981 resultados para Disposal of solid waste


Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Hardin County Sanitary Solid Waste Disposal Commission for the year ended June 30, 2006.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Delaware County Solid Waste Disposal Commission for the year ended June 30, 2006

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Delaware County Solid Waste Disposal Commission for the year ended June 30, 2007

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Hardin County Sanitary Solid Waste Disposal Commission for the year ended June 30, 2007

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Hardin County Sanitary Solid Waste Disposal Commission for the year ended June 30, 2008

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Delaware County Solid Waste Disposal Commission for the year ended June 30, 2008

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Hardin County Sanitary Solid Waste Disposal Commission for the year ended June 30, 2009

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Delaware County Solid Waste Disposal Commission for the year ended June 30, 2009

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Delaware County Solid Waste Disposal Commission for the year ended June 30, 2010

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Delaware County Solid Waste Disposal Commission for the year ended June 30, 2011

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Delaware County Solid Waste Disposal Commission for the year ended June 30, 2012

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Delaware County Solid Waste Disposal Commission for the year ended June 30, 2013

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Delaware County Solid Waste Disposal Commission for the year ended June 30, 2014

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Different geoenvironmental site investigation techniques to assess contamination from a municipal solid waste disposal site in Brazil are presented here. Superficial geophysical investigation (geoelectrical survey), resistivity piezocone penetration tests (RCPTU), soil samples collected with direct-push samplers and water samples collected from monitoring wells were applied in this study. The application of the geoelectrical method was indispensable to identify the presence and flow direction of contamination plumes (leachate) as well as to indicate the most suitable locations for RCPTU tests and soil and water sampling. Chemical analyses of groundwater samples contributed to a better understanding of the flow of the contaminated plume. The piezocone presented some limitations for tropical soils, since the groundwater level is sometimes deeper than the layer which is impenetrable to the cone, and the soil genesis and unsaturated conditions affect soil behavior. The combined interpretation of geoelectrical measurements and soil and water samplings underpinned the interpretation of RCPTU tests. The interpretation of all the test results indicates that the contamination plume has already overreached the landfill's west-northwest borders. Geoenvironmental laboratory test results suggest that contamination from the solid waste disposal site has been developing gradually, indicating the need for continuous monitoring of the groundwater.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The urban solid waste of the city of Indaiatuba (pop. 175 000), located in the state of São Paulo, was characterized, focusing on the recycling potential. For this purpose, collected waste was subdivided into 27 items, classified by mass and volume. About 90% of this waste was found to be potentially recyclable and only 10% requiring landfilling. The compostable organic matter, in the form of food and garden waste, both with high moisture content (51 and 41%, respectively), represents 54% in mass and 21% in volume. The most common type of plastic in this waste is high density polyethylene, whose estimated disposal is about 5000 kg day(-1). A socio-economic analysis of the waste generation indicates that low-income neighbourhoods discard relatively less packaging and more food waste, shoes and construction debris than middle and high income ones, which may be due to low purchasing power and schooling. Our findings indicate that more aluminium and uncoloured polyethylene terephthalate is discarded in the warmest months of the year, probably due to a greater consumption of canned and bottled drinks.