Hazardous waste, responsible party clean up efforts require improved oversight : report to the chairman, Subcommittee on Commerce, Transportation and Tourism, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives /

"B-221269"--P. [1].

Final environmental impact statement : wastewater treatment facilities, South Shore Lake Tahoe Basin /

"May 1981."

Notification of hazardous waste activity

"EPA form 8700-12"--Cover

Federal liabilities under hazardous waste laws.

Item 1005-C

Nonnuclear industrial hazardous waste : classifying for hazard management.

S/N 052-003-00859-9

Ecological assessment of hazardous waste sites : a field and laboratory reference /

Mode of access: Internet.

Selected problems of hazardous waste management in California; report.

Most of the pages of the photocopy, which is in double columns, represent approximately 2 pages of the original.

Need for improved operation and maintenance of municipal waste treatment plants, report to the Congress

"Federal Water Quality Administration. Department of the Interior. B-166506."

Bioremediation of PAHs - Limitations and soultions

Introduction 1.1 Occurrence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in the environment Worldwide industrial and agricultural developments have released a large number of natural and synthetic hazardous compounds into the environment due to careless waste disposal, illegal waste dumping and accidental spills. As a result, there are numerous sites in the world that require cleanup of soils and groundwater. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are one of the major groups of these contaminants (Da Silva et al., 2003). PAHs constitute a diverse class of organic compounds consisting of two or more aromatic rings with various structural configurations (Prabhu and Phale, 2003). Being a derivative of benzene, PAHs are thermodynamically stable. In addition, these chemicals tend to adhere to particle surfaces, such as soils, because of their low water solubility and strong hydrophobicity, and this results in greater persistence under natural conditions. This persistence coupled with their potential carcinogenicity makes PAHs problematic environmental contaminants (Cerniglia, 1992; Sutherland, 1992). PAHs are widely found in high concentrations at many industrial sites, particularly those associated with petroleum, gas production and wood preserving industries (Wilson and Jones, 1993). 1.2 Remediation technologies Conventional techniques used for the remediation of soil polluted with organic contaminants include excavation of the contaminated soil and disposal to a landfill or capping - containment - of the contaminated areas of a site. These methods have some drawbacks. The first method simply moves the contamination elsewhere and may create significant risks in the excavation, handling and transport of hazardous material. Additionally, it is very difficult and increasingly expensive to find new landfill sites for the final disposal of the material. The cap and containment method is only an interim solution since the contamination remains on site, requiring monitoring and maintenance of the isolation barriers long into the future, with all the associated costs and potential liability. A better approach than these traditional methods is to completely destroy the pollutants, if possible, or transform them into harmless substances. Some technologies that have been used are high-temperature incineration and various types of chemical decomposition (for example, base-catalyzed dechlorination, UV oxidation). However, these methods have significant disadvantages, principally their technological complexity, high cost , and the lack of public acceptance. Bioremediation, on the contrast, is a promising option for the complete removal and destruction of contaminants. 1.3 Bioremediation of PAH contaminated soil & groundwater Bioremediation is the use of living organisms, primarily microorganisms, to degrade or detoxify hazardous wastes into harmless substances such as carbon dioxide, water and cell biomass Most PAHs are biodegradable unter natural conditions (Da Silva et al., 2003; Meysami and Baheri, 2003) and bioremediation for cleanup of PAH wastes has been extensively studied at both laboratory and commercial levels- It has been implemented at a number of contaminated sites, including the cleanup of the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Prince William Sound, Alaska in 1989, the Mega Borg spill off the Texas coast in 1990 and the Burgan Oil Field, Kuwait in 1994 (Purwaningsih, 2002). Different strategies for PAH bioremediation, such as in situ , ex situ or on site bioremediation were developed in recent years. In situ bioremediation is a technique that is applied to soil and groundwater at the site without removing the contaminated soil or groundwater, based on the provision of optimum conditions for microbiological contaminant breakdown.. Ex situ bioremediation of PAHs, on the other hand, is a technique applied to soil and groundwater which has been removed from the site via excavation (soil) or pumping (water). Hazardous contaminants are converted in controlled bioreactors into harmless compounds in an efficient manner. 1.4 Bioavailability of PAH in the subsurface Frequently, PAH contamination in the environment is occurs as contaminants that are sorbed onto soilparticles rather than in phase (NAPL, non aqueous phase liquids). It is known that the biodegradation rate of most PAHs sorbed onto soil is far lower than rates measured in solution cultures of microorganisms with pure solid pollutants (Alexander and Scow, 1989; Hamaker, 1972). It is generally believed that only that fraction of PAHs dissolved in the solution can be metabolized by microorganisms in soil. The amount of contaminant that can be readily taken up and degraded by microorganisms is defined as bioavailability (Bosma et al., 1997; Maier, 2000). Two phenomena have been suggested to cause the low bioavailability of PAHs in soil (Danielsson, 2000). The first one is strong adsorption of the contaminants to the soil constituents which then leads to very slow release rates of contaminants to the aqueous phase. Sorption is often well correlated with soil organic matter content (Means, 1980) and significantly reduces biodegradation (Manilal and Alexander, 1991). The second phenomenon is slow mass transfer of pollutants, such as pore diffusion in the soil aggregates or diffusion in the organic matter in the soil. The complex set of these physical, chemical and biological processes is schematically illustrated in Figure 1. As shown in Figure 1, biodegradation processes are taking place in the soil solution while diffusion processes occur in the narrow pores in and between soil aggregates (Danielsson, 2000). Seemingly contradictory studies can be found in the literature that indicate the rate and final extent of metabolism may be either lower or higher for sorbed PAHs by soil than those for pure PAHs (Van Loosdrecht et al., 1990). These contrasting results demonstrate that the bioavailability of organic contaminants sorbed onto soil is far from being well understood. Besides bioavailability, there are several other factors influencing the rate and extent of biodegradation of PAHs in soil including microbial population characteristics, physical and chemical properties of PAHs and environmental factors (temperature, moisture, pH, degree of contamination). Figure 1: Schematic diagram showing possible rate-limiting processes during bioremediation of hydrophobic organic contaminants in a contaminated soil-water system (not to scale) (Danielsson, 2000). 1.5 Increasing the bioavailability of PAH in soil Attempts to improve the biodegradation of PAHs in soil by increasing their bioavailability include the use of surfactants , solvents or solubility enhancers.. However, introduction of synthetic surfactant may result in the addition of one more pollutant. (Wang and Brusseau, 1993).A study conducted by Mulder et al. showed that the introduction of hydropropyl-ß-cyclodextrin (HPCD), a well-known PAH solubility enhancer, significantly increased the solubilization of PAHs although it did not improve the biodegradation rate of PAHs (Mulder et al., 1998), indicating that further research is required in order to develop a feasible and efficient remediation method. Enhancing the extent of PAHs mass transfer from the soil phase to the liquid might prove an efficient and environmentally low-risk alternative way of addressing the problem of slow PAH biodegradation in soil.

Lining of waste impoundment and disposal facilities /

"SW-870"--Cover.

Sistema de Gerenciamento Integrado de resíduos perigosos: modelagem e validação nos laboratórios da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Apesar dos impactos ambientais ocasionados pela poluição e acidentes químicos, constata-se que algumas organizações ainda investem pouco na prevenção, redução ou eliminação de seus resíduos. Em algumas Instituições de Ensino e Pesquisa (IES) do Brasil, não é incomum o manejo inadequado dos resíduos perigosos gerados em laboratórios de ensino e pesquisa, aumentando tais riscos. Para minimizar ou eliminar tais riscos, há que se realizarem investimentos em processos tecnológicos de tratamento e na seleção de métodos adequados ao gerenciamento. O objetivo desta pesquisa foi modelar um Sistema de Gerenciamento Integrado de Resíduos Perigosos e validá-lo através de sua aplicação em estudo piloto nos laboratórios dos Institutos de Química e Biologia da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. A pesquisa empírica e exploratória foi realizada através de revisão bibliográfica e coleta de dados sobre o estado da arte no gerenciamento de resíduos em algumas IES nacionais e internacionais, seguido da seleção do sistema adequado a ser modelado e aplicado nestes contextos. O trabalho de campo consistiu na coleta de dados através de observação direta e aplicação de questionário junto aos responsáveis pelos laboratórios. As etapas do estudo foram: levantamento das instalações dos laboratórios; observação do manejo e geração dos resíduos; elaboração do banco de dados; análise qualitativa e quantitativa dos dados; modelagem do Sistema de Gerenciamento Integrado de Resíduos Perigosos SIGIRPE; implantação do modelo; apresentação e avaliação dos resultados; elaboração do manual para uso do sistema. O monitoramento quantitativo de resíduos foi feito através de ferramentas do sistema para a sua análise temporal. Os resultados da pesquisa permitiram conhecer a dinâmica e os problemas existentes nos laboratórios, bem como verificar a potencialidade do modelo. Conclui-se que o SIGIRPE pode ser aplicado a outros contextos desde que seja adequado para tal fim. É imprescindível ter uma estrutura institucional que elabore o Plano de Gerenciamento Integrado de Resíduos e viabilize sua implementação. A universidade, enquanto formadora dos futuros profissionais, é um lócus privilegiado na construção e disseminação do conhecimento, tendo o dever de realizar boas práticas no trato das questões ambientais, em particular, com relação aos resíduos. Assim, elas devem estabelecer entre suas estratégias de ação, a inclusão de políticas ambientais em seus campi, onde a Educação Ambiental deve ser permanente. Espera-se que este trabalho contribua com o planejamento e o gerenciamento dos resíduos perigosos gerados em laboratórios e com as mudanças necessárias rumo à sustentabilidade ambiental. O SIGIRPE foi elaborado e testado, mas não foi possível verificar sua aplicação por outros usuários. É o que se espera com a continuidade desta pesquisa e no desenvolvimento de futuros trabalhos, tais como: teste do sistema em hospitais, laboratórios, clínicas; estudar outras aplicações na área de segurança química de laboratórios através da inclusão de roteiro de transporte interno de resíduos, rotas de fuga, mapas de risco, localização de equipamentos de proteção individual e coletiva; demonstrar a potencialidade de uso do sistema e sensibilizar os segmentos envolvidos através de palestras, mini-cursos e outras estratégias de informação em revistas científicas especializadas.

Waste management in Forlì-Cesena province: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Forlì incinerator

This work assesses the environmental impact of a municipal solid waste incinerator with energy recovery in Forlì-Cesena province (Emilia-Romagna region, Italy). The methodology used is Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). As the plant already applies the best technologies available in waste treatment, this study focuses on the fate of the residues (bottom and fly ash) produced during combustion. Nine scenarios are made, based on different ash treatment disposing/recycling techniques. The functional unit is the amount of waste incinerated in 2011. Boundaries are set from waste arrival in the plant to the disposal/recovery of the residues produced, with energy recovery. Only the operative period is considered. Software used is GaBi 4 and the LCIA method used is CML2001. The impact categories analyzed are: abiotic depletion, acidification, eutrophication, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, global warming, human toxicity, ozone layer depletion, photochemical oxidant formation, terrestrial ecotoxicity and primary energy demand. Most of the data are taken from Herambiente. When primary data are not available, data from Ecoinvent and GaBi databases or literature data are used. The whole incineration process is sustainable, due to the relevant avoided impact given by co-generator. As far as regards bottom ash treatment, the most influential process is the impact savings from iron recovery. Bottom ash recycling in road construction or as building material are both valid alternatives, even if the first option faces legislative limits in Italy. Regarding fly ash inertization, the adding of cement and Ferrox treatment results the most feasible alternatives. However, this inertized fly ash can maintain its hazardous nature. The only method to ensure the stability of an inertized fly ash is to couple two different stabilization treatments. Ash stabilization technologies shall improve with the same rate of the flexibility of the national legislation about incineration residues recycling.

Evaluation of semi-passive treatment technologies for septic lagoon capacity expansion

In Canada, increases in rural development has led to a growing need to effectively manage the resulting municipal and city sewage without the addition of significant cost- and energy- expending infrastructure. Storring Septic Service Limited is a family-owned, licensed wastewater treatment facility located in eastern Ontario. It makes use of a passive waste stabilization pond system to treat and dispose of waste and wastewater in an environmentally responsible manner. Storring Septic, like many other similar small-scale wastewater treatment facilities across Canada, has the potential to act as a sustainable eco-engineered facility that municipalities and service providers could utilize to manage and dispose of their wastewater. However, it is of concern that the substantial inclusion of third party material could be detrimental to the stability and robustness of the pond system. In order to augment the capacity of the current facility, and ensure it remains a self-sustaining system with the capacity to safely accept septage from other sewage haulers, it was hypothesized that pond effluent treatment could be further enhanced through the incorporation of one of three different technology solutions, which would allow the reduction of wastewater quality parameters below existing regulatory effluent discharge limits put in place by Ontario’s Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC). Two of these solutions make use of biofilm technologies in order to enhance the removal of wastewater parameters of interest, and the third utilizes the natural water filtration capabilities of zebra mussels. Pilot-scale testing investigated the effects of each of these technologies on treatment performance under both cold and warm weather operation. This research aimed to understand the important mechanisms behind biological filtration methods in order to choose and optimize the best treatment strategy for full-scale testing and implementation. In doing so, a recommendation matrix was elaborated provided with the potential to be used as a universal operational strategy for wastewater treatment facilities located in environments of similar climate and ecology.

Pesticide container processing in commercial reconditioning facilities /

Mode of access: Internet.