578 resultados para Humanitarian Resettlement


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Description based on: Oct. 1, 1980-Sept. 30, 1981.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"May 21, 1986."

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"Submitted by Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, Literacy & Language Program ... Stephen Reder, Project Director."--T.p.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"April 30, 1984 [cover, October 1984]"

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"June 1984 [cover, October 1984]"

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"April 30, 1984"

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"Scientific rationalism, psychology, biology, sociology, comparative religion and mythology, freethought, ethical culture, etc"

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

This article calls for a widening of the debate about humanitarian intervention to incorporate insights from constructivism, 'Welsh School' Critical Security Studies, and critical approaches to Third World International Relations. After identifying a series of problems with the contemporary debate, which is dominated by the English School, it calls for a broadening of the concept of intervention and suggests a need to rethink the meaning of humanitarianism and terms such as the 'supreme humanitarian emergency'.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

This article investigates the ethics of intervention and explores the decision to invade Iraq. It begins by arguing that while positive international law provides an important framework for understanding and debating the legitimacy of war, it does not cover the full spectrum of moral reasoning on issues of war and peace. To that end, after briefly discussing the two primary legal justifications for war (implied UN authorization and pre-emptive self-defence), and finding them wanting, it asks whether there is a moral 'humanitarian exceptions to this rule grounded in the 'just war' tradition. The article argues that two aspects of the broad tradition could be used to make a humanitarian case for war: the 'holy war' tradition and classical just war thinking based on natural law. The former it finds problematic, while the latter it argues provides a moral space to justify the use of force to halt gross breaches of natural law. Although such an approach may provide a moral justification for war, it also opens the door to abuse. It was this very problem that legal positivism from Vattel onwards was designed to address. As a result, the article argues that natural law and legal positivist arguments should be understood as complementary sets of ideas whose sometimes competing claims must be balanced in relation to particular cases. Therefore, although natural law may open a space for justifying the invasion of Iraq on humanitarian terms, legal positivism strictly limits that right. Ignoring this latter fact, as happened in the Iraq case, opens the door to abuse.