885 resultados para Methods for Multi-criteria Evaluation
Resumo:
Systematic consideration of scientific support is a critical element in developing and, ultimately, using adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) for various regulatory applications. Though weight of evidence (WoE) analysis has been proposed as a basis for assessment of the maturity and level of confidence in an AOP, methodologies and tools are still being formalized. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Users' Handbook Supplement to the Guidance Document for Developing and Assessing AOPs (OECD 2014a; hereafter referred to as the OECD AOP Handbook) provides tailored Bradford-Hill (BH) considerations for systematic assessment of confidence in a given AOP. These considerations include (1) biological plausibility and (2) empirical support (dose-response, temporality, and incidence) for Key Event Relationships (KERs), and (3) essentiality of key events (KEs). Here, we test the application of these tailored BH considerations and the guidance outlined in the OECD AOP Handbook using a number of case examples to increase experience in more transparently documenting rationales for assigned levels of confidence to KEs and KERs, and to promote consistency in evaluation within and across AOPs. The major lessons learned from experience are documented, and taken together with the case examples, should contribute to better common understanding of the nature and form of documentation required to increase confidence in the application of AOPs for specific uses. Based on the tailored BH considerations and defining questions, a prototype quantitative model for assessing the WoE of an AOP using tools of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is described. The applicability of the approach is also demonstrated using the case example aromatase inhibition leading to reproductive dysfunction in fish. Following the acquisition of additional experience in the development and assessment of AOPs, further refinement of parameterization of the model through expert elicitation is recommended. Overall, the application of quantitative WoE approaches hold promise to enhance the rigor, transparency and reproducibility for AOP WoE determinations and may play an important role in delineating areas where research would have the greatest impact on improving the overall confidence in the AOP.
Resumo:
The province of Salta is located the Northwest of Argentina in the border with Bolivia, Chile and Paraguay. Its Capital is the city of Salta that concentrates half of the inhabitants of the province and has grown to 600000 hab., from a small active Spanish town well founded in 1583. The city is crossed by the Arenales River descending from close mountains at North, source of water and end of sewers. But with actual growing it has become a focus of infection and of remarkable unhealthiness. It is necessary to undertake a plan for the recovery of the river, directed to the attainment of the well-being and to improve the life?s quality of the Community. The fundamental idea of the plan is to obtain an ordering of the river basin and an integral management of the channel and its surroundings, including the cleaning out. The improvement of the water?s quality, the healthiness of the surroundings and the improvement of the environment, must go hand by hand with the development of sport activities, of relaxation, tourism, establishment of breeding grounds, kitchen gardens, micro enterprises with clean production and other actions that contribute to their benefit by the society, that being a basic factor for their care and sustainable use. The present pollution is organic, chemical, industrial, domestic, due to the disposition of sweepings and sewer effluents that affects not only the flora and small fauna, destroying the biodiversity, but also to the health of people living in their margins. Within the plan it will be necessary to consider, besides hydric and environmental cleaning and the prevention of floods, the planning of the extraction of aggregates, the infrastructure and consolidation of margins works and the arrangement of all the river basin. It will be necessary to consider the public intervention at state, provincial and local level, and the private intervention. In the model it has been necessary to include the sub-model corresponding to the election of the entity to be the optimal instrument to reach the proposed objectives, giving an answer to the social, environmental and economic requirements. For that the authors have used multi-criteria decision methods to qualify and select alternatives, and for the programming of their implementation. In the model the authors have contemplated the short, average and long term actions. They conform a Paretooptimal alternative which secures the ordering, integral and suitable management of the basin of the Arenales River, focusing on its passage by the city of Salta.
Resumo:
In multi-attribute utility theory, it is often not easy to elicit precise values for the scaling weights representing the relative importance of criteria. A very widespread approach is to gather incomplete information. A recent approach for dealing with such situations is to use information about each alternative?s intensity of dominance, known as dominance measuring methods. Different dominancemeasuring methods have been proposed, and simulation studies have been carried out to compare these methods with each other and with other approaches but only when ordinal information about weights is available. In this paper, we useMonte Carlo simulation techniques to analyse the performance of and adapt such methods to deal with weight intervals, weights fitting independent normal probability distributions orweights represented by fuzzy numbers.Moreover, dominance measuringmethod performance is also compared with a widely used methodology dealing with incomplete information on weights, the stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). SMAA is based on exploring the weight space to describe the evaluations that would make each alternative the preferred one.
Resumo:
La agricultura es uno de los sectores ms afectados por el cambio climtico. A pesar de haber demostrado a lo largo de la historia una gran capacidad para adaptarse a nuevas situaciones, hoy en da la agricultura se enfrenta a nuevos retos tales como satisfacer un elevado crecimiento en la demanda de alimentos, desarrollar una agricultura sostenible con el medio ambiente y reducir las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero. El potencial de adaptacin debe ser definido en un contexto que incluya el comportamiento humano, ya que ste juega un papel decisivo en la implementacin final de las medidas. Por este motivo, y para desarrollar correctamente polticas que busquen influir en el comportamiento de los agricultores para fomentar la adaptacin a estas nuevas condiciones, es necesario entender previamente los procesos de toma de decisiones a nivel individual o de explotacin, as como los efectos de los factores que determinan las barreras o motivaciones de la implementacin de medidas. Esta Tesis doctoral trata de profundizar en el anlisis de factores que influyen en la toma de decisiones de los agricultores para adoptar estrategias de adaptacin al cambio climtico. Este trabajo revisa la literatura actual y desarrolla un marco metodolgico a nivel local y regional. Dos casos de estudio a nivel local (Doana, Espaa y Makueni, Kenia) han sido llevados a cabo con el fin de explorar el comportamiento de los agricultores hacia la adaptacin. Estos casos de estudio representan regiones con notables diferencias en climatologa, impactos del cambio climtico, barreras para la adaptacin y niveles de desarrollo e influencia de las instituciones pblicas y privadas en la agricultura. Mientras el caso de estudio de Doana representa un ejemplo de problemas asociados al uso y escasez del agua donde se espera que se agraven en el futuro, el caso de estudio de Makueni ejemplifica una zona fuertemente amenazada por las predicciones de cambio climtico, donde adicionalmente la falta de infraestructura y la tecnologa juegan un papel crucial para la implementacin de la adaptacin. El caso de estudio a nivel regional trata de generalizar en frica el comportamiento de los agricultores sobre la implementacin de medidas. El marco metodolgico que se ha seguido en este trabajo abarca una amplia gama de enfoques y mtodos para la recoleccin y anlisis de datos. Los mtodos utilizados para la toma de datos incluyen la implementacin de encuestas, entrevistas, talleres con grupos de inters, grupos focales de discusin, revisin de estudios previos y bases de datos pblicas. Los mtodos analticos incluyen mtodos estadsticos, anlisis multicriterio para la toma de decisiones, modelos de optimizacin de uso del suelo y un ndice compuesto calculado a travs de indicadores. Los mtodos estadsticos se han utilizado con el fin de evaluar la influencia de los factores socioeconmicos y psicolgicos sobre la adopcin de medidas de adaptacin. Dentro de estos mtodos se incluyen regresiones logsticas, anlisis de componentes principales y modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Mientras que el anlisis multicriterio se ha utilizado con el fin de evaluar las opciones de adaptacin de acuerdo a las opiniones de las diferentes partes interesadas, el modelo de optimizacin ha tenido como fin analizar la combinacin ptima de medidas de adaptacin. El ndice compuesto se ha utilizado para evaluar a nivel regional la implementacin de medidas de adaptacin en frica. En general, los resultados del estudio ponen de relieve la gran importancia de considerar diferentes escalas espaciales a la hora de evaluar la implementacin de medidas de adaptacin al cambio climtico. El comportamiento de los agricultores es diferente entre lugares considerados a una escala local relativamente pequea, por lo que la generalizacin de los patrones del comportamiento a escalas regionales o globales resulta relativamente compleja. Los resultados obtenidos han permitido identificar factores determinantes tanto socioeconmicos como psicolgicos y calcular su efecto sobre la adopcin de medidas de adaptacin. Adems han proporcionado una mejor comprensin del distinto papel que desempean los cinco tipos de capital (natural, fsico, financiero, social y humano) en la implementacin de estrategias de adaptacin. Con este trabajo se proporciona informacin de gran inters en los procesos de desarrollo de polticas destinadas a mejorar el apoyo de la sociedad a tomar medidas contra el cambio climtico. Por ltimo, en el anlisis a nivel regional se desarrolla un ndice compuesto que muestra la probabilidad de adoptar medidas de adaptacin en las regiones de frica y se analizan las causas que determinan dicha probabilidad de adopcin de medidas. ABSTRACT Agriculture is and will continue to be one of the sectors most affected by climate change. Despite having demonstrated throughout history a great ability to adapt, agriculture today faces new challenges such as meeting growing food demands, developing sustainable agriculture and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Adaptation policies planned on global, regional or local scales are ultimately implemented in decisionmaking processes at the farm or individual level so adaptation potentials have to be set within the context of individual behaviour and regional institutions. Policy instruments can play a formative role in the adoption of such policies by addressing incentives/disincentives that influence farmers behaviour. Hence understanding farmlevel decisionmaking processes and the influence of determinants of adoption is crucial when designing policies aimed at fostering adoption. This thesis seeks to analyse the factors that influence decisionmaking by farmers in relation to the uptake of adaptation options. This work reviews the current knowledge and develops a methodological framework at local and regional level. Whilst the case studies at the local level are conducted with the purpose of exploring farmers behaviour towards adaptation the case study at the regional level attempts to upscale and generalise theory on adoption of farmlevel adaptation options. The two case studies at the local level (Doana, Spain and Makueni, Kenya) encompass areas with different; climates, impacts of climate change, adaptation constraints and limits, levels of development, institutional support for agriculture and influence from public and private institutions. Whilst the Doana Case Study represents an area plagued with waterusage issues, set to be aggravated further by climate change, Makueni Case study exemplifies an area decidedly threatened by climate change where a lack of infrastructure and technology plays a crucial role in the uptake of adaptation options. The proposed framework is based on a wide range of approaches for collecting and analysing data. The approaches used for data collection include the implementation of surveys, interviews, stakeholder workshops, focus group discussions, a review of previous case studies, and public databases. The analytical methods include statistical approaches, multi criteria analysis for decisionmaking, land use optimisation models, and a composite index based on public databases. Statistical approaches are used to assess the influence of socioeconomic and psychological factors on the adoption or support for adaptation measures. The statistical approaches used are logistic regressions, principal component analysis and structural equation modelling. Whilst a multi criteria analysis approach is used to evaluate adaptation options according to the different perspectives of stakeholders, the optimisation model analyses the optimal combination of adaptation options. The composite index is developed to assess adoption of adaptation measures in Africa. Overall, the results of the study highlight the importance of considering various scales when assessing adoption of adaptation measures to climate change. As farmers behaviour varies at a local scale there is elevated complexity when generalising behavioural patterns for farmers at regional or global scales. The results identify and estimate the effect of most relevant socioeconomic and psychological factors that influence adoption of adaptation measures to climate change. They also provide a better understanding of the role of the five types of capital (natural, physical, financial, social, and human) on the uptake of farmlevel adaptation options. These assessments of determinants help to explain adoption of climate change measures and provide helpful information in order to design polices aimed at enhancing societal support for adaptation policies. Finally the analysis at the regional level develops a composite index which suggests the likelihood of the regions in Africa to adopt farmlevel adaptation measures and analyses the main causes of this likelihood of adoption.
Resumo:
Upper limb function impairment is one of the most common sequelae of central nervous system injury, especially in stroke patients and when spinal cord injury produces tetraplegia. Conventional assessment methods cannot provide objective evaluation of patient performance and the tiveness of therapies. The most common assessment tools are based on rating scales, which are inefficient when measuring small changes and can yield subjective bias. In this study, we designed an inertial sensor-based monitoring system composed of five sensors to measure and analyze the complex movements of the upper limbs, which are common in activities of daily living. We developed a kinematic model with nine degrees of freedom to analyze upper limb and head movements in three dimensions. This system was then validated using a commercial optoelectronic system. These findings suggest that an inertial sensor-based motion tracking system can be used in patients who have upper limb impairment through data integration with a virtual reality-based neuroretation system.
Resumo:
Agricultural water management needs to evolve in view of increased water scarcity, especially when farming and natural protected areas are closely linked. In the study site of Don?ana (southern Spain), water is shared by rice producers and a world heritage biodiversity ecosystem. Our aim is to contribute to defining adaptation strategies that may build resilience to increasing water scarcity and minimize water conflicts among agricultural and natural systems. The analytical framework links a participatory process with quantitative methods to prioritize the adaptation options. Bottom-up proposed adaptation measures are evaluated by a multi-criteria analysis (MCA) that includes both socioeconomic criteria and criteria of the ecosystem services affected by the adaptation options. Criteria weights are estimated by three different methods?analytic hierarchy process, Likert scale and equal weights?that are then compared. Finally, scores from an MCA are input into an optimization model used to determine the optimal land-use distribution in order to maximize utility and land-use diversification according to different scenarios of funds and water availability. While our results show a spectrum of perceptions of priorities among stakeholders, there is one overriding theme that is to define a way to restore part of the rice fields to natural wetlands. These results hold true under the current climate scenario and evenmore so under an increased water scarcity scenario.
Resumo:
Small changes in agricultural practices have a large potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, the implementation of such practices at the local level is often limited by a range of barriers. Understanding the barriers is essential for defining effective measures, the actual mitigation potential of the measures, and the policy needs to ensure implementation. Here we evaluate behavioural, cultural, and policy barriers for implementation of mitigation practices at the local level that imply small changes to farmers. The choice of potential mitigation practices relevant to the case study is based on a literature review of previous empirical studies. Two methods that include the stakeholders? involvement (experts and farmers) are undertaken for the prioritization of these potential practices: (a) Multi-criteria analysis (MCA) of the choices of an expert panel and (b) Analysis of barriers to implementation based on a survey of farmers. The MCA considers two future climate scenarios ? current climate and a drier and warmer climate scenario. Results suggest that all potential selected practices are suitable for mitigation considering multiple criteria in both scenarios. Nevertheless, if all the barriers for implementation had the same influence, the preferred mitigation practices in the case study would be changes in fertilization management and use of cover crops. The identification of barriers for the implementation of the practices is based on the econometric analysis of surveys given to farmers. Results show that farmers? environmental concerns, financial incentives and access to technical advice are the main factors that define their barriers to implementation. These results may contribute to develop effective mitigation policy to be included in the 2020 review of the European Union Common Agricultural Policy.
Resumo:
Las alteraciones del sistema climtico debido al aumento de concentraciones de gases de efecto invernadero (GEI) en la atmsfera, tendrn implicaciones importantes para la agricultura, el medio ambiente y la sociedad. La agricultura es una fuente importante de emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero (globalmente contribuye al 12% del total de GEI), y al mismo tiempo puede ser parte de la solucin para mitigar las emisiones y adaptarse al cambio climtico. Las acciones frente al desafo del cambio climtico deben priorizar estrategias de adaptacin y mitigacin en la agricultura dentro de la agenda para el desarrollo de polticas. La agricultura es por tanto crucial para la conservacin y el uso sostenible de los recursos naturales, que ya estn sometidos a impactos del cambio climtico, al mismo tiempo que debe suministrar alimentos para una poblacin creciente. Por tanto, es necesaria una coordinacin entre las actuales estrategias de poltica climtica y agrcola. El concepto de agricultura climticamente inteligente ha surgido para integrar todos estos servicios de la produccin agraria. Al evaluar opciones para reducir las amenazas del cambio climtico para la agricultura y el medio ambiente, surgen dos preguntas de investigacin: Qu informacin es necesaria para definir prcticas agrarias inteligentes? Qu factores influyen en la implementacin de las prcticas agrarias inteligentes? Esta Tesis trata de proporcionar informacin relevante sobre estas cuestiones generales con el fin de apoyar el desarrollo de la poltica climtica. Se centra en sistemas agrcolas Mediterrneos. Esta Tesis integra diferentes mtodos y herramientas para evaluar las alternativas de gestin agrcola y polticas con potencial para responder a las necesidades de mitigacin y adaptacin al cambio climtico. La investigacin incluye enfoques cuantitativos y cualitativos e integra variables agronmicas, de clima y socioeconmicas a escala local y regional. La investigacin aporta una recopilacin de datos sobre evidencia experimental existente, y un estudio integrado sobre el comportamiento de los agricultores y las posibles alternativas de cambio (por ejemplo, la tecnologa, la gestin agrcola y la poltica climtica). Los casos de estudio de esta Tesis - el humedal de Doana (S Espaa) y la regin de Aragn (NE Espaa) - permiten ilustrar dos sistemas Mediterrneos representativos, donde el uso intensivo de la agricultura y las condiciones semiridas son ya una preocupacin. Por este motivo, la adopcin de estrategias de mitigacin y adaptacin puede desempear un papel muy importante a la hora de encontrar un equilibrio entre la equidad, la seguridad econmica y el medio ambiente en los escenarios de cambio climtico. La metodologa multidisciplinar de esta tesis incluye una amplia gama de enfoques y mtodos para la recopilacin y el anlisis de datos. La toma de datos se apoya en la revisin bibliogrfica de evidencia experimental, bases de datos pblicas nacionales e internacionales y datos primarios recopilados mediante entrevistas semi-estructuradas con los grupos de inters (administraciones pblicas, responsables polticos, asesores agrcolas, cientficos y agricultores) y encuestas con agricultores. Los mtodos de anlisis incluyen: meta-anlisis, modelos de gestin de recursos hdricos (modelo WAAPA), anlisis multicriterio para la toma de decisiones, mtodos estadsticos (modelos de regresin logstica y de Poisson) y herramientas para el desarrollo de polticas basadas en la ciencia. El meta-anlisis identifica los umbrales crticos de temperatura que repercuten en el crecimiento y el desarrollo de los tres cultivos principales para la seguridad alimentaria (arroz, maz y trigo). El modelo WAAPA evala el efecto del cambio climtico en la gestin del agua para la agricultura de acuerdo a diferentes alternativas polticas y escenarios climticos. El anlisis multicriterio evala la viabilidad de las prcticas agrcolas de mitigacin en dos escenarios climticos de acuerdo a la percepcin de diferentes expertos. Los mtodos estadsticos analizan los determinantes y las barreras para la adopcin de prcticas agrcolas de mitigacin. Las herramientas para el desarrollo de polticas basadas en la ciencia muestran el potencial y el coste para reducir GEI mediante las prcticas agrcolas. En general, los resultados de esta Tesis proporcionan informacin sobre la adaptacin y la mitigacin del cambio climtico a nivel de explotacin para desarrollar una poltica climtica ms integrada y ayudar a los agricultores en la toma de decisiones. Los resultados muestran las temperaturas umbral y la respuesta del arroz, el maz y el trigo a temperaturas extremas, siendo estos valores de gran utilidad para futuros estudios de impacto y adaptacin. Los resultados obtenidos tambin aportan una serie de estrategias flexibles para la adaptacin y la mitigacin a escala local, proporcionando a su vez una mejor comprensin sobre las barreras y los incentivos para su adopcin. La capacidad de mejorar la disponibilidad de agua y el potencial y el coste de reduccin de GEI se han estimado para estas estrategias en los casos de estudio. Estos resultados podran ayudar en el desarrollo de planes locales de adaptacin y polticas regionales de mitigacin, especialmente en las regiones Mediterrneas. ABSTRACT Alterations in the climatic system due to increased atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) are expected to have important implications for agriculture, the environment and society. Agriculture is an important source of GHG emissions (12 % of global anthropogenic GHG), but it is also part of the solution to mitigate emissions and to adapt to climate change. Responses to face the challenge of climate change should place agricultural adaptation and mitigation strategies at the heart of the climate change agenda. Agriculture is crucial for the conservation and sustainable use of natural resources, which already stand under pressure due to climate change impacts, increased population, pollution and fragmented and uncoordinated climate policy strategies. The concept of climate smart agriculture has emerged to encompass all these issues as a whole. When assessing choices aimed at reducing threats to agriculture and the environment under climate change, two research questions arise: What information defines smart farming choices? What drives the implementation of smart farming choices? This Thesis aims to provide information on these broad questions in order to support climate policy development focusing in some Mediterranean agricultural systems. This Thesis integrates methods and tools to evaluate potential farming and policy choices to respond to mitigation and adaptation to climate change. The assessment involves both quantitative and qualitative approaches and integrates agronomic, climate and socioeconomic variables at local and regional scale. The assessment includes the collection of data on previous experimental evidence, and the integration of farmer behaviour and policy choices (e.g., technology, agricultural management and climate policy). The case study areas -- the Doana coastal wetland (S Spain) and the Aragn region (NE Spain) illustrate two representative Mediterranean regions where the intensive use of agriculture and the semi-arid conditions are already a concern. Thus the adoption of mitigation and adaptation measures can play a significant role for reaching a balance among equity, economic security and the environment under climate change scenarios. The multidisciplinary methodology of this Thesis includes a wide range of approaches for collecting and analysing data. The data collection process include revision of existing experimental evidence, public databases and the contribution of primary data gathering by semi-structured interviews with relevant stakeholders (i.e., public administrations, policy makers, agricultural advisors, scientist and farmers among others) and surveys given to farmers. The analytical methods include meta-analysis, water availability models (WAAPA model), decision making analysis (MCA, multi-criteria analysis), statistical approaches (Logistic and Poisson regression models) and science-base policy tools (MACC, marginal abatement cost curves and SOC abatement wedges). The meta-analysis identifies the critical temperature thresholds which impact on the growth and development of three major crops (i.e., rice, maize and wheat). The WAAPA model assesses the effect of climate change for agricultural water management under different policy choices and climate scenarios. The multi-criteria analysis evaluates the feasibility of mitigation farming practices under two climate scenarios according to the expert views. The statistical approaches analyses the drivers and the barriers for the adoption of mitigation farming practices. The science-base policy tools illustrate the mitigation potential and cost effectiveness of the farming practices. Overall, the results of this Thesis provide information to adapt to, and mitigate of, climate change at farm level to support the development of a comprehensive climate policy and to assist farmers. The findings show the key temperature thresholds and response to extreme temperature effects for rice, maize and wheat, so such responses can be included into crop impact and adaptation models. A portfolio of flexible adaptation and mitigation choices at local scale are identified. The results also provide a better understanding of the stakeholders oppose or support to adopt the choices which could be used to incorporate in local adaptation plans and mitigation regional policy. The findings include estimations for the farming and policy choices on the capacity to improve water supply reliability, abatement potential and cost-effective in Mediterranean regions.
Resumo:
Hoy en da, por primera vez en la historia, la mayor parte de la poblacin podr vivir hasta los sesenta aos y ms (United Nations, 2015). Sin embargo, todava existe poca evidencia que demuestre que las personas mayores, estn viviendo con mejor salud que sus padres, a la misma edad, ya que la mayora de los problemas de salud en edades avanzadas estn asociados a las enfermedades crnicas (WHO, 2015). Los sistemas sanitarios de los pases desarrollados funcionan adecuadamente cuando se trata del cuidado de enfermedades agudas, pero no son lo suficientemente eficaces en la gestin de las enfermedades crnicas. Durante la ltima dcada, se han realizado esfuerzos para mejorar esta gestin, por medio de la utilizacin de estrategias de prevencin y de reenfoque de la provisin de los servicios de atencin para la salud (Kane et al. 2005). Segn una revisin sistemtica de modelos de cuidado de salud, comisionada por el sistema nacional de salud Britnico, pocos modelos han conceptualizado cules son los componentes que hay que utilizar para proporcionar un cuidado crnico efectivo, y estos componentes no han sido suficientemente estructurados y articulados. Por lo tanto, no hay suficiente evidencia sobre el impacto real de cualquier modelo existente en la actualidad (Ham, 2006). Las innovaciones podran ayudar a conseguir mejores diagnsticos, tratamientos y gestin de pacientes crnicos, as como a dar soporte a los profesionales y a los pacientes en el cuidado. Sin embargo, la forma en las que estas innovaciones se proporcionan no es lo suficientemente eficiente, efectiva y amigable para el usuario. Para mejorar esto, hace falta crear equipos de trabajo y estrategias multidisciplinares. En conclusin, hacen falta actividades que permitan conseguir que las innovaciones sean utilizadas en los sistemas de salud que quieren mejorar la gestin del cuidado crnico, para que sea posible: 1) traducir la atencin sanitaria basada en la evidencia en conocimiento factible; 2) hacer frente a la complejidad de la atencin sanitaria a travs de una investigacin multidisciplinaria; 3) identificar una aproximacin sistemtica para que se establezcan intervenciones innovadoras en el cuidado de salud. El marco de referencia desarrollado en este trabajo de investigacin es un intento de aportar estas mejoras. Las siguientes hiptesis han sido propuestas: Hiptesis 1: es posible definir un proceso de traduccin que convierta un modelo de cuidado crnico en una descripcin estructurada de objetivos, requisitos e indicadores clave de rendimiento. Hiptesis 2: el proceso de traduccin, si se ejecuta a travs de elementos basados en la evidencia, multidisciplinares y de orientacin econmica, puede convertir un modelo de cuidado crnico en un marco descriptivo, que define el ciclo de vida de soluciones innovadoras para el cuidado de enfermedades crnicas. Hiptesis 3: es posible definir un mtodo para evaluar procesos, resultados y capacidad de desarrollar habilidades, y asistir equipos multidisciplinares en la creacin de soluciones innovadoras para el cuidado crnico. Hiptesis 4: es posible dar soporte al desarrollo de soluciones innovadoras para el cuidado crnico a travs de un marco de referencia y conseguir efectos positivos, medidos en indicadores clave de rendimiento. Para verificar las hiptesis, se ha definido una aproximacin metodolgica compuesta de cuatro Fases, cada una asociada a una hiptesis. Antes de esto, se ha llevado a cabo una Fase 0, donde se han analizado los antecedentes sobre el problema (i.e. adopcin sistemtica de la innovacin en el cuidado crnico) desde una perspectiva multi-dominio y multi-disciplinar. Durante la fase 1, se ha desarrollado un Proceso de Traduccin del Conocimiento, elaborado a partir del JBI Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) model of evidence-based healthcare (Pearson, 2005), y sobre el cual se han definido cuatro Bloques de Innovacin. Estos bloques consisten en una descripcin de elementos innovadores, definidos en la fase 0, que han sido aadidos a los cuatros elementos que componen el modelo JBI. El trabajo llevado a cabo en esta fase ha servido tambin para definir los materiales que el proceso de traduccin tiene que ejecutar. La traduccin que se ha llevado a cabo en la fase 2, y que traduce la mejor evidencia disponible de cuidado crnico en accin: resultado de este proceso de traduccin es la parte descriptiva del marco de referencia, que consiste en una descripcin de un modelo de cuidado crnico (se ha elegido el Chronic Care Model, Wagner, 1996) en trminos de objetivos, especificaciones e indicadores clave de rendimiento y organizada en tres ciclos de innovacin (diseo, implementacin y evaluacin). Este resultado ha permitido verificar la segunda hiptesis. Durante la fase 3, para demostrar la tercera hiptesis, se ha desarrollado un mtodo-mixto de evaluacin de equipos multidisciplinares que trabajan en innovaciones para el cuidado crnico. Este mtodo se ha creado a partir del mtodo mixto usado para la evaluacin de equipo multidisciplinares translacionales (Wooden, 2013). El mtodo creado aade una dimensin procedural al marco. El resultado de esta fase consiste, por lo tanto, en una primera versin del marco de referencia, lista para ser experimentada. En la fase 4, se ha validado el marco a travs de un caso de estudio multinivel y con tcnicas de observacin-participante como mtodo de recoleccin de datos. Como caso de estudio se han elegido las actividades de investigacin que el grupo de investigacin LifeStech ha desarrollado desde el 2008 para mejorar la gestin de la diabetes, actividades realizadas en un contexto internacional. Los resultados demuestran que el marco ha permitido mejorar las actividades de trabajo en distintos niveles: 1) la calidad y cantidad de las publicaciones; 2) se han conseguido dos contratos de investigacin sobre diabetes: el primero es un proyecto de investigacin aplicada, el segundo es un proyecto financiado para acelerar las innovaciones en el mercado; 3) a travs de los indicadores claves de rendimiento propuestos en el marco, una prueba de concepto de un prototipo desarrollado en un proyecto de investigacin ha sido transformada en una evaluacin temprana de una intervencin eHealth para el manejo de la diabetes, que ha sido recientemente incluida en Repositorio de prcticas innovadoras del Partenariado de Innovacin Europeo en Envejecimiento saludable y activo. La verificacin de las 4 hiptesis ha permitido demonstrar la hiptesis principal de este trabajo de investigacin: es posible contribuir a crear un puente entre la atencin sanitaria y la innovacin y, por lo tanto, mejorar la manera en que el cuidado crnico sea procurado en los sistemas sanitarios. ABSTRACT Nowadays, for the first time in history, most people can expect to live into their sixties and beyond (United Nations, 2015). However, little evidence suggests that older people are experiencing better health than their parents, and most of the health problems of older age are linked to Chronic Diseases (WHO, 2015). The established health care systems in developed countries are well suited to the treatment of acute diseases but are mostly inadequate for dealing with CDs. Healthcare systems are challenging the burden of chronic diseases by putting more emphasis on the prevention of disease and by looking for new ways to reorient the provision of care (Kane et al., 2005). According to an evidence-based review commissioned by the British NHS Institute, few models have conceptualized effective components of care for CDs and these components have been not structured and articulated. Consequently, there is limited evidence about the real impact of any of the existing models (Ham, 2006). Innovations could support to achieve better diagnosis, treatment and management for patients across the continuum of care, by supporting health professionals and empowering patients to take responsibility. However, the way they are delivered is not sufficiently efficient, effective and consumer friendly. The improvement of innovation delivery, involves the creation of multidisciplinary research teams and taskforces, rather than just working teams. There are several actions to improve the adoption of innovations from healthcare systems that are tackling the epidemics of CDs: 1) Translate Evidence-Based Healthcare (EBH) into actionable knowledge; 2) Face the complexity of healthcare through multidisciplinary research; 3) Identify a systematic approach to support effective implementation of healthcare interventions through innovation. The framework proposed in this research work is an attempt to provide these improvements. The following hypotheses have been drafted: Hypothesis 1: it is possible to define a translation process to convert a model of chronic care into a structured description of goals, requirements and key performance indicators. Hypothesis 2: a translation process, if executed through evidence-based, multidisciplinary, holistic and business-oriented elements, can convert a model of chronic care in a descriptive framework, which defines the whole development cycle of innovative solutions for chronic disease management. Hypothesis 3: it is possible to design a method to evaluate processes, outcomes and skill acquisition capacities, and assist multidisciplinary research teams in the creation of innovative solutions for chronic disease management. Hypothesis 4: it is possible to assist the development of innovative solutions for chronic disease management through a reference framework and produce positive effects, measured through key performance indicators. In order to verify the hypotheses, a methodological approach, composed of four Phases that correspond to each one of the stated hypothesis, was defined. Prior to this, a Phase 0, consisting in a multi-domain and multi-disciplinary background analysis of the problem (i.e.: systematic adoption of innovation to chronic care), was carried out. During phase 1, in order to verify the first hypothesis, a Knowledge Translation Process (KTP) was developed, starting from the JBI Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) model of evidence-based healthcare was used (Pearson, 2005) and adding Four Innovation Blocks. These blocks represent an enriched description, added to the JBI model, to accelerate the transformation of evidence-healthcare through innovation; the innovation blocks are built on top of the conclusions drawn after Phase 0. The background analysis gave also indication on the materials and methods to be used for the execution of the KTP, carried out during phase 2, that translates the actual best available evidence for chronic care into action: this resulted in a descriptive Framework, which is a description of a model of chronic care (the Chronic Care Model was chosen, Wagner, 1996) in terms of goals, specified requirements and Key Performance Indicators, and articulated in the three development cycles of innovation (i.e. design, implementation and evaluation). Thanks to this result the second hypothesis was verified. During phase 3, in order to verify the third hypothesis, a mixed-method to evaluate multidisciplinary teams working on innovations for chronic care, was created, based on a mixed-method used for the evaluation of Multidisciplinary Translational Teams (Wooden, 2013). This method adds a procedural dimension to the descriptive component of the Framework, The result of this phase consisted in a draft version of the framework, ready to be tested in a real scenario. During phase 4, a single and multilevel case study, with participant-observation data collection, was carried out, in order to have a complete but at the same time multi-sectorial evaluation of the framework. The activities that the LifeStech research group carried out since 2008 to improve the management of diabetes have been selected as case study. The results achieved showed that the framework allowed to improve the research activities in different directions: the quality and quantity of the research publications that LifeStech has issued, have increased substantially; 2 project grants to improve the management of diabetes, have been assigned: the first is a grant funding applied research while the second is about accelerating innovations into the market; by using the assessment KPIs of the framework, the proof of concept validation of a prototype developed in a research project was transformed into an early stage assessment of innovative eHealth intervention for Diabetes Management, which has been recently included in the repository of innovative practice of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Health Ageing initiative. The verification of the 4 hypotheses lead to verify the main hypothesis of this research work: it is possible to contribute to bridge the gap between healthcare and innovation and, in turn, improve the way chronic care is delivered by healthcare systems.
Resumo:
En el presente estudio se propone una metodologa para la evaluacin de proyectos de implantacin de cultivos energticos, integrando una serie de factores de inters en un modelo de decisin, basado en un enfoque multicriterio. Mediante este modelo se pretende evaluar tanto los territorios ms adecuados para la introduccin un cultivo energtico, como la especie ms apropiada a los condicionantes que presenta el lugar elegido. Para este estudio se ha realizado una seleccin previa de cuatro especies forestales, cuyas caractersticas de crecimiento y produccin las hace adecuadas para su aplicacin en un proyecto de este tipo. Las cuatro especies escogidas han sido chopo, sauce, eucalipto y paulonia. La metodologa propuesta ha consistido primero en un estudio ecolgico en el mbito de la Pennsula Ibrica y Baleares, con el fin de identificar aquellas regiones ptimas para cada una de las cuatro especies estudiadas. En este proceso se han seleccionado una serie de factores climticos, que vendrn definidos a partir de los condicionantes ecolgicos de dichas especies. Posteriormente se ha propuesto un modelo multicriterio, basado en tcnicas conocidas y de aplicacin sencilla, donde se integran aspectos ambientales, econmicos y sociales, que vendrn a completar la informacin ecolgica trabajada previamente. Este modelo incluye la tcnica de comparacin por pares propuesta por el Dr. Saaty en el ao 1980, para la ponderacin de los factores o criterios seleccionados. Posteriormente, y tras su valoracin, se utiliza la suma lineal ponderada como tcnica de decisin final. Una vez definido el modelo, se ha aplicado a una comarca en particular, la comarca agraria de Navalmoral de la Mata. A partir de la informacin recopilada referente a todos los criterios seleccionados previamente en el modelo, se ha procedido a valorar cada uno de ellos. Con estos valores y tras la ponderacin de criterios, se ha aplicado el modelo, para obtener finalmente los territorios dentro de la comarca, y las especies forestales con mayor aptitud para el desarrollo de un proyecto de implantacin de cultivos energticos. ABSTRACT A methodology has been proposed for the evaluation of projects to implement energy crops; this includes a number of factors of interest in a decision model based on a multi-criteria approach. This model is to evaluate both the most suitable territories for introducing an energy crop, as the most appropriate species to the conditions presented by the place chosen For this study has made a preliminary selection of four species, with characteristics of growth and production, what making them suitable for use in a project of this type. The four species selected were poplar, willow, eucalyptus and paulownia. The proposed methodology consists first in an ecological study in the context of the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands, in order to identify those best regions for each of the four species studied. In this process has selected a series of climatic factors, which will be defined from the ecological conditions of these species. Then we have proposed a multi-criteria model based on known techniques and simple application where are integrated environmental, economic and social aspects, which will complement the ecological information previous. This model includes the technique proposed by Dr. Saaty in 1980, the weighting by pairs of factors or criteria selected. Then, after valuation, the weighted linear sum as final decision technique is used. After defining the model has been applied to a particular region, the agrarian region of Navalmoral de la Mata. From the information collected concerning to the criteria previously selected in the model, we proceeded to value each. With these values and assigned weights, the model has been applied to finally get the territories and forest species with greater aptitude for the development of a project to implement energy crops.
Resumo:
Acknowledgments Financial Support: HERU and HSRU receive a core grant from the Chief Scientists Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, and the Centre for Clinical epidemiology & Evaluation is funded by Vancouver Coastal Health Authority. The model used for the illustrative case study in this paper was developed as part of a NHS Technology Assessment Review, funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Program (project number 09/146/01). The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Scottish Government, NHS, Vancouver Coastal Health, NIHR HTA Program or the Department of Health. The authors wish to thank Kathleen Boyd and members of the audience at the UK Health Economists Study Group, for comments received on an earlier version of this paper. We also wish to thank Cynthia Fraser (University of Aberdeen) for literature searches undertaken to inform the manuscript, and Mohsen Sadatsafavi (University of British Columbia) for comments on an earlier draft
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.
Resumo:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of State Vehicle Programs, Washington, D.C.
Resumo:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis, Washington, D.C.