A very limited number of keywords (main patterns) describes all sequences of the human variable heavy (VH) and κ (Vκ) domains

Sequences of the variable heavy (VH) and κ (Vκ) domains of Ig structures were divided into 21 fragments that correspond to strands, loops, or parts of these structural units of the variable domains. Amino acid sequences of fragments (termed “words”) were collected from the 1,172 human heavy and 668 human κ chains available in the Kabat database. Statistical analysis of words of 17 fragments was performed (fragments that comprise the complementary determining regions′ fragments will not be discussed in this paper). The number of different words (those with different residues in at least one position) ranged, for various fragments, from 11 to 75 in the κ chains, and from 23 to 189 in the heavy chains. The main result of this study is that very few keywords, or main patterns of words, were necessary to describe over 90% of the sequences (no more than two keywords per fragment in the κ and no more than five per fragment in the heavy chains). No identical keywords were found for different fragments of the variable domains. Keywords of aligned fragments of the VH and Vκ domains were different in all but two instances. Thus, knowing the keywords, one can determine whether any given small part of a sequence belongs to a heavy or κ chain and predict its precise localization in the sequence. In addition, by using all of the keywords obtained through analysis of the Kabat database, it was possible to describe completely the sequences of the human VH and Vκ germ-line segments.

Enzymatic processing of DNA containing tandem dihydrouracil by endonucleases III and VIII

Endonuclease III from Escherichia coli, yeast (yNtg1p and yNtg2p) and human and E.coli endonuclease VIII have a wide substrate specificity, and recognize oxidation products of both thymine and cytosine. DNA containing single dihydrouracil (DHU) and tandem DHU lesions were used as substrates for these repair enzymes. It was found that yNtg1p prefers DHU/G and exhibits much weaker enzymatic activity towards DNA containing a DHU/A pair. However, yNtg2p, E.coli and human endonuclease III and E.coli endonuclease VIII activities were much less sensitive to the base opposite the lesion. Although these enzymes efficiently recognize single DHU lesions, they have limited capacity for completely removing this damaged base when DHU is present on duplex DNA as a tandem pair. Both E.coli endonuclease III and yeast yNtg1p are able to remove only one DHU in DNA containing tandem lesions, leaving behind a single DHU at either the 3′- or 5′-terminus of the cleaved fragment. On the other hand, yeast yNtg2p can remove DHU remaining on the 5′-terminus of the 3′ cleaved fragment, but is unable to remove DHU remaining on the 3′-terminus of the cleaved 5′ fragment. In contrast, both human endonuclease III and E.coli endonuclease VIII can remove DHU remaining on the 3′-terminus of a cleaved 5′ fragment, but are unable to remove DHU remaining on the 5′-terminus of a cleaved 3′ fragment. Tandem lesions are known to be generated by ionizing radiation and agents that generate reactive oxygen species. The fact that these repair glycosylases have only a limited ability to remove the DHU remaining at the terminus suggests that participation of other repair enzymes is required for the complete removal of tandem lesions before repair synthesis can be efficiently performed by DNA polymerase.

PEA3 sites within the progression elevated gene-3 (PEG-3) promoter and mitogen-activated protein kinase contribute to differential PEG-3 expression in Ha-ras and v-raf oncogene transformed rat embryo cells

Transformation of normal cloned rat embryo fibroblast (CREF) cells with cellular oncogenes results in acquisition of anchorage-independent growth and oncogenic potential in nude mice. These cellular changes correlate with an induction in the expression of a cancer progression-promoting gene, progression elevated gene-3 (PEG-3). To define the mechanism of activation of PEG-3 as a function of transformation by the Ha-ras and v-raf oncogenes, evaluations of the signaling and transcriptional regulation of the ~2.0 kb promoter region of the PEG-3 gene, PEG-Prom, was undertaken. The full-length and various mutated regions of the PEG-Prom were linked to a luciferase reporter construct and tested for promoter activity in CREF and oncogene-transformed CREF cells. An analysis was also performed using CREF cells doubly transformed with Ha-ras and the Ha-ras specific suppressor gene Krev-1, which inhibits the transformed phenotype in vitro. These assays document an association between expression of the transcription regulator PEA3 and PEG-3. The levels of PEA3 and PEG-3 RNA and proteins are elevated in the oncogenically transformed CREF cells, and reduced in transformation and tumorigenic suppressed Ha-ras/Krev-1 doubly transformed CREF cells. Enhanced tumorigenic behavior, PEG-3 promoter function and PEG-3 expression in Ha-ras transformed cells were all dependent upon increased activity within the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays and DNase I footprinting experiments indicate that PEA3 binds to sites within the PEG-Prom in transformed rodent cells in an area adjacent to the TATA box in a MAPK-dependent fashion. These findings demonstrate an association between Ha-ras and v-raf transformation of CREF cells with elevated PEA3 and PEG-3 expression, and they implicate MAPK signaling via PEA3 as a signaling cascade involved in activation of the PEG-Prom.

Reconstitution of repair-gap UV mutagenesis with purified proteins from Escherichia coli: a role for DNA polymerases III and II.

Using a cell-free system for UV mutagenesis, we have previously demonstrated the existence of a mutagenic pathway associated with nucleotide-excision repair gaps. Here, we report that this pathway can be reconstituted by using six purified proteins: UvrA, UvrB, UvrC, DNA helicase II, DNA polymerase III core, and DNA ligase. This establishes the minimal requirements for repair-gap UV mutagenesis. DNA polymerase II could replace DNA polymerase III, although less effectively, whereas DNA polymerase I, the major repair polymerase, could not. DNA sequence analysis of mutations generated in the in vitro reaction revealed a spectrum typical of mutations targeted to UV lesions. These observations suggest that repair-gap UV mutagenesis is performed by DNA polymerase III, and to a lesser extent by DNA polymerase II, by filling-in of a rare class of excision gaps that contain UV lesions.

Peptide inhibitors of peptidyltransferase alter the conformation of domains IV and V of large subunit rRNA: a model for nascent peptide control of translation.

Peptides of 5 and 8 residues encoded by the leaders of attenuation regulated chloramphenicol-resistance genes inhibit the peptidyltransferase of microorganisms from the three kingdoms. Therefore, the ribosomal target for the peptides is likely to be a conserved structure and/or sequence. The inhibitor peptides "footprint" to nucleotides of domain V in large subunit rRNA when peptide-ribosome complexes are probed with dimethyl sulfate. Accordingly, rRNA was examined as a candidate for the site of peptide binding. Inhibitor peptides MVKTD and MSTSKNAD were mixed with rRNA phenol-extracted from Escherichia coli ribosomes. The conformation of the RNA was then probed by limited digestion with nucleases that cleave at single-stranded (T1 endonuclease) and double-stranded (V1 endonuclease) sites. Both peptides selectively altered the susceptibility of domains IV and V of 23S rRNA to digestion by T1 endonuclease. Peptide effects on cleavage by V1 nuclease were observed only in domain V. The T1 nuclease susceptibility of domain V of in vitro-transcribed 23S rRNA was also altered by the peptides, demonstrating that peptide binding to the rRNA is independent of ribosomal protein. We propose the peptides MVKTD and MSTSKNAD perturb peptidyltransferase center catalytic activities by altering the conformation of domains IV and V of 23S rRNA. These findings provide a general mechanism through which nascent peptides may cis-regulate the catalytic activities of translating ribosomes.