et polypes colorectaux dans le canton de Vaud, 1983-2007: tendances et déterminants

Le cancer colorectal atteint, chaque année, plus d'un million de personnes dans le monde et plus de 500'000 en meurent [1]. Il affecte de manière très inégalitaire les différentes parties du monde. En effet, s'il constitue un problème de santé publique majeur dans des régions telles que l'Amérique du Nord, l'Europe ou l'Océanie (incidence supérieure à 50 pour 100'000), il est nettement plus rare dans certains pays d'Asie, d'Afrique ou d'Amérique du Sud (incidence inférieure à 10 pour 100'000) [2]. Aux Etats-Unis, on estime que 5 à 6% de la population générale présentera un cancer colorectal au cours de sa vie [3]. En Suisse, le cancer colorectal est le deuxième cancer le plus mortel, avec quelque 1'600 décès par an, après le cancer du poumon [4]. Avec 4'000 nouveaux cas annuels, il représente 11% de tous les cancers chez l'homme et chez la femme [5]. Le cancer colorectal est le troisième cancer le plus fréquent après celui du poumon et de la prostate chez l'homme, alors qu'il n'est précédé chez la femme que par le cancer du sein. Pour la période 2003-07, l'incidence en Suisse est estimée à 50 cas/100'000 hommes et 32 cas/100'000 femmes (taux standardisés selon la population européenne) [5] et son taux de survie relative à 5 ans est de 60%, ce qui en fait le taux le plus élevé d'Europe [6]. Le fait que l'incidence chez les migrants ait tendance à rattraper celle des indigènes en moins d'une génération suggère que les facteurs environnementaux jouent un rôle prédominant dans la carcinogénèse des tumeurs colorectales [7]. Cependant, d'autres facteurs, notamment génétiques, interviennent dans la survenue des cancers colorectaux. En effet, dans des conditions de vie similaires, on observe une incidence de cancers colorectaux différente entre différentes ethnies. Des études américaines ont par exemple montré une incidence plus élevée chez les noirs (48 pour 100'000) que chez les blancs (40/100'000) ou les hispaniques (26/100'000) [8]. Les hommes sont plus fréquemment touchés par le cancer colorectal que les femmes, avec un sexe ratio de 1,5 [9]. Les premiers cas de cancers colorectaux apparaissent à partir de 25 ans et l'incidence augmente de manière quasi exponentielle jusqu'à un âge de 75-80 ans, puis se stabilise [10]. L'âge moyen au diagnostic se situe entre 65 et 70 ans. Environ 66% des cancers colorectaux sont localisés dans le côlon (dans l'ordre décroissant: au niveau du sigmoïde, du côlon ascendant, descendant et transverse), 27% dans le rectum, 4% dans l'anus tandis qu'environ 4% restent multiples et indéfinis [10]. Notons encore, qu'à des fins de comparaisons épidémiologiques, les cancers du côlon, du rectum et de l'anus sont souvent regroupés dans l'unique groupe des tumeurs colorectales.

Méta-analyses d'essais randomisés sur données individuelles dans le traitement des cancers ORL non métastatiques : principes, résultats, perspectives [Individual patient data meta-analyses of randomized trials for the treatment of non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: Principles, results and perspectives].

Meta-analyses are considered as an important pillar of evidence-based medicine. The aim of this review is to describe the main principles of a meta-analysis and to use examples of head and neck oncology to demonstrate their clinical impact and methodological interest. The major role of individual patient data is outlined, as well as the superiority of individual patient data over meta-analyses based on published summary data. The major clinical breakthrough of head and neck meta-analyses are summarized, regarding concomitant chemotherapy, altered fractionated chemotherapy, new regimens of induction chemotherapy or the use of radioprotectants. Recent methodological developments are described, including network meta-analyses, the validation of surrogate markers. Lastly, the future of meta-analyses is discussed in the context of personalized medicine.

Role of brachytherapy in the treatment of cancers of the anal canal. Long-term follow-up and multivariate analysis of a large monocentric retrospective series.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are few data on long-term clinical results and tolerance of brachytherapy in anal canal cancer. We present one of the largest retrospective analyses of anal canal cancers treated with external beam radiotherapy with/without (±) chemotherapy followed by a brachytherapy boost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical results in terms of efficacy and toxicity. The impact of different clinical and therapeutic variables on these outcomes was studied. RESULTS: From May 1992 to December 2009, 209 patients received brachytherapy after external beam radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. Of these patients, 163 were stage II or stage IIIA (UICC 2002) and 58 were N1-3. According to age, ECOG performance status (PS), and comorbidities, patients received either radiotherapy alone (58/209) or radiochemotherapy (151/209). The median follow-up was 72.8 months. The 5- and 10-year local control rates were 78.6 and 73.9 %, respectively. Globally, severe acute and late G3-4 reactions (NCI-CTC scale v. 4.0) occurred in 11.2 and 6.3 % of patients, respectively. Univariate analysis showed the statistical impact of the pelvic treatment volume (p = 0.046) and of the total dose (p = 0.02) on the risk of severe acute and late toxicities, respectively. Only six patients required permanent colostomy because of severe late anorectal toxicities. CONCLUSION: After a long follow-up time, brachytherapy showed an acceptable toxicity profile and high local control rates in patients with anal canal cancer.