Explaining and Comparing - Improving United States and European Union-Africa Economic Relations: Policy Memo. ACES Working Papers, 2012

As evidenced by the disparities seen in the world, development does not occur uniformly around the world. Global superpowers like the United States and the European Union collectively dominate other parts of the world simply because of their ability to develop at a faster rate. With the rise of globalization and the increasing connectivity of the world economy, the world has reached a time where it is imperative that those nations and unions holding power to commit to elevating their fellow nations through supportive policy ties. The United States and the European Union, as leading global nations, have an important role in developing the economies of other countries; by taking various policy measures, the US and EU can create stronger economic ties to Africa and create a advantageous relationship for all the regions involved.

The United States dominates global investment banking: does it matter for Europe? Bruegel Policy Contribution 2016/06, March 2016

In the aftermath of the global financial crisis, the market share of US investment banks is increasing, while that of their European counterparts is declining. We present evidence that US investment banks are on the verge of taking over pole position in European investment banking. Meanwhile, since 2015, Chinese investment banks have overtaken American and European investment banks in the Asia-Pacific market. Credit rating agencies and investment banks are the gatekeepers of the capital markets. The European supervisory institutions can effectively supervise the European operations of these US-managed players. On the political side, we suggest that the European Commission should continue to view its, albeit declining, banking industry as a strategic sector. The Commission, the European Central Bank and the Bank of England should jointly develop a strategic agenda for the EU-US Regulatory Dialogue. Finally, corporates rely on investment banks to issue new securities. We recommend that the big European corporates should cherish the (few) remaining European investment banks, by giving them at least one place in otherwise US- dominated banking syndicates. That could help to avoid complete dependence on US investment banks.

Pro-American non-alignment. Sweden and Finland develop closer military co-operation with the United States. OSW COMMENTARY NUMBER 205/31.03.2016

Russia’s increasingly aggressive policy and its enhanced military activity in the Nordic-Baltic region has led to revaluations in Sweden’s and Finland’s security and defence policies and a rethinking of the formats of their military co-operation. While remaining outside NATO, the two states have been developing closer bilateral defence co-operation and working more closely with the United States, while at the same time developing co-operation with NATO. Sweden and Finland perceive the United States as the guarantor of regional and European security. From their point of view, the United States is currently the country that has both the necessary military capabilities and the political will to react in the event of a conflict between Russia and NATO in the Nordic-Baltic region, in which both countries would inevitably become involved despite their non-aligned status. For Sweden and Finland, intensified co-operation with the United States offers an alternative to NATO membership, which is currently out of the question for domestic political reasons. Meanwhile, the US has also become increasingly aware of the strategic importance of the two states, which, for the purposes of contingency planning, are in fact an extension of NATO’s north-eastern flank.

Foreign aid : questions on the Central American regional program need to be resolved : report to the Honorable Patrick Leahy, United States Senate /

"B-221422"--P. [1].

General index to the published volumes of the Diplomatic correspondence and Foreign relations of the United States. 1861-1899.

Published in accordance with the Sundry civil act of June 6, 1900.

Foreign relations of the United States, 1955-1957.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Foreign relations of the United States 1955-1957.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Trade with Cuba. Hearings before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives, Eighty-seventh Congress, first session, on H. R. 8465, a bill to prohibit the shipment in interstate or foreign commerce of articles imported into the United States from Cuba, and for other purposes (and identical bills); H.R. 8866, a bill tp prohibit the shipment in interstate or foreign commerce of articles imported into the United States from Cuba, to provide penalties for such shipment, and for other purposes. August 29 and September 1, 1961.

Mode of access: Internet.

United States-Latin American relations: United States and Latin American policies affecting their economic relations. A study prepared at the request of the Subcommittee on American Republics Affairs of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate ... No. 5.

At head of title: 86th Cong., 2d sess. Committee print.

United States-Latin American relations; compilation of studies prepared under the direction of the Subcommittee on American Republics Affairs of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, pursant to S. Res. 330, 85th Congress, S. Res. 31 and S. Res. 250, 86th Congress.

Bibliographical footnotes.

Developments in Mexico and United States-Mexican relations : hearing before the Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere Affairs of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, first session, October 16, 1985.

Item 1017-A, 1017-B (microfiche).

Shlaudeman nomination : hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, second session, on the nomination of Harry W. Shlaudeman, of California, a Foreign Service officer of class 1, to be Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs, May 25, and June 10 and 11, 1976.

Includes bibliographical references.

The foreign trade dilemma : fact and fiction : hearing before the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States, Ninety-eighth Congress, second session, May 1, 1984.

Mode of access: Internet.