Rebuilding less vulnerable communities : the case of Holy Cross

La résilience est la capacité à s’adapter aux menaces et à atténuer ou éviter un risque, elle peut être trouvée dans des bâtiments résistant aux dangers ou dans des systèmes sociaux adaptables (Pelling, 2003). Par conséquence, ce concept peut aussi être compris comme la capacité de reconstruire un quartier avec des composants plus solides et plus viables. Presque quatre ans après l’ouragan Katrina, la Nouvelle-Orléans est considérée comme un laboratoire à ciel ouvert. Le niveau de résilience de ses communautés peut y être examiné. L’état actuel de la reconstitution de ses quartiers diffère largement des uns aux autres. L’arrondissement historique de Holy Cross est l’un des plus vieux quartiers de la ville, cette communauté vulnérable est connue pour son patrimoine culturel, apparent non seulement dans son architecture unique, mais aussi ses relations sociales. Un des principaux défi de la reconstruction du quartier de Holly Cross est de trouver une façon de concilier la préservation du patrimoine bâti et de son tissu urbain ancien avec de nouveaux plans de développement, afin de créer une communauté durable. Cette étude examine les rôles des acteurs impliqués dans le processus de reconstruction et leur efficacité sur la création d’un Holy Cross plus durable, résistant et abordable, afin d’encourager le retour de ses résidents. Elle présente également les efforts actuels pour proposer des projets de reconstruction durables tout en préservant le caractère patrimonial du quartier.

Research and teaching: a holy or an unholy alliance?

Much of the self-image of the Western university hangs on the idea that research and teaching are intimately connected. The central axiom here is that research and teaching are mutually supportive of each other. An institution lacking such a set of relationships between research and teaching falls short of what it means to be a university. This set of beliefs raises certain questions: Is it the case that the presence of such a mutually supportive set of relationships between research and teaching is a necessary condition of the fulfilment of the idea of the university? (A conceptual question). And is it true that, in practice today, such a mutually supportive set of relationships between research and teaching characterises universities? (An empirical question). In my talk, I want to explore these matters in a critical vein. I shall suggest that: a) In practice today, such a mutually supportive set of relationships between research and teaching is in jeopardy. Far from supporting each other, very often research and teaching contend against each other. Research and teaching are becoming two separate ideologies, with their own interest structures. b) Historically, the supposed tight link between research and teaching is both of recent origin and far from universally achieved in universities. Institutional separateness between research and teaching is and has been evident, both across institutions and even across departments in the same institution. c) Conceptually, research and teaching are different activities: each is complex and neither is reducible to the other. In theory, therefore, research and teaching may be said to constitute a holy alliance but in practice, we see more of an unholy alliance. If, then, in an ideal world, a positive relationship between research and teaching is still a worthwhile goal, how might it be construed and worked for? Seeing research and teaching as two discrete and unified sets of activity is now inadequate. Much better is a construal of research and teaching as themselves complexes, as intermingling pools of activity helping to form the liquid university that is emerging today. On this view, research and teaching are fluid spaces, ever on the move, taking up new shapes, and themselves dividing and reforming, as the university reworks its own destiny in modern society. On such a perspective, working out a productive relationship between research and teaching is a complex project. This is an alliance that is neither holy nor unholy. It is an uneasy alliance, with temporary accommodations and continuous new possibilities

As Relações entre Filhos/as de Santo e Espíritos no Cosmo Religioso Umbandista : uma abordagem a partir do contexto de Viçosa/AL

Contundentemente, espíritos do cosmo religioso umbandista estão e interferem na vida dos filhos/as de santo ou como proclama a religiosidade umbandista, nos seus ‘cavalos’. Este trabalho pesquisa oito terreiros de Umbanda inseridos no município de Viçosa/Alagoas, por meio das relações existentes entre filhos/as de santo e espíritos neste cosmo religioso ímpar e multifacetado. Para o desenvolvimento desta pesquisa, fez-se uso de um aparato metodológico que possibilitou compreender fenomenologicamente este processo análogo circunscrito em discursos sobre ‘marcas’ ou ‘sofrimentos’ resultantes das atitudes negligenciais dos filhos/as de santo que constituem a memória umbandista viçosense. Pretendeu-se mostrar também que o imbricamento dos aspectos relacionais como: reverência, temor, devoção, respeito, esperança, fidelidade, dedicação e obediência às entidades cultuadas, configuram-se nessa dinâmica relacional. Este cosmo religioso traz em seu arcabouço existencial discursos e situações vivenciadas em todas as esferas da vida desses filhos/as de santo, principalmente religiosa. O presente trabalho apontou, portanto, a relação de interdependência existente como fruto dessa religiosidade marcada por fé e mistérios.