Yellow submarine of the Wnt/Frizzled signaling: submerging from the G protein harbor to the targets.

The Wnt/Frizzled signaling pathway plays multiple functions in animal development and, when deregulated, in human disease. The G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) Frizzled and its cognate heterotrimeric Gi/o proteins initiate the intracellular signaling cascades resulting in cell fate determination and polarization. In this review, we summarize the knowledge on the ligand recognition, biochemistry, modifications and interacting partners of the Frizzled proteins viewed as GPCRs. We also discuss the effectors of the heterotrimeric Go protein in Frizzled signaling. One group of these effectors is represented by small GTPases of the Rab family, which amplify the initial Wnt/Frizzled signal. Another effector is the negative regulator of Wnt signaling Axin, which becomes deactivated in response to Go action. The discovery of the GPCR properties of Frizzled receptors not only provides mechanistic understanding to their signaling pathways, but also paves new avenues for the drug discovery efforts.

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction studies of Drosophila melanogaster Gαo-subunit of heterotrimeric G protein in complex with the RGS domain of CG5036.

Regulator of G-protein signalling (RGS) proteins negatively regulate heterotrimeric G-protein signalling through their conserved RGS domains. RGS domains act as GTPase-activating proteins, accelerating the GTP hydrolysis rate of the activated form of Gα-subunits. Although omnipresent in eukaryotes, RGS proteins have not been adequately analysed in non-mammalian organisms. The Drosophila melanogaster Gαo-subunit and the RGS domain of its interacting partner CG5036 have been overproduced and purified; the crystallization of the complex of the two proteins using PEG 4000 as a crystallizing agent and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis are reported. Diffraction data were collected to 2.0 Å resolution using a synchrotron-radiation source.

The glucose transporter 4 FQQI motif is necessary for Akt Substrate of 160-Kilodalton-dependent plasma membrane translocation but not Golgi-localized g-ear-containing Arf-binding protein-dependent entry into the insulin-responsive storage compartment.

Newly synthesized glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) enters into the insulin-responsive storage compartment in a process that is Golgi-localized γ-ear-containing Arf-binding protein (GGA) dependent, whereas insulin-stimulated translocation is regulated by Akt substrate of 160 kDa (AS160). In the present study, using a variety of GLUT4/GLUT1 chimeras, we have analyzed the specific motifs of GLUT4 that are important for GGA and AS160 regulation of GLUT4 trafficking. Substitution of the amino terminus and the large intracellular loop of GLUT4 into GLUT1 (chimera 1-441) fully recapitulated the basal state retention, insulin-stimulated translocation, and GGA and AS160 sensitivity of wild-type GLUT4 (GLUT4-WT). GLUT4 point mutation (GLUT4-F5A) resulted in loss of GLUT4 intracellular retention in the basal state when coexpressed with both wild-type GGA and AS160. Nevertheless, similar to GLUT4-WT, the insulin-stimulated plasma membrane localization of GLUT4-F5A was significantly inhibited by coexpression of dominant-interfering GGA. In addition, coexpression with a dominant-interfering AS160 (AS160-4P) abolished insulin-stimulated GLUT4-WT but not GLUT4-F5A translocation. GLUT4 endocytosis and intracellular sequestration also required both the amino terminus and large cytoplasmic loop of GLUT4. Furthermore, both the FQQI and the SLL motifs participate in the initial endocytosis from the plasma membrane; however, once internalized, unlike the FQQI motif, the SLL motif is not responsible for intracellular recycling of GLUT4 back to the specialized compartment. Together, we have demonstrated that the FQQI motif within the amino terminus of GLUT4 is essential for GLUT4 endocytosis and AS160-dependent intracellular retention but not for the GGA-dependent sorting of GLUT4 into the insulin-responsive storage compartment.

G Protein-Coupled Receptor heterodimerization in the brain

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play critical roles in cellular processes and signaling and have been shown to form heteromers with diverge biochemical and/or pharmacological activities that are different from those of the corresponding monomers or homomers. However, despite extensive experimental results supporting the formation of GPCR heteromers in heterologous systems, the existence of such receptor heterocomplexes in the brain remains largely unknown, mostly because of the lack of appropriate methodology. Herein, we describe the in situ proximity ligation assay procedure underlining its high selectivity and sensitivity to image GPCR heteromers with confocal microscopy in brain sections. We describe here how the assay is performed and discuss advantages and disadvantages of this method compared with other available techniques.

Regulation of frizzled receptor activity at the plasma membrane : an interplay of the receptor, the trimeric G protein Go, and RGS protein and a scaffolding protein Kermit

G-protein-signaling pathways convey extracellular signals inside the cells and regulate distinct physiological responses. This type of signaling pathways consists of three major components: G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), heterotrimeric G proteins (G-proteins) and downstream effectors. Upon ligand binding, GPCRs activate heterotrimeric G proteins to initiate the signaling cascade. Dysfunction of GPCR signaling correlates with numerous diseases such as diabetes, nervous and immune system deficiency, and cancer. As the signaling switcher, G-proteins (Gs, Gq/11, G12/13, and Gi/o) have been an appealing topic of research for decades. A heterotrimeric G-protein is composed of three subunits, the guanine nucleotide associated a-subunit, ß and y subunits. In general, the duration of signaling is determined by the lifetime of activated (GTP bound) Ga subunits. Identification of novel communication partners of Ga subunits appears to be an attractive way to understand the machinery of GPCR signaling. In our lab, we mainly focus on Gao, which is abundantly expressed in the nervous system. Here we present two novel interacting partners of Drosophila Gao: Dhit and Kermit, identified through yeast two-hybrid screening and genetic screening respectively. Dhit is characterized by a small size with a conserved RGS domain and an N-terminal cysteine rich motif. The RGS domain possesses the GAP (GTPase activating protein) activity towards G proteins. However, we found that Dhit exerts not only the GAP activity but also the GDI (guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor) activity towards Gao. The unexpected GDI activity is preserved in GAIP/RGS19 - a mammalian homologue of Dhit. Further experiments confirmed the GDI activity of Dhit and GAIP/RGS19 in Drosophila and mammalian cell models. Therefore, we propose that Dhit and its mammalian homologues modulate GPCR signaling by a double suppression of Ga subunits - suppression of their nucleotide exchange with GTP and acceleration of their hydrolysis of GTP. Kermit/GEPC was first identified as a binding partner of GAIP/RGS19 in a yeast two- hybrid screen. Instead of interacting with the Drosophila homologue of GAIP/RGS19 (Dhit), Kermit binds to Gao in vivo and in vitro. The functional consequence of Kermit/Gao interaction is the regulation of localization of Vang (one of the planar cell polarity core components) at the apical membrane. Overall, my work elaborated the action of Gao with its two interaction partners in Gao- mediated signaling pathway. Conceivably, the understanding of GPCR signaling including Gao and its regulators or effectors will ultimately shed light on future pharmaceutical research. - Les voies de signalisation médiées par les protéines G transmettent des signaux extracellulaires à l'intérieur des cellules pour réguler des réponses physiologiques distinctes. Cette voie de signalisation consiste en trois composants majeurs : les récepteurs couplés aux protéines G (GPCRs), les protéines G hétérotrimériques (G-proteins) et les effecteurs en aval. Suite à la liaison du ligand, les GPCRs activent les protéines G hétérotrimériques qui initient la cascade de signalisation. Des dysfonctions dans la signalisation médiée par les GPCRs sont corrélées avec de nombreuses maladies comme le diabète, des déficiences immunes et nerveuses, ainsi que le cancer. Puisque la voie de signalisation s'active et se désactive, les protéines G (Gs, Gq/11, G12/13 et Gi/o) ont été un sujet de recherche attrayant pendant des décennies. Une protéine G hétérotrimérique est composée de trois sous-unités, la sous-unité a associée au nucléotide guanine, ainsi que les sous-unités ß et y. En général, la durée du signal est déterminée par le temps de demi-vie des sous-unités Ga activées (Ga liées au GTP). Identifier de nouveaux partenaires de communication des sous-unités Ga se révèle être un moyen attractif de comprendre la machinerie de la signalisation par les GPCRs. Dans notre laboratoire nous nous sommes concentrés principalement sur Gao qui est exprimée de manière abondante dans le système nerveux. Nous présentons ici deux nouveaux partenaires qui interagissent avec Gao chez la drosophile: Dhit et Kermit, qui ont été identifiés respectivement par la méthode du yeast two-hybrid et par criblage génétique. Dhit est caractérisé par une petite taille, avec un domaine RGS conservé et un motif N- terminal riche en cystéines. Le domaine RGS contient une activité GAP (GTPase activating protein) pour les protéines G. Toutefois, nous avons découvert que Dhit exerce non seulement une activité GAP mais aussi une activité GDI (guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor) à l'égard de Gao. Cette activité GDI inattendue est préservée dans RGS19 - un homologue de Dhit chez les mammifères. Des expériences supplémentaires ont confirmé l'activité GDI de Dhit et de RGS19 chez Drosophila melanogaster et les modèles cellulaires mammifères. Par conséquent, nous proposons que Dhit et ses homologues mammifères modulent la signalisation GPCR par une double suppression des sous-unités Ga - suppression de leur nucléotide d'échange avec le GTP et une accélération dans leur hydrolyse du GTP. Kermit/GIPC a été premièrement identifié comme un partenaire de liaison de RGS19 dans le criblage par yeast two-hybrid. Au lieu d'interagir avec l'homologue chez la drosophile de RGS19 (Dhit), Kermit se lie à Gao in vivo et in vitro. La conséquence fonctionnelle de l'interaction Kermit/Gao est la régulation de la localisation de Vang, un des composants essentiel de la polarité planaire cellulaire, à la membrane apicale. Globalement, mon travail a démontré l'action de Gao avec ses deux partenaires d'interaction dans la voie de signalisation médiée par Gao. La compréhension de la signalisation par les GPCRs incluant Gao et ses régulateurs ou effecteurs aboutira à mettre en lumière de futurs axes dans la recherche pharmacologique.

G alpha-q/11 protein plays a key role in insulin-induced glucose transport in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.

We evaluated the role of the G alpha-q (Galphaq) subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins in the insulin signaling pathway leading to GLUT4 translocation. We inhibited endogenous Galphaq function by single cell microinjection of anti-Galphaq/11 antibody or RGS2 protein (a GAP protein for Galphaq), followed by immunostaining to assess GLUT4 translocation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Galphaq/11 antibody and RGS2 inhibited insulin-induced GLUT4 translocation by 60 or 75%, respectively, indicating that activated Galphaq is important for insulin-induced glucose transport. We then assessed the effect of overexpressing wild-type Galphaq (WT-Galphaq) or a constitutively active Galphaq mutant (Q209L-Galphaq) by using an adenovirus expression vector. In the basal state, Q209L-Galphaq expression stimulated 2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake and GLUT4 translocation to 70% of the maximal insulin effect. This effect of Q209L-Galphaq was inhibited by wortmannin, suggesting that it is phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-kinase) dependent. We further show that Q209L-Galphaq stimulates PI3-kinase activity in p110alpha and p110gamma immunoprecipitates by 3- and 8-fold, respectively, whereas insulin stimulates this activity mostly in p110alpha by 10-fold. Nevertheless, only microinjection of anti-p110alpha (and not p110gamma) antibody inhibited both insulin- and Q209L-Galphaq-induced GLUT4 translocation, suggesting that the metabolic effects induced by Q209L-Galphaq are dependent on the p110alpha subunit of PI3-kinase. In summary, (i) Galphaq appears to play a necessary role in insulin-stimulated glucose transport, (ii) Galphaq action in the insulin signaling pathway is upstream of and dependent upon PI3-kinase, and (iii) Galphaq can transmit signals from the insulin receptor to the p110alpha subunit of PI3-kinase, which leads to GLUT4 translocation.

Structural determinants involved in the activation and regulation of G protein-coupled receptors: lessons from the alpha1-adrenegic receptor subtypes.

The aim of a large number of studies on G protein-coupled receptors was centered on understanding the structural basis of their main functional properties. Here, we will briefly review the results obtained on the alpha1-adrenergic receptor subtypes belonging to the rhodopsin-like family of receptors. These findings contribute, on the one hand, to further understand the molecular basis of adrenergic transmission and, on the other, to provide some generalities on the structure-functional relationship of G protein-coupled receptors.

Characterization of the phosphorylation sites involved in G protein-coupled receptor kinase- and protein kinase C-mediated desensitization of the alpha1B-adrenergic receptor.

Catecholamines as well as phorbol esters can induce the phosphorylation and desensitization of the alpha1B-adrenergic receptor (alpha1BAR). In this study, phosphoamino acid analysis of the phosphorylated alpha1BAR revealed that both epinephrine- and phorbol ester-induced phosphorylation predominantly occurs at serine residues of the receptor. The findings obtained with receptor mutants in which portions of the C-tail were truncated or deleted indicated that a region of 21 amino acids (393-413) of the carboxyl terminus including seven serines contains the main phosphorylation sites involved in agonist- as well as phorbol ester-induced phosphorylation and desensitization of the alpha1BAR. To identify the serines invoved in agonist- versus phorbol ester-dependent regulation of the receptor, two different strategies were adopted, the seven serines were either substituted with alanine or reintroduced into a mutant lacking all of them. Our findings indicate that Ser394 and Ser400 were phosphorylated following phorbol ester-induced activation of protein kinase C, whereas Ser404, Ser408, and Ser410 were phosphorylated upon stimulation of the alpha1BAR with epinephrine. The observation that overexpression of G protein-coupled kinase 2 (GRK2) could increase agonist-induced phosphorylation of Ser404, Ser408, and Ser410, strongly suggests that these serines are the phosphorylation sites of the alpha1BAR for kinases of the GRK family. Phorbol ester-induced phosphorylation of the Ser394 and Ser400 as well as GRK2-mediated phosphorylation of the Ser404, Ser408, and Ser410, resulted in the desensitization of alpha1BAR-mediated inositol phosphate response. This study provides generalities about the biochemical mechanisms underlying homologous and heterologous desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors linked to the activation of phospholipase C.

Effects of polymorphisms in beta1-adrenoceptor and alpha-subunit of G protein on heart rate and blood pressure during exercise test. The finnish cardiovascular study.

J Appl Physiol vol 100, no 2, pp 507-511, 2006

On the role of G protein-coupled receptors oligomerization

The existence of a supramolecular organization of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) is now being widely accepted by the scientific community. Indeed, GPCR oligomers may enhance the diversity and performance by which extracellular signals are transferred to the G proteins in the process of receptor transduction, although the mechanism that underlies this phenomenon still remains unsolved. Recently, it has been proposed that a trans-conformational switching model could be the mechanism allowing direct inhibition/activation of receptor activation/inhibition, respectively. Thus, heterotropic receptor-receptor allosteric regulations are behind the GPCR oligomeric function. In this paper we want to revise how GPCR oligomerization impinges on several important receptor functions like biosynthesis, plasma membrane diffusion or velocity, pharmacology and signaling. In particular, the rationale of receptor oligomerization might lie in the need of sensing complex whole cell extracellular signals and translating them into a simple computational model.

Hypothyroidism decreases proinsulin gene expression and the attachment of its mRNA and eEF1A protein to the actin cytoskeleton of INS-1E cells

The actions of thyroid hormone (TH) on pancreatic beta cells have not been thoroughly explored, with current knowledge being limited to the modulation of insulin secretion in response to glucose, and beta cell viability by regulation of pro-mitotic and pro-apoptotic factors. Therefore, the effects of TH on proinsulin gene expression are not known. This led us to measure: a) proinsulin mRNA expression, b) proinsulin transcripts and eEF1A protein binding to the actin cytoskeleton, c) actin cytoskeleton arrangement, and d) proinsulin mRNA poly(A) tail length modulation in INS-1E cells cultured in different media containing: i) normal fetal bovine serum - FBS (control); ii) normal FBS plus 1 µM or 10 nM T3, for 12 h, and iii) FBS depleted of TH for 24 h (Tx). A decrease in proinsulin mRNA content and attachment to the cytoskeleton were observed in hypothyroid (Tx) beta cells. The amount of eEF1A protein anchored to the cytoskeleton was also reduced in hypothyroidism, and it is worth mentioning that eEF1A is essential to attach transcripts to the cytoskeleton, which might modulate their stability and rate of translation. Proinsulin poly(A) tail length and cytoskeleton arrangement remained unchanged in hypothyroidism. T3 treatment of control cells for 12 h did not induce any changes in the parameters studied. The data indicate that TH is important for proinsulin mRNA expression and translation, since its total amount and attachment to the cytoskeleton are decreased in hypothyroid beta cells, providing evidence that effects of TH on carbohydrate metabolism also include the control of proinsulin gene expression.

GABA accumulation and the hypersensitive response in isolated mesophyll cells treated with the G protein activator mastoparan

GABA (y-amino butyric acid) is a non-protein amino acid synthesized through the a-decarboxylation of L-glutamate. This reaction is catalyzed by L-glutamate decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.15), a cytosolic Ca2+/calmodulin-stimulated enzyme. The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not GABA accumulation is associated with the hypersensitive response of isolated Asparagus sprengeri mesophyll cells. The addition of 25 J.lM mastoparan, a G protein activator, to suspensions of isolated asparagus mesophyll cells significantly increased GABA synthesis and cell death. Cell death was assessed using Evan's blue dye and fluorescein diacetate tests for cell viability. In addition, mastoparan stimulated pH-dependent alkalinization of the external medium, and a rapid and large 02 consumption followed by a loss of photosynthetic activity. The rate of 02 consumption and the net decrease in 02 in the dark was enhanced by light. The inactive mastoparan analogue Mas17 was ineffective in stimulating GABA accumulation, medium alkalinization, 02 uptake and cell death. Accumulation of H202 in response tomastoparan was not detected, however, mastoparan caused the cell-dependent degradation of added H202. The pH dependence of mastoparan-stimulated alkalinization suggests cellular electrolyte leakage, while the consumption of 02 corresponds to the oxidative burst in which 02 at the cell surface is reduced to form various active oxygen species. The results are indicative of the "hypersensitive response" of plants to pathogen attack, namely, the death of cells in the locality of pathogen invasion. The data are compatible with a model in which mastoparan triggers G protein activity, subsequent intracellular signal transduction pathway/s, and the hypersensitive response. It is postulated that the physiological elicitation of the hypersensitive response involves G protein signal transduction. The synthesis of GABA during the hypersensitive response has not been documented previously; however the role/s of GABA synthesis in the hypersensitive response, if any, remain unclear.

Skeletal muscle protein content of lipolytic inhibitor G(0)/G(1) switch gene-2 protein: the effect of endurance training

The first and rate-limiting step of lipolysis is the removal of the first fatty acid from a triglyceride molecule; it is catalyzed by adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL). ATGL is co-activated by comparative gene identification-58 (CGI-58) and inhibited by the G(0)/G(1) switch gene-2 protein (G0S2). G0S2 has also recently been identified as a positive regulator of oxidative phosphorylation within the mitochondria. Previous research has demonstrated in cell culture, a dose dependent mechanism for inhibition by G0S2 on ATGL. However our data is not consistent with this hypothesis. There was no change in G0S2 protein content during an acute lipolytic inducing set of contractions in both whole muscle, and isolated mitochondria yet both ATGL and G0S2 increase following endurance training, in spite of the fact that there should be increased reliance on intramuscular lipolysis. Therefore, inhibition of ATGL by G0S2 appears to be regulated through more complicated intracellular or post-translation regulation.

Liberation and Non-Attachment: Arjuna’s Fear in the Bhagavad-Gītā

This thesis takes liberation to be supreme knowledge of the unity underlying the world of multiplicity. This knowledge is always already attained, so all are eternally liberated, but it is unrecognized in ordinary experience. We will look at the Bhagavad-Gītā to consider why this is so. When Arjuna saw Kṛṣṇa’s imperishable Self, he saw all beings standing as one in Kṛṣṇa; thus, he was confronted by supreme knowledge. But he was overwhelmed with fear and confusion and took refuge in blindness. I argue that Arjuna was not prepared to face recognition because he was unpractised in non-attachment. Attached to his subjectivity, he trembled in the face of unity. The supreme goal is standing firm in recognition while living in the world.

Use of cellular impedance to characterize ligand functional selectivity at G protein-coupled receptors

Les récepteurs couplés aux protéines G (RCPGs) représentent la plus grande famille de cibles thérapeutiques pour le traitement d’une panoplie de pathologies humaines. Bien que plusieurs décennies de recherche aient permis de façonner nos connaissances sur ces protéines membranaires, notre compréhension des déterminants moléculaires de leur activité signalétique reste encore limitée. De ces domaines de recherche, une avancée récente a mis à jour un nouveau phénomène, appelé sélectivité fonctionnelle des ligands, qui a bouleversé les paradigmes décrivant leu fonctionnement de ces récepteurs. Ce concept émane d’observations montrant que l’activité pharmacologique de certains ligands n’est pas nécessairement conservée sur tout le répertoire signalétiques connu du récepteur et peu se restreindre à l'activation sélective d’un sous-groupe de voies de signalisation.Ce nouveau modèle pharmacologique de l'activation des RCPG ouvre de nouvelles possibilités pour la découverte de médicaments plus efficace et sûr, ciblant les RCPGs. En effet, il permet la conception de molécules modulant spécifiquement les voies signalétiques d’intérêt thérapeutique, sans engager les autres voies qui pourraient mener à des effets secondaires indésirables ou de la tolérance. Cette thèse décrit l'utilisation d'une nouvelle approche sans marquage, basée sur la mesure du changement l'impédance cellulaire. Par la mesure des changements cellulaires, comme la morphologie, l’adhésion et/ou la redistribution des macromolécules, cette approche permet de mesurer de façon simultanée l'activité de plusieurs voies de signalisation impliqués dans ces réponses. Utilisant le récepteur β2-adrénergique (β2AR) comme modèle, nous avons démontré que les variations dans l’impédance cellulaire étaient directement liées à l’activation de multiples voies de signalisation suite à la stimulation du récepteur par son ligand. L’agoniste type du β2AR, l’isoprotérénol, s’est avéré induire une réponse d’impédance dose-dépendante constituée, dans le temps, de plusieurs caractéristiques distinctes pouvant être bloquées de façon compétitive par l’antagoniste ICI118,551 Par l’utilisation d’inhibiteurs sélectifs, nous avons été en mesure de déterminer la contribution de plusieurs voies signalétiques canoniques, comme les voies dépendantes de Gs et Gi, la production d’AMPc et l’activation de ERK1/2, sur ces changements. De plus, la dissection de la réponse d’impédance a permis d’identifier une nouvelle voie de mobilisation du Ca2+ contribuant à la réponse globale des changements initiés par la stimulation du β2AR. Dans une autre étude, nous avons rapporté que la réponse calcique induite par le β2AR serait attribuable à une transactivation Gs-dépendant du récepteur purinergique P2Y11, lui-même couplé à la protéine Gq. La mesure d’impédance permettant de distinguer et de décrire une pléiade d’activités signalétiques, nous avons émis l’hypothèse que des ligands arborant des profils signalétiques différents généreraient des réponses d’impédance distinctes. Le criblage d’une librairie de ligands spécifiques au β2AR a révélé une grande variété de signatures d’impédance. Grâce au développement d’une approche computationnelle innovatrice, nous avons été en mesure de regrouper ces signatures en cinq classes de composés, un regroupement qui s’est avéré hautement corrélé avec le profil signalétique des différents ligands. Nous avons ensuite combiné le criblage de composés par impédance avec l’utilisation d’inhibiteurs sélectifs de voies signalétiques afin d’augmenter la résolution du regroupement. En évaluant l’impact d’une voie signalétique donnée sur la signature d’impédance, nous avons été en mesure de révéler une plus grande variété de textures parmi les ligands. De plus, cette méthode s’est avérée efficace pour prédire le profil signalétique d’une librairie de composés non caractérisés, ciblant le β2AR. Ces travaux ont mené à l’élaboration d’une méthode permettant d’exprimer visuellement la sélectivité fonctionnelle de ligands et ont révélé de nouvelles classes de composés pour ce récepteur. Ces nouvelles classes de composés ont ensuite été testées sur des cardiomyocytes humains, confirmant que les composés regroupés dans différentes classes produisent des effets distincts sur la contractilité de ces cellules. Globalement, ces travaux démontrent la pertinence de l’utilisation de l’impédance cellulaire pour une évaluation précise des différences fonctionnelles parmi les composés ciblant les RCPGs. En fournissant une représentation pluridimensionnelle de la signalisation émanant des RCPGs à l’aide d’un seul essai ne requérant pas de marquage, les signatures d’impédance représentent une stratégie simple et innovante pour l’évaluation de la fonctionnalité sélective des ligands. Cette méthode pourrait être d’une grande utilité dans le processus de découverte de nouveaux médicaments.