973 resultados para United States. Federal Maritime Commission.
Resumo:
"December 1946."
Resumo:
Caption title.
Resumo:
"June 8, 9, 1987"--Pt. 2.
Resumo:
John H. Bankhead, subcommittee chairman.
Resumo:
Wesley L. Jones, chairman.
Resumo:
Beginning with 1980, issued in two parts: Transport statistics in the United States. Part 1, Railroads, and; Transport statistics in the United States. Part 2, Motor carriers.
Resumo:
Microfiche.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Issued in parts.
Resumo:
Decisions in actions brought before the U. S. Civil Service Commission, as well as in cases initiated before the U. S. Merit Systems Protection Board under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978
Resumo:
Fiscal year ends June 30.
Resumo:
Includes index.
Resumo:
United States federal agencies assess flood risk using Bulletin 17B procedures which assume annual maximum flood series are stationary. This represents a significant limitation of current flood frequency models as the flood distribution is thereby assumed to be unaffected by trends or periodicity of atmospheric/climatic variables and/or anthropogenic activities. The validity of this assumption is at the core of this thesis, which aims to improve understanding of the forms and potential causes of non-stationarity in flood series for moderately impaired watersheds in the Upper Midwest and Northeastern US. Prior studies investigated non-stationarity in flood series for unimpaired watersheds; however, as the majority of streams are located in areas of increasing human activity, relative and coupled impacts of natural and anthropogenic factors need to be considered such that non-stationary flood frequency models can be developed for flood risk forecasting over relevant planning horizons for large scale water resources planning and management.
Resumo:
Patent law has a significant instrumental and symbolic role in regulating nanotechnology. A 2011 report of the United States Federal Trade Commission noted that ‘the patent system plays a critical role in promoting innovation across industries from biotechnology to nanotechnology, and by entities from large corporations to independent inventors’. This chapter considers the much contested legal, ethical and social issues involved with regulating the patenting of nanotechnology. Section I considers the efforts of patent offices to classify nanotechnology and the empirical evidence about patent filing rates. Section II examines whether there is a ‘tragedy of the anticommons’ emerging in respect of nanotechnology. It contemplates access mechanisms – such as the defence of experimental use, patent pools, open innovation models and technology transfer. Section III explores ethical and social concerns associated with nanotechnology – in particular, issues about the impact upon human health and the environment.