207 resultados para Jameson


Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Bibliographical footnotes.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Vol. 1-56 edited by Robert Jameson; vol. 57, by Laurence Jameson; New series, by Thomas Anderson, Sir William Jardine and John Hutton Balfour, and vol. 3-19, for America, by Henry D. Rogers.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Top Row: Lisa Abe, Benita C. Aldrich, Elizabeth A. Alexander, Christina Andrakovich, Andrea A Astalos, Aimee K. Baptiste, Jacqueline A. Baransri, Paula A. Bonell, Tonya T. Boven, Sara L. Briggs, Heidi M. Brogger, Maureen A. Burns, Mike R. Byrd

Row 2: Julie A. Camilleri, Maria C. Cano, Sally J. Clement, Martra Finneren, Elizabeth Lobbestael-Monte, Cherryl Drongowski, Laura Stuckey, Elizabeth Scamperle, Amy Wenk, Karin B. Colvin, Gloria R. Crandall, Kristen T. Crane

Row 3: Rita J. Curtis, Cheri K. Davis, Patrick Ahearne, Lynne Yarger, Patricia Tibbits, Kathleen Donahoe, Rosemary Defever, Theresa A. Dietz

Row 4: Maureen Donnelly, Alysse E. Donohue, Susan Holmes, Tina Alexandris, Pam S. Dunbrock, Beth A. Elya

Row 5: Michelle L. Everly, Nazanin Farah, Kathie Fetting, Tanya Meier, Richard A. Fons, Cheryl D. Ford

Row 6: Tonya M. Forton, Alvira Galbraith, Holly B. Goldrick, Sally Sample, Violet Barkauskas, Rhetaugh G. Dumars, Share' Ketefian, Janice B. Lindberg, Elizabeth Pennington, Cheryl A. Grega, Michelle L. grinwis, Paula C. Haffner

Row 7: Peggy A. Harper, Michele R. Haseluhn, Christina M. Hayosh, Michele M. Hopkins, Martha A. James, Elizabeth J. Jameson, Jan I. Joyce, Henry Justusson, Shamrock E. Kealy, Linda A. Kendall, Karrie C. Kerby, Diane M. Kilian, Rene E. Kloosterman, Marie T. Kolar

Row 8: Regina M. Kudla, Julie A. Lasecki, Jenny K. Lindholm, Beth M. Luttrell, Mary E. Malone, Tami J. Nishon, Leah D. Olson, Lori J. Painter, Peggy A. Paulson, Jill A. Rodman, Sherri R. Runciman, Joanne A. Sandler, Patricia L. Sano

Row 9: Leah A. Shults, Catherine E. Slusher, Jennifer A. Snell, Abbe E. Sorin, Iliana I. Staneva, Jennifer R. Stouffer, Jane A. Tanton, Margaret O. Tear, Andrea L. Vandenbergh, Michele M. Vandenburg, Carol A. Waycott, Julie A. Westmeyer, Jane C. Zapytowski, Patricia L. Zickuhr

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Top Row: Jessica M. Adair, Casey Arnett, Amy Lynn Babchek, Mary E. Bartlett, Rhonda Bass, Nancy Bidlack, Heather Bjerke, Stacy Bodrie, Dana Boonstra, Kellu Bowers, Pamela Bowser, Rachel L. Bradley, Michele Brotherton, Stacie Buckler, Hope Bufkin

Row 2: Saran Burnley, Jennifer Caraan, Barbara Carpenter, Nutrena Helene Watts, Aimee Schuman, Debra Jameson, Jennifer Jennings, Mary Cassette, Nikki Burns, Lisa Multhaupt, Jeffrey M. Adams, Christine Hepner, Julie Chamberlain, Andy Chan, Jennifer Choike

Row 3: Heather Chrisman, Abbey C. Clark, Renita Cobb, Amy Cotton, Cattleya Crossen, Kimberly Curl, Christy Debolt, Patricia DeLamielleure, Jennifer Dyer, Lisa L. Eliasom, Patricia Fowler Faling, Rita Fallone

Row 4: Richard Fisher, Rebecca J. Forbes, Tiffany Fowler, Karen R. Fritz, Debbie M. Fulton, Michelle J. Gaskill, Ellen M. Gavin, Emily Golin, Umeika Makita Griffith, Lydia D. Hampton, Natalie Michele Hoffman, Julie Holbird

Row 5: Kathryn A. Huffman, Tara Lynn Humphrey, Nicole Jaccques, Michelle C. Johnson, Bryan Wayne Kerridge, Violet H. Barkauskas, Beverly Jones, Ada Sue Hinshaw, Nola Pender, Susan Boehm, Noelle Kirouac, Sarah Kohn, Sherri Krajenta, Brian Kubinski, Stephanie L. Kuczera

Row 6: Heather Lange, Sang Hee Lee, Soya Lee, Natalie Lehrer, Kimberly Lilley, Elizabeth A. Lundy, Darcey Lutz-Guenther, Michelle J. Malicsi, Dawn Marteeny, Sheila Mendiola, Sharon Mitchell, Caryl S. Molton, Colette Montilla, Celeste Montone-Horne, Emily T. Mooney, Naima Moore

Row 7: Kami Nobis, Thresa M. Nugent, Michelle Ober, Nisha Patel, Stephanie Perrett, Holly Powers, Julie L. Pryor, Elizabeth K. Rachubinski, Anne Rammelkamp, Kathy Rarog, Erin Richards, Amy Roehrig, Catherine Ann Rosloniec, Tansey Rosset, Kimberly Sanders, Marla Sands, James C. Sausser

Row 8: Juana Sebree, Erin J. Showers, Prabhjyot Singh, Lynn Sinkel, Nicole LaDon Smith, Nicole M. Speck, Mickie Speers, Krista Stapleton, Karon Starr, Elizabeth Studley, Janice Brenda Supena, Rashelle Talbert,Kimberly Tocco, Edda Toting, Lisa Uren, Lori VanBergen

Row 9: Lisa VanStratton, kathleen Veenstra, Kristen Venadam, Rhonda E. Walkowe, Ching-Ru Bonny Wang, Deborah Webb, Ruthann Clausen Weiss, Debra R. White, Rochelle Whiteman, Tara Wilson, Jessica Wise, Sheryl Woloskie, Denice Annette Zakalata, Rebecca S. Zeiler

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Essays on Shakespeare's female characters; published also under title: Shakespeare's heroines.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Essays on Shakespeare's female characters; published also under titles: Shakespeare's heroines; Shakespeare's female characters.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Bibliography: p. vi-ix.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

4 plates follow text. In English.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Allegory is not obsolete as Samuel Coleridge and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe have claimed. It is alive and well and has transformed from a restrictive concept to a concept that is flexible and can form to meet the needs of the author or reader. The most efficient way to evidence this is by making a case study of it with a suitable work that will allow us to perceive its plasticity. This essay uses J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings as a multi-perspective case study of the concept of allegory; the size and complexity of the narrative make it a suitable choice. My aim is to illustrate the plasticity of allegory as a concept and illuminate some of the possibilities and pitfalls of allegory and allegoresis. As to whether The Lord of the Rings can be treated as an allegory, it will be examined from three different perspectives: as a purely writerly process, a middle ground of writer and reader and as a purely readerly process. The Lord of the Rings will then be compared to a series of concepts of allegorical theory such as Plato’s classical “The Ring of Gyges”, William Langland’s classic The Vision of William Concerning Piers the Plowman and contemporary allegories of racism and homoeroticism to demonstrate just how adaptable this concept is. The position of this essay is that the concept of allegory has changed over time since its conception and become more malleable. This poses certain dangers as allegory has become an all-round tool for anyone to do anything that has few limitations and has lost its early rigid form and now favours an almost anything goes approach.