Time-related improvement of survival in resectable gastric cancer: the role of Japanese-style gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy

Background: We investigated the change of prognosis in resected gastric cancer (RGC) patients and the role of radical surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyze the outcome of 426 consecutive patients from 1975 to 2002, divided into 2 time-periods (TP) cohort: Before 1990 (TP1, n = 207) and 1990 or after (TP2; n= 219). Partial gastrectomy and D1-lymphadenetomy was predominant in TP1 and total gastrectomy with D2-lymphadenectomy it was in TP2. Adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of mitomycin C (MMC), 10¿20 mg/m2 iv 4 courses or MMC plus Tegafur 500 mg/m2 for 6 months. Results: Positive nodes were similar in TP2/TP1 patients with 56%/59% respectively. Total gastrectomy was done in 56%/45% of TP2/TP1 respectively. Two-drug adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 65%/18% of TP2/TP1 respectively. Survival at 5 years was 66% for TP2 versus 42%for TP1 patients (p < 0.0001). Survival by stages II, IIIA y IIIB for TP2 versus TP1 patients was 70 vs. 51% (p = 0.0132); 57 vs. 22% (p = 0.0008) y 30 vs. 15% (p = 0.2315) respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age, stage of disease and period of treatment were independent variables. Conclusion: The global prognosis and that of some stages have improved in recent years with case RGC patients treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Cardiac and pericardial fistulae associated with esophageal or gastric neoplasms: a literature review

Pericardial and cardiac fistulae secondary to esophageal or gastric tumors are considered exceptional. They have never been the object of a literature review. We reviewed the medical literature between 1881 and 2001, searching for all published cases of pericardial or cardiac fistulae developed from esophageal and gastric tumors or favored by the applied therapy to these tumors. The cases of metastasization, tumor spread, and neoplasic pericardial effusion without fistula were excluded. Fifty patients were identified, with one original case. More than half the cases (56%) occurred in the last 25 years. Substernal pain is the main symptom. The majority of patients present at least one condition favoring fistula formation. The auscultation of a water-wheel murmur may suggest a pneumopericardium and therefore a pericardial fistula, as does a purulent pericarditis. Arrhythmias, signs of ischemia, and hematemesis point toward a ventricular fistula. Neurological and hemostasis disorders may be suspect of an atrial lesion. Diagnosis should be made by the association of a scanner and a transit. Prognosis is bad: 76% of the patients die in the first month. Pericardial or cardiac fistulae are part of the differential diagnosis of thoracic pain in patients with esophageal or gastric tumors and in patients who were treated for these pathologies. The diagnosis must be as quick as possible. An operation (patients with a good prognosis) or the placement of a stent (patients with a bad prognosis) is the only chance of survival

Novel Chemotherapy Combinations in Advanced Gastric Cancer: an Updated Meta-Analysis

Combination chemotherapy is widely accepted for patients with advanced gastric cancer, but uncertainty remains regarding the choice of the regimen. Objectives: To assess the effect of: Comparison 1) irinotecan versus non-irinotecancontaining regimens, comparison 2) docetaxel versus non-docetaxel-containing regimens, comparison 3) regimens including oral 5-FU prodrugs versus intravenous fluoropyrimidines, comparison 4) oxaliplatin versus cisplatin-containing regimens on overall survival. Search Strategy: We searched: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, proceedings from ECCO, ESMO, ASCO until December 2009. Selection Criteria: Randomised controlled trials on the above mentioned chemotherapy regimens in advanced or metastatic denocarcinoma of the stomach or GE-junction. Results: The meta-analysis of overall survival for comparison 1) included 4 trials, 640 patients, and results in a HR of 0.86 (95% CI 0.73-1.02) in favour of the irinotecancontaining regimens. For comparison 2) 4 trials with a total of 924 patients have been included in the analysis of overall survival. The resulting HR is 0.93 (95% CI 0.79-1.09) in favour of the docetaxel-containing regimens, with moderate heterogeneity (I2 =7%). For comparison 3 and 4, one major relevant study (Cunningham 2008) could not be included in this meta-analysis after discussion because it included patients with squamous cell cancer of the esophagus as well. Thus, for comparison 3) one relevant study (Kang 2009; 316 patients) comparing capecitabine versus 5-FU in combination with cisplatin is eligible. The resulting HR is 0.85 (95%CI 0.65-1.11) in favour of the oral regimen. For comparison 4) two eligible trials were identified (Al Batran 2008, Popov 2008; 292 patients) with a resulting HR of 0.82 (95% CI 0.47-1.45) in favour of the oxaliplatin-based regimens. For three further trials data is incomplete at present. Conclusions: Chemotherapy combinations including irinotecan, oxaliplatin, docetaxel or oral 5-FU prodrugs are alternative treatment options to cisplatin/5-FU or cisplatin/ 5-FU/anthracycline-combinations, but do not provide significant advantages in overall survival. Supported by: KKS Halle, grant number [BMBF/FKZ 01GH01GH0105]. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Nutritional deficiencies after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity often cannot be prevented by standard multivitamin supplementation

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing use of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) in the treatment of morbid obesity, data about postoperative nutritional deficiencies and their treatment remain scarce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a standard multivitamin preparation in the prevention and treatment of nutritional deficiencies in obese patients after RYGBP. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of 2 y of follow-up of obese patients after RYGBP surgery. Between the first and the sixth postoperative months, a standardized multivitamin preparation was prescribed for all patients. Specific requirements for additional substitutive treatments were systematically assessed by a biologic workup at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 mo. RESULTS: A total of 137 morbidly obese patients (110 women and 27 men) were included. The mean (+/-SD) age at the time of surgery was 39.9 +/- 10.0 y, and the body mass index (in kg/m(2)) was 46.7 +/- 6.5. Three months after RYGBP, 34% of these patients required at least one specific supplement in addition to the multivitamin preparation. At 6 and 24 mo, this proportion increased to 59% and 98%, respectively. Two years after RYGBP, a mean amount of 2.9 +/- 1.4 specific supplements had been prescribed for each patient, including vitamin B-12, iron, calcium + vitamin D, and folic acid. At that time, the mean monthly cost of the substitutive treatment was $34.83. CONCLUSION: Nutritional deficiencies are very common after RYGBP and occur despite supplementation with the standard multivitamin preparation. Therefore, careful postoperative follow-up is indicated to detect and treat those deficiencies.

A single dose of intravenous esomeprazole decreases gastric secretion in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Data suggest that esomeprazole decreases gastric secretion. AIMS: To assess the effect of a single i.v. esomeprazole dose on gastric secretion volume 3 h after drug administration, as a primary endpoint, and to evaluate, as secondary endpoints, the reduction 1 and 5 h after dosing; time when the gastric pH was <2.5 and esomeprazole's safety. METHODS: In all, 23 healthy Helicobacter pylori-negative volunteers (10 men, 13 women, mean age 28.2 +/- 6) participated in this single-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-way, single-dose cross-over study. In different sessions, volunteers received i.v. either esomeprazole 40 mg or placebo. An inserted double-lumen nasogastric tube perfused and aspirated gastric liquid. Mechanical fractioned aspiration measured secretion volume; aliquot spectrophotometry assessed gastric secretion volume lost to the duodenum. RESULTS: Three hours post-i.v. esomeprazole, average gastric secretion decreased by 77.6% (vs. baseline) compared to placebo. Values 1 and 5 h after dosing were 73.5% and 74.5%. Five hours after esomeprazole, the gastric pH was <2.5 3.9% of the time and 73.3% after placebo (P < 0.002). Esomeprazole was well-tolerated. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous esomeprazole decreases gastric secretions. The potential clinical impact in averting bronchoaspiration during anaesthesia induction and in intensive care patients should be investigated in further studies.

Redistribution of gastric blood flow by embolization of gastric arteries before esophagectomy.

Background. Anastomotic leak remains a common and potentially deleterious complication after esophagectomy. Preoperative embolization of the left gastric artery and splenic artery (PAE) has been suggested to lower anastomotic leak rates. We present the results of our 5-year experience with this technique.Methods. All patients undergoing PAE before esophagectomy since introduction of this technique in 2004 were compared in a 1: 2 matched-pair analysis with patients without PAE. Matching criteria were type of anastomosis, neoadjuvant treatment, comorbidity, and age. Data were derived from a retrospective chart review from 2000 to 2006 that was perpetuated as a prospective database up to date. Outcome measures were anastomotic leak, overall complications, and hospital stay.Results. Between 2000 and 2009, 102 patients underwent esophagectomy for cancer in our institution with an overall leak rate of 19% and a mortality of 8%. All 19 patients having PAE since 2004 were successfully matched 1: 2 to 38 control patients without PAE; both groups were similar regarding demographics and operation characteristics. Two PAE (11%) and 8 control patients (21%) had an anastomotic leak, but the difference was statistically not significant (p = 0.469). Overall and major complication rates for PAE and control group were 89% versus 79% (p = 0.469) and 37% versus 34% (p = 1.000), respectively. Median intensive care unit and hospital stay were 3 versus 3 days (p = 1.000) and 22 versus 17 days (p = 0.321), respectively.Conclusions. In our experience, PAE has no significant impact on complications and anastomotic leak in particular after esophagectomy. (Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:1556-61) (C) 2011 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Effects of gastric bypass and gastric banding on glucose kinetics and gut hormone release

Rapport de Synthèse : Introduction : outre son effet bénéfique sur le poids, la chirurgie bariatrique améliore de façon considérable l'homéostasie glucide chez les patients diabétiques. Cette amélioration survient très tôt dans la période post-opératoire, avant que le poids ne soit réduit de manière importante. De plus, les interventions chirurgicales qui "court-circuitent" une partie de l'intestin grêle, telle que le by-pass gastrique, apparaissent être plus efficaces que les interventions purement restrictives, telles que le cerclage gastrique. Objectifs : cette étude a pour but d'étudier la cinétique du glucose et la sécrétion d'hormones gastro-intestinales, consécutive à l'ingestion d'une dose charge de glucose, chez des patients opérés d'un by-pass ou d'un cerclage gastrique. Méthodes : nous avons comparé des groupes de femmes non diabétiques ayant bénéficié d'un by-pass gastrique (BPG, n=8) ou d'un cerclage gastrique (CG, n=6) à un groupe de femmes contrôles d'âge et de poids appariées n'ayant subi aucune intervention bariatrique (C, n=8). L'étude a été réalisée alors que le poids des volontaires était stable, soit entre 9 et 48 mois après le BPG, et 25 à 85 mois après le CG. Nous avons étudié, pendant les 4 heures qui ont suivies l'ingestion d'une dose charge de glucose; la cinétique du glucose ingéré et du glucose total à l'aide d'un glucose radio-activement marqué, ainsi que la cinétique de l'insuline et de différentes hormones gastro-intestinales. Résultats : l'apparition du glucose exogène dans la circulation systémique est plus rapide chez les patients opérés d'un BPG et s'accompagne d'une hyperglycémie postprandiale plus brève. La réponse insulinique est également plus précoce et plus importante que dans les deux autres groupes. S'agissant des hormones gastro-intestinales, on observe dans la période postprandiale une augmentation de PYY et de GLP-1 et une suppression de la grehline significativement plus importante après BPG. Discussion : ces différentes observations suggèrent que le BPG est associé à de profonds changements de la cinétique du glucose et des altérations de la régulation d'hormones gastro-intestinales. Les modifications susmentionnées apparaissant être secondaires aux modifications anatomiques consécutives au BPG, i.e. la mise "hors-circuit" de l'estomac distal et de l'intestin grêle proximal, compte tenu du fait qu'elles ne sont pas observées après CG. Finalement, la stimulation de PYY et de GLP-1 ainsi que la suppression postprandiale plus importante de ghréline est compatible avec la diminution spontanée de la prise alimentaire observée chez les patients opérés d'un BPG.

Laparoscopic Gastric Banding Outcomes Do Not Depend on Device or Technique. Long-Term Results of a Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Lapband® and the SAGB®.

BACKGROUND: Gastric banding still represents one of the most widely used bariatric procedures. It provides acceptable weight loss in many patients, but has frequent long-term complications. Because different types of bands may lead to different results, we designed a randomized study to compare the Lapband® with the SAGB®. We hereby report on the long-term results. METHODS: Between December 1998 and June 2002, 180 morbidly obese patients were randomized between Lapband® or SAGB®. Weight loss, long-term morbidity, and need for reoperation were evaluated. RESULTS: Long-term weight loss did not differ between the two bands. Patients who maintained their band had an acceptable long-term weight loss of between 50 and 60 % EBMIL. In both groups, about half the patients developed long-term complications, with about 50 % requiring major redo surgery. There was no difference in the overall rates of long-term complications or failures between the two groups, but patients who had a Lapband® were significantly more prone to develop band slippage/pouch dilatation (13.3 versus 0 %, p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: Although in the absence of complication, gastric banding leads to acceptable weight loss; the long-term complication and major reoperation rates are very high independently from the type of band used or on the operative technique. Gastric banding leads to relatively poor overall long-term results and therefore should not be considered the procedure of choice for the treatment of morbid obesity. Patients should be informed of the limited overall weight loss and the very high complication rates.

A practical right-sided incisional gastropexy technique for treatment or prevention of gastric dilatation volvulus

Yhteenveto: Käytännöllinen oikeanpuoleinen viiltogastropeksia mahalaukun laajentumisen ja kiertymisen hoitona tai ennaltaehkäisynä

Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass is Superior to Gastric Banding in Non-superobese Patients. a Matched-case Study with Five-year Follow-up

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) and gastric banding (GB) are the two most popular bariatric procedures. Only few studies have compared their results and follow-up duration is usually limited to <3 years. Patients and Methods: Using our prospective bariatric database, we matched non-superobese GB to RYGBP patients for sex, age and BMI to RYGBP. Follow-up considered up to five years. Results: 442 patients were matched in 221 pairs. Mean age (38,6) and mean BMI (43) were identical. Overall operative morbidity was higher after RYGBP (17,2 versus 5,4 %, p<0,001), but major morbidity was similar (3,6 versus 2,2 %, p=0,57). More patients developed long-term complications after GB (43,9 % versus 19 %, p<0,001), and more required reoperations (24,4 % versus 12 %, p=0,001). After RYGBP, reoperations were mainly due to internal hernias (87 %), with no reversal, whereas 18,5 % of the GB patients required band removal. Even including only patients who retained their band, weight loss after RYGBP was better throughout the study period, with 5-year EBMIL of 77,6 % and 61,7 % (p<0,001) after RYGBP and GB respectively. RYGBP was associated with better food tolerance and greater improvement of the lipid profile. Conclusions: GB is associated with a smaller overall operative morbidity and similar major morbidity, but with more long-term complications, more reoperations, a significant number of reversal or conversion procedures, and reduced weight loss when compared with RYGBP. Five-year results of RYGBP are superior to GB and patients should be informed accordingly.

Bypass gastrique: prise en charge des complications et désagrements alimentaires [Gastric bypass: management of complications and food tolerance]

La chirurgie bariatrique est le seul traitement qui permette une perte pondérale significative sur le long terme mais le succès d'une telle intervention repose avant tout dans une sélection et une préparation attentive du patient. Une bonne connaissance des implications de l'opération permet de favoriser un changement de comportement alimentaire et par là aussi de diminuer les complications et les désagréments alimentaires. L'éducation du patient n'a de sens que si elle s'inscrit dans une prise en charge pluridisciplinaire, comprenant également un suivi diététique, planifié sur le long terme. La mastication, la vitesse d'ingestion des aliments, le fait de renoncer aux boissons gazeuses et de devoir boire régulièrement entre les repas, sont les éléments les plus difficiles à mettre en place pour le patient. Bariatric surgery is the only treatment inducing effective weight loss on the long term. The success of such an intervention is possible by carefully selecting and educating the candidates. Good understanding of the bariatric surgery implications allows the patients to modify their eating habits and thus decrease complications and food intolerance. Therefore patient education requires a multidisciplinary approach which implies the follow-up of a dietician on the long term. Mastication, speed of food ingestion, avoidance of carbonated beverages as well as the obligation to drink at frequent and regular intervals are the most difficult aspects to be taught to the patients

Improved Surgical Technique Reduces Complications at the Gastro-jejunostomy After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Introduction: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is one of the commonest procedure for morbid obesity. It is associated with effective long-term weight loss, but can lead to significant complications, especially at the gastrojejunostomy (GJS) Patients and Methods: All the patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGBP at one of our two institutions were included in this study, in which we compared two different techniques for the construction of the GJS and their effects on the incidence of complications. In group A, anatomosis was performed on the posterior aspect of the gastric pouch. In group B it was performed across the staple line used to form the gastric pouch. A 21-mm circular stapler was used in all patients. Results: A total of 1128 patients were included between June 1999 and September 2009, 639 in group A and 488 in group B. Sixty patients developed a total of 65 complications at the GJS, with 14 (1,2 %) leaks, 42 (3,7 %) stricture, and 9 (0,8 %) marginal ulcers. Leaks (0,2 versus 2 %, p=0,005) and strictures (0,8 versus 5,9%, p<0,0001) were significantly fewer in group B than in group A. Conclusions: Improved surgical technique, with the GJS across the staple line used to form the gastric pouch, significantly reduces the rate of anastomotic complications at the GJS. A circular 21-mm stapler can be used with a low complication rate, and especially a low stricture rate. Additional methods to limit complications at the GJS are probably not routinely warranted.

Moeglichkeiten der systemischen Therapie im metastasierten Stadium [Treatment options for chemotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer]

Die Ergebnisse mehrerer, in letzter Zeit publizierter Phase-III-Studien haben die therapeutischen Möglichkeiten in der Behandlung des metastasierten Magenkarzinoms deutlich erweitert. Die Dauerinfusion von 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) kann ohne Verlust an Wirkung durch Capecitabin ersetzt werden, ebenso wie Cisplatin durch Oxaliplatin. Nach den Ergebnissen der REAL-2-Studie zeigt die Kombination aus Epirubicin, Oxaliplatin und Capecitabin (EOX) eine Verbesserung des Gesamtüberlebens (9,9 vs. 11,2 Monate; HR 0,8) im Vergleich zu Epirubicin, Cisplatin und 5-FU (ECF). Die Frage, ob in der First-Line-Therapie eine Dreifachkombination oder eine Zweifachkombination eingesetzt werden sollte, ist allerdings weiterhin umstritten. Die Kombination aus Irinotecan und 5-FU stellt für solche Patienten, bei denen aufgrund von Komorbiditäten eine platinfreie Therapie bevorzugt wird, eine Alternative zur Kombination Cisplatin/5-FU dar. Docetaxel, 5-FU und Cisplatin (DCF) hat sich bezüglich des Überlebens in einer randomisierten Phase-III-Studie als statistisch signifikant überlegen erwiesen, allerdings besteht eine ausgeprägte hämatologische Toxizität, welche die Anwendbarkeit insbesondere bei den häufig älteren Patienten mit einem Magenkarzinom limitiert. Randomisierte Phase-III-Studien zum Vergleich von DCF mit anderen Dreierkombinationen, wie z. B. EOX, stehen aus. Recently published results from several phase III trials have significantly increased the therapeutic options in the treatment of metastatic stomach cancer: The continuous infusion of 5-FU can be replaced by capecitabine, and cisplatin can be replaced by oxaliplatin in both cases without impairing efficacy. According to the results of the REAL-2 trial, the combination of epirubicin, oxaliplatin and capecitabine (EOX) achieved superior results for overall survival compared to epirubicin, cisplatin und 5-FU (ECF) (9.9 versus 11.2 months, HR 0.8). However, the question of whether an optimal first line therapy should include a triplet regimen or the sequential use of doublets is a matter of debate. The combination of irinotecan and 5-FU may serve as an alternative to platinum-containing regimens in patients where, due to co-morbidity, a platinum-free regimen is preferred. The 3-drug combination of docetaxel, 5-FU and cisplatin (DCF) demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit compared to the 2-drug combination of 5-FU and cisplatin in a randomized phase III trial, although results were limited by a particularly significant hematological toxicity, which prevents its application in the large group of elderly patients with gastric cancer. Direct randomized phase III comparisons of DCF with other 3-drug combinations, such as EOX are still missing.