Ontario Game and Fishery Laws 1916

A paperback booklet of the Ontario Game and Fishery Laws 1916. The booklet is 91 pages in length and includes an index. See the full text in the Brock University Special Collections and Archives.

By-Laws No. 1 through 11

The by-laws are signed by George Barnes and include the first two which state the name of the company is the Ontario Grape Growing and Wine Manufacturing Company and the second by-law states that the place of business is at Barnesdale, St. Catharines, Ontario.

Constitution and By-Laws of the Citizens' Hose Company

Constitution and By-laws of the Citizens’ Hose Company is a 12 page 14 cm. x 9 ½ cm. booklet. The booklet is slightly discoloured and has had some water damage. This does not affect the text, Aug. 1, 1871.

Long Point Company by-laws together with by-laws as to shooting on Long Point

Long Point Company by-laws together with by-laws as to shooting on Long Point. This is a 9 page printed booklet, 1869. Spectator Printing House, Cor. Main and James Streets.

An act to consolidate and amend the laws for protection of game and fur-bearing animals in Ontario

An act to consolidate and amend the laws for protection of game and fur-bearing animals in Ontario (1 double-sided page of printed material), 1871.

Copy 1 of the Proceedings of the Long Point Company with copy of new by-laws

Copy 1 of the Proceedings of the Long Point Company with copy of new by-laws. This copy (copy 2 is filed with minutes) has a torn back cover and a section cut from the last page. This does affect the text slightly. This is a 14 page printed booklet, June 1874.

Long Point Company by-laws and field by-laws

Long Point Company by-laws and field by-laws (1 printed page), June 1881.

Copy 2 of the Proceedings of the Long Point Company with copy of new by-laws

Copy 2 of the Proceedings of the Long Point Company with copy of new by-laws. This copy (copy 1 is filed with by-laws) is missing the back cover (14 page printed booklet), June 1874.

Letter (unsigned) written to the Long Point Co. [by S.D. Woodruff] regarding the by-laws

Letter (unsigned) written to the Long Point Co. [by S.D. Woodruff] regarding the by-laws, July 2, 1881.

Booklet containing Jekyl Island Club charter, constitution, by-laws and members’ names

Booklet containing Jekyl Island Club charter, constitution, by-laws and members’ names (2 copies). The first copy is missing the membership list and the pages are loose. The spine is taped. The 2nd copy is in good condition, 1887.

Military laws of the united states; including those relatingto the Marine Corps, to which is prefixed the Constitution of the United StatesComplied by Colonel Trueman Corss, U.S. Army

UANL

The Jurisprudence of Surveillance:a Critical Look at the Laws of Intimacy

Affirmer que les citoyens des démocraties occidentales sont l’objet d’une surveillance systématique efficace et à grande échelle a de quoi provoquer une réaction incrédule. Démagogie, diront certains. Pourtant, les progrès réalisés dans les technologies de collecte, de traitement et de stockage d’information forcent une réflexion sur cette hypothèse. Il a été souligné justement que les coûts élevés liés aux moyens rudimentaires employés par les polices secrètes d’antan endiguaient en quelque sorte la menace. Les filatures, les infiltrations, les rapts nocturnes de dissidents pêchaient par manque de subtilité. Au contraire, le génie des techniques modernes vient de ce qu’elles n’entravent pas le quotidien des gens. Mais au-delà du raffinement technique, le contrôle panoptique de la masse atteint un sommet d’efficience dès lors que celle-ci est amenée à y consentir. Comme le faisait remarquer le professeur Raab : « [TRADUCTION] La surveillance prospère naturellement dans les régimes autoritaires qui ne s’exposent pas au débat public ni à la critique. Lorsqu’elle est utilisée dans des régimes dits démocratiques, elle est légitimée et circonscrite par des arguments de nécessité ou de justifications spéciales, tout comme la censure »[1]. Or, le droit, en tant que discours de rationalité, accomplit savamment ce travail de légitimation. C’est dans cet esprit qu’une analyse radicale des règles de droit encadrant le droit à la vie privée apporte une lucidité nouvelle sur notre faux sentiment de sécurité.