Margin requirements and volatility : evidence from Canadian stocks

Margin policy is used by regulators for the purpose of inhibiting exceSSIve volatility and stabilizing the stock market in the long run. The effect of this policy on the stock market is widely tested empirically. However, most prior studies are limited in the sense that they investigate the margin requirement for the overall stock market rather than for individual stocks, and the time periods examined are confined to the pre-1974 period as no change in the margin requirement occurred post-1974 in the U.S. This thesis intends to address the above limitations by providing a direct examination of the effect of margin requirement on return, volume, and volatility of individual companies and by using more recent data in the Canadian stock market. Using the methodologies of variance ratio test and event study with conditional volatility (EGARCH) model, we find no convincing evidence that change in margin requirement affects subsequent stock return volatility. We also find similar results for returns and trading volume. These empirical findings lead us to conclude that the use of margin policy by regulators fails to achieve the goal of inhibiting speculating activities and stabilizing volatility.

Volume-Synchronized Probability of Informed Trading (VPIN), Market Volatility, and High-Frequency Liquidity

We assess the predictive ability of three VPIN metrics on the basis of two highly volatile market events of China, and examine the association between VPIN and toxic-induced volatility through conditional probability analysis and multiple regression. We examine the dynamic relationship on VPIN and high-frequency liquidity using Vector Auto-Regression models, Granger Causality tests, and impulse response analysis. Our results suggest that Bulk Volume VPIN has the best risk-warning effect among major VPIN metrics. VPIN has a positive association with market volatility induced by toxic information flow. Most importantly, we document a positive feedback effect between VPIN and high-frequency liquidity, where a negative liquidity shock boosts up VPIN, which, in turn, leads to further liquidity drain. Our study provides empirical evidence that reflects an intrinsic game between informed traders and market makers when facing toxic information in the high-frequency trading world.

An Eigenfunction Approach for Volatility Modeling.

In this paper, we introduce a new approach for volatility modeling in discrete and continuous time. We follow the stochastic volatility literature by assuming that the variance is a function of a state variable. However, instead of assuming that the loading function is ad hoc (e.g., exponential or affine), we assume that it is a linear combination of the eigenfunctions of the conditional expectation (resp. infinitesimal generator) operator associated to the state variable in discrete (resp. continuous) time. Special examples are the popular log-normal and square-root models where the eigenfunctions are the Hermite and Laguerre polynomials respectively. The eigenfunction approach has at least six advantages: i) it is general since any square integrable function may be written as a linear combination of the eigenfunctions; ii) the orthogonality of the eigenfunctions leads to the traditional interpretations of the linear principal components analysis; iii) the implied dynamics of the variance and squared return processes are ARMA and, hence, simple for forecasting and inference purposes; (iv) more importantly, this generates fat tails for the variance and returns processes; v) in contrast to popular models, the variance of the variance is a flexible function of the variance; vi) these models are closed under temporal aggregation.

Aggregations and Marginalization of GARCH and Stochastic Volatility Models

The GARCH and Stochastic Volatility paradigms are often brought into conflict as two competitive views of the appropriate conditional variance concept : conditional variance given past values of the same series or conditional variance given a larger past information (including possibly unobservable state variables). The main thesis of this paper is that, since in general the econometrician has no idea about something like a structural level of disaggregation, a well-written volatility model should be specified in such a way that one is always allowed to reduce the information set without invalidating the model. To this respect, the debate between observable past information (in the GARCH spirit) versus unobservable conditioning information (in the state-space spirit) is irrelevant. In this paper, we stress a square-root autoregressive stochastic volatility (SR-SARV) model which remains true to the GARCH paradigm of ARMA dynamics for squared innovations but weakens the GARCH structure in order to obtain required robustness properties with respect to various kinds of aggregation. It is shown that the lack of robustness of the usual GARCH setting is due to two very restrictive assumptions : perfect linear correlation between squared innovations and conditional variance on the one hand and linear relationship between the conditional variance of the future conditional variance and the squared conditional variance on the other hand. By relaxing these assumptions, thanks to a state-space setting, we obtain aggregation results without renouncing to the conditional variance concept (and related leverage effects), as it is the case for the recently suggested weak GARCH model which gets aggregation results by replacing conditional expectations by linear projections on symmetric past innovations. Moreover, unlike the weak GARCH literature, we are able to define multivariate models, including higher order dynamics and risk premiums (in the spirit of GARCH (p,p) and GARCH in mean) and to derive conditional moment restrictions well suited for statistical inference. Finally, we are able to characterize the exact relationships between our SR-SARV models (including higher order dynamics, leverage effect and in-mean effect), usual GARCH models and continuous time stochastic volatility models, so that previous results about aggregation of weak GARCH and continuous time GARCH modeling can be recovered in our framework.

Jumps in the Volatility of Financial Markets.

Recent work suggests that the conditional variance of financial returns may exhibit sudden jumps. This paper extends a non-parametric procedure to detect discontinuities in otherwise continuous functions of a random variable developed by Delgado and Hidalgo (1996) to higher conditional moments, in particular the conditional variance. Simulation results show that the procedure provides reasonable estimates of the number and location of jumps. This procedure detects several jumps in the conditional variance of daily returns on the S&P 500 index.

Arbitrage-Based Pricing when Volatility is Stochastic.

The paper investigates the pricing of derivative securities with calendar-time maturities.

Stochastic Volatility.

This paper prepared for the Handbook of Statistics (Vol.14: Statistical Methods in Finance), surveys the subject of stochastic volatility. the following subjects are covered: volatility in financial markets (instantaneous volatility of asset returns, implied volatilities in option prices and related stylized facts), statistical modelling in discrete and continuous time and, finally, statistical inference (methods of moments, quasi-maximum likelihood, likelihood-based and bayesian methods and indirect inference).

Efficient estimation using the characteristic function : theory and applications with high frequency data

The attached file is created with Scientific Workplace Latex

Caractérisation de la composante toxicocinétique du facteur d’ajustement pour la variabilité interindividuelle utilisé en analyse du risque toxicologique

Un facteur d’incertitude de 10 est utilisé par défaut lors de l’élaboration des valeurs toxicologiques de référence en santé environnementale, afin de tenir compte de la variabilité interindividuelle dans la population. La composante toxicocinétique de cette variabilité correspond à racine de 10, soit 3,16. Sa validité a auparavant été étudiée sur la base de données pharmaceutiques colligées auprès de diverses populations (adultes, enfants, aînés). Ainsi, il est possible de comparer la valeur de 3,16 au Facteur d’ajustement pour la cinétique humaine (FACH), qui constitue le rapport entre un centile élevé (ex. : 95e) de la distribution de la dose interne dans des sous-groupes présumés sensibles et sa médiane chez l’adulte, ou encore à l’intérieur d’une population générale. Toutefois, les données expérimentales humaines sur les polluants environnementaux sont rares. De plus, ces substances ont généralement des propriétés sensiblement différentes de celles des médicaments. Il est donc difficile de valider, pour les polluants, les estimations faites à partir des données sur les médicaments. Pour résoudre ce problème, la modélisation toxicocinétique à base physiologique (TCBP) a été utilisée pour simuler la variabilité interindividuelle des doses internes lors de l’exposition aux polluants. Cependant, les études réalisées à ce jour n’ont que peu permis d’évaluer l’impact des conditions d’exposition (c.-à-d. voie, durée, intensité), des propriétés physico/biochimiques des polluants, et des caractéristiques de la population exposée sur la valeur du FACH et donc la validité de la valeur par défaut de 3,16. Les travaux de la présente thèse visent à combler ces lacunes. À l’aide de simulations de Monte-Carlo, un modèle TCBP a d’abord été utilisé pour simuler la variabilité interindividuelle des doses internes (c.-à-d. chez les adultes, ainés, enfants, femmes enceintes) de contaminants de l’eau lors d’une exposition par voie orale, respiratoire, ou cutanée. Dans un deuxième temps, un tel modèle a été utilisé pour simuler cette variabilité lors de l’inhalation de contaminants à intensité et durée variables. Ensuite, un algorithme toxicocinétique à l’équilibre probabiliste a été utilisé pour estimer la variabilité interindividuelle des doses internes lors d’expositions chroniques à des contaminants hypothétiques aux propriétés physico/biochimiques variables. Ainsi, les propriétés de volatilité, de fraction métabolisée, de voie métabolique empruntée ainsi que de biodisponibilité orale ont fait l’objet d’analyses spécifiques. Finalement, l’impact du référent considéré et des caractéristiques démographiques sur la valeur du FACH lors de l’inhalation chronique a été évalué, en ayant recours également à un algorithme toxicocinétique à l’équilibre. Les distributions de doses internes générées dans les divers scénarios élaborés ont permis de calculer dans chaque cas le FACH selon l’approche décrite plus haut. Cette étude a mis en lumière les divers déterminants de la sensibilité toxicocinétique selon le sous-groupe et la mesure de dose interne considérée. Elle a permis de caractériser les déterminants du FACH et donc les cas où ce dernier dépasse la valeur par défaut de 3,16 (jusqu’à 28,3), observés presqu’uniquement chez les nouveau-nés et en fonction de la substance mère. Cette thèse contribue à améliorer les connaissances dans le domaine de l’analyse du risque toxicologique en caractérisant le FACH selon diverses considérations.

"Empirical Analysis of Jumps Contribution to Volatility Forecasting Using High Frequency Data".

Rapport de recherche présenté à la Faculté des arts et des sciences en vue de l'obtention du grade de Maîtrise en sciences économiques.

Cross-sectoral variation in the volatility of plant-level idiosyncratic shocks

We estimate the volatility of plant–level idiosyncratic shocks in the U.S. manufacturing sector. Our measure of volatility is the variation in Revenue Total Factor Productivity which is not explained by either industry– or economy–wide factors, or by establishments’ characteristics. Consistent with previous studies, we find that idiosyncratic shocks are much larger than aggregate random disturbances, accounting for about 80% of the overall uncertainty faced by plants. The extent of cross–sectoral variation in the volatility of shocks is remarkable. Plants in the most volatile sector are subject to about six times as much idiosyncratic uncertainty as plants in the least volatile. We provide evidence suggesting that idiosyncratic risk is higher in industries where the extent of creative destruction is likely to be greater.