Nuclear Energy Levels of ^31S and ^33Cl

The reaction ³²S(³He, α) ³¹S has been used to locate 42 levels in ³¹S. For 11 of the first 17 levels ℓ_n-values have been determined. The first 6 excited states of ³¹S have been studied by applying the particle-gamma correlation method of Litherland and Ferguson (their Method II) to the reaction ³²S(³He, αγ) ³¹S. The resulting spins and parities are: E_X, J^π = 1.25 MeV, 3/2⁺; 2.23 MeV, 5/2⁺; 3.08 MeV, 1/2⁺; 3.29 MeV, 5/2⁺, 3/2⁺; 3.35 MeV, 7/2, 3/2; 3.44 MeV, 3/2⁺. Mixing and branching ratios have also been determined. The ground state Q-value for the reaction ³²S(³He, α)³¹S has been measured to be 5.538 ± 0.006 MeV. Analysis of the spectra of the reaction ³²S(³He, α)³³Cl which were obtained as a by-product of the spectra of the reaction ³²S(³He, α) ³¹S located levels in ³³Cl at the following excitation energies: 0, 810 ± 9, (1978 ± 14), 2351 ± 9, 2686 ± 8, 2848 ± 9 (a known doublet), 2980 ± 9, and 4119 ± 10 keV. The 2.0 MeV level was only weakly populated, and to confirm its existence the reaction ³⁶Ar(p, α)³³Cl has been studied. In this reaction the 2.0 MeV level was strongly populated and the measured excitation energy was 1999 ± 20 keV. The experimental results for ³¹S and ³³Cl are compared with their analogs and with nuclear model predictions.

Open cycle thorium–uranium-fuelled nuclear energy systems

The potential for countries that currently have a nominal nuclear energy infrastructure to adopt thorium–uranium-fuelled nuclear energy systems, using a once-through ‘open’ nuclear fuel cycle, has been suggested by the International Atomic Energy Agency. This review paper highlights generation II, III and III+ nuclear energy technologies that could potentially adopt an open thorium–uranium fuel cycle and qualitatively highlights the main differences between the open thorium–uranium and open uranium fuel cycles.

Areva and EDF: business prospects and risks in nuclear energy

This report examines the financial position of EDF and Areva and analyses what the impact of their nuclear ambitions will be on this.

ENEL: business prospects and risks in nuclear energy

This report examines the level of debt of ENEL and how that will be impacted by its plans for new nuclear power plants.

Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems: Heat Transfer Issues and Trends

Almost 450 nuclear power plants are currently operating throughout the world and supplying about 17% of the world’s electricity. These plants perform safely, reliably, and have no free-release of byproducts to the environment. Given the current rate of growth in electricity demand and the ever growing concerns for the environment, the US consumer will favor energy sources that can satisfy the need for electricity and other energy-intensive products (1) on a sustainable basis with minimal environmental impact, (2) with enhanced reliability and safety and (3) competitive economics. Given that advances are made to fully apply the potential benefits of nuclear energy systems, the next generation of nuclear systems can provide a vital part of a long-term, diversified energy supply. The Department of Energy has begun research on such a new generation of nuclear energy systems that can be made available to the market by 2030 or earlier, and that can offer significant advances toward these challenging goals [1]. These future nuclear power systems will require advances in materials, reactor physics as well as heat transfer to realize their full potential. In this paper, a summary of these advanced nuclear power systems is presented along with a short synopsis of the important heat transfer issues. Given the nature of research and the dynamics of these conceptual designs, key aspects of the physics will be provided, with details left for the presentation.

Nuclear energy: draft resolution approved by Committee II on 25 May 1957

Incluye Bibliografía