320 resultados para LEAFLETS


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Influence of soybean phenological stage and leaflets age on infection by Phakopsora pachyrhizi This work was conducted to study the influence of soybean growth stage and leaf age on the infection of Phakopsora pachyrhizi, the soybean rust pathogen. Soybean plants (cv. BRS 154 and BRS 258) at the V(3), R(1) and R(5) growth stages were inoculated with a 1 x 10(5) urediniospores per mL suspension. After a period of 24 hours in dew chambers, all plants were removed from the chambers and placed under greenhouse conditions for 20 days. Mean latent period (PLM) and disease severity were estimated. The susceptibility of trifoliate leaves to soybean rust was estimated on cv. BRS 154 at the growth stage R5. Pathogen inoculation was done at the first four trifoliate leaves. Fifteen days after inoculation, leaflets of each trefoil were evaluated for disease severity, lesion mean size and infection frequency. Plants` growth stage did not influence the PLM. Cultivars BRS 154 and BRS 258 presented PLM of 8 and 9 days, respectively. There was no difference in disease severity at the growth stages V(3) and R(1), but those values were higher than at the R(5) growth stage, 8 days after inoculation. The oldest trefoil showed the highest disease values.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Leaflets in gutter after demonstration of former South Vietnamese vice president Nguyen Cao Ky to Brisbane, Australia in January 1967.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

OBJECTIVE To review studies on the readability of package leaflets of medicinal products for human use.METHODS We conducted a systematic literature review between 2008 and 2013 using the keywords “Readability and Package Leaflet” and “Readability and Package Insert” in the academic search engine Biblioteca do Conhecimento Online,comprising different bibliographic resources/databases. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses criteria were applied to prepare the draft of the report. Quantitative and qualitative original studies were included. Opinion or review studies not written in English, Portuguese, Italian, French, or Spanish were excluded.RESULTS We identified 202 studies, of which 180 were excluded and 22 were enrolled [two enrolling healthcare professionals, 10 enrolling other type of participants (including patients), three focused on adverse reactions, and 7 descriptive studies]. The package leaflets presented various readability problems, such as complex and difficult to understand texts, small font size, or few illustrations. The main methods to assess the readability of the package leaflet were usability tests or legibility formulae. Limitations with these methods included reduced number of participants; lack of readability formulas specifically validated for specific languages (e.g., Portuguese); and absence of an assessment on patients literacy, health knowledge, cognitive skills, levels of satisfaction, and opinions.CONCLUSIONS Overall, the package leaflets presented various readability problems. In this review, some methodological limitations were identified, including the participation of a limited number of patients and healthcare professionals, the absence of prior assessments of participant literacy, humor or sense of satisfaction, or the predominance of studies not based on role-plays about the use of medicines. These limitations should be avoided in future studies and be considered when interpreting the results.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v.1 (1906-1908)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v.2 (1908-1910)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v.3 (1910-1911)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v.4 (1911-1912)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v.5 (1912-1913)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v.6 (1913-1914)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v.7(1914-1915)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v.8(1915-1919)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v.9(1920-1937)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v.10(1938-1939)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v.1-10 Index

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v.1 (1903-1906)