Soybean Planting Dates in Northeast Iowa

Soybean planting date studies of various types have been conducted at this site since 1976. Earlier tests included later planting dates (May through mid-June), differing variety maturities, and comparisons with starter fertilizer and Ridomil fungicide soil treatments. Research reports on these studies can be found in previous annual progress reports with the last summary in the 2001 and 2009 reports.

Converting Land from Poplar Tree Bioenergy Planting to Cropland: An Example

Many landowners ask about the process and costs for returning land to crop production after trees are cut for biomass. A field on the Squaw Creek bottom, Story County, Iowa was planted to hybrid poplar trees in spring 2000. The trees were planted in rows with a 10-ft spacing. The trees were cut in spring 2010. The resulting field was four acres, and this is the account of the first corn crop in 2011 on the area.

Second Year Performance of Honeycrisp on 31 Dwarfing Rootstocks in the Iowa Planting of the NC-140 2010 Regional Apple Rootstock Trial

To evaluate the adaptability and performance of new and promising apple rootstocks in the dwarfing size-control category, a NC-140 regional rootstock trial was established in 2010 at 12 sites in the United States (CO, IA, IL, IN, MA, MI, MN, NJ, NY, OH, UT, WI), two sites in Canada (BC, NS), and one site in Mexico (CHIH) with Honeycrisp serving as the test cultivar. The Iowa planting, located at the ISU Horticulture Research Station, includes 31 rootstocks with new selections from the Cornell-Geneva breeding program (G, CG.), Russia (Bud), Germany (PiAu), and Japan (Supp), with M.26, M.9 Pajam 2, and M.9 T337 serving as industry standards. Tissue cultured propagated (TC) rootstocks of G.41, G.202, and G.935 were included for comparison with normal (N) stool bed propagated rootstocks. This report summarizes the tree-growth characteristics of the Iowa planting during the 2011 growing season.

Effect of Date of Planting on Soybean Sudden Death Syndrome

The objectives of this project was to study the effect of planting date on the onset of soybean sudden death syndrome (SDS). It is believed, that avoiding planting soybeans into wet cold soil may delay or lower the severity of SDS. Planting date for soybeans is important and can have a large effect on yield potential.

Optimum Soybean Planting Date

Past research by Iowa State University has shown that the optimum planting date for soybeans, assuming favorable soil conditions, is the first week in May for the northern third of Iowa. The optimum date for the southern two thirds of Iowa is the last week of April. Given that rapidly changing soybean genetics have shown improvements in both yield and disease resistance, this trial was designed to demonstrate the planting recommendation under local conditions.

Early Planting of Tomatoes in a High Tunnel with Plant Coverings

High tunnels have been successfully used in Iowa to modify the climate and extend the growing season for tomatoes and other crops. Without the use of supplemental heat these ventilated, single layered plastic structures have typically increased average inside air temperatures by 10°F or more over outside temperatures for the growing season. The same tunnel, however, will only increase the daily low temperature by about 1 or 2°F, thus making early season high tunnel plantings without additional heat or plant coverings risky in Iowa. Fabric row covers are commonly used in high tunnels to provide for an additional 2-4°F frost protection during cold evenings. The recommended planting date for high tunnel tomatoes in Iowa has been about April 16 (4 to 5 weeks ahead of the recommended outside planting date). Producers are also advised to have some sort of plant covering material available to protect plants during a late spring frost.

Seedling Nutrient Loading to Improve Planting Success: A Mediterranean Perspective

Conferencia Internacional Nutrient Dynamics of Planted Forests, Noviembre de 2012

Neural bruise prediction models for fruit handling and machinery evaluation.

Some neural bruise prediction models have been implemented in the laboratory, for the most traded fruit species and varieties, allowing the prediction of the acceptability or rejectability for damages, with respect to the EC Standards. Different models have been built for both quasi-static (compression) and dynamic (impact) loads covering the whole commercial ripening period of fruits. A simulation process has been developed gathering the information on laboratory bruise models and load sensor calibrations for different electronic devices (IS-100 and DEA-1, for impact and compression loads respectively). Some evaluation methodology has been designed gathering the information on the mechanical properties of fruits and the loading records of electronic devices. The evaluation system allows to determine the current stage of fruit handling process and machinery.

Influencia de las condiciones de ejecución en la resistencia de anclajes en convencional y autocompactante

A través de los años las estructuras de hormigón armado han ido aumentando su cuota de mercado, sustituyendo a las estructuras de fábrica de piedra o ladrillo y restándole participación a las estructuras metálicas. Uno de los primeros problemas que surgieron al ejecutar las estructuras de hormigón armado, era cómo conectar una fase de una estructura de este tipo a una fase posterior o a una modificación posterior. Hasta los años 80-90 las conexiones de una fase de una estructura de hormigón armado, con otra posterior se hacían dejando en la primera fase placas de acero con garrotas embebidas en el hormigón fresco o barras grifadas recubiertas de poliestireno expandido. Una vez endurecido el hormigón se podían conectar nuevas barras, para la siguiente fase mediante soldadura a la placa de la superficie o enderezando las barras grifadas, para embeberlas en el hormigón fresco de la fase siguiente. Estos sistemas requerían conocer la existencia y alcance de la fase posterior antes de hormigonar la fase previa. Además requerían un replanteo muy exacto y complejo de los elementos de conexión. Otro problema existente en las estructuras de hormigón era la adherencia de un hormigón fresco a un hormigón endurecido previamente, ya que la superficie de contacto de ambos hormigones suponía un punto débil, con una adherencia baja. A partir de los años 80, la industria química de la construcción experimentó un gran avance en el desarrollo de productos capaces de generar una buena adherencia sobre el hormigón endurecido. Este avance tecnológico tenía aplicación tanto en la adherencia del hormigón fresco sobre el hormigón endurecido, como en la adherencia de barras post-instaladas en agujeros de hormigón endurecido. Este sistema se denominó “anclajes adherentes de barras de acero en hormigón endurecido”. La forma genérica de ejecutarlos es hacer una perforación cilíndrica en el soporte de hormigón, con una herramienta especifica como un taladro, limpiar la perforación, llenarla del material adherente y finalmente introducir la barra de acero. Los anclajes adherentes se dividen en anclajes cementosos y anclajes químicos, siendo estos últimos los más habituales, fiables, resistentes y fáciles de ejecutar. El uso del anclaje adherente de barras de acero en hormigón endurecido se ha extendido por todo el espectro productivo, siendo muy habitual tanto en construcción de obras de hormigón armado de obra civil y edificación, como en obras industriales, instalaciones o fijación de elementos. La ejecución de un anclaje de una barra de acero en hormigón endurecido depende de numerosas variables, que en su conjunto, o de forma aislada pueden afectar de forma notable a la resistencia del anclaje. Nos referimos a variables de los anclajes, que a menudo no se consideran tales como la dirección de la perforación, la máquina de perforación y el útil de perforación utilizado, la diferencia de diámetros entre el diámetro del taladro y la barra, el tipo de material de anclaje, la limpieza del taladro, la humedad del soporte, la altura del taladro, etc. La utilización en los últimos años de los hormigones Autocompactables, añade una variable adicional, que hasta ahora apenas ha sido estudiada. En línea con lo apuntado, la presente tesis doctoral tiene como objetivo principal el estudio de las condiciones de ejecución en la resistencia de los anclajes en hormigón convencional y autocompactable. Esta investigación se centra principalmente en la evaluación de la influencia de una serie de variables sobre la resistencia de los anclajes, tanto en hormigón convencional como en un hormigón autocompactable. Para este estudio ha sido necesaria la fabricación de dos soportes de hormigón sobre los cuales desarrollar los ensayos. Uno de los bloques se ha fabricado con hormigón convencional y el otro con hormigón autocompactable. En cada pieza de hormigón se han realizado 174 anclajes con barras de acero, variando los parámetros a estudiar, para obtener resultados de todas las variables consideradas. Los ensayos a realizar en ambos bloques son exactamente iguales, para poder comparar la diferencia entre un anclaje en un soporte de hormigón con vibrado convencional (HVC) y un hormigón autocompactante (HAC). De cada tipo de ensayo deseado se harán dos repeticiones en la misma pieza. El ensayo de arrancamiento de las barras se realizara con un gato hidráulico hueco, con un sistema de instrumentación de lectura y registro de datos en tiempo real. El análisis de los resultados, realizado con una potente herramienta estadística, ha permitido determinar y evaluar numéricamente la influencia de los variables consideradas en la resistencia de los anclajes realizados. Así mismo ha permitido diferenciar los resultados obtenidos en los hormigones convencionales y autocompactantes, tanto desde el punto de vista de la resistencia mecánica, como de las deformaciones sufridas en el arrancamiento. Se define la resistencia mecánica de un anclaje, como la fuerza desarrollada en la dirección de la barra, para hacer su arrancamiento del soporte. De la misma forma se considera desplazamiento, a la separación entre un punto fijo de la barra y otro del soporte, en la dirección de la barra. Dichos puntos se determinan cuando se ha terminado el anclaje, en la intersección de la superficie plana del soporte, con la barra. Las conclusiones obtenidas han permitido establecer qué variables afectan a la ejecución de los anclajes y en qué cuantía lo hacen, así como determinar la diferencia entre los anclajes en hormigón vibrado convencional y hormigón autocompactante, con resultados muy interesantes, que permiten valorar la influencia de dichas variables. Dentro de las conclusiones podemos destacar tres grupos, que denominaremos como de alta influencia, baja influencia y sin influencia. En todos los casos hay que hacer el estudio en términos de carga y de desplazamiento. Podemos considerar como de alta influencia, en términos de carga las variables de máquina de perforación y el material de anclaje. En términos de desplazamiento podemos considerar de alta influencia además de la máquina de perforación y el material de anclaje, el diámetro del taladro, así como la limpieza y humedad del soporte. Podemos considerar de baja influencia, en términos de carga las variables de tipo de hormigón, dirección de perforación, limpieza y humedad del soporte. En términos de desplazamiento podemos considerar de baja influencia el tipo de hormigón y la dirección de perforación. Podemos considerar en el apartado de “sin influencia”, en términos de carga las variables de diámetro de perforación y altura del taladro. En términos de desplazamiento podemos considerar como “sin influencia” la variable de altura del taladro. Podemos afirmar que las diferencias entre los valores de carga aumentan de forma muy importante en términos de desplazamiento. ABSTRACT Over the years the concrete structures have been increasing their market share, replacing the masonry structures of stone or brick and subtracting as well the participation of the metallic structures. One of the first problems encountered in the implementing of the reinforced concrete structures was connecting a phase structure of this type at a later stage or a subsequent amendment. Until the 80s and 90s the connections of one phase of a reinforced concrete structure with a subsequent first phase were done by leaving the steel plates embedded in the fresh concrete using hooks or bent bars coated with expanded polystyrene. Once the concrete had hardened new bars could be connected to the next stage by welding them to the surface plate or by straightening the bent bars to embed them in the fresh concrete of the next phase. These systems required a previous knowledge of the existence and scope of the subsequent phase before concreting the previous one. They also required a very precise and complex rethinking of the connecting elements. Another existing problem in the concrete structures was the adhesion of a fresh concrete to a previously hardened concrete, since the contact surface of both concretes leaded to a weak point with low adherence. Since the 80s, the chemicals construction industry experienced a breakthrough in the development of products that generate a good grip on the concrete. This technological advance had its application both in the grip on one hardened fresh concrete and in the adhesion of bar post-installed in holes of hardened concrete. This system was termed as adherent anchors of steel bars in hardened concrete. The generic way of executing this system is by firstly drilling a cylindrical hole in the concrete support using a specific tool such as a drill. Then, cleaning the bore and filling it with bonding material to lastly, introduce the steel bar. These adherent anchors are divided into cement and chemical anchors, the latter being the most common, reliable, durable and easy to run. The use of adhesive anchor of steel bars in hardened concrete has spread across the production spectrum turning itself into a very common solution in both construction of reinforced concrete civil engineering and construction, and industrial works, installations and fixing elements as well. The execution of an anchor of a steel bar in hardened concrete depends on numerous variables which together or as a single solution may significantly affect the strength of the anchor. We are referring to variables of anchors which are often not considered, such as the diameter difference between the rod and the bore, the drilling system, cleansing of the drill, type of anchor material, the moisture of the substrate, the direction of the drill, the drill’s height, etc. During recent years, the emergence of self-compacting concrete adds an additional variable which has hardly been studied so far. According to mentioned this thesis aims to study the main performance conditions in the resistance of conventional and self-compacting concrete anchors. This research is primarily focused on the evaluation of the influence of several variables on the strength of the anchoring, both in conventional concrete and self-compacting concrete. In order to complete this study it has been required the manufacture of two concrete supports on which to develop the tests. One of the blocks has been manufactured with conventional concrete and the other with self-compacting concrete. A total of 174 steel bar anchors have been made in each one of the concrete pieces varying the studied parameters in order to obtain results for all variables considered. The tests to be performed on both blocks are exactly the same in order to compare the difference between an anchor on a stand with vibrated concrete (HVC) and a self-compacting concrete (SCC). Each type of test required two repetitions in the same piece. The pulling test of the bars was made with a hollow jack and with an instrumentation system for reading and recording data in real time. The use of a powerful statistical tool in the analysis of the results allowed to numerically determine and evaluate the influence of the variables considered in the resistance of the anchors made. It has likewise enabled to differentiate the results obtained in the self-compacting and conventional concretes, from both the outlook of the mechanical strength and the deformations undergone by uprooting. The mechanical strength of an anchor is defined as the strength undergone in a direction of the bar to uproot it from the support. Likewise, the movement is defined as the separation between a fixed point of the bar and a fixed point from the support considering the direction of the bar. These points are only determined once the anchor is finished, with the bar, at the intersection in the flat surface of the support. The conclusions obtained have established which variables affect the execution of the anchors and in what quantity. They have also permitted to determine the difference between the anchors in vibrated concrete and selfcompacting concrete with very interesting results that also allow to assess the influence of these mentioned variables. Three groups are highlighted among the conclusions called high influence, low influence and no influence. In every case is necessary to perform the study in terms of loading and movement. In terms of loading, there are considered as high influence two variables: drilling machinery and anchorage material. In terms of movement, there are considered as high influence the drilling diameter and the cleaning and moisture of the support, besides the drilling machinery and the anchorage material. Variables such as type of concrete, drilling direction and cleaning and moisture of the support are considered of low influence in terms of load. In terms of movement, the type of concrete and the direction of the drilling are considered variables of low influence. Within the no influence section in terms of loading, there are included the diameter of the drilling and the height of the drill. In terms of loading, the height of the drill is considered as a no influence variable. We can affirm that the differences among the loading values increase significantly in terms of movement.

A partial study of vertical distribution of conventional no-till seeders and spatial variability of seed depth placement of maize in the Alentejo region, Portugal

The requirements for a good stand in a no-till field are the same as those for conventional planting as well as added field and machinery management. Among the various factors that contribute towards producing a successful maize crop, seed depth placement is a key determinant. Although most no-till planters on the market work well under good soil and residue conditions, adjustments and even modifications are frequently needed when working with compacted or wet soils or with heavy residues. The main objective of this study, carried out in 2010, 2011 and 2012, was to evaluate the vertical distribution and spatial variability of seed depth placement in a maize crop under no-till conditions, using precision farming technologies and conventional no-till seeders. The results obtained indicate that the seed depth placement was affected by soil moisture content and forward speed. The seed depth placement was negatively correlated with soil resistance and seeding depth had a significant impact on mean emergence time and the percentage of emerged plants. Shallow average depth values and high coefficients of variation suggest a need for improvements in controlling the seeders’ sowing depth mechanism or more accurate calibration by operators in the field.

Establishing Quercus ilex under Mediterranean dry conditions: sowing recalcitrant acorns versus planting seedlings at different depths and tube shelter light transmissions

Article New Forests November 2015, Volume 46, Issue 5, pp 869-883 First online: 17 June 2015 Establishing Quercus ilex under Mediterranean dry conditions: sowing recalcitrant acorns versus planting seedlings at different depths and tube shelter light transmissionsJuan A. OlietAffiliated withDepartamento de Sistemas y Recursos Naturales, E.T.S. Ingenieros de Montes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Email author View author's OrcID profile , Alberto Vázquez de CastroAffiliated withDepartamento de Sistemas y Recursos Naturales, E.T.S. Ingenieros de Montes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Jaime PuértolasAffiliated withLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University $39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95 * Rent the article at a discount Rent now * Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT. Get Access AbstractSuccess of Mediterranean dry areas restoration with oaks is a challenging goal. Testing eco-techniques that mimic beneficial effects of natural structures and ameliorate stress contributes to positive solutions to overcoming establishment barriers. We ran a factorial experiment in a dry area, testing two levels of solid wall transmission of tube shelters (60 and 80 %) plus a control mesh, and two depths (shallow and 15 cm depth) of placing either planted seedlings or acorns of Quercus ilex. Microclimate of the planting or sowing spots was characterized by measuring photosynthetically active radiation, temperature and relative humidity. Plant response was evaluated in terms of survival, phenology, acorn emergence and photochemical efficiency (measured through chlorophyll fluorescence). We hypothesize that tube shelters and deep planting improve Q. ilex post-planting and sowing performance because of the combined effects of reducing excessive radiation and improving access to moist soil horizons. Results show that temperature and PAR was reduced, and relative humidity increased, in deep spots. Midsummer photochemical efficiency indicates highest level of stress for oaks in 80 % light transmission shelter. Optimum acorn emergence in spring was registered within solid wall tree shelters, and maximum summer survival of germinants and of planted seedlings occurred when acorns or seedlings were placed at 15 cm depth irrespectively of light transmission of shelter. Survival of germinants was similar to that of planted seedlings. The importance of techniques to keep high levels of viability after sowing recalcitrant seeds in the field is emphasized in the study

Modulation of an early step in the secretory machinery in hippocampal nerve terminals

In hippocampal neurons, neurotransmitter release can be regulated by protein kinase A (PKA) through a direct action on the secretory machinery. To identify the site of PKA modulation, we have taken advantage of the ability of the neurotoxin Botulinum A to cleave the synaptic protein SNAP-25. Cleavage of this protein decreases the Ca2+ responsiveness of the secretory machinery by partially uncoupling Ca2+-sensing from fusion per se. This is expressed as a shift toward higher Ca2+ levels of the Ca2+ to neurotransmitter release relationship and as a perturbation of synaptic delay under conditions where secretion induced by the Ca2+-independent secretagogue ruthenium red is unimpaired. We find that SNAP-25 cleavage also perturbs PKA-dependent modulation of secretion; facilitation of ruthenium red-evoked neurotransmitter release by the adenylyl cyclase activator forskolin is blocked completely after Botulinum toxin A action. Together with our observation that forskolin modifies the Ca2+ to neurotransmitter release relationship, our results suggest that SNAP-25 acts as a functional linker between Ca2+ detection and fusion and that PKA modulates an early step in the secretory machinery related to calcium sensing to facilitate synaptic transmission.

Rer1p as common machinery for the endoplasmic reticulum localization of membrane proteins

Rer1p, a Golgi membrane protein, is required for the correct localization of an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane protein, Sec12p, by a retrieval mechanism from the cis-Golgi to the ER. To test whether or not the role of Rer1p is common to multiple ER membrane proteins, we examined the localization of two other ER membrane proteins, Sec71p and Sec63p, in the wild-type and rer1 mutant yeast cells, using their fusions with an α-mating factor precursor (Mfα1p). Although Sec71p and Sec63p have completely different topology from Sec12p, their Mfα1p fusion proteins were also mislocalized to the trans-Golgi in the rer1 mutant. Overexpression of these fusions caused their mislocalization to the trans-Golgi even in the wild-type cells, and this mislocalization was partially suppressed by the co-overexpression of Rer1p. Either Sec71p or an artificial chimeric protein whose ER localization depends on Rer1p gave a competitive effect on the localization of the Mfα1-Sec71p fusion, which was abolished in rer1. Thus, Rer1p appears to be one of the common limiting components in the retrieval machinery for ER membrane proteins. The results also suggest that Sec71p and Sec63p depend on ER-Golgi recycling, at least partly, for ER localization. We also examined the effect of a mutation in α-COP, a subunit of yeast coatomer, on the localization of these ER membrane proteins. The Mfα1p fusions of Sec12p, Sec71p, and Sec63p were all more or less mislocalized in ret1–1. These observations imply that the roles of Rer1p and coatomer are much more general than thought before.

MAL, an Integral Element of the Apical Sorting Machinery, Is an Itinerant Protein That Cycles between the Trans-Golgi Network and the Plasma Membrane

The MAL proteolipid is a nonglycosylated integral membrane protein found in glycolipid-enriched membrane microdomains. In polarized epithelial Madin-Darby canine kidney cells, MAL is necessary for normal apical transport and accurate sorting of the influenza virus hemagglutinin. MAL is thus part of the integral machinery for glycolipid-enriched membrane–mediated apical transport. At steady state, MAL is predominantly located in perinuclear vesicles that probably arise from the trans-Golgi network (TGN). To act on membrane traffic and to prevent their accumulation in the target compartment, integral membrane elements of the protein-sorting machinery should be itinerant proteins that cycle between the donor and target compartments. To establish whether MAL is an itinerant protein, we engineered the last extracellular loop of MAL by insertion of sequences containing the FLAG epitope or with sequences containing residues that became O-glycosylated within the cells or that displayed biotinylatable groups. The ectopic expression of these modified MAL proteins allowed us to investigate the surface expression of MAL and its movement through different compartments after internalization with the use of a combination of assays, including surface biotinylation, surface binding of anti-FLAG antibodies, neuraminidase sensitivity, and drug treatments. Immunofluorescence and flow cytometric analyses indicated that, in addition to its Golgi localization, MAL was also expressed on the cell surface, from which it was rapidly internalized. This retrieval implies transport through the endosomal pathway and requires endosomal acidification, because it can be inhibited by drugs such as chloroquine, monensin, and NH4Cl. Resialylation experiments of surface MAL treated with neuraminidase indicated that ∼30% of the internalized MAL molecules were delivered to the TGN, probably to start a new cycle of cargo transport. Together, these observations suggest that, as predicted for integral membrane members of the late protein transport machinery, MAL is an itinerant protein cycling between the TGN and the plasma membrane.

Assembly of the Nuclear Transcription and Processing Machinery: Cajal Bodies (Coiled Bodies) and Transcriptosomes

We have examined the distribution of RNA transcription and processing factors in the amphibian oocyte nucleus or germinal vesicle. RNA polymerase I (pol I), pol II, and pol III occur in the Cajal bodies (coiled bodies) along with various components required for transcription and processing of the three classes of nuclear transcripts: mRNA, rRNA, and pol III transcripts. Among these components are transcription factor IIF (TFIIF), TFIIS, splicing factors, the U7 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle, the stem–loop binding protein, SR proteins, cleavage and polyadenylation factors, small nucleolar RNAs, nucleolar proteins that are probably involved in pre-rRNA processing, and TFIIIA. Earlier studies and data presented here show that several of these components are first targeted to Cajal bodies when injected into the oocyte and only subsequently appear in the chromosomes or nucleoli, where transcription itself occurs. We suggest that pol I, pol II, and pol III transcription and processing components are preassembled in Cajal bodies before transport to the chromosomes and nucleoli. Most components of the pol II transcription and processing pathway that occur in Cajal bodies are also found in the many hundreds of B-snurposomes in the germinal vesicle. Electron microscopic images show that B-snurposomes consist primarily, if not exclusively, of 20- to 30-nm particles, which closely resemble the interchromatin granules described from sections of somatic nuclei. We suggest the name pol II transcriptosome for these particles to emphasize their content of factors involved in synthesis and processing of mRNA transcripts. We present a model in which pol I, pol II, and pol III transcriptosomes are assembled in the Cajal bodies before export to the nucleolus (pol I), to the B-snurposomes and eventually to the chromosomes (pol II), and directly to the chromosomes (pol III). The key feature of this model is the preassembly of the transcription and processing machinery into unitary particles. An analogy can be made between ribosomes and transcriptosomes, ribosomes being unitary particles involved in translation and transcriptosomes being unitary particles for transcription and processing of RNA.