Desarrollo social y planificación social: estudio de problemas conceptuales = Social development and social planning: a survey of conceptual and practical problems in Latin America

Incluye Bibliografía

Desarrollo económico y social y las relaciones externas de América Latina = Economic and social development and external relations of Latin America

Incluye Bibliografía

Desarrollo económico y social y las relaciones económicas externas de América Latina = Economic and social development and the external economic relations of Latin America

Incluye Bibliografía

Desarrollo económico y social y las relaciones externas de América Latina = Economic and social development and external relations of Latin America

Incluye Bibliografía

Honduras: assessment of the damage caused by hurricane Mitch, 1998: implications for economic and social development and for the environment

Includes bibliography

Guatemala: assessment of the damage caused by hurricane Mitch, 1998: implications for economic and social development and for the environment

Includes bibliography

El Salvador: assessment of the damage caused by hurricane Mitch, 1998: implications for economic and social development and for the environment

Includes bibliography

Nicaragua: assessment of the damage caused by hurricane Mitch, 1998: implications for economic and social development and for the environment

Includes bibliography

Costa Rica: assessment of the damage caused by hurricane Mitch, 1998: implications for economic and social development and for the environment

Includes bibliography

Central America: assessment of the damage caused by hurricane Mitch, 1998: implications for economic and social development and for the environment

Includes bibliography

A Critical Response to Kevin Stenson’s Governing the Local: Sovereignty, Social Governance and Community Safety

In his compelling case study of local governance and community safety in the UK Thames Valley, Kevin Stenson makes several important contributions to the field of governmentality studies. While the paper’s merits are far-reaching, to this reader’s assessment they can be summarized in the following key areas: 1) Empirically, the article enhances our knowledge of the political economic transformation of a region otherwise overlooked in social science research ; 2) Conceptually, Stenson offers several theoretical and analytical refrains that, while becoming increasingly commonplace, are nonetheless still germane and rightly oriented to offer push back against otherwise totalizing, reified accounts of roll back/roll out neoliberalism. A welcomed new approach is offered as a corrective, The Realist Governmentality perspective, which emphasizes the interrelated and co-constitutive nature of politics, local culture, and habitus in processes related to the restructuring of social governance; 3) Methodologically, the paper makes a pitch for the ways in which finely grained, nuanced, mixed-method/ethnographic analyses have the potential to further problematize and recast a field of governmentality studies far too often dominated by discursive and textual approaches.

Governing the Local: Sovereignty, Social Governance and Community Safety

There has been much commentary about the re-ordering of the relations between nation state government, geographical territory, and populations in the advanced liberal democracies. This is seen as a product of: increasing demographic and cultural diversity due to legal and illegal migration; economic, cultural, and political global interdependence; footloose mobility of capital and the outsourcing of jobs to poorer countries; the growing power of international corporations and financial markets; and the growth of supra-national bodies like the European Union and The North Atlantic Free Trade Association, the World Trade Organisation, and (debatably), the UN. These developments are held to be associated with the gradual demise of the model of the increasingly secular nation state first crystallised by the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648. This conception provided a mutual, guarantee of states’ jurisdiction over territory and populations through their legitimated attempts to monopolise the use of force. Though, the relations between these states have always been asymmetrical and often challenged (Hunter 1998).