United States exploring expeditions. Voyage of the U. S. exploring squadron,

Mode of access: Internet.

Repellents to protect trees and shrubs from damage by rabbits /

Cover title.

1910 UM Track Team

Back Row: st. mngr. Ben Boynton, ? Crossman, Harold Christopher, Louis Haller, John C. Bogle, Robert Hammond, Benjamin Reck, Fred Ross, Clarence Keck, trainer Keene Fitzpatrick

Middle Row: Hugh Gamble, John Hodgen, Charles Hall, captain Joe Horner, May, Ralph Craig, John Lapham, Arthur Bohnsock, Eugene Leger

Front Row (in floor): Walter Willits, Frederick (?) Beardsley, Cleon Spangler, William Kerr(?), James Angell McLaughlin

1911 UM Track Team

Back Row: Benjamin Reck, ? Smith, George Lawton, Robert Hammond, H.C. Smith, Cole

3rd Row: st. mngr. Herbert Goetz, John Otte, XX Elliott, Roger Waring, Louis Haller, ? Crossman, James Angell McLaughlin, XX White, Ath. Dir. Philip Bartelme

2nd Row: Charles Hall. Edmond Hanavan, Raymond Haimbaugh, Ralph Craig, Carroll Haff, Hugh Gamble, Fred Ross

Front Row (on floor): Charles Kime, Frederick(?) Beardsley, Walter Willits, Cleon Spangler, XX Pierce,

1912 UM Track Team

Back Row: Ross H. Smith, Herschel C. Smith, Charles M. Smith, Charles Barton, Ellwood Griest, Withred H. Cook, James Bond, Lorenzo Lapsley

3rd Row: Ath. Dir. Bartelme, E. M. White, David H. Cohn, Charles. S. White, David Wiggins, Harry E. Brown, John Otte, Isaac Van Kammen, st. mngr Harold Williamson

2nd Row: Warren Sargent, James Craig, Raymond Haimbaugh, Edmond Hanavan, captain Hugh Gamble, Carroll Haff, Benjamin Reck, Arthur Kohler

Front Row: Frederick(?) Beardsley, Kenneth Young, Roger Waring, Louis Baier, Raymond Blake, Howard Seward

1920 UM Track Team

Top Row: Floyd. Lashmet, R. Jerome Dunne, Carl Johnson, William Naylor, Francisco Penberthy

4th Row: Jarl Larson, Paul Burkholder, George Earle, Thomas Maynard, William Meese

3rd Row: Ath. Dir. Philip Bartelme, Nelson Joyner, Howard Hoffman, Bradner Wheeler, Calvin Wetzel, Marion Slaughter, Walter Wesbrook, st. mngr. Frederick Parsons

2nd Row: Lawrence Butler, Joseph Baker, Robert Cook, Coach Steve Farrell, Curtis C. Later, Raymond Beardsley, Richard Losch

Front Row: Lester Lukins, Walter Rea, Donald Douglas

Life, here and there, or, Sketches of society and adventure at far-apart times and places /

C.W. Benedict, stereotyper, 201 William St., N.Y.

Summer cruise in the Mediterranean on board an American frigate./

Mode of access: Internet.

Works.

With reproductions of original title-pages.

The legends of Saint Patrick /

Mode of access: Internet.

Systems for assessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas

Since the mid-1990s, numerous methodologies have been developed to assess the management effectiveness of protected areas, many tailored to particular regions or habitats. Recognizing the need for a generic approach, the World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) developed an evaluation framework allowing specific evaluation methodologies to be designed within a consistent overall approach. Twenty-seven assessment methodologies were analyzed in relation to this framework. Two types of data were identified: quantitative data derived from monitoring and qualitative data derived from scoring by managers and stakeholders. The distinction between methodologies based on data types reflects different approaches to assessing management. Few methodologies assess all the WCPA framework elements. More useful information for adaptive management will come from addressing all six elements. The framework can be used to adapt existing methodologies or to design new, more comprehensive methodologies for evaluation, using quantitative monitoring data, qualitative scoring data, or a combination of both.

Case Comment : Challenging the validity of leasehold guarantees:undue influence, non-est factum and formality issues

Case: Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme Trustees v Yardley [2011] EWHC 1380 (QB) (QBD). The recent case of Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme Trustees v Yardley, nicely illustrates, inter alia, the impact of the contractual defences of undue influence and the plea of non est factum in the context of avoiding liability under leasehold guarantees, within the setting of the landlord and tenant relationship. Additionally, the case also gives us an insight into the possible application of other technical defences relating to the law of formalities for leases. Judgment in this case was handed down on September 30, 2011.

Social determinants of dental treatment needs in Brazilian adults

Background The chronic cumulative nature of caries makes treatment needs a severe problem in adults. Despite the fact that oral diseases occur in social contexts, there are few studies using multilevel analyses focusing on treatment needs. Thus, considering the importance of context in explaining oral health related inequalities, this study aims to evaluate the social determinants of dental treatment needs in 35–44 year old Brazilian adults, assessing whether inequalities in needs are expressed at individual and contextual levels. Methods The dependent variables were based on the prevalence of normative dental treatment needs in adults: (a) restorative treatment; (b) tooth extraction and (c) prosthetic treatment. The independent variables at first level were household income, formal education level, sex and race. At second level, income, sanitation, infrastructure and house conditions. The city-level variables were the Human Development Index (HDI) and indicators related to health services. Exploratory analysis was performed evaluating the effect of each level through calculating Prevalence Ratios (PR). In addition, a three-level multilevel modelling was constructed for all outcomes to verify the effect of individual characteristics and also the influence of context. Results In relation to the need for restorative treatment, the main factors implicated were related to individual socioeconomic position, however the city-level contextual effect should also be considered. Regarding need for tooth extraction, the contextual effect does not seem to be important and, in relation to the needs for prosthetic treatment, the final model showed effect of individual-level and city-level. Variables related to health services did not show significant effects. Conclusions Dental treatment needs related to primary care (restoration and tooth extraction) and secondary care (prosthesis) were strongly associated with individual socioeconomic position, mainly income and education, in Brazilian adults. In addition to this individual effect, a city-level contextual effect, represented by HDI, was also observed for need for restorations and prosthesis, but not for tooth extractions. These findings have important implications for the health policy especially for financing and planning, since the distribution of oral health resources must consider the inequalities in availability and affordability of dental care for all.