795 resultados para Accounting -- Standards.
Resumo:
Uno de los ámbitos menos estudiado y que afectaría al incentivo que las entidades financieras tienen para originar operaciones de titulización es el marco contable aplicado a los derechos de crédito utilizados como subyacente en el momento de su cesión. El trabajo de investigación que se ha realizado para esta tesis doctoral tiene como objetivo demostrar la existencia de diferencias significativas en el tratamiento de la baja contable de los activos titulizados dentro de los marcos contables aplicados a los países que conforman la Unión Europea y los Estados Unidos, esto es, las Normas Internacionales de Información Financiera (NIIF) y las Financial Accounting Standards (FAS), respectivamente. Nuestro análisis sugiere que esas diferencias han tenido un impacto material en las entidades de crédito originadoras de este tipo de operaciones en términos, principalmente, de cesión de riesgo de crédito o transferencia de activos a terceros, aunque de diferente signo en función de que estuviesen a un lado u otro del Atlántico. Tanto en el pasado como actualmente, los activos titulizados bajo el marco normativo estadounidense han conseguido la baja contable en mayor proporción que los titulizados bajo el marco contable europeo. Ese tratamiento diferenciado de los activos involucrados en operaciones de titulización ha tenido, además, repercusiones en la rentabilidad económica que las entidades originadoras pueden obtener a partir de estas operaciones, en los indicadores de la fortaleza financiera de las mismas y, en último término en la actividad crediticia de los bancos. Este estudio aporta evidencias que sugieren la necesidad de una mayor convergencia entre los dos sistemas contables IASB y FASB, fundamentalmente en la conceptualización de la transferencia de activo sobre la base del mismo criterio, bien sea la transmisión de riesgos y beneficios asociados al mismo como ocurre en las NIIF o a la transmisión del control sobre dicho activo como ocurre en las FAS.
Resumo:
La modificación realizada en el año 2004 por el International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) de la normativa contable reguladora del reconocimiento del fondo de comercio y su deterioro – la Norma Internacional de Información Financiera nº 3 (NIIF 3) y la Norma Internacional de Contabilidad nº36 (NIC 36) – no parece haber alcanzado los objetivos perseguidos, a consecuencia de la utilización discrecional, por parte de gestores y administradores, de la flexibilidad otorgada por la normativa contable de deterioro, que se esperaba mejoraría la utilidad de la información financiera suministrada al mercado y transmitiría unas mayores cotas de información interna sobre los fundamentos económicos subyacentes en la firma y los flujos de efectivo futuros esperados. II. OBJETIVOS El objetivo principal de la tesis es contrastar empíricamente la existencia de discrecionalidad por parte de los gestores a la hora de contabilizar el deterioro del fondo de comercio y analizar los principales intereses corporativos que pueden conducir a dicha discrecionalidad estimando, cuantitativamente, su impacto en la decisión de deteriorar o no el fondo de comercio así como en la cuantía reconocida por deterioro de este activo. El ámbito territorial de nuestro estudio se centra en las empresas cotizadas en España, dada su pertenencia al ámbito de aplicación de las NIC-NIIF y su importancia cuantitativa, en términos de PIB, dentro de la zona euro, con objeto de aportar nuevas evidencias empíricas acerca de cómo los intereses corporativos afectan a las hipótesis empleadas en la valoración posterior del fondo de comercio y, por ende, en la decisión final de deteriorarlo o no así como en la cuantía por deterioro a reconocer, en el marco de las NIC-NIIF...
Resumo:
O processo de Harmonização Contabilística é um processo que surge em consequência do processo de Globalização da Economia. Com a evolução do comércio global, exige-se que a informação contabilística seja mais uniforme entre os diversos países/continentes, para que os utilizadores dessa informação possam tomar as melhores decisões. Em Portugal, o referido processo tem sido influenciado pela regulamentação produzida a nível europeu. Fruto desta influência, a partir de 01 de janeiro de 2005 as empresas cotadas em bolsa ficaram obrigadas a aplicar as International Accounting Standards/International Financial Reporting Standards (IAS/IFRS) e as Standing Interpretations Committee/International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (SIC/IFRIC), de acordo com o Regulamento 1606/CE/2002. Em 2003, a CNC elaborou um projeto de linhas de orientação para um novo modelo de normalização contabilística, documento que serviria de base ao Projeto do novo Sistema de Normalização Contabilística (SNC), tendo o novo SNC entrado em vigor em 1 de janeiro de 2010. É, pois, dentro destas alterações introduzidas no normativo contabilístico nacional que se desenvolve este estudo, que tem como principal objetivo analisar e quantificar os impactos sobre o Capital Próprio, decorrentes da adoção do SNC em empresas do setor agrícola. Para o efeito utilizamos uma amostra de 6980 empresas do referido setor. Dos resultados obtidos concluímos que 4910 empresas, o que representa 70,34% do total, apresentaram alterações no Capital Próprio. A rubrica Reserva foi aquela que mais vezes sofreu variações, tendo sido alterada no Balanço de 4008 empresas. As alterações no Capital Próprio têm impacto nos rácios de Solvabilidade Financeira e Autonomia Financeira. Uma análise desses indicadores permitiu-nos concluir que, em termos de Solvabilidade Financeira, 6,32 % das empresas (441) pioraram a sua situação, 81,15 % (5664) mantiveram-na inalterada e 6,72 % (469) melhoraram a sua Solvabilidade Financeira. Relativamente à Autonomia Financeira as variações foram menos significativas, pois 99,07 % (6915 empresas) mantiveram inalterado o seu desempenho, 0,11 % (8 empresas) pioraram a sua situação relativamente ao presente indicador e 0,19 % (13 empresas) melhoraram. No entanto, estes indicadores de equilíbrio financeiro devem ser analisados num contexto de transição, uma vez que não se verificou um real aumento ou diminuição da estrutura de Capitais Próprios destas empresas, mas apenas uma nova reconfiguração contabilística.
Resumo:
This paper examines the differences between the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The areas closely examined are the differences inrevenue recognition and reporting of intangibles. By investigating the differences in the two sets of standards I put into context the changes that would be necessary for domestic companies adopting the IFRS. The differences between these two standards are important because the implementation of IFRS into the U.S. is a current issue for domestic companies. It is important to note how the new standards will affect different companies in different ways. Depending on the size and industry, some companies will have a harder time transitioning to the new standards. However, once these companies make the transition to IFRS they will have better recognition and reporting of revenues and intangibles.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"August 2001, 1.5M CC - No. 270"--P. [4] of cover.
Resumo:
We live in uncertain times. The sub-prime crisis that commenced in the U.S. in 2007, the global economic crisis that followed, and the recent sovereign debt crisis in various European countries have led to ongoing instability in global financial markets that continues to receive daily media attention. These uncertain times create enormous opportunities for researchers across many disciplines to research capital markets and business practices. From an accounting perspective, accounting regulators have been active in developing new standards to address risk management issues arising from the crises and have continued to develop and refine financial reporting standards. With the adoption of, or transition to international financial reporting standards (IFRS) in many countries, the globalisation of financial reporting standards is close to becoming a reality. However, doubts still remain about whether the IFRS will lead to any real long-term improvement in financial reporting and transparency (see Sunder, 2011)...
Resumo:
Despite the ubiquitous nature of the discourse on human rights there is currently little research on the emergence of disclosure by multinational corporations on their human rights obligations or the regulatory dynamic that may lie behind this trend. In an attempt to begin to explore the extent to which, if any, the language of human rights has entered the discourse of corporate accountability, this paper investigates the adoption of the International Labour Organisation's (ILO) human rights standards by major multinational garment retail companies that source products from developing countries, as disclosed through their reporting media. The paper has three objectives. Firstly, to empirically explore the extent to which a group of multinational garment retailers invoke the language of human rights when disclosing their corporate responsibilities. The paper reviews corporate reporting media including social responsibility codes of conduct, annual reports and stand-alone social responsibility reports released by 18 major global clothing and retail companies during a period from 1990 to 2007. We find that the number of companies adopting and disclosing on the ILO's workplace human rights standards has significantly increased since 1998 – the year in which the ILO's standards were endorsed and accepted by the global community (ILO, 1998). Secondly, drawing on a combination of Responsive Regulation theory and neo-institutional theory, we tentatively seek to understand the regulatory space that may have influenced these large corporations to adopt the language of human rights obligations. In particular, we study the role that International Governmental Organisation's (IGO) such as ILO may have played in these disclosures. Finally, we provide some critical reflections on the power and potential within the corporate adoption of the language of human rights.
Resumo:
Legacies of the Global Financial Crisis and major domestic corporate collapses – such as HIH Insurance Pty Ltd and One.Tel Ltd (telecommunications) – have significantly changed Australia‟s financial regulatory landscape. Legal requirements for auditors have attracted particular attention as have practice standards more broadly around disclosure and conflict of interest. Conversely, although successful detection and prosecution of breaches may rest in significant part on forensic accounting activities, Australia‟s practitioners in this field have no minimum training or qualifications standards other than the baseline requirements mandated by the country‟s three professional accounting bodies. For those unaffiliated with these organizations, no professional oversight exists. In Australia, growth in the forensic accounting industry has been in direct response to public demand for expertise in a broad range of fraud, forensic and business analytics areas in order to improve the corporate governance practices of Australian organizations. During the 1990s, Australian forensic accounting firms expanded and diversified into a number of different areas going well beyond just the examination of financial documents and involvement in financial litigation disputes. “Big 4” accounting firms such as PriceWaterhouseCoopers, KPMG, Deloitte and Ernst and Young formed independent forensic accounting or forensic services units; a number of mid-tier and „boutique‟ forensic accounting firms similarly expanded into forensic investigative, analytical and advisory services. By 2008, 800 forensic accountants were registered with the country‟s largest specialist forensic accounting group, the Forensic Accounting Special Interest Group (FASIG) of the ICAA1. Currently, obtaining more precise figures on numbers of forensic accounting practitioners is problematic: professional accounting bodies either do not keep a register or have ceased registering their forensic accounting members; lack of formal recognition, admission or certification processes complicate identification of candidates; and diversity of the skills sets the industry requires has meant the influx of non-accounting based specialists.
Resumo:
This book covers key discussions involving major US and European multinational companies (MNCs) that source products from suppliers in developing countries. Due to the transfer of production from developed to developing nations, there is an urgent need to establish social compliance as a new form of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and a means by which MNCs can meet expected social standards. The cases described are internationally relevant and can be seen to reflect or represent the behavior of many MNCs and their suppliers in developing nations. The discussion offers essential insights into how different levels of social compliance risk and pressure (including broader stakeholder concerns) move managers to adopt or embrace particular social compliance accounting, reporting and auditing strategies. The book will help readers to understand the major concerns, challenges and dilemmas faced by management in the supply chains of MNCs, and proposes measures that can be taken to resolve those dilemmas. Most importantly, it develops a systematic method of assessing the social compliance performance of suppliers to MNCs. This includes highly detailed accounts of the social compliance performance of suppliers within the clothing industry (in a developing nation) that supply goods to the extensive US and European markets. The book offers a valuable guide, not only for corporate managers but also for practitioners, researchers, academics, and undergraduate and postgraduate business students.
Resumo:
In response to current and increasing demand for assurance on greenhouse gas statements, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) released an exposure draft of a new assurance standard, ISAE 3410 'Assurance on a Greenhouse Gas Statement' (IFAC 2011), to provide comprehensive guidance on these types of greenhouse gas (GHG) assurance engagements. Internationally, approximately 50 percent of GHG statements are independently assured. The related assurance market is competitive, with the accounting profession and those outside the profession currently holding approximately equal shares. This paper highlights the characteristics of GHG assurance engagements that warrant multi-disciplinary teamwork, the unique and interdependent skill-sets that different practitioners bring to these engagements, and the market forces that create a demand for diverse providers.
Resumo:
We develop a model of strategic grade determination by universities distinguished by their distributions of student academic abilities. Universities choose grading standards to maximize the total wages of graduates, taking into account how the grading standards affect firms' productivity assessment and job placement. We identify conditions under which better universities set lower grading standards, exploiting the fact that firms cannot distinguish between good and badA''s. In contrast, a social planner sets stricter standards at better universities. We show how increases in skilled jobs drive grade inflation, and determine when grading standards fall faster at better schools. (JEL I21)
Resumo:
This paper aims to examine the perception of key actors regarding the costs and benefits that result from adopting International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in Ukraine. Authors showed that IFRS implementation impacts on internal reporting quality, the relationship with customers, creditors and shareholders, the access to international markets and external financing. They also indicated that financial managers have serious concerns about implementation costs related to the introduction of IFRS. These costs relate to training, instruction on IFRS adoption and translation of current IFRS, changes in software systems, double purpose accounting and deadlines for IFRS adoption and consulting services.