A Reliability test system for educational purposes-basic data

The IEEE Reliability Test System (RTS) developed by the Application of Probability Method Subcommittee has been used to compare and test a wide range of generating capacity and composite system evaluation techniques and subsequent digital computer programs. A basic reliability test system is presented which has evolved from the reliability education and research programs conducted by the Power System Research Group at the University of Saskatchewan. The basic system data necessary for adequacy evaluation at the generation and composite generation and transmission system levels are presented together with the fundamental data required to conduct reliability-cost/reliability-worth evaluation

Cost evaluation and comparison of three decision strategies for cardiac revascularization : results of the suspected CAD protocol of the European CMR registry

Background: The public health burden of coronary artery disease (CAD) is important. Perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is generally accepted to detect and monitor CAD. Few studies have so far addressed its costs and costeffectiveness. Objectives: To compare in a large CMR registry the costs of a CMR-guided strategy vs two hypothetical invasive strategies for the diagnosis and the treatment of patients with suspected CAD. Methods: In 3'647 patients with suspected CAD included prospectively in the EuroCMR Registry (59 centers; 18 countries) costs were calculated for diagnostic examinations, revascularizations as well as for complication management over a 1-year follow-up. Patients with ischemia-positive CMR underwent an invasive X-ray coronary angiography (CXA) and revascularization at the discretion of the treating physician (=CMR+CXA strategy). Ischemia was found in 20.9% of patients and 17.4% of them were revascularized. In ischemia-negative patients by CMR, cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarctions occurred in 0.38%/y. In a hypothetical invasive arm the costs were calculated for an initial CXA followed by FFR testing in vessels with ≥50% diameter stenoses (=CXA+FFR strategy). To model this hypothetical arm, the same proportion of ischemic patients and outcome was assumed as for the CMR+CXA strategy. The coronary stenosis - FFR relationship reported in the literature was used to derive the proportion of patients with ≥50% diameter stenoses (Psten) in the study cohort. The costs of a CXA-only strategy were also calculated. Calculations were performed from a third payer perspective for the German, UK, Swiss, and US healthcare systems.

Improving the grid operation and reliability cost of distribution systems with dispersed generation

In this work, a mathematical model to analyze the impact of the installation and operation of dispersed generation units in power distribution systems is proposed. The main focus is to determine the trade-off between the reliability and operational costs of distribution networks when the operation of isolated areas is allowed. In order to increase the system operator revenue, an optimal power flow makes use of the different energy prices offered by the dispersed generation connected to the grid. Simultaneously, the type and location of the protective devices initially installed on the protection system are reconfigured in order to minimize the interruption and expenditure of adjusting the protection system to conditions imposed by the operation of dispersed units. The interruption cost regards the unsupplied energy to customers in secure systems but affected by the normal tripping of protective devices. Therefore, the tripping of fuses, reclosers, and overcurrent relays aims to protect the system against both temporary and permanent fault types. Additionally, in order to reduce the average duration of the system interruption experienced by customers, the isolated operation of dispersed generation is allowed by installing directional overcurrent relays with synchronized reclose capabilities. A 135-bus real distribution system is used in order to show the advantages of using the mathematical model proposed. © 1969-2012 IEEE.

National Driver Register (NDR) alternative program cost evaluation. Part II. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Cost evaluation for nine Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards: Task VIII - FMVSS 301, fuel system integrity - determination of the model year when manufacturers made changes to meet Standard's 1976 requirements. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Cost evaluation for nine Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards - Vol. V. - FMVSS 213.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Cost evaluation for nine Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Volume I: FMVSS 105. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Cost evaluation for nine Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Volume II: FMVSS 108. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Cost evaluation for nine Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Volume III: FMVSS 122. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Cost evaluation for nine Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Volume IV: FMVSS 202 and 207. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Cost evaluation for nine Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Volume VI: FMVSS 220, 221 and 222. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Cost evaluation for four federal motor vehicle safety standards. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Cost evaluation for nine Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards - Task IX: FMVSS 214, side door strength, identification and cost evaluation of design and manufacturing changes. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Cost evaluation for four federal motor vehicle safety standards. Task VI additional bumpers, FMVSS 215 - exterior protection. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Cost evaluation of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 105-83. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.