A Intertextualidade geradora de sentido no gênero desenho animado de núcleo familiar Os Simpsons

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Alcântara Machado e Norman Rockwell: a arte de descrever sociedades

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

A cultura norte-americana como um instrumento do soft power dos Estados Unidos: o caso do Brasil durante a política de boa vizinhança

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Segredos do sotão: feminismo e escritura na obra de Kate Chopin

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

A presença de Kaiser no Quadro Teórico do Tratamento Temático da Informação (TTI)

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

As muitas plumagens do pássaro vermelho: resistência e assimilação na obra de Zitkala-Sa

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

A utilização do Resource Description and Access (RDA) na criação de registros de autoridade para pessoas, famílias e entidades coletivas

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Iris Murdoch e Simone de Beauvoir: uma leitura feminista de A fairly honourable defeat e La femme rompue

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Thou Shall Not Kill: Vegetarianism in the Christian Faith

Biblical justifications for a vegetarian diet seem to meet with much adversity within mainstream American culture. Texts suggesting that people were intended to be vegetarians can be found in the Bible. However, this interpretation of Biblical texts has not been widely accepted by Protestant Christianity. This research attempts to identifY social and religious characteristics of people who are vegetarian. Fundamentalism, denomination, belief in the inerrancy of the Bible, and strength of belief in Christianity are examined as factors related to supporting vegetarianism. The General Social Survey's data from 1993 and 1994 were used in this study. The data were analyzed using frequencies, means, cross tabulations. correlations, and regressions. The sample was 57% female and 87% white, the mean age was 46 and the average level of education was 13 years. The study found that, among the independent variables. belief in animal rights, rather than any specific religious views, had the strongest influence on vegetarianism.

An Overview of Historical Beaver Management in Arizona

In the mid-1820s, Anglo-American fur trappers, known as "mountain men," entered Arizona and began trapping beaver (Castor canadensis). In Arizona there have been a number of famous mountain men such as Sylvester and James Pattie, Ewing Young, Jededia Smith, and Bill Williams who trapped along the waterways in northern and southern Arizona. Although the heyday of mountain men lasted only a few decades due to a population decline of beaver, management of these animals continues to this day. The purpose of managing beavers shifted from monetary gain to controlling wildlife damage. During the late 1900s, beaver were still widely distributed in limited numbers throughout much of the state. We provide a historical overview of beaver management in Arizona with emphasis on the mountain men, recreational trapping, wildlife damage management, and beaver research in Arizona.

¿Cuán gramaticalmente complejos son los títulos de los artículos científicos en las ciencias naturales?

[EN]This paper examines a corpus of 150 titles of research articles published between 2010 and 2013 in Anglo-American natural sciences journals (physics, chemistry and biology) in order to determine their lexical density and grammatical and morphosyntactic features. Towards that end, the frequency of present and past participles, prepositions, coordinating and subordinate conjunctions, and the frequency and length of compound words was recorded in each title. The total number of content and function words was also recorded so as to determine title lexical density. ANOVA tests were applied in order to assess whether statistically significant differences in the frequency of the above mentioned variables were detected within and across disciplines and in the whole corpus.

Zum Stand der aktuellen Diskussion des globalen Klimawandels : Versuch einer kritischen Wertung seiner Ursachen und Folgen sowie von Handlungsweisen im Licht von Wissenschaft und Öffentlichkeit

Mittels gründlicher Literaturrecherchen wurde dokumentiert, wie Wissenschaft, Medien, Wirtschaft und Staatsregierungen den globalen Klimawandel seit der Industriellen Revolution bewertet haben. Dabei wurde der breite wissenschaftliche Konsens über die ausschlaggebende Rolle des Treibhauseffektes dokumentiert. Kontrovers dazu wurden aber auch anderslautende Meinungen über „natürliche Faktoren“ im Klimasystem aufgezeigt. Bedenken des Verfassers bestehen zur Praktikabilität des Kyoto-Protokolls und zur politischen Anwendbarkeit der IPCC-Berichte, die in der Gefahr stehen, durch ihre nicht ableitbaren Wahrscheinlichkeitsaussagen eine wissenschaftliche Neutralität vermissen zu lassen. Im Blick auf die Klimaschutzpolitik kann Deutschland in der Welt als Vorreiter mit Einschränkungen angesehen werden. Die anwendungsbezogene Klimaforschung wird in Deutschland gefördert, in den USA dagegen die Grundlagenforschung, was mit der Herkunft der Klimaskeptiker einhergeht, die vorwiegend aus dem angloamerikanischen Kulturkreis stammen und kaum aus Deutschland kommen. Dies spiegelt sich als roter Faden in den Forschungsergebnissen verschiedener Medienwissenschaftler wider, wonach die US-Medien im Gegensatz zu deutschen um eine Balance zwischen anthropogenen und natürlichen Ursachen des Klimawandels bemüht sind. Ein in den USA medial präsentierter scheinbarer Dissens der Klimaforschung findet sich als Abbild in heterogenen klimaschutzpolitischen Ausrichtungen der USA auf föderaler und bundesstaatlicher Ebene wieder, wohingegen sich in Deutschland der wissenschaftliche Konsens und die mediale Berichterstattung in einer homogenen Klimaschutzpolitik niederschlagen.

Men's Modesty, Religion, and the State: Spaces of Collision

This article examines religious practices in the United States, which govern modesty and other dress norms for men. I focus both on the spaces within which they most collide with regulatory regimes of the state and the legal implications of these norms, particularly for observant Muslim men. Undergirding the research are those ‘‘gender equality’’ claims made by many religious adherents, that men are required to maintain proper modesty norms just as are women. Also undergirding the research is the extensive anti-Islam bias in American culture today. The spaces within which men’s religiously proscribed dress and grooming norms are most at issue—indicated by First Amendment legal challenges to rights of religious practice—are primarily those state-controlled, total institutions Goffman describes, such as in the military and prisons. The implications of gendered modesty norms are important, as state control over religious expression in prisons, for example, is much more difficult to contest than in other spaces, although this depends entirely on who is doing the contesting and within which religious context. In American society today—and particularly within the context of growing Islamaphobia following the 9/11 attacks—the implications are greatest for those men practicing ‘‘prison Islam.’’