881 resultados para Business life insurance


Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2 Briefe zwischen der Buchhandlung Peter Naacher und Max Horkheimer, 1966-1968; 1 Brief von E. Nabulon an Max Horkheimer, 1971; 13 Briefe und Beilage zwischen dem Dozenten Georg Nádor und Max Horkheimer, 1964-1967; 4 Briefe zwischen Cornelia Nass und Max Horkheimer sowie der Beilage: Vortrag von Val. Giscard d'Estaing über "die neue Gesellschaft" Brüssel 1970, 1970-1972; 6 Briefe zwischen Else Nassauer und Max Horkheimer, 1967-1973; 3 Briefe zwischen S.Andhil Fineberg und Max Horkheimer, 1967-1969; 1 Brief von Dr. med. Horst Naujoks an Max Horkheimer, 1963; 3 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an die Zeitschrift Nebelspalter, 1964-1969; 7 Briefe zwischen Max Horkheimer und Carl Nedelmann, 1964; 2 Briefe und Beilage zwischen Dr. Renate Neef-Cramer und Max Horkheimer, 1972; 3 Briefe zwischen Walter Neef und Max Horkheimer, 1965; 1 Brief an Dr. Oskar Negt von Max Horkheimer, 1964; 9 Briefe zwischen Dr. Günther Nenning und Max Horkheimer, 1962-1972; 4 Briefe zwischen der Neuen Deutschen Biographie und Max Horkheimer, 1969-1970; 4 Briefe und Beilage zwischen der Wochenschrift Neue Politik und Max Horkheimer, 1971; 6 Briefe zwischen Joachim Günther und Max Horkheimer, 1969-1970; 10 Briefe zwischen der Neuen Rundschau Rudolf Hartung und Max Horkheimer, 1964-1968; 1 Brief an Heinz Friedrich von Max Horkheimer, 1969; 9 Briefe zwischen Dr. Günther Nenning und Max Horkheimer, 1969-1972; 4 Briefe zwischen dem Rektor Günther Neuhardt und Max Horkheimer, 1970; 7 Briefe zwischen Rexa Neumeister und Max Horkheimer, 1967; 28 Briefe und Beilage zwischen dem Professor Ludwig Neundörfer und Max Horkheimer, 1955-1971; 1 Brief an den Professor John J. Neunaier von Max Horkheimer, 1965; 2 Briefe zwischen der Newton Compton Editori und Max Horkheimer, 1970; 3 Briefe zwischen der New York Times und Max Horkheimer, 1959-1960; 4 Briefe und Beilage zwischen Stephen Ney und Max Horkheimer, 1967; 4 Briefe und Beilage zwischen dem Student Claus Niederberger und Max Horkheimer, 1973; 1 Brief an Dr. Friedrich Niewöhner von Max Horkheimer, 1973; 4 Briefe zwischen dem Professor August Nietschke und Max Horkheimer, 1965; 1 Dankesbrief von N.N. an Maidon Horkheimer, 1963; 1 Brief [Hinweis auf eine Krebstherapie] von N.N. an Max Horkheimer; 1 Brief [gegen den Kommunismus] von N.N. an Max Horkheimer, 1955; 1 Brief [Ansichtskarte, Unterzeichnet mit D.C.] von N.N. an Max Horkheimer, 1953; 1 Telegramm [Mitteilung über Schiffverbindung] von N.N. an Max Horkheimer, 1949; 3 Briefe und Beilage zwischen dem Northern Life Insurance Co. Seattle, Wash. und Max Horkheimer, 1951-1953; 4 Briefe und Beilage zwischen den Nürnberger Nachrichten und Max Horkheimer sowie einem Interview mit Max Horkheimer, 1973; 1 Brief von der Nymphenburger Verlagshandlung an Max Horkheimer, 1968;

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

1 Brief von Frederick Pollock an Walter Munding, 16.08.1950; 1 Brief von Frederick Pollock an Joseph Christ, 24.05.1950; 1 Brief von Albert Flegenheimer an Frederick Pollock, 18.05.1950; 2 Briefe von Frederick Pollock an E. Wehrle, 03.04.1950; 1 Brief von Margot von Mendelssohn an Max Horkheimer, 18.01.1950; 1 Brief von Nothern Life Insurance Co. (Seattle) an Max Horkheimer, 16.01.1950;

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

This layer is a georeferenced raster image of the historic paper map entitled: Railway and highway map of the famous Berkshire Hills region, showing also villages and points of interest, by Walter Watson, C.E. for the Berkshire Life Insurance Co. of Pittsfield, Mass., 1883. Scale [1:134,376]. The image inside the map neatline is georeferenced to the surface of the earth and fit to the Massachusetts State Plane Coordinate System, Mainland Zone (in Feet) (Fipszone 2001). All map collar and inset information is also available as part of the raster image, including any inset maps, profiles, statistical tables, directories, text, illustrations, or other information associated with the principal map. This map shows features such as main roads, railroads and railroad stations, drainage, mountains, schools, churches, cemeteries, town boundaries and more. Relief is shown by hachures and spot heights. Includes text and illustrations. This layer is part of a selection of digitally scanned and georeferenced historic maps of Massachusetts from the Harvard Map Collection. These maps typically portray both natural and manmade features. The selection represents a range of regions, originators, ground condition dates (1755-1922), scales, and purposes. The digitized selection includes maps of: the state, Massachusetts counties, town surveys, coastal features, real property, parks, cemeteries, railroads, roads, public works projects, etc.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

This layer is a georeferenced raster image of the historic paper map entitled: Railway and highway map of the famous Berkshire Hills region : showing also villages and points of interest, by Walter Watson, C.E. for the Berkshire Life Insurance Co. of Pittsfield, Mass., 1883, corrected to 1896. Scale [1:134,376]. The image inside the map neatline is georeferenced to the surface of the earth and fit to the Massachusetts State Plane Coordinate System, Mainland Zone (in Feet) (Fipszone 2001). All map collar and inset information is also available as part of the raster image, including any inset maps, profiles, statistical tables, directories, text, illustrations, or other information associated with the principal map. This map shows features such as main roads, railroads and railroad stations, drainage, mountains, schools, churches, cemeteries, town boundaries and more. Relief is shown by hachures and spot heights. Includes text and illustrations. This layer is part of a selection of digitally scanned and georeferenced historic maps of Massachusetts from the Harvard Map Collection. These maps typically portray both natural and manmade features. The selection represents a range of regions, originators, ground condition dates (1755-1922), scales, and purposes. The digitized selection includes maps of: the state, Massachusetts counties, town surveys, coastal features, real property, parks, cemeteries, railroads, roads, public works projects, etc.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mutual recognition is a remarkable innovation facilitating economic intercourse across borders. In the EU's internal goods market it has been helpful in tackling or avoiding the remaining obstacles, namely, regulatory barriers between Member States. However, there is a curious paradox. Despite the almost universal acclaim of the great merits of mutual recognition the principle has, in and by itself, contributed only modestly to the actual realisation of free movement in the single market. It is also surprising that economists have not or hardly underpinned their widespread appreciation for the principle by providing rigorous analysis which could substantiate the case for mutual recognition for policy makers. Business in Europe has shown a sense of disenc hantment with the principle because of the many costs and uncertainties in its application in actual practice. The purpose of the present paper is to provide the economic and strategic arguments for employing mutual recognition much more systematically in the single market for goods and services. The strategic and the "welfare" gains are analysed and adetailed exposition of the fairly high information , transaction and compliance costs is provided. The information costs derive from the fact that mutual recognition remains a distant abstraction for day-to-day business life. Understandably, verifying the "equivalence" of objectives of health and safety between Member States is perceived as difficult and uncertain. This sentiment is exacerbated by the complications of interpreting the equivalence of "effects". In actual practice, these abstractions are expected to override clear and specific national product or services rules, which local inspectors or traders may find problematic without guidance. The paper enumerates several other costs including, inter alia, the absence of sectoral rule books and the next-to-prohibitive costs of monitoring of the application of the principle. The basic problems in applying mutual recognition in the entire array of services are inspected, showing why the principle can only be used in a limited number of services markets and even there it may contribute only modestly to genuine free movement and competitive exposure. A special section is devoted to a range of practical illustrations of the difficulties business experiences when relying on mutual recognition. Finally, the corollary of mutual recognition - regulatory competition - is discussed in terms of a cost/benefits analysis compared to what is often said to be the alternative , that is "harmonisation" , in EU parlance the "new approach" to approximation. The conclusion is that the manifold benefits of mutual recognition for Europe are too great to allow the present ambiguities to continue. The Union needs much more pro-active approaches to reduce the costs of mutual recognition as well as permanent monitoring structures for its application to services (analogous to those already successfully functioning in goods markets). Above all, what is required is a "mutual recognition culture" so that the EU can better enjoy the fruits of its own regulatory ingenuity.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

At the height of the financial crisis, the Western welfare state prevented a repeat of the Great Depression. But there were also suggestions that social policy had contributed to the crisis, particularly by promoting households’ access to credit in pursuit of welfare goals. Others claim that it was the withdrawal of state welfare that led to the disaster. Against this background that motivated our interest, we propose a systematic way of assessing the relationship between financial market and public welfare provisions. We use structural vector auto-regression to establish the causal link and its direction. Two hypotheses about this relationship can be inferred from the literature. First, the notion that welfare states ‘decommodify’ livelihoods or that there is an equity-efficiency tradeoff would suggest that welfare states substitute to varying degrees for financial market offers of insurance and savings. By contrast, welfare states may support private interests selectively and/or help markets for households to function better; thus the nexus would be one of complementarity. Our empirical strategy is to spell out the causal mechanisms that can account for a substitutive or complementary relationship and then to see whether advanced econometric techniques find evidence for the existence of either of these mechanisms in six OECD countries. We find complementarity between public welfare (spending and tax subsidies) and life insurance markets for four out of our six countries, notably even for the United States. Substitution between welfare and finance is the more plausible interpretation for France and the Netherlands, which is surprising. Data availability constrains us from testing the implications for the welfare state contribution to the crisis directly but our findings suggest that the welfare state cannot generally be blamed for the financial crisis.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Report year ends Decemember 1.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Latest issue consulted: Vol. 80, no. 6 (July-Aug. 1981).

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"...sequel to Medical impairment study (1929) ... and the pamphlet Impairment study (1936)."