Cohort study of trials submitted to ethics committee identified discrepant reporting of outcomes in publications.

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with discrepant outcome reporting in randomized drug trials. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Cohort study of protocols submitted to a Swiss ethics committee 1988-1998: 227 protocols and amendments were compared with 333 matching articles published during 1990-2008. Discrepant reporting was defined as addition, omission, or reclassification of outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 870 of 2,966 unique outcomes were reported discrepantly (29.3%). Among protocol-defined primary outcomes, 6.9% were not reported (19 of 274), whereas 10.4% of reported outcomes (30 of 288) were not defined in the protocol. Corresponding percentages for secondary outcomes were 19.0% (284 of 1,495) and 14.1% (334 of 2,375). Discrepant reporting was more likely if P values were <0.05 compared with P ≥ 0.05 [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.38; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07, 1.78], more likely for efficacy compared with harm outcomes (aOR: 2.99; 95% CI: 2.08, 4.30) and more likely for composite than for single outcomes (aOR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.20). Cardiology (aOR: 2.34; 95% CI: 1.44, 3.79) and infectious diseases (aOR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.01, 3.13) had more discrepancies compared with all specialties combined. CONCLUSION: Discrepant reporting was associated with statistical significance of results, type of outcome, and specialty area. Trial protocols should be made freely available, and the publications should describe and justify any changes made to protocol-defined outcomes.

Audit report on the Iowa Judicial Retirement System for the year ended June 30, 2008

Audit report on the Iowa Judicial Retirement System for the year ended June 30, 2008

Perceptual mapping of practical ethics along the value chain: A multiple correspondence analysis with industry and cultural indices as supplementary variables

This paper presents findings from a study investigating a firm s ethical practices along the value chain. In so doing we attempt to better understand potential relationships between a firm s ethical stance with its customers and those of its suppliers within a supply chain and identify particular sectoral and cultural influences that might impinge on this. Drawing upon a database comprising of 667 industrial firms from 27 different countries, we found that ethical practices begin with the firm s relationship with its customers, the characteristics of which then influence the ethical stance with the firm s suppliers within the supply chain. Importantly, market structure along with some key cultural characteristics were also found to exert significant influence on the implementation of ethical policies in these firms.

The ethics of creative accounting: Some Spanish evidence

'Creative accounting' involves accountants in making accounting policy choices or manipulating transactions in such a way as to give the impression in the accounts that they prefer. While regarded as unethical by most observers, a defence of creative accounting can be based on the ability of the users of accounts to identify bias in accounting policy choices and make appropriate adjustments.In this paper we take the example of the Barcelona Football Club where the club management made three key accounting policy choices that presented a favourable position, and a supporters' club presented an alternative report choosing three alternative accounting policies that presented an unfavourable position. We presented each of these financial reports to one of two groups of Spanish bank loan offices, with supporting notes making the impact of the accounting policy choices clear. We found that the more favourable set of accounts was significantly more likely to attract a positive response to a loan request.This result undermines the defence for creative accounting, based on the ability of users to identify manipulation.

Market institutions and judicial rulemaking

Assuming that the degree of discretion granted to judges was the main distinguishing feature between common and civil law until the 19th century, we argue that constraining judicial discretion was instrumental in protecting freedom of contract and developing the market order in civil law. We test this hypothesis by analyzing the history of Western law. In England, a unique institutional balance between the Crown and the Parliament guaranteed private property and prompted the gradual evolution towards a legal framework that facilitated market relationships, a process that was supported by the English judiciary. On the Continent, however, legal constraints on the market were suppressed in a top-down fashion by the founders of the liberal state, often against the will of the incumbent judiciary. Constraining judicial discretion there was essential for enforcing freedom of contract and establishing the legal order of the market economy. In line with this evidence, our selection hypothesis casts doubts on the normative interpretation of empirical results that proclaim the superiority of one legal system over another, disregarding the local conditions and institutional interdependencies on which each legal system was grounded.

The quasi-judicial role of large retailers: An efficiency hypothesis of their relation with suppliers

The paper explores an efficiency hypothesis regarding the contractual process between large retailers, such as Wal-Mart and Carrefour, and their suppliers. The empirical evidence presented supports the idea that large retailers play a quasi-judicial role, acting as "courts of first instance" in their relationships with suppliers. In this role, large retailers adjust the terms of trade to on-going changes and sanction performance failures, sometimes delaying payments. A potential abuse of their position is limited by the need for re-contracting and preserving their reputations. Suppliers renew their confidence in their retailers on a yearly basis, through writing new contracts. This renovation contradicts the alternative hypothesis that suppliers are expropriated by large retailers as a consequence of specific investments.

Consideracions a tenir en compte en les peticions d’accés a la documentació judicial per part de persones privades

El règim d’accés de persones privades a la documentació, informació o dades, generada pels poders públics, en general, i per l’Administració de justícia, en particular, està actualment dispers en principis i criteris legals continguts dins d’un ampli ventall normatiu, que s’ha d’interpretar i aplicar d’acord amb el principi d’unitat de l’ordenament jurídic. En aquest document s’elabora una aproximació al règim d’accés general a la documentació judicial per part de persones privades a partir d’una recopilació i organització de la normativa vigent i dels principis i criteris generals que conté i que configuren aquest règim d’accés, amb l’objectiu d’ajudar els responsables de la documentació i dels arxius judicials en la seva aplicació. A més, s’analitzen les característiques de la documentació judicial respecte als nivells de reserva i es proposen 15 consideracions que caldria formalitzar en el procés de canalització de les consultes, tot atenent les característiques de la documentació sol·licitada i la condició o interès acreditat per part de la persona sol·licitant. Aquestes 15 consideracions estan precedides d’unes consideracions prèvies en relació amb els principis o drets, reconeguts en el marc constitucional, que cal valorar en les sol·licituds d’accés a la documentació judicial per part de persones privades.

Sports and journalism ethics: the coverage of 2012 London Olympics in the British, North-American and Spanish press

Sports and journalism ethics: the coverage of 2012 London Olympics in the British, North-American and Spanish press is a research focused on analysing the treatment that the quality press of three countries (United Kingdom, United States of America and Spain) will carry out in the London Olympic Games. Through a solid methodological approach based on the combination of the qualitative content analysis and qualitative indepth interviews, the investigation will study if the media provide a quality coverage,that is, if they adequate their pieces to the fundamental principles of journalistic deontology (truth, justice, freedom and social responsibility). Furthermore, the research will assess if the selected media comply with the prescriptions established in the ethical codes, stylebooks, newsroom statutes and national and international recommendations about journalism ethics, ranging from each media’s guidelines to key transnational codes established by the UNESCO, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) orthe Council of Europe.

Report on the Iowa Judicial Branch for the year ended June 30, 2008

Report on the Iowa Judicial Branch for the year ended June 30, 2008

Actuación del servicio de inspección del Consejo General del Poder Judicial

En la actualidad existe una Comisión Delegada para el Servicio de Inspección, integrada por cuatro Vocales del Consejo General del Poder Judicial, y la Inspección está compuesta por una Jefatura del Servicio, con de un Jefe, un Adjunto y un Secretario, que configuran la Unidad Central y trece Unidades Inspectoras, formadas por dos, tres o cuatro Letrados, cada una de las cuales tiene asignados, o bien todos los órganos de un determinado orden jurisdiccional: penal, violencia sobre la mujer, menores, vigilancia penitenciaria, incapacidades, contencioso-administrativo, social y mercantil, o bien todos los órganos de 1ª Instancia, Instrucción y Mixtos de cada una de las Comunidades Autónomas, una de ellas se ocupa de todas las Audiencias Provinciales del territorio español y la Unidad Central tiene asignado el Tribunal Supremo, los Tribunales Superiores de Justicia, la Audiencia Nacional y los Tribunales y Juzgados Togados. Hay además un coordinador territorial por cada Comunidad Autónoma, que es quien coordina la información procedente de todos los órganos de su territorio, independientemente del Orden Jurisdiccional de que se trate, así como un coordinador por cada jurisdicción, trabajando todos en equipo. Forma también parte del Servicio, la Sección de Informes, que tramita, en coordinación con la Unidad de Atención Ciudadana, las quejas y denuncias presentadas por los ciudadanos, cuando éstas puedan dar lugar a responsabilidad disciplinaria de un Juez o Magistrado.

Concurs de la Ciutat Judicial

Concurs de la Ciutat Judicial

Department of Ethics and Campaign Disclosure, FY 2007

These Facts sheets have been developed to provide a multitude of information about executive branch agencies/departments on a single sheet of paper. The Facts provides general information, contact information, workforce data, leave & benefits information, and affirmative action data. This is the most recent update of information for the fiscal year 2007.

Department of Ethics and Campaign Disclosure, FY 2008

These Facts sheets have been developed to provide a multitude of information about executive branch agencies/departments on a single sheet of paper. The Facts provides general information, contact information, workforce data, leave & benefits information, and affirmative action data. This is the most recent update of information for the fiscal year 2007.

Combined report on the eight Judicial District Departments of Correctional Services for the year ended June 30, 2008

Combined report on the eight Judicial District Departments of Correctional Services for the year ended June 30, 2008

Report on the Iowa Judicial Branch – County Clerks of District Courts, a part of the State of Iowa, for the year ended June 30, 2008

Report on the Iowa Judicial Branch – County Clerks of District Courts, a part of the State of Iowa, for the year ended June 30, 2008