Accounting for selected assets and liabilities.

Shipping list no.: 93-0454-P.

Accounting for inventory and related property.

"October 27, 1993."

Accounting for direct loans and loan guarantees.

"August 23, 1993."

Accounting for revenue and other financing sources and concepts for reconciling budgetary and financial accounting /

Cover title.

Accounting for property, plant, and equipment.

Includes bibliographical references.

Amendments to deferred maintenance reporting : amending SFFAS no. 6, Accounting for property, plant and equipment and SFFAS no. 8, Supplementary stewardship reporting.

"June 8, 1999."

OS ATIVOS FIXOS TANGÍVEIS: ESTUDO COMPARATIVO DOS NORMATIVOS CONTABILÍSTICOS PÚBLICOS E PRIVADOS

Objetivo: Em virtude da necessidade de comparabilidade da informação financeira das entidades públicas dos diferentes países Europeus e, consequentemente, da necessidade de adoção das International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS), foi necessário proceder a uma reforma dos sistemas de Contabilidade Pública dos diferentes Estados membros da União Europeia. Desta reforma resultou a aprovação, do Sistema de Normalização Contabilística para as Administrações Públicas (SNC-AP), através do Decreto-lei nº 192/2015, de 11/9, que traz várias mudanças, nomeadamente quanto à contabilização dos ativos fixos tangíveis (AFT). Atendendo a este contexto, este trabalho tem por objetivos efetuar um estudo comparativo do definido nos normativos contabilísticos públicos (nomeadamente no Plano Oficial de Contabilidade das Autarquias Locais – POCAL e no SNC-AP) e privados (Sistema de Normalização Contabilística – SNC), quanto às principais particularidades da contabilização dos AFT, nomeadamente o seu reconhecimento e a sua mensuração. Metodologia: Na elaboração deste trabalho foi adotada uma metodologia qualitativa baseada num estudo comparativo dos normativos contabilísticos públicos (POCAL e SNC-AP) e privados (SNC), quanto ao reconhecimento e mensuração dos AFT. Originalidade: Consideramos que este trabalho é um tema original e atual, que tem por base um diploma recente (SNC-AP), cuja obrigatoriedade de aplicação apenas se estabelece para o ano de 2017, e que, por essa razão, ainda não foi muito abordado no âmbito da investigação científica. Por outro lado, este trabalho poderá contribuir para um estudo comparativo das diferentes normas, existentes em Portugal, no âmbito público e privado. Resultados: Este estudo permite concluir que o novo normativo (SNC-AP) evidencia um avanço face ao POCAL, definindo não só o conceito de ativo e de AFT, como também os critérios de reconhecimento que um elemento deve cumprir para que possa ser reconhecido como tal, permitindo assim uma maior consistência no reconhecimento destes elementos, por parte das diferentes entidades públicas. Portanto, no que respeita ao reconhecimento dos ativos o SNC-AP aproxima-se do SNC, com algumas particularidades específicas do âmbito público, como o facto de um elemento poder ser reconhecido como ativo mesmo que não produza rendimentos, desde que possua potencial de serviço. Por outro lado, relativamente à mensuração, o SNC-AP segue de perto, com as devidas adaptações, os normativos internacionais e também o SNC, introduzindo, comparativamente ao definido no POCAL, dois momentos de mensuração dos AFT, e referindo o justo valor explicitamente enquanto critério de mensuração aplicável a situações concretas, e já não apenas o tradicional custo histórico. Limitações: A atualidade do tema deste trabalho trouxe algumas limitações no que respeita à revisão de literatura de trabalhos de cariz científico, que são ainda escassos. Por outro lado, o facto do SNC-AP apenas ser de aplicação obrigatória no ano de 2017, e atualmente apenas estar a ser aplicado por algumas entidades piloto, não nos permitiu efetuar um estudo das consequências que, na prática, a adoção deste novo normativo terá, no que respeita ao reconhecimento e mensuração dos AFT.

The views of corporate managers on the current state of, and future prospects for, social reporting in Bangladesh: an engagement based study

Purpose – This paper seeks to respond to recent calls for more engagement-based studies of corporate social reporting (CSR) practice by examining the views of corporate managers on the current state of, and future prospects for, social reporting in Bangladesh. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses a series of interviews with senior managers from 23 Bangladeshi companies representing the multinational, domestic private and public sectors. Findings – Key findings are that the main motivation behind current reporting practice lies in a desire on the part of corporate management to manage powerful stakeholder groups, whilst perceived pressure from external forces, notably parent companies' instructions and demands from international buyers, is driving the process forward. In the latter context it appears that adoption of international social accounting standards and codes is likely to become more prevalent in the future. Reservations are expressed as to whether such a passive compliance strategy is likely to achieve much in the way of real changes in corporate behaviour, particularly when Western developed standards and codes are imposed without consideration of local cultural, economic and social factors. Indeed, such imposition could be regarded as little more than an example of the erection of non-tariff trade barriers rather than representing any meaningful move towards empowering indigenous stakeholder groups. Originality/value – The paper contributes to the literature on CSR in developing countries where there is a distinct lack of engagement-based published studies.

A conceptual framework of accounting policy choice under SSAP 20

Purpose - To provide a framework of accounting policy choice associated with the timing of adoption of the UK Statement of Standard Accounting Practice (SSAP) No. 20, "Foreign Currency Translation". The conceptual framework describes the accounting policy choices that firms face in a setting that is influenced by: their financial characteristics; the flexible foreign exchange rates; and the stock market response to accounting decisions. Design/methodology/approach - Following the positive accounting theory context, this paper puts into a framework the motives and choices of UK firms with regard to the adoption or deferment of the adoption of SSAP 20. The paper utilises the theoretical and empirical findings of previous studies to form and substantiate the conceptual framework. Given the UK foreign exchange setting, the framework identifies the initial stage: lack of regulation and flexibility in financial reporting; the intermediate stage: accounting policy choice; and the final stage: accounting choice and policy review. Findings - There are situations where accounting regulation contrasts with the needs and business objectives of firms and vice-versa. Thus, firms may delay the adoption up to the point where the increase in political costs can just be tolerated. Overall, the study infers that firms might have chosen to defer the adoption of SSAP 20 until they reach a certain corporate goal, or the adverse impact (if any) of the accounting change on firms' financial numbers is minimal. Thus, the determination of the timing of the adoption is a matter which is subject to the objectives of the managers in association with the market and economic conditions. The paper suggests that the flexibility in financial reporting, which may enhance the scope for income-smoothing, can be mitigated by the appropriate standardisation of accounting practice. Research limitations/implications - First, the study encompassed a period when firms and investors were less sophisticated users of financial information. Second, it is difficult to ascertain the decisions that firms would have taken, had the pound appreciated over the period of adoption and had the firms incurred translation losses rather than translation gains. Originality/value - This paper is useful to accounting standards setters, professional accountants, academics and investors. The study can give the accounting standard-setting bodies useful information when they prepare a change in the accounting regulation or set an appropriate date for the implementation of an accounting standard. The paper provides significant insight about the behaviour of firms and the associated impacts of financial markets and regulation on the decision-making process of firms. The framework aims to assist the market and other authorities to reduce information asymmetry and to reinforce the efficiency of the market. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Stakeholder accounting : the case of the electricity industry in England and Wales

This thesis proposes to explore the potential for stakeholder based accounting as a means to explain the social performance of organisations. It argues that organisations have a contract with society and as a consequence they must be accountable to that society for their actions. Further, it is suggested that as part of this accountability there is a broader need in the public interest for social accounting. Due to the pluralistic nature of modern societies it is argued that a stakeholder framework is one way in which this accountability can be achieved. In order to consider the nature of such social accounting a case study of the electricity industry in England and Wales is undertaken. This industry is very important to modern society, has significant environment implications and has a recent history of remarkable change. These factors make it an interesting and unique case within which to consider accountability. From the performance measurement and accounting literature and a series of interviews with both stakeholders and privatised companies a model of stakeholder performance is developed. This is then used to analyse the electricity industry in England and Wales since privatisation. The objective is to demonstrate how certain stakeholders have fared, whether they have won or lost. Further, institutional and resource dependency theories are used to consider what factors determine the relative success or failure of the different stakeholder groups. Finally the possible implications of recent developments in Social Accounting Standards, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), AccountAbility 1000 (AA1000) and Social Accountability 8000 (SA8000), and the potential for Internet reporting are considered.

Accounting for derivatives:an evaluation of reporting practice by UK banks

In 1998 the Accounting Standards Board (ASB) published FRS 13, ‘Derivatives and other Financial Instruments: Disclosures’. This laid down the requirements for disclosures of an entity’s policies, objectives and strategies in using financial instruments, their impact on its risk, performance and financial condition, and details of how risks are managed. FRS 13 became effective in March 1999, and this paper uses the 1999 annual reports of UK banks to evaluate the usefulness of disclosures from a user’s perspective. Usefulness is measured in terms of the criteria of materiality, relevance, reliability, comparability and understandability as defined in the ASB’s Statement of Principles (ASB, 1999). Our findings suggest that the narrative disclosures are generic in nature, the numerical data incomplete and not always comparable, and that it is difficult for the user to combine both narrative and numerical information in order to assess the banks’ risk profile. Our overall conclusion is therefore that current UK financial reporting practices are of limited help to users wishing to assess the scale of an institution’s financial risk exposure.

Pre-adoption market reaction to IFRS 9:a cross-country event-study

We are the first to examine the market reaction to 13 announcement dates related to IFRS 9 for over 5400 European listed firms. We find an overall positive reaction to the introduction of IFRS 9. The regulation is particularly beneficial to shareholders of firms in countries with weaker rule of law and a smaller divergence between local GAAP and IAS 39. Bootstrap simulations rule out the possibility that sampling error or data mining are driving our findings. Our main findings are also robust to confounding events and the extent of the media coverage for each event. These results suggest that investors perceive the new regulation as shareholder-wealth enhancing and support the view that stronger comparability across accounting standards of European firms is beneficial to international investors and outweighs the costs of poorer firm-specific information.

Understanding Annual Reports of Hospitality Firms

In her discussion - Understanding Annual Reports of Hospitality Firms - by Elisa S. Moncarz, Associate Professor, School of Hospitality Management, Florida International University, Associate Professor Moncarz initially offers: “Management bears full responsibility for the reporting function of annual reports prepared by publicly-held companies designed to provide interested parties with information that is useful in making business and economic decisions. In Part I the author reviews the content of annual reports of firms in the hospitality industry, while looking at recent developments affecting annual reports. Part 11, in a subsequent issue, will comprise an in-depth examination of the annual report of an actual firm in the hospitality industry, focusing on suggested guidelines and recommendations for how to use annual reports as an aid to the decision-making process in the hospitality industry.” This article is to be considered a primer on reading and understanding annual reports, as well as a glimpse into the dynamics that affect them. In defining what an annual report is, Associate Professor Moncarz informs you with citation, “Annual reports are required by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) ¹ for all companies with securities sold to the general public. These reports, which must be issued within 90 days after the close of the calendar (or fiscal) year, comprise a primary source of information about these companies,” she further reports. “Indeed, the official version of the company's history is summed up yearly in its annual report by providing full information of the company's operations over the period as well as what the company is gearing up to accomplish in the next year,” Professor Moncarz closes the definition. Why should thus happen over and above SEC requirements? The financial component is an important one; the author offers her informed view: “The major objective of financial statement reporting is to provide information that is useful to present and potential investors, creditors, and other financial statement users in making rational investment, credit, and similar decisions. Thus, financial statements represent the primary (and most reliable) source of knowledge about a particular firm in the hospitality industry.” The above two paragraphs crystallize the requirement and the objective of annual reports. “A typical annual report of a hospitality firm contains a number of standard features which may be broken down into the following three sections…” General, financial data, and supplementary data are variously bounded and circumscribed for you. As a marketing device and feel-good initiative, the annual report is a useful tool for a hospitality corporation that is in-the-black, and focused on the future, says the author. She cites the Marriott Corporation’s 1985 annual report as an example. Of course, an annual report can also be a harbinger of bad news for shareholders as well. Notes/footnotes and disclosure are key elements to the credibility of any annual report; Professor Moncarz discusses these concepts at length. “Given the likelihood that the hospitality industry will continue to face an uncertain economic environment for some time, financial statement users should become more demanding in their need for information that will help assure the firm's survival and evaluate its ability to generate earnings, increase the firm's investment value, and provide for its future growth,” Professor Moncarz says. “Accordingly, understanding annual reports in the hospitality industry should become even more critical.”

A problemática da dicotomia contabilística ao nível dos subsídios ao investimento

A globalização dos mercados, articulada com a abertura das fronteiras dentro da União Europeia, e com a diversidade de sistemas contabilísticos, acentuou a necessidade de criar um único sistema contabilístico que fosse aceite internacionalmente e, ao mesmo tempo, que facilitasse o acesso aos mercados de capitais internacionais. O novo Sistema de Normalização Contabilística (SNC) adotado em Portugal é baseado essencialmente em princípios, conduzindo à existência de novos conceitos e à necessidade de incorporar novas formas de entender a contabilidade. Constata-se que os procedimentos contabilísticos impostos pelo SNC, no caso particular da Norma de Contabilidade e Relato Financeiro (NCRF) 22 - Contabilização dos Subsídios do Governo e Divulgação de Apoios do Governo, são mais exigentes e pormenorizados do que os previstos no anterior sistema normativo nacional, em vigor até 31/12/2009. Verifica-se ainda que esta norma, no que diz respeito ao tratamento contabilístico dos subsídios relacionados com ativos, não segue o preconizado na atual International Accounting Standard (IAS), ou Norma Internacional de Contabilidade (NIC) 20 - Contabilização dos Subsídios do Governo e Divulgação de Apoios do Governo. Pretende-se assim analisar as referidas normas, enumerando as suas principais diferenças, e constatar como os outros países da União Europeia contabilizam estes subsídios. The globalization of markets, combined with the opening of borders within the European Union, and the diversity of accounting systems, emphasized the need to create a single accounting system that is internationally accepted and at the same time, improving access to markets international capital. New Accounting Standards System adopted in Portugal is essentially based on principles leading to the existence of new concepts and the need to incorporate new ways of understanding accounting. It appears that the accounting procedures required by the SNC, particularly in the case of NCRF 22 - Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, are more stringent and detailed than those of the preceding national regulatory system in force until 31/12/2009. It also appears that this standard with regard to the accounting treatment of grants related to assets, does not follow the recommendations in the current IAS 20 - Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance. The aim is to analyze the standards, enumerating the main differences, and see how the other UE countries account for these allowances.