Molecular basis of selective PPARgamma modulation for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) (alpha, beta/delta and gamma) are lipid sensors capable of adapting gene expression to integrate various lipid signals. As such, PPARs are also very important pharmaceutical targets, and specific synthetic ligands exist for the different isotypes and are either currently used or hold promises in the treatment of major metabolic disorders. In particular, compounds of the class of the thiazolinediones (TZDs) are PPARgamma agonists and potent insulin-sensitizers. The specific but still broad expression patterns of PPARgamma, as well as its implication in numerous pathways, constitutes also a disadvantage regarding drug administration, since this potentially increases the chance to generate side-effects through the activation of the receptor in tissues or cells not affected by the disease. Actually, numerous side effects associated with the administration of TZDs have been reported. Today, a new generation of PPARgamma modulators is being actively developed to activate the receptor more specifically, in a cell and time-dependent manner, in order to induce a specific subset of target genes only and modulate a restricted number of metabolic pathways. We will discuss here why and how the development of such selective PPARgamma modulators is possible, and summarize the results obtained with the published molecules.

Preserved capillary density of dorsal finger skin in treated hypertensive patients with or without type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVES: Capillary rarefaction is a hallmark of untreated hypertension. Recent data indicate that rarefaction may be reversed by antihypertensive treatment in nondiabetic hypertensive patients. Despite the frequent association of diabetes with hypertension, nothing is known on the capillary density of treated diabetic patients with hypertension. METHODS: We enrolled 21 normotensive healthy, 25 hypertensive only, and 21 diabetic (type 2) hypertensive subjects. All hypertensive patients were treated with a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system, and a majority had a home blood pressure ≤135/85 mmHg. Capillary density was assessed with videomicroscopy on dorsal finger skin and with laser Doppler imaging on forearm skin (maximal vasodilation elicited by local heating). RESULTS: There was no difference between any of the study groups in either dorsal finger skin capillary density (controls 101 ± 11 capillaries/mm(2) , nondiabetic hypertensive 99 ± 16, diabetic hypertensive 96 ± 18, p > 0.5) or maximal blood flow in forearm skin (controls 666 ± 114 perfusion units, nondiabetic hypertensive 612 ± 126, diabetic hypertensive 620 ± 103, p > 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the presence or not of type 2 diabetes, capillary density is normal in hypertensive patients with reasonable control of blood pressure achieved with a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system.

Le diabète de type 2 est-il uniquement une affaire d'hyperglycémie? Entre science, humanisme et economie [Type 2 diabetes, is it just a case of hyperglycemia? Confusion between the interests of science, humanity and the economy]

The recommendations for the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients are often centered on the glycemia. These clinical trials based on this approach show only a beneficial effects on the prevention of microangiopathy. The coronary artery disease which is the main cause of mortality among these patients, is not reduced. These data should be interpreted with a systemic prospect. The diabetes vascular complications have multifactorial causes and these clinical trials are motivated for the promotion of hypoglycemic agents. Fortunately, the STENO study offers another glance on the treatment of the diabetes, associating multirisk approach and patients' accompaniment. It obliges to have a critical glance on the research often moved by economic issues and gives to the center a humanistic approach based on the therapeutic relation.

Cardiorenal end points in a trial of aliskiren for type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to determine whether use of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren would reduce cardiovascular and renal events in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, or both. METHODS: In a double-blind fashion, we randomly assigned 8561 patients to aliskiren (300 mg daily) or placebo as an adjunct to an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin-receptor blocker. The primary end point was a composite of the time to cardiovascular death or a first occurrence of cardiac arrest with resuscitation; nonfatal myocardial infarction; nonfatal stroke; unplanned hospitalization for heart failure; end-stage renal disease, death attributable to kidney failure, or the need for renal-replacement therapy with no dialysis or transplantation available or initiated; or doubling of the baseline serum creatinine level. RESULTS: The trial was stopped prematurely after the second interim efficacy analysis. After a median follow-up of 32.9 months, the primary end point had occurred in 783 patients (18.3%) assigned to aliskiren as compared with 732 (17.1%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98 to 1.20; P=0.12). Effects on secondary renal end points were similar. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were lower with aliskiren (between-group differences, 1.3 and 0.6 mm Hg, respectively) and the mean reduction in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio was greater (between-group difference, 14 percentage points; 95% CI, 11 to 17). The proportion of patients with hyperkalemia (serum potassium level, ≥6 mmol per liter) was significantly higher in the aliskiren group than in the placebo group (11.2% vs. 7.2%), as was the proportion with reported hypotension (12.1% vs. 8.3%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of aliskiren to standard therapy with renin-angiotensin system blockade in patients with type 2 diabetes who are at high risk for cardiovascular and renal events is not supported by these data and may even be harmful. (Funded by Novartis; ALTITUDE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00549757.).

Genome-wide association identifies nine common variants associated with fasting proinsulin levels and provides new insights into the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Proinsulin is a precursor of mature insulin and C-peptide. Higher circulating proinsulin levels are associated with impaired β-cell function, raised glucose levels, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Studies of the insulin processing pathway could provide new insights about T2D pathophysiology. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We have conducted a meta-analysis of genome-wide association tests of ∼2.5 million genotyped or imputed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and fasting proinsulin levels in 10,701 nondiabetic adults of European ancestry, with follow-up of 23 loci in up to 16,378 individuals, using additive genetic models adjusted for age, sex, fasting insulin, and study-specific covariates. RESULTS: Nine SNPs at eight loci were associated with proinsulin levels (P < 5 × 10(-8)). Two loci (LARP6 and SGSM2) have not been previously related to metabolic traits, one (MADD) has been associated with fasting glucose, one (PCSK1) has been implicated in obesity, and four (TCF7L2, SLC30A8, VPS13C/C2CD4A/B, and ARAP1, formerly CENTD2) increase T2D risk. The proinsulin-raising allele of ARAP1 was associated with a lower fasting glucose (P = 1.7 × 10(-4)), improved β-cell function (P = 1.1 × 10(-5)), and lower risk of T2D (odds ratio 0.88; P = 7.8 × 10(-6)). Notably, PCSK1 encodes the protein prohormone convertase 1/3, the first enzyme in the insulin processing pathway. A genotype score composed of the nine proinsulin-raising alleles was not associated with coronary disease in two large case-control datasets. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified nine genetic variants associated with fasting proinsulin. Our findings illuminate the biology underlying glucose homeostasis and T2D development in humans and argue against a direct role of proinsulin in coronary artery disease pathogenesis.

Prevalence, awareness and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Switzerland : the COLAUS study

Le diabète de type 2 (DT2) a une prévalence élevée dans les pays industrialisés, et on s'attend à une augmentation dans les années à venir en raison du vieillissement de la population ainsi que des modifications du mode de vie. Il existe malheureusement peu de données épidémiologiques sur la prévalence et la prise en charge du diabète en Suisse. Les objectifs de cette étude étaient donc 1) évaluer la prévalence du DT2 dans une cohorte lausannoise ; 2) caractériser la prise en charge des patients atteints de DT2, et 3) identifier les facteurs associés à la prévalence, la connaissance par les patients de leur maladie et le traitement du DT2. Pour ce faire, 6181 sujets (3246 femmes), âgés de 35 à 75 ans et vivant à Lausanne ont été inclus dans l'étude. La prévalence totale du DT2 était de 6.3% (intervalle de confiance à 95%: 5.7-7.0%), une valeur comparable à celle des pays avoisinants. La prévalence était plus élevée chez les hommes que chez les femmes (9.1% contre 3.8%, p<0.001), et augmentait avec l'âge. Deux tiers des patients avec DT2 (65.3% ; 60.4-70.0%) avaient connaissance de leur situation, et plus de trois-quarts d'entre eux étaient traités. Les hommes étaient plus fréquemment traités que les femmes (91.3% contre 75.9%, p<0.001). La plupart des patients suivait une monothérapie (majoritairement par biguanides). Parmi les sujets avec une thérapie multiple, une prévalence plus élevée de glycémie à jeun >7 mmol/1 était présente. L'analyse multivariée a montré que le sexe masculin, l'âge croissant et un indice de masse corporelle élevé étaient associés à une plus grande prévalence du DT2, alors qu'aucune association n'a été trouvée pour l'activité physique et la consommation d'alcool. Parmi les sujets atteints de DT2, l'âge croissant était positivement associé à la connaissance du diabète, de même que l'âge croissant et le sexe masculin étaient associés à une plus grande prévalence du traitement. Le faible taux de connaissance de diabète pourrait être dû à un manque de dépistage par les médecins de premier recours. La présence d'autres facteurs de risque cardiovasculaire devrait inciter les médecins à un dépistage du diabète pour obtenir un meilleur profil de risque. Cette étude a des limitations. D'abord, aucune mesure de l'hémoglobine glyquée n'a été mesurée, et par conséquent la détermination de la prise en charge uniquement par la glycémie à jeun peut être difficile. Ensuite, le taux de participation était bas et pourrait limiter l'interprétation des résultats ; néanmoins, il est comparable à celui d'autres études effectuées dans les pays occidentaux. Il existe peu de données épidémiologiques du DT2 en Suisse, cette étude permet donc d'évaluer la situation actuelle et de déterminer la prévalence et la prise en charge du diabète à Lausanne à travers la cohorte CoLaus. Une telle étude a par conséquent son importance dans le contexte actuel, au vu du vieillissement de la population et de l'augmentation des facteurs de risque cardio-vasculaires.

Contribution of modifiable risk factors to social inequalities in type 2 diabetes: prospective Whitehall II cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the contribution of modifiable risk factors to social inequalities in the incidence of type 2 diabetes when these factors are measured at study baseline or repeatedly over follow-up and when long term exposure is accounted for. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with risk factors (health behaviours (smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, and physical activity), body mass index, and biological risk markers (systolic blood pressure, triglycerides and high density lipoprotein cholesterol)) measured four times and diabetes status assessed seven times between 1991-93 and 2007-09. SETTING: Civil service departments in London (Whitehall II study). PARTICIPANTS: 7237 adults without diabetes (mean age 49.4 years; 2196 women). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of type 2 diabetes and contribution of risk factors to its association with socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 14.2 years, 818 incident cases of diabetes were identified. Participants in the lowest occupational category had a 1.86-fold (hazard ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 1.48 to 2.32) greater risk of developing diabetes relative to those in the highest occupational category. Health behaviours and body mass index explained 33% (-1% to 78%) of this socioeconomic differential when risk factors were assessed at study baseline (attenuation of hazard ratio from 1.86 to 1.51), 36% (22% to 66%) when they were assessed repeatedly over the follow-up (attenuated hazard ratio 1.48), and 45% (28% to 75%) when long term exposure over the follow-up was accounted for (attenuated hazard ratio 1.41). With additional adjustment for biological risk markers, a total of 53% (29% to 88%) of the socioeconomic differential was explained (attenuated hazard ratio 1.35, 1.05 to 1.72). CONCLUSIONS: Modifiable risk factors such as health behaviours and obesity, when measured repeatedly over time, explain almost half of the social inequalities in incidence of type 2 diabetes. This is more than was seen in previous studies based on single measurement of risk factors.

Effects of regular insulin or insulin LISPRO on glucose metabolism after an oral glucose load in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Seven obese Type 2 diabetic patients were studied for two 4-h periods after ingestion of a glucose load to determine the effects of preprandial subcutaneous injection of Insulin Lispro (5 min before the meal) or regular insulin (20 min before the meal) on glucose metabolism. Glucose production and utilisation were measured using a dual isotope method. After Lispro, the mean postprandial increase in plasma glucose was 29% lower and the increase in insulin concentration 25% higher than after regular insulin (p < 0.05). Suppression of endogenous glucose production was similar with both types of insulin. Thus, preprandial injection of Lispro reduced postprandial glucose increments in Type 2 diabetic patients as compared to regular insulin. This effect is best explained by the increased postprandial bioavailability of Lispro.

Une méta-analyse GWA de la glycémie après 2h d'HGPO révèle que GIPR est associé avec la sécrétion de l'insuline en réponse au glucose et que l'ADCY5 est un nouveau gène de suseptibilité au diabète de type 2. [A meta-analysis of GWA blood glucose after 2 h of OGTT revealed that GIPR is associated with the secretion of insulin based on glucose and ADCY5 is a new susceptibility gene for type 2 diabetes.]

Introduction: Les études GVvA (Genome-wide association ,-studies) ont identifié et confirmé plus de 20 gènes de susceptibilité au DT2 et ont contribué à mieux comprendre sa physiopathologie. L'hyperglycémie à jeun (GJ), et 2 heures après une HGPO (G2h) sont les deux mesures cliniques du diagnostic du DT2. Nous avons identifié récemment la G6P du pancréas (G6PC2) comme déterminant de la variabilité physiologique de la GJ puis Ie récepteur à la mélatonine (MTNRIB) qui de plus lie la régulation du rythme circadien au DT2. Dans ce travail nous avons étudié la génétique de la G2h à l'aide de l'approche GWA. Résultats: Nous avons réalisé une méta-analyse GWA dans le cadre de MAGIC (Meta-Analysis of Glucose and Insulin related traits Consortium) qui a inclus 9 études GWA (N=15'234). La réplication de 29 loci (N=6958-30 121, P < 10-5 ) a confirmé 5 nouveaux loci; 2 étant connus comme associés avec Ie DT2 (TCF7L2, P = 1,6 X 10-10 ) et la GJ (GCKR, p = 5,6 X 10-10 ); alors que GIPR (p= 5,2 X 10-12), VSP13C (p= 3,9 X 10-8) et ADCY5 (p = 1,11 X 10-15 ) sont inédits. GIPR code Ie récepteur au GIP (gastric inhibitory polypeptide) qui est sécrété par les ceIlules intestinales pour stimuler la sécrétion de l'insuline en réponse au glucose (l'effet incrétine). Les porteurs du variant GIPR qui augmente la G2h ont également un indice insulinogénique plus bas, (p= 1,0 X 10-17) mais ils ne présentent aucune modification de leur glycémie suite à une hyperglycémie provoquée par voie veineuse (p= 0,21). Ces résultats soutiennent un effet incrétine du locus GIPR qui expliquerait ~9,6 % de la variance total de ce trait. La biologie de ADCY5 et VPS13C et son lien avec l'homéostasie du glucose restent à élucider. GIPR n'est pas associé avec le risque de DT2 indiquant qu'il influence la variabilité physiologique de la G2h alors que le locus ADCY5 est associé avec le DT2 (OR = 1,11, P = 1,5 X 10-15). Conclusion: Notre étude démontre que l'étude de la G2h est une approche efficace d'une part pour la compréhension de la base génétique de la physiologie de ce trait clinique important et d'autre part pour identifier de nouveaux gènes de susceptibilité au DT2.