964 resultados para método Delphi
Resumo:
No ano de 2000, o desempenho dos laboratorios participantes do Programa de Analise de Qualidade de Laboratorios de Fertilidade (PAQLF) foi avaliado atraves dos resultados analiticos de 8 amostras de terra. Os participantes analisaram, obrigatoriamente, P e K (Mehlich-1); ph (agua; Ca, Mg e Al (KCl); H+Al (acetato de Ca ou SMP); e, facultativamente, materia organica (colorimetrico ou Walkey-Black) e os micronutrientes B (agua quente), Cu, Fe, Mn e Zn (Mehlich-1). Os resultados foram avaliados quanto a exatidao (acerto) e precisao (repeticao) e, entao, se calculou o Indice de Excelencia, atribuindo-se conceitos. Dos 79 laboratorios avaliados, 63% apresentaram conceitos A ou B ( 10 destes obtiveram conceito A), sendo habilitados ao uso do selo de qualidade. Foram apresentados os coeficientes de variacao dos parametros analisados e os resultados discrepantes das 8 amostras, no ano, pelos 79 participantes. De modo geral, os parametros que apresentaram resultados mais variaveis foram P, Al, Ca, Mg e K. Materia organica e A+Al foram intermediarios e as menores variacoes foram observadas para pH. Para os micronutrientes, as menores variacoes ocorrem nas determinacoes de Zn.
Resumo:
2015
Resumo:
Monografia apresentada à Universidade Fernando Pessoa para obtenção do grau de Licenciada em Fisioterapia
Resumo:
Purpose: Clear recommendations on how to guide patients with cancer on home parenteral nutrition (HPN) are lacking as the use of HPN in this population remains a controversial issue. Therefore, the aims of this study were to rank treatment recommendations and main outcome indicators to ensure high-quality care and to indicate differences in care concerning benign versus malignant patients. Methods: Treatment recommendations, identified from published guidelines, were used as a starting point for a two-round Delphi approach. Comments and additional interventions proposed in the first round were reevaluated in the second round. Ordinal logistic regression with SPSS 2.0 was used to identify differences in care concerning benign versus malignant patients. Results: Twenty-seven experts from five European countries completed two Delphi rounds. After the second Delphi round, the top three most important outcome indicators were (1) quality of life (QoL), (2) incidence of hospital readmission and (3) incidence of catheter-related infections. Forty-two interventions were considered as important for quality of care (28/42 based on published guidelines; 14/42 newly suggested by Delphi panel). The topics 'Liver disease' and 'Metabolic bone disease' were considered less important for cancer patients, together with use of infusion pumps (p = 0.004) and monitoring of vitamins and trace elements (p = 0.000). Monitoring of QoL is considered more important for cancer patients (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Using a two-round Delphi approach, we developed a minimal set of 42 interventions that may be used to determine quality of care in HPN patients with malignancies. This set of interventions differs from a similar set developed for benign patients. © 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Resumo:
p.93-98
Resumo:
p.27-40
Resumo:
p.271-292
Resumo:
p.123-126
Resumo:
p.139-144
Resumo:
p.193-198
Resumo:
p.51-56
Resumo:
p.69-77
Resumo:
p.63-67
Resumo:
p.217-225
Resumo:
p.85-90