Nuclear energy and world fuel prices.

Bibliographical footnotes.

Japan´s energy future: Between a return to nuclear energy and a turn to renewables

After the triple disaster of 11 March 2011, Japan is at an energy crossroad. In the short and medium run it depends on fossil fuel imports to ensure its energy security, but the long term will be determined by the decisions taken at present. For Japan energy security is a national security challenge, as stated in its National Security Strategy. The article reviews the Japanese nuclear path, studies the factors shaping the Japanese electricity market and analyzes the current energy situation. Moreover, it also assesses the principles that have marked Japan’s energy policy and the two last Strategic Energy Plans -one prior to Fukushima and the other after it- before tackling the debate on the optimal future energy mix that Japan should adopt to meet its energy security trilemma, marked by its environmental commitment.

Energy and system-size dependence of two- and four-particle nu(2) measurements in heavy-ion collisions at root S-NN=62.4 and 200 GeV and their implications on flow fluctuations and nonflow

We present STAR measurements of azimuthal anisotropy by means of the two- and four-particle cumulants nu(2) (nu(2){2} and nu(2){4}) for Au + Au and Cu + Cu collisions at center-of-mass energies root S-NN = 62.4 and 200 GeV. The difference between nu(2){2}(2) and nu(2){4}(2) is related to nu(2) fluctuations (sigma(nu 2)) and nonflow (delta(2)). We present an upper limit to sigma(nu 2)/nu 2. Following the assumption that eccentricity fluctuations sigma(epsilon) dominate nu(2) fluctuations nu(2)/sigma nu(2) approximate to epsilon/sigma epsilon we deduce the nonflow implied for several models of eccentricity fluctuations that would be required for consistency with nu(2){2} and nu(2){4}. We also present results on the ratio of nu(2) to eccentricity.

Energy and water development appropriations for 2012 : hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, first session /

Shipping list number: 2011-0290-P (pt. 1), 2011-0295-P (pt. 2), 2011-0289-P (pt. 3), 2011-0325-P (pt. 4), 2012-0066-P (pt. 5), 2012-0308-P (pt. 6), 2012-0320-P (pt. 7), 2012-0014-P (pt. 8), 2011-0356-P (pt. 9).

Program of the United States Government in atmospheric radioactivity /

"November 7, 1960."

Meteorological data for radiological defense : user's manual.

July 1970.

Nuclear Energy Levels of ^31S and ^33Cl

The reaction ³²S(³He, α) ³¹S has been used to locate 42 levels in ³¹S. For 11 of the first 17 levels ℓ_n-values have been determined. The first 6 excited states of ³¹S have been studied by applying the particle-gamma correlation method of Litherland and Ferguson (their Method II) to the reaction ³²S(³He, αγ) ³¹S. The resulting spins and parities are: E_X, J^π = 1.25 MeV, 3/2⁺; 2.23 MeV, 5/2⁺; 3.08 MeV, 1/2⁺; 3.29 MeV, 5/2⁺, 3/2⁺; 3.35 MeV, 7/2, 3/2; 3.44 MeV, 3/2⁺. Mixing and branching ratios have also been determined. The ground state Q-value for the reaction ³²S(³He, α)³¹S has been measured to be 5.538 ± 0.006 MeV. Analysis of the spectra of the reaction ³²S(³He, α)³³Cl which were obtained as a by-product of the spectra of the reaction ³²S(³He, α) ³¹S located levels in ³³Cl at the following excitation energies: 0, 810 ± 9, (1978 ± 14), 2351 ± 9, 2686 ± 8, 2848 ± 9 (a known doublet), 2980 ± 9, and 4119 ± 10 keV. The 2.0 MeV level was only weakly populated, and to confirm its existence the reaction ³⁶Ar(p, α)³³Cl has been studied. In this reaction the 2.0 MeV level was strongly populated and the measured excitation energy was 1999 ± 20 keV. The experimental results for ³¹S and ³³Cl are compared with their analogs and with nuclear model predictions.

Areva and EDF: business prospects and risks in nuclear energy

This report examines the financial position of EDF and Areva and analyses what the impact of their nuclear ambitions will be on this.

ENEL: business prospects and risks in nuclear energy

This report examines the level of debt of ENEL and how that will be impacted by its plans for new nuclear power plants.

Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems: Heat Transfer Issues and Trends

Almost 450 nuclear power plants are currently operating throughout the world and supplying about 17% of the world’s electricity. These plants perform safely, reliably, and have no free-release of byproducts to the environment. Given the current rate of growth in electricity demand and the ever growing concerns for the environment, the US consumer will favor energy sources that can satisfy the need for electricity and other energy-intensive products (1) on a sustainable basis with minimal environmental impact, (2) with enhanced reliability and safety and (3) competitive economics. Given that advances are made to fully apply the potential benefits of nuclear energy systems, the next generation of nuclear systems can provide a vital part of a long-term, diversified energy supply. The Department of Energy has begun research on such a new generation of nuclear energy systems that can be made available to the market by 2030 or earlier, and that can offer significant advances toward these challenging goals [1]. These future nuclear power systems will require advances in materials, reactor physics as well as heat transfer to realize their full potential. In this paper, a summary of these advanced nuclear power systems is presented along with a short synopsis of the important heat transfer issues. Given the nature of research and the dynamics of these conceptual designs, key aspects of the physics will be provided, with details left for the presentation.