Metaphorical Interpretation: Measuring and Facilitating Growth.

Abstract A total of 378 grade 9 students participated in this study to address the problem that although metaphorical literacy and thought are expected and necessary for success in junior and senior high school and beyond, metaphorical concepts and thought are not required to be explicitly taught to these students. The students were from 20 different classes from 4 levels: English language learners (ELL), school to work (SSTW), applied, and academic. All were from 7 secondary schools within a board in southern Ontario. Nine classes made up the control group and 11 classes made up the treatment group. All classes were given 3 pretests and the posttest. The treatment group was given Socratic lessons and direct instruction on metaphorical thought and expressions during 1 semester and in conjunction with their other classroom material. The pretest scores (TOLD, Peabody, preproverbs concrete, and preproverbs abstract) did not reveal any effect of gender, but the academic students had higher scores than the applied students. The SSTW student results are more variable: (a) for the TOLD test, SSTW scores were between those of the academic and applied students; (b) for Peabody scores, SSTW students’ scores are the same as academic and are greater than applied; (c) for preproverbs concrete and preproverbs abstract, the SSTW scores are not different from the applied scores. The postproverbs concrete and postproverbs abstract scores for the treatment groups also showed no effect of gender but revealed that all students who received the treatment did better on their post scores. The positive changes of the treatment group illustrate a measured movement from literal understanding to abstract understanding using direct Socratic instruction and proverbs as a medium.

The constitution of the United States, a critical discussion of it'sgenesis, development, and interpretation

UANL

Parliamentary Debates in Statutory Interpretation: A Question of Admissibility or of Weight?

The article was first published in the McGill Law Journal. Un résumé en français est disponible.

Driedger's 'Modern Principle' at the Supreme Court of Canada: Interpretation, Justification, Legitimization

Un résumé en français est également disponible

Regulatory History Material as an Extrinsic Aid to Interpretation: An Empirical Study on the Use of RIAS by the Federal Court of Canada

Since 1986, the Canadian Public Administration is required to analyze the socio-economic impact of new regulatory requirements or regulatory changes. To report on its analysis, a Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (RIAS) is produced and published in the Canada Gazette with the proposed regulation to which it pertains for notice to, and comments by, interested parties. After the allocated time for comments has elapsed, the regulation is adopted with a final version of the RIAS. Both documents are again published in the Canada Gazette. As a result, the RIAS acquires the status of an official public document of the Government of Canada and its content can be argued in courts as an extrinsic aid to the interpretation of a regulation. In this paper, an analysis of empirical findings on the uses of this interpretative tool by the Federal Court of Canada is made. A sample of decisions classified as unorthodox show that judges are making determinations on the basis of two distinct sets of arguments built from the information found in a RIAS and which the author calls “technocratic” and “democratic”. The author argues that these uses raise the general question of “What makes law possible in our contemporary legal systems”? for they underline enduring legal problems pertaining to the knowledge and the acceptance of the law by the governed. She concludes that this new interpretive trend of making technocratic and democratic uses of a RIAS in case law should be monitored closely as it may signal a greater change than foreseen, and perhaps an unwanted one, regarding the relationship between the government and the judiciary.

National Application of International Law: The Statutory Interpretation Perspective

Reprinted with permission of the Publisher from The Canadian Yearbook of Internation Law, 41 by Don McRae © University of British Columbia Press 2003. All rights reserved.

Conceptions of God and narratives of modernity : a hermeneutical interpretation of Charles Taylor's A Secular Age

Mémoire numérisé par la Division de la gestion de documents et des archives de l'Université de Montréal

Interpretation of the centromere epigenetic mark to maintain genome stability

Le centromère est la région chromosomique où le kinétochore s'assemble en mitose. Contrairement à certaines caractéristiques géniques, la séquence centromérique n'est ni conservée entre les espèces ni suffisante à la fonction centromérique. Il est donc bien accepté dans la littérature que le centromère est régulé épigénétiquement par une variante de l'histone H3, CENP-A. KNL-2, aussi connu sous le nom de M18BP1, ainsi que ces partenaires Mis18α et Mis18β sont des protéines essentielles pour l'incorporation de CENP-A nouvellement synthétisé aux centromères. Des évidences expérimentales démontrent que KNL-2, ayant un domaine de liaison à l'ADN nommé Myb, est la protéine la plus en amont pour l'incorporation de CENP-A aux centromères en phase G1. Par contre, sa fonction dans le processus d'incorporation de CENP-A aux centromères n'est pas bien comprise et ces partenaires de liaison ne sont pas tous connus. De nouveaux partenaires de liaison de KNL-2 ont été identifiés par des expériences d'immunoprécipitation suivies d'une analyse en spectrométrie de masse. Un rôle dans l'incorporation de CENP-A nouvellement synthétisé aux centromères a été attribué à MgcRacGAP, une des 60 protéines identifiées par l'essai. MgcRacGAP ainsi que les protéines ECT-2 (GEF) et la petite GTPase Cdc42 ont été démontrées comme étant requises pour la stabilité de CENP-A incorporé aux centromères. Ces différentes observations ont mené à l'identification d'une troisième étape au niveau moléculaire pour l'incorporation de CENP-A nouvellement synthétisé en phase G1, celle de la stabilité de CENP-A nouvellement incorporé aux centromères. Cette étape est importante pour le maintien de l'identité centromérique à chaque division cellulaire. Pour caractériser la fonction de KNL-2 lors de l'incorporation de CENP-A nouvellement synthétisé aux centromères, une technique de microscopie à haute résolution couplée à une quantification d'image a été utilisée. Les résultats générés démontrent que le recrutement de KNL-2 au centromère est rapide, environ 5 minutes après la sortie de la mitose. De plus, la structure du domaine Myb de KNL-2 provenant du nématode C. elegans a été résolue par RMN et celle-ci démontre un motif hélice-tour-hélice, une structure connue pour les domaines de liaison à l'ADN de la famille Myb. De plus, les domaines humain (HsMyb) et C. elegans (CeMyb) Myb lient l'ADN in vitro, mais aucune séquence n'est reconnue spécifiquement par ces domaines. Cependant, il a été possible de démontrer que ces deux domaines lient préférentiellement la chromatine CENP-A-YFP comparativement à la chromatine H2B-GFP par un essai modifié de SIMPull sous le microscope TIRF. Donc, le domaine Myb de KNL-2 est suffisant pour reconnaître de façon spécifique la chromatine centromérique. Finalement, l'élément reconnu par les domaines Myb in vitro a potentiellement été identifié. En effet, il a été démontré que les domaines HsMyb et CeMyb lient l'ADN simple brin in vitro. De plus, les domaines HsMyb et CeMyb ne colocalisent pas avec CENP-A lorsqu'exprimés dans les cellules HeLa, mais plutôt avec les corps nucléaires PML, des structures nucléaires composées d'ARN. Donc, en liant potentiellement les transcrits centromériques, les domaines Myb de KNL-2 pourraient spécifier l'incorporation de CENP-A nouvellement synthétisé uniquement aux régions centromériques.

Judicial Creativity in Constitutional Interpretation

The focus of study in this thesis is on the necessity and extent of judicial creativity in interpreting provisions in certain crucial areas in the Constitution of India. Judicial innovation was essential to adapt the constitutional provisions to modern changed context. Creativity of the Court has been mainly in the creation and introduction of certain new concepts not found in any specific provision of the Constitution which, but were essential for its meaningful interpretation.Independence of the judiciary, basic structure and certain elements of social justice cherished as ideal by the makers of the Constitution are some such concepts infused into the Constitution by the judiciary. The second aspect of creativity lies in the attempt of the Court to construe provisions in the Constitution with a view to upholding and maintaining the concepts so infused into the Constitution. Introduction of those concepts into the Constitution was necessary and is justified. all important features of the Constitution like democratic form of government, federal structure, judicial review, independence of judiciary and rule of law were thus included in the doctrine to prevent their alteration by amendments.As a result of such a construction, the nature of those directive principles itself has changed. They ceased to be mere directives for state action but became mandate for it. If left to legislative or executive will for their implementation, the directives would have remained enforceable as ordinary right.To conclude, notwithstanding the errors committed by the Supreme Court in construing the provisions in the above areas, they stand testimony to its creative and innovative response in interpreting the Constitution. If this trend is continued, it will be possible to achieve through the judicial process, maintenance of independence of the judiciary, avoidance of destruction of the Constitution through the process of amendment and realisation of social justice envisaged in the directive principles. It can be hoped that the Court would maintain its energetic and vibrant mind and rise up to the occasions and extend the same to other areas in future.

Interpretation of quasimolecular L X-rays in heavy-ion collisions

Using a relativistic selfconsistent correlation diagram a first interpretation of the shape and position of L MO X-rays is given within a quasi-adiabatic model.

Interpretation of noncharacteristic M X-rays in heavy colliding systems by selfconsistent relativistic molecular calculations

The result of the first calculation of a self-consistent relativistic many electron correlation diagram ever done (for the system Au - I) leads to a good agreement of the spectral shape and position of the observed noncharacteristic X-rays within the quasi adiabatic model.

Many-electron relativistic calculation and interpretation of atomic processes in time dependent heavy-ion scattering

The time dependence of a heavy-ion-atom collision system is solved via a set of coupled channel equations using energy eigenvalues and matrix elements from a self-consistent field relativistic molecular many-electron Dirac-Fock-Slater calculation. Within this independent particle model we give a full many-particle interpretation by performing a small number of single-particle calculations. First results for the P(b) curves for the Ne K-hole excitation for the systems F{^8+} - Ne and F{^6+} - Ne as examples are discussed.