866 resultados para Reproducción animal
Resumo:
Fecha: 25-11-1944 (>1970 reproducción) / Unidad de instalación: Carpeta 25 - Expediente 23-6 / Nº de pág.: 1 (mecanografiada)
Resumo:
Fecha: 1944 (>1970 reproducción) / Unidad de instalación: Carpeta 25 - Expediente 23-7 / Nº de pág.: 1 (mecanografiada)
Resumo:
Fecha: 22-12-1944 (>1970 reproducción) / Unidad de instalación: Carpeta 25 - Expediente 23-8 / Nº de pág.: 1 (mecanografiada)
Resumo:
Fecha: 3-7-1937 (>1970 reproducción) / Unidad de instalación: Carpeta 45 - Expediente 1-1 / Nº de pág.: 2 (mecanografiadas)
Resumo:
Fecha: 27-12-1937 (>1970 reproducción) / Unidad de instalación: Carpeta 45 - Expediente 1-2 / Nº de pág.: 1 (mecanografiada)
Resumo:
Fecha: >1970 reproducción / Unidad de instalación: Carpeta 45 - Expediente 1-4 / Nº de pág.: 3 (mecanografiadas)
Resumo:
Fecha: 15/23-10-1937 (>1970 reproducción) / Unidad de instalación: Carpeta 45 - Expediente 1-7 / Nº de pág.: 5 (mecanografiadas)
Resumo:
Fecha: 10-10-1937 (>1970 reproducción) / Unidad de instalación: Carpeta 45 - Expediente 1-8 / Nº de pág.: 4 (mecanografiadas)
Resumo:
Fecha: 29-10-1937/10-11-1937 (>1970 reproducción) / Unidad de instalación: Carpeta 45 - Expediente 1-9 / Nº de pág.: 3 (mecanografiadas)
Resumo:
Fecha: 15-10-1937/25-10-1937 (>1970 reproducción) / Unidad de instalación: Carpeta 45 - Expediente 1-11 / Nº de pág.: 6 (mecanografiadas)
Resumo:
Fecha: 23-6-1939 (>1970 reproducción) / Unidad de instalación: Carpeta 45 - Expediente 2-1 / Nº de pág.: 2 (mecanografiadas)
Resumo:
(PDF tiene 47 paginas.)
Resumo:
Ponencia leída en el Foro de Comunicaciones IkasArt III (BEC Barakaldo, 2011.11.11)
Resumo:
The three areas in Rookery Bay, near Marco Island and Fakahatchee Bay were sampled from July 1971 through July 1972, and 1,006,640 individual animals were collected, of which the majority (55%) came from the Marco area. The large disparity between the catches at Marco and the remaining study areas was due mainly to the appearance of high numbers of species of polychaetes and echinoderms that were of very minor importance or absent from the catches in Rookery Bay and Fakahatchee Bay. When only the major classes of animals in the catch are considered (i.e., crustaceans, fish and mollusks) the total counts for Fakahatchee (298,830) and Marco (275,075) are quite comparable but both exceed Rookery Bay (119,388) by a considerable margin. The effects of the red tide outbreak in the summer of 1971 were apparently restricted to the Rookery Bay Sanctuary and may account for some of the observed differences. For the purposes of making controlled comparisons between the study areas, three common habitats were selected in each area so that a mud bottom habitat, a sand-shell bottom habitat and a vegetated bottom habitat were located in each of the study areas. Total catches by habitat types for crustaceans, fish and mollusks and certain of the more abundant species show clearly the overwhelming importance of the vegetated bottom as a habitat for animals. By habitat the vegetated areas had the most "indicator species" with five, the mud habitat was next with three and the sand-shell habitat third with two. Thus the vegetated habitat would be the best choice if a single habitat were to be used to detect environmental changes between study areas. (PDF contains 137 pages)
Resumo:
This manual presents geographic information by state of occurrence, and descriptions of the socio-economic impact created by the invasion of non-indigenous and native transplanted animal species in the Laurentian Great Lakes and the coastal waters of the United States. It is not a comprehensive literature review, but rather is intended as a primer for those unfamiliar with the socio-economic impacts of invasive aquatic and marine animals. Readers should also note that the information contained in this manual is current as of its publication date. New information and new species are routinely being added to the wider literature base. Most of the information was gathered from a number of web sites maintained by government agencies, commissions, academic institutions and museums. Additional information was taken from the primary and secondary literature. This manual focuses on socio-economic consequences of invasive species. Thus, ecological impacts, when noted in the literature, are not discussed unless a connection to socio-economic factors can be made. For a majority of the species listed, either the impact of their invasion is not understood, or it is not published in sources surveyed. In the species summaries, sources of information are cited except for information from the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database http://nas.er.usgs.gov. This website formed the base information used in creating tables on geographic distribution, and in many of the species summaries provided. Thus, whenever information is given without specific author/source and date citation, it has come from this comprehensive source. (PDF contains 90 pages)