Dependence of public support for survival of wildlife species on their likeability

We surveyed a sample of 204 individuals selected from the public in Brisbane, Australia, to ascertain the extent to which they like or dislike 24 species of wildlife present in tropical Australia. The species belong to three classes: mammals, birds and reptiles. We calculated likeability indices for each of these species. We also asked respondents if they favoured the survival of each of these species and so the percentage of respondents favouring survival of each of these species could be calculated. Thus, using linear regression analysis, the percentage of respondents favouring survival of each of the species was related to their indices of likeability. In addition, the data enables the average likeability of species in the three classes (mammals, birds and reptiles) to be compared with the average support for survival of species in each of these three classes. As a result, we are able to assess how important stated likeability seems to be for preferences for survival of species, and to reconsider the hypothesis in the literature that there is likely to be more public support for the survival of mammals than for birds than for reptiles.

The recent Australian debate about the prohibition on cannabis use

This paper outlines the ethical arguments used in the Australian debate about whether or not to relax the prohibition on cannabis use by adults. Over the past two decades a rising prevalence of cannabis use in the Australian population has led to proposals for the decriminalization of the personal use of cannabis. Three states and territories have removed criminal penalties for personal use while criminal penalties are rarefy imposed in the remaining states. Libertarian arguments for legalization of cannabis use have attracted a great deal of media interest but very little public and political support. Other arguments in favour of decriminalization have attracted more support. One has been the utilitarian argument that prohibition has failed to deter cannabis use and the social costs of its continuation outweigh any benefits that it produces. Another has been the argument from hypocrisy that cannabis is less harmful than alcohol and so, on the grounds of consistency, if alcohol is legally available then so should cannabis. To date public opinion has not favoured legalization, although support for the decriminalization of personal cannabis use has increased. In the long term, the outcome of the debate may depend more upon trends in cannabis use and social attitudes among young adults than upon the persuasiveness of the arguments for a relaxation of the prohibition of cannabis.

Genetic and physical interactions between Microphthalmia transcription factor and PU.1 are necessary for osteoclast gene expression and differentiation

The microphthalmia transcription factor (MITF), a basic-helix-loop-helix zipper factor, regulates distinct target genes in several cell types. We hypothesized that interaction with the Ets family factor PU.1, whose expression is limited to hematopoietic cells, might be necessary for activation of target genes like tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) in osteoclasts. Several lines of evidence were consistent with this model. The combination of MITF and PU.1 synergistically activated the TRAP promoter in transient assays. This activation was dependent on intact binding sites for both factors in the TRAP promoter. MITF and PU.1 physically interacted when coexpressed in COS cells or in vitro when purified recombinant proteins were studied. The minimal regions of MITF and PU.1 required for the interaction were the basic-helix-loop-helix zipper domain and the Ets DNA binding domain, respectively. Significantly, mice heterozygous for both the mutant mi allele and a PU.1 null allele developed osteopetrosis early in life which resolved with age. The size and number of osteoclasts were not altered in the double heterozygous mutant mice, indicating that the defect lies in mature osteoclast function. Taken in total, the results afford an example of how lineage-specific gene regulation can be achieved by the combinatorial action of two broadly expressed transcription factors.

Public works policy in Portugal: a case study in unsustainability

International Journal of Engineering and Industrial Management, nº 1, p. 195-208

Conceções éticas de estudantes universitários portugueses sobre as sentenças penais: reabilitar ou retribuir?

A presente investigação tem como objetivo analisar as perceções dos estudantes universitários portugueses sobre as finalidades das sentenças penais tendo subjacentes as Teorias Absolutas e das Teorias Relativas. Pretendeu-se avaliar que objetivos de sentença são mais apoiados entre os estudantes e perceber se existem outras variáveis como preditores significativos, tais como, género, orientação politica, religião, curso e experiência prévia de vitimação. Uma amostra de 344 estudantes universitários, a frequentar os cursos de Ciências Sociais (40,8%), Engenharia (34,9%) e Direito (24,3%), com idades compreendidas entre os 17 e os 48 anos, selecionada por conveniência, preencheu o instrumento de 20 itens adaptado de Cullen, Cullen, e Wozniak. Os resultados apontam para a estabilidade da estrutura dimensional do instrumento adaptado, definido por 2 fatores e 16 itens: o fator punição e o fator reabilitação. O fator mais apoiado entre os participantes foi o de reabilitação o que contraria que a opinião pública a respeito da sentença é mais influenciada pelo retribucionismo. Os participantes apoiam várias finalidades da sentença. Não foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas em função da orientação política, da religião e da experiência de vitimização. Contudo, diferenças estatisticamente significativas foram encontradas para o sexo dos participantes e para o curso.

Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences.

v.1 (1911)

Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences.

v.3 (1913)

Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences.

v.2 (1912)

Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences.

v.5 (1915)

Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences.

v.6 (1916)

Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences.

v.4 (1914)

Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences.

v.7 (1917)

Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences.

v.8 (1918)

Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences.

v.11 (1921)

Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences.

v.9 (1919)