Majority versus minority influence, message processing and attitude change:the Source-Context-Elaboration Model

This chapter examines the contexts in which people will process more deeply, and therefore be more influenced by, a position that is supported by either a numerical majority or minority. The chapter reviews the major theories of majority and minority influence with reference to which source condition is associated with most message processing (and where relevant, the contexts under which this occurs) and experimental research examining these predictions. The chapter then presents a new theoretical model (the source-context-elaboration model, SCEM) that aims to integrate the disparate research findings. The model specifies the processes underlying majority and minority influence, the contexts under which these processes occur and the consequences for attitudes changed by majority and minority influence. The chapter then describes a series of experiments that address each of the aspects of the theoretical model. Finally, a range of research-related issues are discussed and future issues for the research area as a whole are considered.

Majority versus minority influence:the role of message processing in determining resistance to counter-persuasion

Two experiments examined the extent to which attitudes changed following majority and minority influence are resistant to counter-persuasion. In both experiments participants' attitudes were measured after being exposed to two messages, delayed in time, which argued opposite positions (initial message and counter-message). In the first experiment, attitudes following minority endorsement of the initial message were more resistant to a second counter-message only when the initial message contained strong versus weak arguments. Attitudes changed following majority influence did not resist the second counter-message and returned to their pre-test level. Experiment 2 varied whether memory was warned (i.e., message recipients expected to recall the message) or not, to manipulate message processing. When memory was warned, which should increase message processing, attitudes changed following both majority and minority influence resisted the second counter-message. The results support the view that minority influence instigates systematic processing of its arguments, leading to attitudes that resist counter-persuasion. Attitudes formed following majority influence yield to counter-persuasion unless there is a secondary task that encourages message processing.

Effects of caffeine on persuasion and attitude change:the role of secondary tasks in manipulating systematic message processing

Two experiments are reported that examine the effects of caffeine consumption on attitude change by using different secondary tasks to manipulate message processing. The first experiment employed an orientating task whilst the second experiment employed a distracter task. In both experiments participants consumed an orange-juice drink that either contained caffeine (3.5?mg/kg body weight) or did not contain caffeine (placebo) prior to reading a counter-attitudinal communication. The results across both experiments were similar. When message processing was reduced or under high distraction, there was no attitude change irrespective of caffeine consumption. However, when message processing was enhanced or under low distraction, there was greater attitude change in the caffeine vs. placebo conditions. Furthermore, attitudes formed after caffeine consumption resisted counter-persuasion (Experiment 1) and led to indirect attitude change (Experiment 2). The extent that participants engaged in message-congruent thinking mediated the amount of attitude change. These results provide evidence that moderate amounts of caffeine increase systematic processing of the arguments in the message resulting in greater agreement.

Systematic and heuristic processing of majority and minority-endorsed messages:the effects of varying outcome relevance and levels of orientation on attitude and message processing

Two experiments investigated the conditions under which majority and minority sources instigate systematic processing of their messages. Both experiments crossed source status (majority vs. minority) with message quality (strong vs. weak arguments). In each experiment, message elaboration was manipulated by varying either motivational (outcome relevance, Experiment 1) or cognitive (orientating tasks, Experiment 2) factors. The results showed that when either motivational or cognitive factors encouraged low message elaboration, there was heuristic acceptance of the majority position without detailed message processing. When the level of message elaboration was intermediate, there was message processing only for the minority source. Finally, when message elaboration was high, there was message processing for both source conditions. These results show that majority and minority influence is sensitive to motivational and cognitive factors that constrain or enhance message elaboration and that both sources can lead to systematic processing under specific circumstances. © 2007 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Majority versus minority influence: When, not whether, source status instigates heuristic or systematic processing

Two experiments investigated the extent of message processing of a persuasive communication proposed by either a numerical majority or minority. Both experiments crossed source status (majority versus minority) with message quality (strong versus weak arguments) to determine which source condition is associated with systematic processing. The first experiment showed a reliable difference between strong and weak messages, indicating systematic processing had occurred, for a minority irrespective of message direction (pro- versus counter-attitudinal), but not for a majority. The second experiment showed that message outcome moderates when a majority or a minority leads to systematic processing. When the message argued for a negative personal outcome, there was systematic processing only for the majority source; but when the message did not argue for a negative personal outcome, there was systematic processing only for the minority source. Thus one key moderator of whether a majority or minority source leads to message processing is whether the topic induces defensive processing motivated by self-interest. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Morningness-eveningness orientation, optimal time-of-day and attitude change: Evidence for the systematic processing of a persuasive communication

This study investigates the effects of morningness-eveningness orientation and time-of-day on persuasion. In an attitude change paradigm, 120 female participants read a persuasive message that consisted of six counter-attitudinal arguments (anti-voluntary euthanasia) either in the morning (8:30 a.m.) or in the evening (7:00 p.m.). Attitude change was assessed by measuring attitudes towards the target issue before and after exposure to the message. Message processing was assessed by thought-listing and message recall tasks. Self-reported mood and arousal were monitored throughout. Participants were classified into M- and E-types according to their scores on the Horne and Ostberg (1976) MEQ questionnaire. When tested at their respective optimal time-of-day (i.e., morning for M-types/evening for E-types), M- and E-types reported higher energetic arousal, greater agreement with the message, greater message-congruent thinking, and a propensity for superior message recall compared to M- and E-types tested at their nonoptimal time-of-day (i.e., evening for M-types/morning for E-types). The attitude change in those tested at their optimal time-of-day was mediated by the level of message-congruent thinking. Results are interpreted in terms of the Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Majority versus minority influence:when, not whether, source status instigates heuristic or systematic processing

Two experiments investigated the extent of message processing of a persuasive communication proposed by either a numerical majority or minority. Both experiments crossed source status (majority versus minority) with message quality (strong versus weak arguments) to determine which source condition is associated with systematic processing. The first experiment showed a reliable difference between strong and weak messages, indicating systematic processing had occurred, for a minority irrespective of message direction (pro- versus counter-attitudinal), but not for a majority. The second experiment showed that message outcome moderates when a majority or a minority leads to systematic processing. When the message argued for a negative personal outcome, there was systematic processing only for the majority source; but when the message did not argue for a negative personal outcome, there was systematic processing only for the minority source. Thus one key moderator of whether a majority or minority source leads to message processing is whether the topic induces defensive processing motivated by self-interest.

Morningness-eveningness orientation and attitude change:evidence for greater systematic processing and attitude change at optimal time-of-day

This study examines the relationship between morningness-eveningness orientation and time-of day on attitude change, and tests the hypothesis that people will be more persuaded when tested at their optimal time-of-day (i.e., morning for M-types and evening for E-types) than non-optimal time-of-day (i.e., evening for M-Types and morning for E-types). Two hundred and twenty participants read a message that contained either strong vs. weak quality counter-attitudinal arguments (anti-voluntary euthanasia) in the morning (9.00. a.m.) or in the evening (7.00. p.m.). When tested at their respective optimal time-of-day (for both M- and E-types) there was a reliable difference in attitude change between the strong vs. weak messages (indicating message processing had occurred) while there was no difference between strong vs. weak messages when tested at their non-optimal time-of-day. In addition, the amount of message-congruent thinking mediated the attitude change. The results show that M- and E-types pay greater attention to and elaborate on a persuasive message at their optimal time-of-day, and this leads to increased attitude change, compared to those tested at their non-optimal time-of-day. © 2012.

Jerim-320: A New 320-Bit Hash Function Compared To Hash Functions With Parallel Branches

This paper describes JERIM-320, a new 320-bit hash function used for ensuring message integrity and details a comparison with popular hash functions of similar design. JERIM-320 and FORK -256 operate on four parallel lines of message processing while RIPEMD-320 operates on two parallel lines. Popular hash functions like MD5 and SHA-1 use serial successive iteration for designing compression functions and hence are less secure. The parallel branches help JERIM-320 to achieve higher level of security using multiple iterations and processing on the message blocks. The focus of this work is to prove the ability of JERIM 320 in ensuring the integrity of messages to a higher degree to suit the fast growing internet applications

Information-Centric Content Retrieval for Delay-Tolerant Networks

The shift from host-centric to information-centric networking (ICN) promises seamless communication in mobile networks. However, most existing works either consider well-connected networks with high node density or introduce modifications to {ICN} message processing for delay-tolerant Networking (DTN). In this work, we present agent-based content retrieval, which provides information-centric {DTN} support as an application module without modifications to {ICN} message processing. This enables flexible interoperability in changing environments. If no content source can be found via wireless multi-hop routing, requesters may exploit the mobility of neighbor nodes (called agents) by delegating content retrieval to them. Agents that receive a delegation and move closer to content sources can retrieve data and return it back to requesters. We show that agent-based content retrieval may be even more efficient in scenarios where multi-hop communication is possible. Furthermore, we show that broadcast communication may not be necessarily the best option since dynamic unicast requests have little overhead and can better exploit short contact times between nodes (no broadcast delays required for duplicate suppression).

A Comunicação Mediada por Interfaces Digitais: a interação humana com os jogos digitais em celulares.

O trabalho é um estudo exploratório sobre o processamento de mensagens de entretenimento. O objetivo do trabalho foi propor e testar um modelo de processamento de mensagens dedicado à compreensão de jogos digitais. Para realizar tal tarefa realizou-se um extenso levantamento de técnicas de observação de usuários diante de softwares e mídias, para conhecer as qualidades e limitações de cada uma dessas técnicas, bem como de sua abordagem do problema. Também foi realizado um levantamento dos modelos de processamento de mensagens nas mídias tradicionais e nas novas mídias. Com isso foi possível propor um novo modelo de análise de processamento de mensagens de entretenimento. Uma vez criado o modelo teórico, fez-se preciso testar se os elementos propostos como participantes desse processo estavam corretos e se seriam capazes de capturar adequadamente as semelhanças e diferenças entre a interação entre jogadores e as diferentes mídias. Por essa razão, estruturou-se uma ferramenta de coleta de dados, que foi validada junto a designers de jogos digitais, uma vez que esses profissionais conhecem o processo de criação de um jogo, seus elementos e objetivos. Posteriormente, foi feito um primeiro teste, junto a praticantes de jogos digitais de diversas idades em computadores pessoais e TV digital interativa, a fim e verificar como os elementos do modelo relacionavam-se entre si. O teste seguinte fez a coleta de dados de praticantes de jogos digitais em aparelhos celulares, tendo como objetivo capturar como se dá a formação de uma experiência através do processamento da mensagem de entretenimento num meio cujas limitações são inúmeras: tamanho de tela e teclas, para citar algumas delas. Como resultado, verificou-se, por meio de testes estatísticos, que jogos praticados em meios como computadores pessoais atraem mais por seus aspectos estéticos, enquanto a apreciação de um jogo em aparelhos celulares depende muito mais de sua habilidade de manter a interação que um jogo praticado em PC. Com isso conclui-se que o processamento das mensagens de entretenimento depende da capacidade dos seus criadores em entender os limites de cada meio e usar adequadamente os elementos que compõe o ambiente de um jogo, para conseguir levar à apreciação do mesmo.(AU)

A Comunicação Mediada por Interfaces Digitais: a interação humana com os jogos digitais em celulares.

O trabalho é um estudo exploratório sobre o processamento de mensagens de entretenimento. O objetivo do trabalho foi propor e testar um modelo de processamento de mensagens dedicado à compreensão de jogos digitais. Para realizar tal tarefa realizou-se um extenso levantamento de técnicas de observação de usuários diante de softwares e mídias, para conhecer as qualidades e limitações de cada uma dessas técnicas, bem como de sua abordagem do problema. Também foi realizado um levantamento dos modelos de processamento de mensagens nas mídias tradicionais e nas novas mídias. Com isso foi possível propor um novo modelo de análise de processamento de mensagens de entretenimento. Uma vez criado o modelo teórico, fez-se preciso testar se os elementos propostos como participantes desse processo estavam corretos e se seriam capazes de capturar adequadamente as semelhanças e diferenças entre a interação entre jogadores e as diferentes mídias. Por essa razão, estruturou-se uma ferramenta de coleta de dados, que foi validada junto a designers de jogos digitais, uma vez que esses profissionais conhecem o processo de criação de um jogo, seus elementos e objetivos. Posteriormente, foi feito um primeiro teste, junto a praticantes de jogos digitais de diversas idades em computadores pessoais e TV digital interativa, a fim e verificar como os elementos do modelo relacionavam-se entre si. O teste seguinte fez a coleta de dados de praticantes de jogos digitais em aparelhos celulares, tendo como objetivo capturar como se dá a formação de uma experiência através do processamento da mensagem de entretenimento num meio cujas limitações são inúmeras: tamanho de tela e teclas, para citar algumas delas. Como resultado, verificou-se, por meio de testes estatísticos, que jogos praticados em meios como computadores pessoais atraem mais por seus aspectos estéticos, enquanto a apreciação de um jogo em aparelhos celulares depende muito mais de sua habilidade de manter a interação que um jogo praticado em PC. Com isso conclui-se que o processamento das mensagens de entretenimento depende da capacidade dos seus criadores em entender os limites de cada meio e usar adequadamente os elementos que compõe o ambiente de um jogo, para conseguir levar à apreciação do mesmo.(AU)

A Comunicação Mediada por Interfaces Digitais: a interação humana com os jogos digitais em celulares.

O trabalho é um estudo exploratório sobre o processamento de mensagens de entretenimento. O objetivo do trabalho foi propor e testar um modelo de processamento de mensagens dedicado à compreensão de jogos digitais. Para realizar tal tarefa realizou-se um extenso levantamento de técnicas de observação de usuários diante de softwares e mídias, para conhecer as qualidades e limitações de cada uma dessas técnicas, bem como de sua abordagem do problema. Também foi realizado um levantamento dos modelos de processamento de mensagens nas mídias tradicionais e nas novas mídias. Com isso foi possível propor um novo modelo de análise de processamento de mensagens de entretenimento. Uma vez criado o modelo teórico, fez-se preciso testar se os elementos propostos como participantes desse processo estavam corretos e se seriam capazes de capturar adequadamente as semelhanças e diferenças entre a interação entre jogadores e as diferentes mídias. Por essa razão, estruturou-se uma ferramenta de coleta de dados, que foi validada junto a designers de jogos digitais, uma vez que esses profissionais conhecem o processo de criação de um jogo, seus elementos e objetivos. Posteriormente, foi feito um primeiro teste, junto a praticantes de jogos digitais de diversas idades em computadores pessoais e TV digital interativa, a fim e verificar como os elementos do modelo relacionavam-se entre si. O teste seguinte fez a coleta de dados de praticantes de jogos digitais em aparelhos celulares, tendo como objetivo capturar como se dá a formação de uma experiência através do processamento da mensagem de entretenimento num meio cujas limitações são inúmeras: tamanho de tela e teclas, para citar algumas delas. Como resultado, verificou-se, por meio de testes estatísticos, que jogos praticados em meios como computadores pessoais atraem mais por seus aspectos estéticos, enquanto a apreciação de um jogo em aparelhos celulares depende muito mais de sua habilidade de manter a interação que um jogo praticado em PC. Com isso conclui-se que o processamento das mensagens de entretenimento depende da capacidade dos seus criadores em entender os limites de cada meio e usar adequadamente os elementos que compõe o ambiente de um jogo, para conseguir levar à apreciação do mesmo.(AU)

Flooded with Information from Social Media: Effects of Disaster Information Source and Visuals on Viewers' Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Responses

While a variety of crisis types loom as real risks for organizations and communities, and the media landscape continues to evolve, research is needed to help explain and predict how people respond to various kinds of crisis and disaster information. For example, despite the rising prevalence of digital and mobile media centered on still and moving visuals, and stark increases in Americans’ use of visual-based platforms for seeking and sharing disaster information, relatively little is known about how the presence or absence of disaster visuals online might prompt or deter resilience-related feelings, thoughts, and/or behaviors. Yet, with such insights, governmental and other organizational entities as well as communities themselves may best help individuals and communities prepare for, cope with, and recover from adverse events. Thus, this work uses the theoretical lens of the social-mediated crisis communication model (SMCC) coupled with the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing (LC4MP) to explore effects of disaster information source and visuals on viewers’ resilience-related responses to an extreme flooding scenario. Results from two experiments are reported. First a preliminary 2 (disaster information source: organization/US National Weather Service vs. news media/USA Today) x 2 (disaster visuals: no visual podcast vs. moving visual video) factorial between-subjects online experiment with a convenience sample of university students probes effects of crisis source and visuals on a variety of cognitive, affective, and behavioral outcomes. A second between-subjects online experiment manipulating still and moving visual pace in online videos (no visual vs. still, slow-pace visual vs. still, medium-pace visual vs. still, fast-pace visual vs. moving, slow-pace visual vs. moving, medium-pace visual vs. moving, fast-pace visual) with a convenience sample recruited from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (mTurk) similarly probes a variety of potentially resilience-related cognitive, affective, and behavioral outcomes. The role of biological sex as a quasi-experimental variable is also investigated in both studies. Various implications for community resilience and recommendations for risk and disaster communicators are explored. Implications for theory building and future research are also examined. Resulting modifications of the SMCC model (i.e., removing “message strategy” and adding the new category of “message content elements” under organizational considerations) are proposed.

New perspectives on the processing and release of public information

This article discusses issues related to the organization and reception of information in the context of services and public information systems driven by technology. It stems from the assumption that in a ""technologized"" society, the distance between users and information is almost always of cognitive and socio-cultural nature, a product of our effort to design communication. In this context, we favor the approach of the information sign, seeking to answer how a documentary message turns into information, i.e. a structure recognized as socially useful. Observing the structural, cognitive and communicative aspects of the documentary message, based on Documentary Linguistics, Terminology, as well as on Textual Linguistics, the policy of knowledge management and innovation of the Government of the State of Sao Paulo is analyzed, which authorizes the use of Web 2.0, also questioning to what extent this initiative represents innovation in the environment of libraries.