A vaccine against nicotine for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco dependence is the leading cause of preventable death and disabilities worldwide and nicotine is the main substance responsible for the addiction to tobacco. A vaccine against nicotine was tested in a 6-month randomized, double blind phase II smoking cessation study in 341 smokers with a subsequent 6-month follow-up period. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: 229 subjects were randomized to receive five intramuscular injections of the nicotine vaccine and 112 to receive placebo at monthly intervals. All subjects received individual behavioral smoking cessation counseling. The vaccine was safe, generally well tolerated and highly immunogenic, inducing a 100% antibody responder rate after the first injection. Point prevalence of abstinence at month 2 showed a statistically significant difference between subjects treated with Nicotine-Qbeta (47.2%) and placebo (35.1%) (P = 0.036), but continuous abstinence between months 2 and 6 was not significantly different. However, in subgroup analysis of the per-protocol population, the third of subjects with highest antibody levels showed higher continuous abstinence from month 2 until month 6 (56.6%) than placebo treated participants (31.3%) (OR 2.9; P = 0.004) while medium and low antibody levels did not increase abstinence rates. After 12 month, the difference in continuous abstinence rate between subjects on placebo and those with high antibody response was maintained (difference 20.2%, P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Whereas Nicotine-Qbeta did not significantly increase continuous abstinence rates in the intention-to-treat population, subgroup analyses of the per-protocol population suggest that such a vaccination against nicotine can significantly increase continuous abstinence rates in smokers when sufficiently high antibody levels are achieved. Immunotherapy might open a new avenue to the treatment of nicotine addiction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Swiss Medical Registry 2003DR2327; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00369616.

Quantification of nicotine, cotinine, trans-3'-hydroxycotinine and varenicline in human plasma by a sensitive and specific UPLC-tandem mass-spectrometry procedure for a clinical study on smoking cessation.

A sensitive and specific ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous quantification of nicotine, its metabolites cotinine and trans-3'-hydroxycotinine and varenicline in human plasma was developed and validated. Sample preparation was realized by solid phase extraction of the target compounds and of the internal standards (nicotine-d4, cotinine-d3, trans-3'-hydroxycotinine-d3 and CP-533,633, a structural analog of varenicline) from 0.5mL of plasma, using a mixed-mode cation exchange support. Chromatographic separations were performed on a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography column (HILIC BEH 2.1×100mm, 1.7μm). A gradient program was used, with a 10mM ammonium formate buffer pH 3/acetonitrile mobile phase at a flow of 0.4mL/min. The compounds were detected on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, operated with an electrospray interface in positive ionization mode and quantification was performed using multiple reaction monitoring. Matrix effects were quantitatively evaluated with success, with coefficients of variation inferior to 8%. The procedure was fully validated according to Food and Drug Administration guidelines and to Société Française des Sciences et Techniques Pharmaceutiques. The concentration range was 2-500ng/mL for nicotine, 1-1000ng/mL for cotinine, 2-1000ng/mL for trans-3'-hydroxycotinine and 1-500ng/mL for varenicline, according to levels usually measured in plasma. Trueness (86.2-113.6%), repeatability (1.9-12.3%) and intermediate precision (4.4-15.9%) were found to be satisfactory, as well as stability in plasma. The procedure was successfully used to quantify nicotine, its metabolites and varenicline in more than 400 plasma samples from participants in a clinical study on smoking cessation.

Clinical and pharmacogenetic study on smoking and smoking cessation

Currently, smoking cessation represents one of the main strategies to reduce the incidence of tobacco-related diseases in the population. Smoking can also influence pharmacotherapy through several pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions. Some of the most concerned drugs are those metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 enzyme (e.g. caffeine, theophylline, clozapine, olanzapine, duloxetine), whose activity is induced by the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons found in tobacco smoke. This can result in a clinically significant decrease in the pharmacological effect of the drugs and the need of higher doses in smokers. Conversely, upon smoking cessation, toxic plasma levels of the drugs can be reached. The main objective of this thesis was to study the interindividual variability in CYP1A2 induction in a large cohort of smokers, by measuring CYP1A2 activity before smoking cessation and one month later in continuously abstinent subjects. For this purpose, a clinical study was conducted, including 194 smokers from the general population who wished to participate in a smoking cessation program and therefore received medical counseling and substitution therapy (nicotine or varenicline). An analytical method for the simultaneous quantification of nicotine, its metabolites and varenicline in plasma was developed and validated using ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. This method was used to confirm abstinence at different time points during the follow-up. Moreover, it was used to determine plasma levels of the smoking cessation drugs, to be used in the study of their pharmacogenetics, which was the secondary objective of this thesis. High interindividual variability in CYP1A2 induction by smoking was observed, ranging from no change to approximately 7 times decreased CYP1A2 activity after smoking cessation. Several clinical and genetic factors were investigated in an attempt to explain this variability. Firstly, a significant influence of CYP1A2*1F and *1D alleles, of contraceptive use and of the number of cigarettes smoked per day on CYP1A2 induced activity was observed, and of CYP1A2*1F and the use of contraceptives on the basal activity. But no influence of these factors was found on CYP1A2 inducibility. Given that known genetic polymorphisms in CYP1A2 gene were shown to explain only poorly the observed variations in activity, additional genetic factors were studied. SNPs in the CYP oxidoreductase (POR) gene were found to influence CYP1A2 basal activity, but not the induction. Finally, a pathway-based approach allowed to identify SNPs in genes coding for nuclear receptors (CAR, RXRa, VDR, PXR) and induction-mediating receptors (AhR), which significantly influenced CYP1A2 inducibility and basal activity (SNPs in the gene coding for CAR and RXRa). As secondary objective of the study, the pharmacogenetics of nicotine and varenicline is being investigated. Therefore, the nicotine metabolite ratio is used in the attempt to better explain nicotine dependence and the failure/success of quitting smoking. A population pharmacokinetic model is being developed for varenicline, integrating clinical and genetic factors (genes coding for its metabolizing enzymes and transporters), with the purpose of trying to predict efficacy and side effects. These findings suggest that the influence of smoking on pharmacotherapy could be better managed by including clinical and possibly in the future genetic factors, in the assessment of the adaptations needed when a person starts or stops smoking.  - L'arrêt du tabac représente une des principales stratégies pour diminuer l'incidence des maladies causées par celui-ci. Le tabagisme peut influencer la thérapie médicamenteuse par des interactions pharmacocinétiques ou pharmacodynamiques. Parmi les médicaments concernés, il y a ceux métabolisés par le cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 (caféine, théophylline, clozapine, olanzapine, duloxétine, etc), dont l'activité enzymatique est induite par les hydrocarbures aromatiques polycycliques présents dans la fumée de cigarette. Ceci peut se traduire par une diminution de l'effet pharmacologique du traitement et la nécessité d'augmenter les doses d'entretien chez les fumeurs. Au contraire, à l'arrêt de la cigarette, les taux plasmatiques des médicaments peuvent devenir toxiques. L'objectif principal de cette thèse était d'étudier la variabilité interindividuelle dans l'induction du CYP1A2 dans une large cohorte de fumeurs, par la mesure de l'activité du CYP1A2 avant l'arrêt de la cigarette, ainsi qu'un mois après chez les sujets abstinents. Pour ce faire, une étude clinique a été conduite, incluant 194 fumeurs de la population générale dans un programme d'arrêt du tabac offrant des consultations spécifiques et un traitement pharmacologique (nicotine ou varénicline). Une méthode analytique pour la quantification simultanée de la nicotine, ses métabolites et la varénicline dans le plasma par chromatographie liquide couplée à la spectrométrie de masse en tandem à été développée et validée. Cette méthode a été utilisée pour confirmer l'abstinence pendant l'étude et déterminer les taux plasmatiques des médicaments, dans le but d'étudier leur pharmacogénétique. Une grande variabilité interindividuelle dans l'induction du CYP1A2 par la fumée a été observée, parfois sans changement et pouvant aller jusqu'à une diminution d'environ 7 fois l'activité du CYP1A2 après l'arrêt de la cigarette. Plusieurs facteurs cliniques et génétiques ont été étudiés pour essayer d'expliquer cette variabilité. Tout d'abord, on a observé une influence significative: des allèles CYP1A2*1F et *1D, des contraceptifs et du nombre de cigarettes fumées par jour sur l'activité induite du CYP1A2, ainsi que l'influence de l'allèle *1F et des contraceptifs sur l'activité basale. Cependant, aucune influence de ces facteurs n'a été démontrée sur l'inductibilité du CYP1A2. Étant donné que les polymorphismes génétiques du CYP1A2 apportent peu de renseignements sur la variabilité de son activité, des facteurs génétiques supplémentaires ont été étudiés. Des polymorphismes dans le gène POR (CYP oxidoreductase) ont été associés à l'activité basale du CYP1A2, mais pas à l'induction. Finalement, une approche basée sur la voie de signalisation du CYP1A2 a permis d'identifier des polymorphismes dans des gènes codant pour des récepteurs nucléaires (CAR, RXRa, VDR, PXR) et d'autres liés à l'induction (AhR) qui influencent significativement l'inductibilité et l'activité basale (les SNPs du CAR et RXRa). L'objectif secondaire de cette étude était d'investiguer la pharmacogénétique de la nicotine et de la varénicline. Le ratio métabolique de la nicotine est utilisé pour mieux expliquer la dépendance à la nicotine et le succès/échec de l'arrêt de la cigarette. Un modèle pharmacocinétique de population est en cours de développement pour la varénicline, intégrant des facteurs cliniques et génétiques (gènes codant pour ses enzymes de métabolisme et transporteurs), pour tenter de prédire son efficacité et ses effets secondaires. Les résultats de cette thèse suggèrent que l'influence du tabagisme sur la pharmacothérapie serait mieux gérée par l'inclusion des facteurs cliniques et peut-être, dans le futur, génétiques, dans l'évaluation des adaptations nécessaires lorsqu'une personne fume ou arrête de fumer.  - l'arrêt du tabac représente une des principales stratégies pour diminuer l'incidence des maladies causées par celui-ci dans la population. Le tabagisme peut influencer les traitements médicamenteux, soit en modifiant leur élimination par l'organisme, soit en agissant sur leur mode d'action. Parmi les médicaments les plus concernés, on retrouve par exemple: la caféine, la théophylline, la clozapine, l'olanzapine, la duloxétine, dont l'élimination est accélérée par la fumée de cigarette (induction enzymatique). Ceci peut se traduire par une diminution de l'effet du traitement et la nécessité d'en augmenter les doses chez les fumeurs. Au contraire, à l'arrêt de la cigarette, on observe un ralentissement de la fonction enzymatique, qui a pour conséquence une augmentation du taux de médicament dans le sang, pouvant devenir toxique. L'objectif principal de cette thèse était d'étudier comment cette induction par le tabac varie dans une population de fumeurs, par la mesure de l'activité de l'enzyme avant l'arrêt de la cigarette, ainsi qu'un mois après chez les sujets abstinents. Pour ce faire, une étude clinique a été conduite, incluant 194 fumeurs de la population générale dans un programme d'arrêt du tabac offrant des consultations spécifiques et un traitement médicamenteux (nicotine ou varénicline). Une méthode analytique a été mise au point pour mesurer la quantité de nicotine, de ses produits de dégradation et de la varénicline dans le sang des participants à l'étude. De plus, cette méthode a été utilisée pour confirmer l'abstinence pendant l'étude. Une grande variabilité interindividuelle a été observée dans l'induction de l'enzyme par la fumée; il en résulte aucun changement d'activité chez certains sujets après l'arrêt de la cigarette, alors que pour d'autres elle peut être diminuée jusqu'à 7 fois. Plusieurs facteurs cliniques et génétiques ont été étudiés pour essayer d'expliquer cette variabilité. Premièrement, une influence sur l'activité de l'enzyme a été observée pour les contraceptifs hormonaux et le nombre de cigarettes fumées par jour, ainsi que pour certaines variations génétiques dans le gène codant pour l'enzyme d'intérêt, mais il η y a pas eu d'influence sur l'induction. Par la suite, des variations génétiques dans d'autres gènes influençant le fonctionnement de l'enzyme ont été associées soit avec son activité, soit avec son induction par le tabac. Finalement, l'étude propose également d'investiguer si le métabolisme de la nicotine a une influence sur la dépendance, les symptômes de sevrage et le succès/échec de l'arrêt de la cigarette. Des variations génétiques dans les gènes du métabolisme de la varénicline sont également étudiées en lien avec les quantités de varénicline mesurées dans le sang ainsi que les effets du médicament. Ceci permettra peut-être de prédire son efficacité et ses effets secondaires. Les résultats de cette thèse suggèrent que l'influence du tabagisme sur la thérapie médicamenteuse serait mieux gérée en tenant compte des facteurs cliniques et peut-être, dans le futur, de la génétique dans l'adaptation des traitements, que la personne soit fumeuse ou en phase d'arrêt.

A pilot study combining individual-based smoking cessation counseling, pharmacotherapy, and dental hygiene intervention.

BACKGROUND: Dentists are in a unique position to advise smokers to quit by providing effective counseling on the various aspects of tobacco-induced diseases. The present study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of integrating dentists in a medical smoking cessation intervention. METHODS: Smokers willing to quit underwent an 8-week smoking cessation intervention combining individual-based counseling and nicotine replacement therapy and/or bupropion, provided by a general internist. In addition, a dentist performed a dental exam, followed by an oral hygiene treatment and gave information about chronic effects of smoking on oral health. Outcomes were acceptability, global satisfaction of the dentist's intervention, and smoking abstinence at 6-month. RESULTS: 39 adult smokers were included, and 27 (69%) completed the study. Global acceptability of the dental intervention was very high (94% yes, 6% mostly yes). Annoyances at the dental exam were described as acceptable by participants (61% yes, 23% mostly yes, 6%, mostly no, 10% no). Participants provided very positive qualitative comments about the dentist counseling, the oral exam, and the resulting motivational effect, emphasizing the feeling of oral cleanliness and health that encouraged smoking abstinence. At the end of the intervention (week 8), 17 (44%) participants reported smoking abstinence. After 6 months, 6 (15%, 95% CI 3.5 to 27.2) reported a confirmed continuous smoking abstinence. DISCUSSION: We explored a new multi-disciplinary approach to smoking cessation, which included medical and dental interventions. Despite the small sample size and non-controlled study design, the observed rate was similar to that found in standard medical care. In terms of acceptability and feasibility, our results support further investigations in this field. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN67470159.

Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients.

BACKGROUND: Smoking contributes to reasons for hospitalisation, and the period of hospitalisation may be a good time to provide help with quitting. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of interventions for smoking cessation that are initiated for hospitalised patients. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group register which includes papers identified from CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO in December 2011 for studies of interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients, using terms including (hospital and patient*) or hospitali* or inpatient* or admission* or admitted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized trials of behavioural, pharmacological or multicomponent interventions to help patients stop smoking, conducted with hospitalised patients who were current smokers or recent quitters (defined as having quit more than one month before hospital admission). The intervention had to start in the hospital but could continue after hospital discharge. We excluded studies of patients admitted to facilities that primarily treat psychiatric disorders or substance abuse, studies that did not report abstinence rates and studies with follow-up of less than six months. Both acute care hospitals and rehabilitation hospitals were included in this update, with separate analyses done for each type of hospital. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data independently for each paper, with disagreements resolved by consensus. MAIN RESULTS: Fifty trials met the inclusion criteria. Intensive counselling interventions that began during the hospital stay and continued with supportive contacts for at least one month after discharge increased smoking cessation rates after discharge (risk ratio (RR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27 to 1.48; 25 trials). A specific benefit for post-discharge contact compared with usual care was found in a subset of trials in which all participants received a counselling intervention in the hospital and were randomly assigned to post-discharge contact or usual care. No statistically significant benefit was found for less intensive counselling interventions. Adding nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to an intensive counselling intervention increased smoking cessation rates compared with intensive counselling alone (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.79, six trials). Adding varenicline to intensive counselling had a non-significant effect in two trials (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.74). Adding bupropion did not produce a statistically significant increase in cessation over intensive counselling alone (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.45, three trials). A similar pattern of results was observed in a subgroup of smokers admitted to hospital because of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this subgroup, intensive intervention with follow-up support increased the rate of smoking cessation (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.56), but less intensive interventions did not. One trial of intensive intervention including counselling and pharmacotherapy for smokers admitted with CVD assessed clinical and health care utilization endpoints, and found significant reductions in all-cause mortality and hospital readmission rates over a two-year follow-up period. These trials were all conducted in acute care hospitals. A comparable increase in smoking cessation rates was observed in a separate pooled analysis of intensive counselling interventions in rehabilitation hospitals (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.14, three trials). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: High intensity behavioural interventions that begin during a hospital stay and include at least one month of supportive contact after discharge promote smoking cessation among hospitalised patients. The effect of these interventions was independent of the patient's admitting diagnosis and was found in rehabilitation settings as well as acute care hospitals. There was no evidence of effect for interventions of lower intensity or shorter duration. This update found that adding NRT to intensive counselling significantly increases cessation rates over counselling alone. There is insufficient direct evidence to conclude that adding bupropion or varenicline to intensive counselling increases cessation rates over what is achieved by counselling alone.

Recent developments for smoking cessation and treatment of nicotine dependence

Nicotine is an addictive drug like heroin, amphetamine or cocaine. Addiction to tobacco leads to significant failure rates in programmes for smoking cessation. The alpha(4)beta(2) and alpha(7) nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and CB1 cannabinoid receptors play an important role in nicotine addiction.

The prospects for immunotherapy in smoking cessation

Context Smoking is a major preventable cause of death and disability that is maintained by dependence on nicotine. Smoking cessation reduces mortality and morbidity. Although existing pharmacological aids to smoking cessation and relapse prevention (nicotine replacement therapy and bupropion) improve on unassisted quitting and behavioural methods, they are only modestly effective. More effective pharmacological methods are required that improve compliance, reduce side-effects, and can be used in combination with existing cessation methods. Starting point A nicotine vaccine is a promising immunotherapeutic approach to smoking cessation and relapse prevention. Such a vaccine would induce the immune system to form specific antibodies to nicotine to prevent it from crossing the blood-brain barrier to act on receptor sites in the central nervous system. Recent studies in rats provide proof of principle by showing that nicotine-specific antibodies can prevent the reinstatement of nicotine self-administration (N Lindblom et al, Respiration 2002; 69: 254–60) and block dopamine release in the shell of the nucleus accumbens (Sde Villiers et al, Respiration 2002; 69: 247–53). A phase 1 trial of a human cocaine vaccine has also recently been successfully completed (T Kosten et al, Vaccine 2002; 20: 1196–204). A safe and effective human nicotine vaccine would potentially have fewer side-effects and better compliance than existing smoking-cessation pharmacotherapies. It could also be used in combination with some of them (eg, bupropion). Where next? The most promising clinical application of a human nicotine vaccine is likely to be in relapse prevention in abstinent smokers. A vaccine may also have a role in preparing smokers to quit. Clinical trials of safety and efficacy in human smokers and ex-smokers are warranted. If a nicotine vaccine proves to be safe and effective, the health-care system will need to ensure that it is registered for clinical use and that the poorer members of the community (among whom smoking prevalence is now highest in developed countries) have access to the vaccine. The community will need to be appropriately informed about the role of a nicotine vaccine to ensure that it is not prematurely used for preventive purposes in children and adolescents.

Nicotine gum treatment before smoking cessation: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: New ways of improving the efficacy of nicotine therapy need to be explored. We tested whether starting nicotine polacrilex gum treatment 4 weeks before the quit date improved smoking abstinence rates compared with starting treatment on the quit date. METHODS: An open randomized trial of 314 daily smokers (mean, 23.7 cigarettes/d) enrolled through the Internet and by physicians in Switzerland from November 2005 to January 2007. In the precessation treatment group, participants received nicotine polacrilex gum (4 mg, unflavored) by mail for 4 weeks before and 8 weeks after their target quit date, and they were instructed to decrease their cigarette consumption by half before quitting. In the usual care group, participants received the same nicotine gum for 8 weeks after their quit date and were instructed to quit abruptly. Instructions were limited to a booklet sent by mail and access to a smoking cessation Web site. Results are expressed as self-reported abstinence rates at the end of treatment and as biochemically verified smoking abstinence (cotinine plus carbon monoxide) after 12 months. RESULTS: Eight weeks after the target quit date, self-reported 4-week abstinence rates were 41.6% in the precessation treatment group and 44.4% in the usual care group (P = .61). One year after the target quit date, biochemically verified 4-week smoking abstinence rates were 20.8% in the precessation treatment group and 19.4% in the usual care group (P = .76). CONCLUSION: Starting nicotine gum treatment 4 weeks before the target quit date was no more effective than starting treatment on the quit date.

Conseit aux fumeurs: mise à jour épidémiologique et clinique [Smoking cessation intervention: 2006 update]

Recent Swiss reports confirmed that several chemical products added to cigarettes may increase the level of dependence and therefore the consumption of cigarettes. Observational studies demonstrated the association between smoking and type II diabetes, that smoking one to four cigarettes daily increases significantly the risk of disease and that the relative risk of breast cancer among non smoking women exposed to passive smoking is increased by 30%. The safety of nicotine replacement therapy for patients with cardiovascular disorders has been confirmed. Among new pharmacological approaches, varenicline, rimonabant, topiramate and nicotine vaccine all appear promising.

Nicotine vaccines for smoking cessation.

BACKGROUND: By reducing the amount of nicotine that reaches the brain when a person smokes a cigarette, nicotine vaccines may help people to stop smoking or to prevent recent quitters from relapsing. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this review are to assess the efficacy of nicotine vaccines for smoking cessation and for relapse prevention, and to assess the frequency and type of adverse events associated with the use of nicotine vaccines. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Review Group specialised register for trials, using the term 'vaccine' in the title or abstract, or in a keyword (date of most recent search April 2012). To identify any other material including reviews and papers potentially relevant to the background or discussion sections, we also searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO, combining terms for nicotine vaccines with terms for smoking and tobacco use, without design limits or limits for human subjects. We searched the Annual Meeting abstracts of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco up to 2012, using the search string 'vaccin'. We searched Google Scholar for 'nicotine vaccine'. We also searched company websites and Google for information related to specific vaccines. We searched clinicaltrials.gov in March 2012 for 'nicotine vaccine' and for the trade names of known vaccine candidates. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials of nicotine vaccines, at Phase II and Phase III trial stage and beyond, in adult smokers or recent ex-smokers. We included studies of nicotine vaccines used as part of smoking cessation or relapse prevention interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data on the type of participants, the dose and duration of treatment, the outcome measures, the randomization procedure, concealment of allocation, blinding of participants and personnel, reporting of outcomes, and completeness of follow-up.Our primary outcome measure was a minimum of six months abstinence from smoking. We used the most rigorous definition of abstinence, and preferred cessation rates at 12 months and biochemically validated rates where available. We have used the risk ratio (RR) to summarize individual trial outcomes. We have not pooled the current group of included studies as they cover different vaccines and variable regimens. MAIN RESULTS: There are no nicotine vaccines currently licensed for public use, but there are a number in development. We found four trials which met our inclusion criteria, three comparing NicVAX to placebo and one comparing NIC002 (formerly NicQbeta) to placebo. All were smoking cessation trials conducted by pharmaceutical companies as part of the drug development process, and all trials were judged to be at high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. Overall, 2642 smokers participated in the included studies in this review. None of the four included studies detected a statistically significant difference in long-term cessation between participants receiving vaccine and those receiving placebo. The RR for 12 month cessation in active and placebo groups was 1.35 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.82 to 2.22) in the trial of NIC002 and 1.74 (95% CI 0.73 to 4.18) in one NicVAX trial. Two Phase III NicVAX trials, for which full results were not available, reported similar quit rates of approximately 11% in both groups. In the two studies with full results available, post hoc analyses detected higher cessation rates in participants with higher levels of nicotine antibodies, but these findings are not readily generalisable. The two studies with full results showed nicotine vaccines to be well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events classified as mild or moderate. In the study of NIC002, participants receiving the vaccine were more likely to report mild to moderate adverse events, most commonly flu-like symptoms, whereas in the study of NicVAX there was no significant difference between the two arms. Information on adverse events was not available for the large Phase III trials of NicVAX.Vaccine candidates are likely to undergo significant changes before becoming available to the general public, and those included in this review may not be the first to reach market; this limits the external validity of the results reported in this review in terms of both effectiveness and tolerability. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no evidence that nicotine vaccines enhance long-term smoking cessation. Rates of serious adverse events recorded in the two trials with full data available were low, and the majority of adverse events reported were at mild to moderate levels. The evidence available suggests nicotine vaccines do not induce compensatory smoking or affect withdrawal symptoms. No nicotine vaccines are currently licensed for use in any country but a number are under development.Further trials of nicotine vaccines are needed, comparing vaccines with placebo for smoking cessation. Further trials are also needed to explore the potential of nicotine vaccines to prevent relapse. Results from past, current and future research should be reported in full. Adverse events and serious adverse events should continue to be carefully monitored and thoroughly reported.

Self-reported smoking cessation activities among Swiss primary care physicians.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Individual counselling, pharmacotherapy, and group therapy are evidence-based interventions that help patients stop smoking. Acupuncture, hypnosis, and relaxation have no demonstrated efficacy on smoking cessation, whereas self-help material may only have a small benefit. The purpose of this study is to assess physicians' current clinical practice regarding smokers motivated to stop smoking. METHODS: The survey included 3385 Swiss primary care physicians. Self-reported use of nine smoking cessation interventions was scored. One point was given for each positive answer about practicing interventions with demonstrated efficacy, i.e. nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, counselling, group therapy, and smoking cessation specialist. No points were given for the recommendation of acupuncture, hypnosis, relaxation, and self-help material. Multivariable logistic analysis was performed to identify factors associated with a good practice score, defined as >1. RESULTS: The response rate was 55%. Respondents were predominately over the age of 40 years (88%), male (79%), and resided in urban areas (74%). Seventeen percent reported being smokers. Most of the physicians prescribed nicotine replacement therapy (84%), bupropion (65%), or provided counselling (70%). A minority of physicians recommended acupuncture (26%), hypnosis (8%), relaxation (7%), or self-help material (24%). A good practice score was obtained by 85% of respondents. Having attended a smoking cessation training program was the only significant predictor of a good practice score (odds ratio: 6.24 , 95% CI 1.95-20.04). CONCLUSION: The majority of respondents practice recommended smoking cessation interventions. However, there is room for improvement and implementing an evidence-based smoking cessation-training program could provide additional benefit.

Tabacologie: mise au point 2015 [Smoking cessation: update 2015].

La prévalence mondiale du tabagisme est environ cinq fois plus importante chez les hommes que chez les femmes, toutefois cet écart tend à s'égaliser. En ce qui concerne les conséquences sur la santé du tabagisme, les femmes semblent plus susceptibles que les hommes. Elles sont notamment plus à risque de présenter certains cancers pulmonaires ou de décéder de maladies cardiovasculaires. Si les hommes sont moins enclins à demander de l'aide pour arrêter de fumer, les femmes quant à elles ont moins de succès dans leurs tentatives d'arrêt et les traitements semblent moins efficaces chez ces dernières. Des interventions d'aide à l'arrêt et des mesures de prévention du tabagisme adaptées aux spécificités de genre ont le potentiel d'améliorer la prise en charge des fumeurs et de diminuer les disparités de genre en santé. Smoking remains a major public health problem in Switzerland and is responsible for about 9000 deaths annually. In 2013, a quarter of the Swiss population (15 and over) were smokers and more than half of them wanted to quit smoking. This article provides an update of Swiss clinical practice guidelines published in 2011 and covers several new features, including views regarding smoking reduction, gradual quitting, use of nicotine replacement therapy for a short period prior to quitting, nicotine mouth spray marketing and the reimbursement of varenicline and bupropion treatments (under certain conditions) by basic health insurance. An algorithm summarizes the different stages of management of patients who smoke.

Nicotine dependence and levels of depression and anxiety in smokers in the process of smoking cessation

Background: Depression and anxiety are psychiatric disorders that are related to tobacco use and associated with dependence, the process of cessation, lapses and relapses after quitting smoking. Objective: To analyze the association of nicotine dependence with the level of anxiety and depression in patients who are in the process of smoking cessation. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted with patients who sought the smoking cessation program in Cuiabá/MT. All the smokers enrolled from May to August 2012, participated in this study. Four instruments were applied: Socio-demographic Questionnaire, Fagerstrom test, Beck Anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory. Following bivariate analysis, using the crude prevalence ratio, with level of significance lower than 5% (p < 0.05), having as variable outcome the nicotine dependence >= 5 (Fagerstrom). The associations with p < 0.20 were selected for robust Multiple Poisson Regression (RPa). Results: Associations of Fagerstrom >= 5 with the male sex (RP = 1.15 CI 95% 1.03-1.28); number of cigarettes/day (RP = 1,33; CI 95% 1.19-1.48); and moderate/severe level of depression (RP = 1.15; CI 95% 1.04-1.28) were found. In the final model (RPa), the following variables remained associated: male gender (RPa 1.12; CI 95% 1.01-1.24), number of cigarettes/day (RPa 1.28; CI 95% 1.15-1.43) and high level of depression (RPa 1.12; CI 95% 1.01-1.23). Discussion: High level of nicotine dependence was associated significantly with the level of depression, emphasizing the association between smoking and psychiatric comorbidities.

Psychosocial interventions for smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND: Quitting smoking improves prognosis after a cardiac event, but many patients continue to smoke, and improved cessation aids are urgently required. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions such as behavioural therapeutic intervention, telephone support and self-help interventions in helping people with coronary heart disease (CHD) to quit smoking. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (issue 2 2003), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and PSYNDEX were searched from the start of the database to August 2003. Results were supplemented by cross-checking references, and handsearches in selected journals and systematic reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled studies (RCTs) in patients with CHD with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. After initial selection of the studies three trials with methodological flaws (e.g. high drop out) were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Abstinence rates were computed according to an intention to treat analysis if possible, or if not on follow-up results only. MAIN RESULTS: We found 16 RCTs meeting inclusion criteria. Interventions consist of behavioural therapeutic approaches, telephone support and self-help material and were either focused on smoking cessation alone or addressed several risk factors. The trials mostly included older male patients with CHD, predominantly myocardial infarction. Overall there was a positive effect of interventions on abstinence after 6 to 12 months (odds ratio (OR) 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25 to 2.22), but substantial heterogeneity between trials. Studies with validated assessment of smoking status at follow-up had lower efficacy (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.11) than non-validated trials (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.93). Studies were clustered by intervention strategy and intensity of the intervention. Clustering reduced heterogeneity, although many trials used more than one type of intervention. The ORs for different strategies were similar (behavioural therapies OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.14; telephone support OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.97; self-help OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.96). More intense interventions showed increased quit rates (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.65) whereas brief interventions did not appear effective (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.22). Two trials had longer term follow-up, and did not show any benefits after 5 years. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial smoking cessation interventions are effective in promoting abstinence at 1 year, provided they are of sufficient duration. Further studies, with longer follow-up, should compare different psychosocial intervention strategies, or the addition of a psychosocial intervention strategy to pharmacological therapy (e.g. nicotine replacement therapy) compared with pharmacological treatment alone.