928 resultados para Imaginary conversations


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Background: Co-speech gestures are part of nonverbal communication during conversations. They either support the verbal message or provide the interlocutor with additional information. Furthermore, they prompt as nonverbal cues the cooperative process of turn taking. In the present study, we investigated the influence of co-speech gestures on the perception of dyadic dialogue in aphasic patients. In particular, we analysed the impact of co-speech gestures on gaze direction (towards speaker or listener) and fixation of body parts. We hypothesized that aphasic patients, who are restricted in verbal comprehension, adapt their visual exploration strategies. Methods: Sixteen aphasic patients and 23 healthy control subjects participated in the study. Visual exploration behaviour was measured by means of a contact-free infrared eye-tracker while subjects were watching videos depicting spontaneous dialogues between two individuals. Cumulative fixation duration and mean fixation duration were calculated for the factors co-speech gesture (present and absent), gaze direction (to the speaker or to the listener), and region of interest (ROI), including hands, face, and body. Results: Both aphasic patients and healthy controls mainly fixated the speaker’s face. We found a significant co-speech gesture x ROI interaction, indicating that the presence of a co-speech gesture encouraged subjects to look at the speaker. Further, there was a significant gaze direction x ROI x group interaction revealing that aphasic patients showed reduced cumulative fixation duration on the speaker’s face compared to healthy controls. Conclusion: Co-speech gestures guide the observer’s attention towards the speaker, the source of semantic input. It is discussed whether an underlying semantic processing deficit or a deficit to integrate audio-visual information may cause aphasic patients to explore less the speaker’s face. Keywords: Gestures, visual exploration, dialogue, aphasia, apraxia, eye movements

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Interdisciplinary citation patterns and other indicators of the flow and sharing of academic knowledge suggest that economists and anthropologists do not talk to each other. Previous studies of this puzzling trend have typically attributed the problem to methodological differences between the two disciplines. Although there are significant differences between economics and anthropology in behavioral assumptions and modes of inquiry, similar differences exist between them and other disciplines (some with much heavier volumes of cross-citations with economics or anthropology), suggesting that the source of the problem lies elsewhere. This paper considers the problem at a deeper level by examining systematic differences in the preferences, capabilities, and literary cultures of economists and anthropologists. Adopting a rhetorical perspective, I consider not the firms, households, or tribes as the principal objective of analysis in the two disciplines, but the conversations between these units. These conversations (through non-verbal as well as verbal media) can be grouped into two genres, based on the type of problem they aim to solve. Those in the first genre aim to solve the problem of interest--how to align the incentives of the parties involved. Those in the second genre deal with the problem of knowledge--how to align localized, and dispersed information. Economists are interested and capable of dealing with primarily, if not exclusively, the first genre, and anthropologists focus on the second. This difference has far reaching consequences for how economists and anthropologists conduct their own scholarly conversations with their own colleagues, why they are having difficulty talking to each other across disciplinary boundaries, and what can be done to change the patterns of communication.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

M. B.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

by James Boswell ; with copious notes and biograph. ill. by Malone

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

En la enseñanza de la arquitectura, el dibujo es tradicionalmente una materia propedéutica que requiere años de entrenamiento hasta conseguir la destreza necesaria para convertirse en herramienta de configuración y en lenguaje de comunicación del proyecto. El requerimiento de un dominio del dibujo eminentemente instrumental es el que encuentra en el año 1957 Javier Seguí, cuando entra en la Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid, y también en 1974, al obtener la cátedra de la asignatura de Análisis de Formas Arquitectónicas tras intentar, sin éxito, la cátedra de la asignatura Proyectos Arquitectónicos. Desde entonces, y durante treinta y nueve años como catedrático, ejerce de profesor en el ahora denominado Departamento de Ideación Gráfica Arquitectónica -agrupamiento de asignaturas encuadradas en un área de conocimiento- trabajando junto a un grupo de compañeros y alumnos que intentan desarrollar un proceso de cambio fundamental en la docencia del dibujo para abandonar la pura representación y convertirla en el dibujar para proyectar. Javier Seguí se jubila en el año 2010. Separado de la docencia y la investigación oficial, continúa dibujando y escribiendo, con el objeto de sistematizar y fundamentar todas aquellas prácticas desarrolladas y reivindicar el funcionamiento de la imaginación. Esta actividad de investigación, desde un extrañamiento extremo, permite elaborar tanto un listado de técnicas operativo-imaginarias de arranque de los procesos de proyectar, como reflexionar y recuperar algunas prácticas desarrolladas desde el grado cero y la radicalidad. Esta investigación aborda la práctica docente de Javier Seguí, ligándola a su producción investigadora desde sus propios dibujos, escritos y conversaciones realizadas en un momento en el que la crisis de la asignatura de dibujo es evidente en un contexto universitario desorientado, que constata el fracaso del cambio que Seguí soñara hace medio siglo. ABSTRACT In the teaching of architecture, drawing has traditionally been a propaedeutic subject requiring years of training to achieve the necessary skill to become a language and communication tool for project configuration. The requirement of a drawing domain aseminently instrumental is what Javier Seguí found in 1957 when he entered the Superior Technical School of Architecture of Madrid (Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid), and also in 1974, when he was awarded the position of Chair of Analysis of Architectural Forms after trying, unsuccessfully, the Chair of Architectural Projects. Since then, and for thirty-nine years as a Professor, he has taught at what now is called the Department of Architectural Graphic Ideation – group of subjects framed as an knowledge area -, in collaboration with a group of colleagues and students who try to develop a process of fundamental change in the teaching of drawing, through the abandonment of pure representation to transform drawing into a project. Javier Seguí retired in 2010. Separated from official teaching and research, he maintains a consistent practice of drawing and writing, in order to systematize and substantiate all practices developed and claim the use of the imagination. This research activity, from a one end distance, allows both a list of imaginary operational techniques to the start-up project processes, as much as recovering some practices developed from scratch and of a radical technical degree. This research addresses the teaching practice of Javier Segui, linking its research output of their own drawings, writings and conversations in a moment in which the crisis of the drawing subject is evident in a disoriented university context, demonstrating the failure of the exchange that Seguí has dreamed of since half a century ago.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.