Juventud vulnerable y escuela media: representaciones y experiencias sobre la autoridad escolar. Vulnerable youth and high school: representation and experiences on scholastic authority.

La investigación busca responder cómo experimentan, se representan y caracterizan grupos juveniles en situación de vulnerabilidad social de la ciudad de Córdoba, la autoridad en la escuela media considerada en tres actores institucionales claves: docentes, preceptores y directores. Se propone indagar acerca de la autoridad desde dos dimensiones: las representaciones juveniles de la autoridad pedagógica (ligada al desempeño de los profesores) y la autoridad en términos de límites que reconocen en los directivos y preceptores vinculándola con el espacio institucional de la escuela. Objetivos Explorar las relaciones con la autoridad escolar vivenciadas en su tránsito por la escuela secundaria por jóvenes en condiciones de vulnerabilidad social de la ciudad de Córdoba. Indagar como vivencian los jóvenes las leyes y normativas escolares atendiendo a la cercanía o distancia con las prácticas que ellos ponen en juego en el seno de sus grupos de referencia. Identificar desde las voces de adolescentes de sectores populares los problemas de convivencia escolar más frecuentes, apuntando a reconocer qué posiciones advierten ante tales situaciones en los adultos que se desempeñan en diferentes roles en la escuela. Explorar en las interacciones y conflictos que se plantean en sus relaciones con docentes, directivos y preceptores. Conocer las valoraciones que los jóvenes efectúan sobre las estrategias de autoridad puestas en juego por profesores (vinculándolas con el desempeño cotidiano en sus asignaturas), preceptores y directivos. Materiales y métodos: Se seguirán dos etapas: a) Realización de grupos focales con adolescentes de 15-17 en situación de vulnerabilidad social que asisten a la escuela media. Se prevé la utilización de muestras intencionales. b) Aplicación de un cuestionario estandarizado a jóvenes de escuelas secundarias en situación de vulnerabilidad. Las preguntas del cuestionario serán elaboradas en forma de escalas de tipo Likert construidas a partir de la información obtenida en la primera etapa Resultados: La investigación producirá conocimientos acerca de: - formas de legitimación de la autoridad escolar por parte de jóvenes socialmente vulnerables - características de la autoridad escolar en docentes, preceptores y directores - modelos institucionales de autoridad escolar Importancia: La significatividad de los resultados se vincula con el marco de las discusiones que se vienen desarrollando en torno a las transformaciones de la educación secundaria, dentro de las cuales la recreación del vínculo docente-alumno y la redefinición de los marcos de autoridad institucionales resultan sustantivos de cara a la mejora. Pertinencia: El trabajo ayudará a identificar núcleos críticos ligados con la gestión de convivencia y de la autoridad escolar, lo que servirá para identificar aspectos de los formatos institucionales que deberían ser revisados y aquellos que podrían ser objeto de afianzamiento y multiplicación.

Maltreatment, psychiatric symptoms and human immunodeficiency virus/sexual transmitted infection risk behavior among youth with alcohol and other drug use problems: A person-centered analysis

Multi-problem youth undergoing treatment for substance use problems are at high behavioral risk for exposure to sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Specific risk factors include childhood adversities such as maltreatment experiences and subsequent forms of psychopathology. The current study used a person-centered analytical approach to examine how childhood maltreatment experiences were related to patterns of psychiatric symptoms and HIV/STI risk behaviors in a sample of adolescents (N = 408) receiving treatment services. Data were collected in face-to-face interviews at two community-based facilities. Descriptive statistics and Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) were used to (a) classify adolescents into groups based on past year psychiatric symptoms, and (b) examine relations between class membership and forms of childhood maltreatment experiences, as well as past year sexual risk behavior (SRB). ^ LPA results indicated significant heterogeneity in psychiatric symptoms among the participants. The three classes generated via the optimal LPA solution included: (a) a low psychiatric symptoms class, (b) a high alcohol symptoms class and (c) a high internalizing symptoms class. Class membership was associated significantly with adolescents’ self-reported scores for childhood sexual abuse and emotional neglect. ANOVAs documented significant differences in mean scores for multiple indices of SRB indices by class membership, demonstrating differential risk for HIV/STI exposure across classes. The two classes characterized by elevated psychiatric symptom profiles and more severe maltreatment histories were at increased behavioral risk for HIV/STI exposure, compared to the low psychiatric symptoms class. The high internalizing symptoms class reported the highest scores for most of the indices of SRB assessed. The heterogeneity of psychiatric symptom patterns documented in the current study has important implications for HIV/STI prevention programs implemented with multi-problem youth. The results highlight complex relations between childhood maltreatment experiences, psychopathology and multiple forms of health risk behavior among adolescents. The results underscore the importance of further integration between substance abuse treatment and HIV/STI risk reduction efforts to improve morbidity and mortality among vulnerable youth. ^

Maltreatment, Psychiatric Symptoms and Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Sexual Transmitted Infection Risk Behavior Among Youth with Alcohol and Other Drug Use Problems: A Person-Centered Analysis

Multi-problem youth undergoing treatment for substance use problems are at high behavioral risk for exposure to sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Specific risk factors include childhood adversities such as maltreatment experiences and subsequent forms of psychopathology. The current study used a person-centered analytical approach to examine how childhood maltreatment experiences were related to patterns of psychiatric symptoms and HIV/STI risk behaviors in a sample of adolescents (N = 408) receiving treatment services. Data were collected in face-to-face interviews at two community-based facilities. Descriptive statistics and Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) were used to (a) classify adolescents into groups based on past year psychiatric symptoms, and (b) examine relations between class membership and forms of childhood maltreatment experiences, as well as past year sexual risk behavior (SRB). LPA results indicated significant heterogeneity in psychiatric symptoms among the participants. The three classes generated via the optimal LPA solution included: (a) a low psychiatric symptoms class, (b) a high alcohol symptoms class and (c) a high internalizing symptoms class. Class membership was associated significantly with adolescents’ self-reported scores for childhood sexual abuse and emotional neglect. ANOVAs documented significant differences in mean scores for multiple indices of SRB indices by class membership, demonstrating differential risk for HIV/STI exposure across classes. The two classes characterized by elevated psychiatric symptom profiles and more severe maltreatment histories were at increased behavioral risk for HIV/STI exposure, compared to the low psychiatric symptoms class. The high internalizing symptoms class reported the highest scores for most of the indices of SRB assessed. The heterogeneity of psychiatric symptom patterns documented in the current study has important implications for HIV/STI prevention programs implemented with multi-problem youth. The results highlight complex relations between childhood maltreatment experiences, psychopathology and multiple forms of health risk behavior among adolescents. The results underscore the importance of further integration between substance abuse treatment and HIV/STI risk reduction efforts to improve morbidity and mortality among vulnerable youth.

Not in Education, Employment, or Training status among young Swiss men. Longitudinal associations with mental health and substance use.

PURPOSE: Not in Education, Employment, or Training (NEET) youth are youth disengaged from major social institutions and constitute a worrying concern. However, little is known about this subgroup of vulnerable youth. This study aimed to examine if NEET youth differ from other contemporaries in terms of personality, mental health, and substance use and to provide longitudinal examination of NEET status, testing its stability and prospective pathways with mental health and substance use. METHODS: As part of the Cohort Study on Substance Use Risk Factors, 4,758 young Swiss men in their early 20s answered questions concerning their current professional and educational status, personality, substance use, and symptomatology related to mental health. Descriptive statistics, generalized linear models for cross-sectional comparisons, and cross-lagged panel models for longitudinal associations were computed. RESULTS: NEET youth were 6.1% at baseline and 7.4% at follow-up with 1.4% being NEET at both time points. Comparisons between NEET and non-NEET youth showed significant differences in substance use and depressive symptoms only. Longitudinal associations showed that previous mental health, cannabis use, and daily smoking increased the likelihood of being NEET. Reverse causal paths were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: NEET status seemed to be unlikely and transient among young Swiss men, associated with differences in mental health and substance use but not in personality. Causal paths presented NEET status as a consequence of mental health and substance use rather than a cause. Additionally, this study confirmed that cannabis use and daily smoking are public health problems. Prevention programs need to focus on these vulnerable youth to avoid them being disengaged.

El Programa Jóvenes con Más y Mejor Trabajo y su incidencia en las trayectorias laborales de beneficiarios y ex beneficiarios

Frente a contextos sociales cambiantes, signados por la desinstitucionalización, y en el marco de las restricciones impuestas por la estructura del mercado laboral argentino, las trayectorias laborales de los jóvenes aparecen sumamente condicionadas. Sin embargo, se buscará dar cuenta, de la misma forma, de sus márgenes de acción, en tanto los elementos subjetivos ocupan un lugar igualmente importante en el análisis de dichas trayectorias. Suscribiendo que existen múltiples mediaciones que intervienen entre lo estructural y lo subjetivo que pueden ampliar las oportunidades, desarrollar recursos y activar la capacidad de utilizarlos, intentaremos comprender si la transición por el Programa Jóvenes con Más y Mejor Trabajo significó cambios en las trayectorias laborales de los jóvenes beneficiarios y ex beneficiarios de la ciudad de La Plata. En este trabajo se adoptó una perspectiva metodológica cualitativa, considerándose central para nuestro objetivo, ya que habilitó el acceso a un análisis interpretacional del discurso de los jóvenes sobre su experiencia en el pasaje por el Programa, como así también en las mencionadas trayectorias laborales. En base a un análisis retrospectivo, se produjeron datos a partir de entrevistas biográficas de carácter individual a los beneficiarios y ex beneficiarios, los cuales se seleccionaron en base a un muestro de tipo teórico

El Programa Jóvenes con Más y Mejor Trabajo y su incidencia en las trayectorias laborales de beneficiarios y ex beneficiarios

Frente a contextos sociales cambiantes, signados por la desinstitucionalización, y en el marco de las restricciones impuestas por la estructura del mercado laboral argentino, las trayectorias laborales de los jóvenes aparecen sumamente condicionadas. Sin embargo, se buscará dar cuenta, de la misma forma, de sus márgenes de acción, en tanto los elementos subjetivos ocupan un lugar igualmente importante en el análisis de dichas trayectorias. Suscribiendo que existen múltiples mediaciones que intervienen entre lo estructural y lo subjetivo que pueden ampliar las oportunidades, desarrollar recursos y activar la capacidad de utilizarlos, intentaremos comprender si la transición por el Programa Jóvenes con Más y Mejor Trabajo significó cambios en las trayectorias laborales de los jóvenes beneficiarios y ex beneficiarios de la ciudad de La Plata. En este trabajo se adoptó una perspectiva metodológica cualitativa, considerándose central para nuestro objetivo, ya que habilitó el acceso a un análisis interpretacional del discurso de los jóvenes sobre su experiencia en el pasaje por el Programa, como así también en las mencionadas trayectorias laborales. En base a un análisis retrospectivo, se produjeron datos a partir de entrevistas biográficas de carácter individual a los beneficiarios y ex beneficiarios, los cuales se seleccionaron en base a un muestro de tipo teórico

El Programa Jóvenes con Más y Mejor Trabajo y su incidencia en las trayectorias laborales de beneficiarios y ex beneficiarios

Frente a contextos sociales cambiantes, signados por la desinstitucionalización, y en el marco de las restricciones impuestas por la estructura del mercado laboral argentino, las trayectorias laborales de los jóvenes aparecen sumamente condicionadas. Sin embargo, se buscará dar cuenta, de la misma forma, de sus márgenes de acción, en tanto los elementos subjetivos ocupan un lugar igualmente importante en el análisis de dichas trayectorias. Suscribiendo que existen múltiples mediaciones que intervienen entre lo estructural y lo subjetivo que pueden ampliar las oportunidades, desarrollar recursos y activar la capacidad de utilizarlos, intentaremos comprender si la transición por el Programa Jóvenes con Más y Mejor Trabajo significó cambios en las trayectorias laborales de los jóvenes beneficiarios y ex beneficiarios de la ciudad de La Plata. En este trabajo se adoptó una perspectiva metodológica cualitativa, considerándose central para nuestro objetivo, ya que habilitó el acceso a un análisis interpretacional del discurso de los jóvenes sobre su experiencia en el pasaje por el Programa, como así también en las mencionadas trayectorias laborales. En base a un análisis retrospectivo, se produjeron datos a partir de entrevistas biográficas de carácter individual a los beneficiarios y ex beneficiarios, los cuales se seleccionaron en base a un muestro de tipo teórico

Dinâmicas nas (re)configurações da cultura organizacional : a Casa de Infância de Santo António (1858-2008)

Tese de Doutoramento, Educação (Sociologia da Educação), 11 de Julho 2013, Universidade dos Açores.

L.I.F.E. Landscape: A Co-created Healing Environment for Vulnerable Maasai Youth

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06

The Attic Youth Cafe

The Attic Youth Cafe was established as a social inclusion initiative and response to the issues of early school leaving, lack of informal educational opportunities, early sexual activity, early use of alcohol and the lack of a recreational space for young people to access information and socialise in. The service operates on a `drop-in` basis and is open to all young people aged between 14-18 years old. The Attic Youth Cafe offers services to the broad youth population and to marginalised and vulnerable young people. Local Community Development Programme Initiative Type Community Cafés Location Cork Target Groups Children (13-18 years) Funding Local Community Development Programme

Closing the summer learning gap for vulnerable junior kindergarten students

Under current academic calendars across North America, summer vacation creates a significant gap in the learning cycle. I t has been argued that this gap actually decreases student achievement levels over the course of the summer. In a synthesis of 39 studies Cooper, Nye, Charlton, Lindsay, & Greathouse (1996) indicated that summer learning loss equaled at least one month of instruction as measured by grade level equivalents on standardized test scores whereby children's test scores were at least one month lower when they returned to school in the fall than scores were when students left in the summer. Specifically, Cooper et aI., (1996) found that the summer learning loss phenomena may be particularly troublesome for less advantaged children including those with speech and language delays, children at-risk for reading disabilities, children from lower socio-economic backgrounds, and children learning English as a second language. In general, research illustrated clearly that the summer learning gap can be particularly problematic for vulnerable children and furthermore, that literacy skills may be the area of achievement that is most affected. A foundational pillar to this research project is including primary caregivers as authentic partners in a summer literacy program designed to support their children's literacy needs. This pillar led the research team to use the Learning Begins at Home: A Research-Based Family Literacy Program Curriculum designed by Antoinette Doyle, Kathleen Hipfner-Boucher, and Janette Pelletier from the Ontario Institute for the Studies of Education. The LBH program is designed to be flexibly adapted to suit the needs of each individual participating family. As indicated by Timmons (2008) literacy interventions are most powerful when they include authentic family involvement. Based on this research, a requirement for participating in the summer literacy program was involvement of a child and one of their primary caregivers. The participating caregiver was integrally involved in the program, participating in workshop activities prior to and following hands-on literacy work with their child. By including primary caregivers as authentic partners, the research team encouraged a paradigmatic shift in the family whereby literacy activities become routine within their household. 5 Participants in this study were 14 children from junior kindergarten classrooms within the Niagara Catholic District School Board. As children were referred to the program, they were assessed by a trained emergent literacy specialist (from Speech Services Niagara) to identify whether they met the eligibility requirements for participation in the summer program. To be eligible to participate, children demonstrated significant literacy needs (i.e. below 25%ile on the Test of Preschool Early Literacy described below). Children with low incidence disabilities (i.e. profound sensory impairments, severe intellectual impairments, developmental disabilities, etc) were excluded as participants. The research team used a standard pre- and posttest design whereby all participating children were assessed with the Test of Preschool Early Literacy (Lonigan et aI., 2007), and a standard measure of letter names and sounds. Pretests were administered two weeks prior to the commencement of the program and the first set of posttests was administered immediately following the program. A second set of posttests was administered in December 2009 to measure the sustainability of the program. As a result of the program, all children scored statistically significantly higher on their literacy scores at the post-program assessment point immediately following the program and also at the Dec-post-program assessment point. These results in general indicated that the summer family literacy program made an immediate impact on the emergent literacy skills of participating children. All participating children demonstrated significant increases in print and phonological awareness as well as their letter sound understanding.

Closing the Summer Learning Gap for Vulnerable Children: An Examination of a Summer Family Literacy Program for Junior Kindergarten Children At-Risk for Reading Difficulties

The learning gap created by summer vacation creates a significant breach in the learning cycle, where student achievement levels decrease over the course ofthe summer (Cooper et aI., 2000). In a review of 39 studies, Cooper and colleagues (1996) specified that the summer learning shortfall equals at least one month loss of instruction as measured by grade level equivalents on standardized test scores. Specifically, the achievement gap has a more profound effect on children as they grow older, where there is a steady deterioration in knowledge and skills sustained during the summer months (Cooper et aI., 1996; Kerry & Davies, 1998). While some stakeholders believe that the benefits of a summer vacation overshadow the reversing effect on achievement, it is the impact of the summer learning gap on vulnerable children, including children who are disadvantaged as a result of requiring special educational needs, children from low socioeconomic backgrounds, and children learning English as a second language, that is most problematic. More specifically, research has demonstrated that it is children's literacy-based skills that are most affected during the summer months. Children from high socioeconomic backgrounds recurrently showed gains in reading achievement over the summer whereas disadvantaged children repeatedly illustrate having significant losses. Consequently, the summer learning gap was deemed to exaggerate the inequality experienced by children from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Ultimately, the summer learning gap was found to have the most profound on vulnerable children, placing these children at an increased chance for academic failure. A primary feature of this research project was to include primary caregivers as authentic partners in a summer family literacy program fabricated to scaffold their children's literacy-based needs. This feature led to the research team adapting and implementing a published study entitled, Learning Begins at Home (LBH): A Research-Based Family Literacy Program Curriculum. Researchers at the Ontario Institute designed this program for the Study of Education, University of Toronto. The LBH program capitalized on incorporating the flexibility required to make the program adaptable to meet the needs of each participating child and his or her primary caregiver. As it has been well documented in research, the role primary caregivers have in an intervention program are the most influential on a child's future literacy success or failure (Timmons, 2008). Subsequently, a requirement for participating in the summer family literacy program required the commitment of one child and one of his or her primary caregivers. The primary caregiver played a fundamental role in the intervention program through their participation in workshop activities prior to and following hands on work with their child. The purpose of including the primary caregiver as an authentic partner in the program was to encourage a definitive shift in the family, whereby caregivers would begin to implement literacy activities in their home on a daily basis. The intervention program was socially constructed through the collaboration of knowledge. The role ofthe author in the study was as the researcher, in charge of analyzing and interpreting the results of the study. There were a total of thirty-six (36) participants in the study; there were nineteen (19) participants in the intervention group and seventeen (17) participants in the control group. All of the children who participated in the study were enrolled in junior kindergarten classrooms within the Niagara Catholic District School Board. Once children were referred to the program, a Speech and Language Pathologist assessed each individual child to identify if they met the eligibility requirements for participation in the summer family literacy intervention program. To be eligible to participate, children were required to demonstrate having significant literacy needs (i.e., below 25%ile on the Test of Preschool Early Literacy described below). Children with low incident disabilities (such as Autism or Intellectual Disabilities) and children with significant English as a Second Language difficulties were excluded from the study. The research team utilized a standard pre-test-post-test comparison group design whereby all participating children were assessed with the Test of Preschool Early Literacy (Lonigan et aI., 2007), and a standard measure of letter identification and letter sound understanding. Pre-intervention assessments were conducted two weeks prior to the intervention program commencing, and the first set of the post-intervention assessments were administered immediately following the completion of the intervention program. The follow-up post-intervention assessments took place in December 2010 to measure the sustainability of the gains obtained from the intervention program. As a result of the program, all of the children in the intervention program scored statistically significantly higher on their literacy scores for Print Knowledge, Letter Identification, and Letter Sound Understanding scores than the control group at the postintervention assessment point (immediately following the completion of the program) and at the December post-intervention assessment point. For Phonological Awareness, there was no statistically significant difference between the intervention group and the control at the postintervention assessment point, however, there was a statistically significant difference found between the intervention group and the control group at the December post-intervention assessment point. In general, these results indicate that the summer family literacy intervention program made an immediate impact on the emergent literacy skills of the participating children. Moreover, these results indicate that the summer family literacy intervention program has the ability to foster the emergent literacy skills of vulnerable children, potentially reversing the negative effect the summer learning gap has on these children.

Youth and social cohesion in Ibero-America: a model in the making. Summary

Includes bibliography

Runaway and Throwaway Youth: Time for Policy Changes and Public Responsibility

The traditional American dream of owning a home, obtaining a college education, and working at a good, paying job is only that, a dream, for scores of homeless youth in America today. There is a growing street population of young people who have been thrown out of their homes by their caretakers or their families, and who face life-threatening situations each day. For these youth, the furthest thing in their lives is reaching the so-called “American Dream;” and their most immediate need is survival, simply living out the day in front of them. They have few options that lead to a decent and safe living environment. Their age, lack of work experience, and absence of a high school diploma make it most difficult to find a job. As a result, they turn to other means for survival; runaways and throwaways are most vulnerable to falling prey to the sex trade, selling drugs, or being lured into human trafficking, and some steal or panhandle. Street youth end up spending their nights in bus stations or finding a room in an abandoned building or an empty stairwell to sleep. Attempting to identify a specific number of homeless youth is difficult at best, but what is even more perplexing is our continued inability to effectively protect our children. We are left with a basic question framed by the fundamental tenets of justice: what is a community’s responsibility to its youth who, for whatever reason, end up living on the streets or in unsafe, abusive environments? The purpose of this paper is to briefly outline the characteristics of homeless youth, in particular differentiating between throwaways and runaways; explore the current federal response to homeless youth; and finally, address the nagging question that swirls around all children: can we aggressively aspire to be a community where every child is healthy and safe, and able to realize his or her fullest potential?

Invisible Suffering: Practitioner Reflections on Peacebuilding Programs with Youth Exposed to Traumatic Stressors in Intergroup Conflict

For decades, the international community has recognized that youth are some of the most vulnerable to mental and emotional distress within the intractable and cyclical nature of identity-based violent conflict. Exposure to traumatic stressors within these intergroup conflicts poses unique risks not only to the neurological and social development of youth, but also to the capacities of youth to fully participate in peacebuilding interventions. The peacebuilding field has yet to strongly consider how traumatic stress affects dynamics within programs for youth and how these programs may need to modify expectations of youth’s cognitive, social, and emotional functioning to account for the traumatic dimensions of political and social violence. Through a qualitative analysis of practitioner reflections gathered from an online survey distributed worldwide, this study explores how practitioners conceptualize and approach issues of traumatic stress in peacebuilding programs focused on youth in conflict-affected contexts. The objective is to identify the working assumptions undergirding practitioner conceptualizations and approaches to traumatic stress and gaps in trauma interventions in peacebuilding programs for youth. The implications of these findings will support efforts to enhance trauma-sensitive peacebuilding practice by revisiting and reconsidering preexisting norms.