976 resultados para Analytic hierarchy process (ahp)
Resumo:
Nos dias de hoje existe uma grande demanda e pressão na seleção e definição de prioridades das alternativas de investimento para alavancar o crescimento de longo prazo das empresas. Em paralelo a este cenário, o ambiente global está cada vez mais incerto, o que implica que as escolhas realizadas por estas empresas devem se adaptar aos novos desejos do mercado e, principalmente, devem manter o direcionamento de crescimento almejado pelas mesmas. Neste contexto conturbado, as ferramentas tradicionais utilizadas para a tomada de decisão, para selecionar e definir as prioridades são as análises econômico-financeira representadas pelo Valor Presente Líquido, a Taxa Interna de Retorno e o Payback. Apesar de estes itens serem métodos robustos e consistentes na avaliação de projetos de investimentos, eles focam apenas em um aspecto (o financeiro), e as empresas, atualmente, estão envolvidas em ambientes que precisam de uma abordagem mais ampla, contemplando outras visões e dimensões não presentes nos estudos financeiros. Ou seja, quando se faz uma análise de carteira de projetos alinhada ao planejamento estratégico, é necessário realizar uma abordagem multicritério envolvendo indicadores quantitativos e qualitativos e disponibilizando aos tomadores de decisão uma informação completa e padronizada de todos os projetos, uma vez que estas iniciativas não possuem características homogêneas, pois cada uma apresenta sua respectiva particularidade e, principalmente, está em diferentes estágios de maturidade. Aliado a estes pontos, é perceptível que o processo de seleção e priorização de projetos necessita de uma sistematização que garanta a esta decisão e a este Portfólio uma maior estabilidade e fidedignidade das informações. Neste trabalho, portanto, foi elaborada uma análise multivariada, mais especificamente, a utilização de sistemas de apoio à tomada de decisão. Foram escolhidos outros critérios além do econômico-financeiro, para suportar a seleção e priorização de projetos no atendimento dos objetivos estratégicos da organização e de seus stakeholders.
Resumo:
A modeling of criterias and alternatives is through and applied a questionnaire based on method AHP to proprietors of gas stations. The considered alternatives had been the maintenance of the current state with electric energy of the deliverer and the generation in small scale based on the natural gas. The used criteria had been Cost of the Investment, Final Cost of the Energy, Operational cost, Ambient Benefits, Risk and Variation of Costs. The study it was carried through in the city of Natal, RN in ranks that make use of the natural as for resale, where the generation alternative on the basis of the available gas is present. The main results evidence in a dimension the viability of use of method AHP with questionnaire by means of validation of the judgments with analysis of variance beyond proper the normal mechanisms of analysis of consistency to the method. The main results of the analysis help to show that in this in case that the profile of models of criteria and judgments of the actors is similar, with the final evidence of that it has a dominance of the maintenance of the energy of the deliverer. The main criterion to influence this decision was the risk
Resumo:
The main goal of this dissertation is to develop a Multi Criteria Decision Aid Model to be used in Oils and Gas perforation rigs contracts choices. The developed model should permit the utilization of multiples criterions, covering problems that exist with models that mainly use the price of the contracts as its decision criterion. The AHP has been chosen because its large utilization, not only academic, but in many other areas, its simplicity of use and flexibility, and also fill all the requirements necessary to complete the task. The development of the model was conducted by interviews and surveys with one specialist in this specific area, who also acts as the main actor on the decision process. The final model consists in six criterions: Costs, mobility, automation, technical support, how fast the service could be concluded and availability to start the operations. Three rigs were chosen as possible solutions for the problem. The results reached by the utilizations of the model suggests that the utilization of AHP as a decision support system in this kind of situation is possible, allowing a simplifications of the problem, and also it s a useful tool to improve every one involved on the process s knowledge about the problem subject, and its possible solutions
Resumo:
This thesis carries through an application of Analysis of Multicriterion Decision with use of the method of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the problematic one of taking of decision of the adoption of electronic collecting in the system of urban transport in the country, a subject that has been controversial. A modeling of criteria and alternatives is carried through and applied a questionnaire based on method AHP the excellent actors in the system of urban transport - Leading of the Managing Agency Public Municipal theatre of Urban Transports, Controller of Company of Bus, Controller of Labor union, Controller of Union of Companies, Communitarian Leader. The considered alternatives were: the maintenance of the current state with collectors, the implementation of electronic collection without collectors, and the implementation of electronic collection with collectors. The used criteria were: job, impact in the fare, control of the system, easiness of use, information. The study was carried through in the city of Natal, RN, where if the adoption of electronic collection argues and where this implementation in some bus lines between Natal and Parnamirim exists, city that integrates the region of the great Natal. The main results of the method evidence in a dimension, the viability of use of method AHP with questionnaire by means of validation of the judgments with analysis of variance beyond proper the normal mechanisms of analysis of consistency to the method, and in another one, the contribution of the analysis boarding multicriterion to become the judgments more clearly. The main results of the analysis help to show that although to models of criteria and distinct judgments of the actors, the method evidenced that it has inclination the adoption of the electronic collection on the current situation, even so with divergences between the maintenance or not of the collector. The research points to the possibility of accomplishment of the application of the AHP in successive rounds of judgments
Resumo:
Este trabalho apresenta uma investigação sobre o emprego de FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) de Processo com a exposição de irregularidades na sua utilização. O método AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) e os Conjuntos Fuzzy são aplicados no estudo das práticas atuais de utilização de FMEA. O AHP é aplicado para a priorização das irregularidades quanto à gravidade de sua ocorrência. Os Conjuntos Fuzzy são aplicados para avaliação do desempenho da utilização de FMEA em algumas empresas do ramo automotivo. Como resultado, tem-se a aceitação de oito e a não aceitação de três dos onze formulários de FMEA averiguados.
Resumo:
A Digital Factory is a concept which improves the collaboration among product development processes. Despite the benefits brought by this concept, failures may occur in its implementation. This paper aims to present the Critical Success Factors in the implementation of a Digital Factory project in a Brazilian company. These factors were identified by an exploratory survey on the implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning and Product Lifecycle Management among other systems. Following this identification, the factors were prioritized using the Delphi Method and the Analytic Hierarchy Process; this evaluation was carried out by professionals from enterprises which implement Digital Factory projects, in Brazil and abroad. Nine factors were identified. The five main priorities were: Continuous Support and Commitment from Top Management; Comprehensive Business Reengineering; Skilled and Experienced Partners; Participation and Commitment of Users; and Appropriate Role of the Project Manager.
Resumo:
This paper aimed to analyse supply chain risk factors in aerospace industry. It was conducted an exploratory research at an important Brazilian aerospace company. This company has a major role at the global aerospace industry. Senior managers assessed risk factors such as quality, productivity, supply chain, business strategy, organisation, environmental and natural political, indicators, product management, and information system. Analytic hierarchy process was applied to prioritise these factors. The most relevant were quality and productivity. Copyright © 2011 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
Resumo:
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
Resumo:
Pós-graduação em Geociências e Meio Ambiente - IGCE
Resumo:
Pós-graduação em Engenharia Civil - FEIS
Resumo:
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Resumo:
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Resumo:
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Resumo:
Pós-graduação em Geografia - FCT
Resumo:
Este trabalho estuda uma aplicação de um Método Multicritério (AHP do inglês Analytic Hierarchy Process) para analisar os problemas do congestionamento do tráfego aéreo nos aeroportos brasileiros, focando-se na ponte São Paulo-Rio de Janeiro. Primeiramente com um estudo em grupo mediante comparação em pares e posteriormente mediante um estudo individual com ratings. O objetivo deste trabalho será obter a alternativa mais adequada para os interesses do tráfego aéreo de Brasil