Abnormal Return of Dividend Announcements during a Boom and a Recession. Empirical evidence from the years of 2002 - 2002 and 2005 - 2007, including the Finnish extra dividends

Tutkimuksen tavoitteena on tutkia epänormaalien tuottojen esiintymistä nousu- ja laskusuhdanteen aikana osingonilmoituspäivän ympärillä. Osinkoilmoitukset ovat kerätty Yhdysvaltojen markkinalta (NYSE) ajanjaksoilta 2000 - 2002, jolloin pörssit laskivat teknokuplan jälkeen ja 2005 - 2007, jolloin sijoittajat kokivat suuria kurssivoittoja. Osinkoilmoitushavainnot koostuvat yhtiöistä, jotka nostivat tai pitivät osinko per osake paikallaan. Tavoitteena on tutkia eroja epänormaaleissa tuotoissa näiden kahden ajanjakson välillä. Toiseksi, tavoitteena on tutkia miten epänormaalit tuotot poikkeavat toisistaan eri osinkotuottoluokissa. Kolmanneksi, tavoitteena on tutkia esiintyikö markkinoilla epänormaaleja tuottoja kun suomalaiset yritykset ilmoittivat ylimääräisistä osingoista, pääasiassa vuonna 2004. Yksinkertaisesti ja lyhyesti sanottuna tavoitteena on tutkia arvostavatko sijoittajat osinkoja enemmän laskukauden vai nousukauden aikana. Rahoitusteorian mukaan sijoittajien tulisi arvostaa laskukauden aikana enemmän yhtiöitä, jotka pystyvät maksamaan huonosta taloustilanteesta huolimatta hyvää osinkoa. Empiiriset testit Yhdysvalloista osoittavat, että osingon nostamisesta johtuvat epänormaalit tuotot olivat suuremmat laskusuhdanteen aikana kuin noususuhdanteen aikana. Tämä on linjassa teorian kanssa. Osingon-nostot aiheuttivat nousukauden aikana vähäisiä epänormaaleja tuottoja. Selviä eroja eri osingontuottoluokkien välillä ei pystytty havaitsemaan. Tulokset yhdistetystä aineistosta osoittavat, että sijoittajat kokivat vähäisiä positiivisia epänormaaleja tuottoja laskukauden aikana. Nousukautena tuotot olivat lähellä nollaa. Suomen markkinoilla havaittiin selvä epänormaalituotto osingonilmoituspäivänä. Tulokset ovat pääpiirteittäin linjassa teorian kanssa. Sijoittajat arvostavat osinkoja hieman enemmän lasku- kuin noususuhdanteen aikana.

Osakekurssin reagointi tulosvaroitukseen nousu- ja laskumarkkinoilla

Tutkimuksen tavoitteena on selvittää tapahtuuko tulosvaroituksen yhteydessä yli- tai alireagointia nousu- ja laskumarkkinoiden aikana. Tutkimus tehdään tapahtumatutkimuksena, jossa tarkoituksena on tutkia osakkeiden epänormaaleja tuottoja tulosvaroituspäivän ympärillä. Tapahtumaikkunan pituus on yhteensä 11 päivää [-5, +5]. Aineisto koostuu Helsingin pörssin OMXH25 indeksin yritysten julkaisemista tulosvaroituksista vuosien 1997–2009 välillä. Tälle aikavälille osuu 200 päivän liukuvalla keskiarvolla mitattuna kaksi nousu- ja kaksi laskumarkkinaa. Tutkimuksessa ei havaittu selvää yli- tai alireagointia nousu- tai laskumarkkinoilla. Sen sijaan tietty säännöllisyys reagoinnissa tulosvaroituksiin löydettiin: Nousumarkkinoilla, tulosvaroituspäivän jälkeen näkyy selvä positiivinen tuotto kahden päivän ajalta tulosvaroituksen jälkeen, riippumatta siitä onko kyseessä positiivinen vai negatiivinen tulosvaroitus. Vastaavasti laskumarkkinoilla löydettiin selvä negatiivinen epänormaali tuotto kahden päivän ajalta tulosvaroituksen jälkeen.

Stock Repurchase Authorizations - Finnish Companies

The aim of this study is to examine the abnormal market reaction caused by share repurchase authorizations. We study this abnormal reaction from five different angles. First four concentrate on average abnormal returns while the fifth concentrates on cumulative abnormal return. Data consists of 508 share repurchase authorization from Finnish stock market. Event study methodology is used to examine the stock price reaction and regression analysis is used to find correlation between actual buybacks and abnormal returns. The empirical results show that markets do usually react positively to share repurchase authorizations. There are some differences depending which of the five angles the abnormal returns are being examined. Statistically we can confirm that some authorization give positive reaction while others do not. Also we didn’t find a statistically significant positive correlation between actual buybacks and abnormal returns.

Ceticismo ou reputação nas recompras de ações?

Este trabalho investiga as recompras de ações no Brasil pelo prisma da reputação das empresas anunciadoras. Por meio de uma base de dados ainda inexplorada, o formulário de referência anual, que possibilita a diferenciação dos anúncios de recompras pelas quantidades efetivamente compradas. Com metodologia de estudo de evento e regressão, foram analisados os anúncios de recompras de ações da própria companhia em mercado aberto para o período compreendido entre os anos de 2007 a 2014. Os principais resultados encontrados foram à existência de reputação para empresas que apresentam uma taxa efetiva de recompra mais elevada e uma penalização para as empresas que apresentam baixas taxas efetivas de recompra em anúncios anteriores, quanto mais próximo de zero a taxa efetiva de recompra do anuncio anterior, menor é o efeito de um novo anúncio. Por fim, foi encontrado retorno anormal acumulado significativo no mercado acionário brasileiro para empresas que anunciam recompra de ações próprias no mercado aberto de 1,12% no primeiro dia, 1,56% no quinto dia e 1,97% ao final do primeiro mês. Para eventos com histórico, foi de 0,98% no primeiro dia, 1,33% no quinto dia e 1,38% ao final do primeiro mês. Já para o caso nos quais os eventos foram antecedidos imediatamente por anúncios de recompra com taxas efetivas de recompras de no mínimo 70%, foi de 1,42% no primeiro dia, 2,70% no quinto dia e 5,09% ao final do primeiro mês.

Stock index reaction to large price changes:evidence frommajor Asian stock indexes

We examine the short-term price behavior of ten Asian stock market indexes following large price changes or “shocks”. Under the standard OLS regression, there is stronger support for return continuations particularly following positive and negative price shocks of less than 10% in absolute size. The results under the GJR-GARCH method provide stronger support for market efficiency, especially for large price shocks. For example, for the Hong Kong stock index, negative shocks of less than -5% but more than -10% generate a significant one day cumulative abnormal return (CAR) of-0.754% under the OLS method, but an insignificant CAR of 0.022% under the GJR-GARCH. We find no support for the uncertainty information hypothesis. Furthermore, the CARs following the period after the Asian financial crisis adjust more quickly to price shocks.

Audit committee director turnover

Actions by both private sector organizations and legislators in recent years have highlighted the importance of the audit committee of the board of directors of corporations in the financial reporting process. For example, the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 has multiple sections that deal with the composition and functioning of audit committees. My dissertation examines multiple issues related to the composition of audit committees. In the first two parts of my dissertation, I examine the stock market reactions to disclosures of audit committee appointments and departures in the 8-Ks filed with the SEC during 2008 and 2009. I find that there is a positive stock market reaction to the appointment of audit committee directors who are financial experts. The second essay investigates the cumulative abnormal return to departure of audit committee directors. I find that when an accounting expert leaves the audit committee, the market reaction is significantly negative. These results are consistent with regulators’ concerns related to having directors with audit, accounting and other financial expertise on corporate audit committees. The third essay of my dissertation examines the changes in audit committee composition in the last decade. I find that while the increase in audit committee size is relatively modest, there has been a significant increase in the number of audit committee experts and the frequency of audit committee meetings over the past decade; interestingly, such increase in the number of meetings has persisted even after the media focus on the auditing profession, in the immediate aftermath of the Enron and Andersen failures, have waned. My results show that audit committee composition and its role continues to evolve with regulatory and other corporate governance related changes.

Three Essays in Empirical Asset Pricing

The financial crisis of 2007-2008 led to extraordinary government intervention in firms and markets. The scope and depth of government action rivaled that of the Great Depression. Many traded markets experienced dramatic declines in liquidity leading to the existence of conditions normally assumed to be promptly removed via the actions of profit seeking arbitrageurs. These extreme events motivate the three essays in this work. The first essay seeks and fails to find evidence of investor behavior consistent with the broad 'Too Big To Fail' policies enacted during the crisis by government agents. Only in limited circumstances, where government guarantees such as deposit insurance or U.S. Treasury lending lines already existed, did investors impart a premium to the debt security prices of firms under stress. The second essay introduces the Inflation Indexed Swap Basis (IIS Basis) in examining the large differences between cash and derivative markets based upon future U.S. inflation as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI). It reports the consistent positive value of this measure as well as the very large positive values it reached in the fourth quarter of 2008 after Lehman Brothers went bankrupt. It concludes that the IIS Basis continues to exist due to limitations in market liquidity and hedging alternatives. The third essay explores the methodology of performing debt based event studies utilizing credit default swaps (CDS). It provides practical implementation advice to researchers to address limited source data and/or small target firm sample size.

Reputational risk of banks : a study on the effects of regulatory sanctions for major european banks

Mestrado em Finanças

The wealth effects of commercial bank securities issuances announcement

Banks are often excluded in corporate finance research mainly because of the regulatory concerns. Compares to non-bank firms, banks are heavily regulated due to its special economic role of money and the uncertainty. Heavy regulation on banks could reduce the information asymmetry between the managers and investor by limiting the behaviour of banks at the time of the Seasoned Equity Offering (SEO), and by increasing the incentive for banks to avoid excessive risk-taking. Therefore, the market may be less likely to assume that bank issued securities signal information that the bank is overvalued compared to their non-bank counterparts. The objective of this thesis is therefore to examine commercial banks issued securities announcement effect. Three interrelated research questions are addressed in this thesis: 1) What is the difference in convertible bond announcement effect between banks and non-banks firm? 2) What is the difference in SEO announcement effect between banks and non-banks? 3) How do the stringency levels of bank regulation impact on the announcement effects of bank issued SEO? By using the U.S. convertible bond and SEO data from 1982 to 2012, I find that the bank issued a convertible bond and SEO announcement experience higher cumulative abnormal return than non-bank. This is consistent with the view that bank regulation reveals positive information about banks. Since banks are heavily regulated, the market is less likely to assume that the issuance of the convertible bond and SEO by banks signals information that is overvalued. These results are robust after controlling for a number of firm-, issue-, and market-specific characteristics. These results are robust by considering the different categories of non-bank industries by undertaking tests in relation to the differences in the CARS upon convertible bond/ SEO across industries, as well as the unbalanced sample between banks and non-banks by using the matched sample analysis. However, the relation between the stringency level of bank regulation and bank issued securities announcement effect may be nonlinear. As hypothesised, I find that bank regulation has an inverted U-shaped relation with the announcement effect of bank SEO by using the SEO data across 21 countries from 2001 to 2012. Under a less bank regulation environment, the market reacts more positively to the bank SEO announcement for an increase in the level of bank regulation. However, the bank SEO announcement effects become more negative if the bank regulation becomes too stringent. This inverted U-shaped relationship is robust after I use the exogenous cross-country, cross-year variation in the timing of the Basel II adoption as the instrument to assess the causal impact of bank regulation on SEO announcement effects. However, the stringency of regulation does not have a significant impact on the announcement effects of involuntary bank equity issuance.

Evidence of portuguese stock market abnormal returns

According to the stock market efficiency theory, it is not possible to consistently beat the market. However, technical analysis is more and more spread as an efficient way to achieve abnormal returns. In fact there is evidence that momentum investing strategies provide abnormal returns in different stock markets, Jegadeesh, N. and Titman, S. (1993), George, T. and Hwang, C. (2004) and Du, D. (2009). In this work we study if like other markets, the Portuguese stock market also allows to obtain abnormal returns, using a strategy that consists in picking stocks according to their past performance. Our work confirms the results of Soares, J. and Serra, A. (2005) and Pereira, P. (2009), showing that an investor can get abnormal returns investing in momentum portfolios. The Portuguese stock market evidences momentum returns in short term, exhibiting reversal in long term.

The impact of family control on firm's return

Family firm is a field of growing interest. The aim of this article is to understand whether CEOs identity impacts family firm’s stock returns. From a sample of Portuguese and Spanish family firms findings show that who manages the firms result in significantly different risk exposure. Moreover, we find that the abnormal return found by Fahlenbrach (2009) to founder-controlled firms disappear when we use valueweighted portfolios and include two new factors: market aggregate illiquidity and debt intensity to the four-factor Carhart model. Finally, our results explain why the majority of family firm is controlled by its founder.

Has the time for renewables finally arrived? – An event study on EPA’s Clean Power Plan

The recent proposals presented by EPA aimed to reduce the dependency of fossil fuels and to lower current emissions levels, hoping to gradually shift electric generation units to renewable energy sources. Actually, the Final Rule Proposal announcement day exhibited a negative Abnormal Return on Fossil Fuels but the following days had positive Abnormal Returns, mostly due to legislative change perceived by financial markets which eased up implementation periods of the proposed measures in the Final Rule when compared to the Draft Rule. Oppositely, Renewables and Solar Portfolios exhibited negative Cumulative Abnormal Returns over the period surrounding the Final Rule.

Yritysostojen vaikutus osakkeiden hintoihin metsäteollisuustoimialalla

Tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli selvittää yritysostoilmoitusten vaikutusta ostajayrityksen osakekursseihin ja tutkia kasvattavatko yritysostot ostajayrityksen osakkeenomistajien varallisuutta ylisuurten tuottojen muodossa. Tutkimuksessa tarkasteltiin myös, vaikuttaako ylisuurten tuottojen syntymiseen ostokohteen liiketoimintatyyppi, yritysoston koko tai ostajan oma aikaisempi taloudellinen menestys. Tutkimuskohteena olivat kansainväliset metsäteollisuusyritykset. Tutkimusmenetelmänä käytettiin tapaustutkimusta. Tutkimustulosten mukaan liiketoimintatyypin mukaisesti tarkasteltuna paperin, kartongin ja pehmopaperin valmistajan ostoilmoituksen vaikutuksesta havaintoperiodin kumulatiiviset tuotot olivat ostajayrityksellä positiivisia. Yritysoston koon perusteella tarkasteltuna pienet ostot, joiden suuruus oli alle 10 prosenttia ostajan edellisen vuoden taseesta, olivat ostajan kannalta kannattavia. Yrityksen aikaisemman taloudellisen menestyksen perusteella voidaan todeta, että keskiarvoa paremman velkaantuneisuusasteen ja oman pääoman tuottoprosentin omaavien yritysten kumulatiiviset epänormaalit tuotot olivat yritysostoilmoituksen vaikutuksesta positiivisia ja tilastollisesti merkitseviä.

Osakeanti-ilmoitusten informaatiovaikutus: case Helsingin Arvopaperipörssi 1993 – 2002

Tutkielman päätavoitteena on selvittää, miten osakkeenomistajien merkintäetuoikeuteen perustuva uusmerkintäilmoitus ja suunnattu osakeanti-ilmoitus vaikuttavat osakekursseihin julkistamispäivän ympäristössä. Tutkimusmetodiikka on lähinnä nomoteettinen, vaikkakin tutkimus sisältää myös komparatiivisen tutkimuksen tunnusmerkkejä. Tutkielman empiriaosuudessa tutkitaan merkintäoikeusantien ja suunnattujen osakeantien informaatiovaikutuksia Helsingin Arvopaperipörssissä vuosina 1993 – 2002. Epänormaalit tuotot laskettiin ajanjaksolta t=-15 ja t=15 käyttämällä keskiarvokorjattua mallia ja markkinakorjattua mallia. Merkintäoikeusantien osalta havaittiin positiivisia kumulatiivisia epänormaaleja tuottoja, kun laskentamenetelmänä käytettiin markkinakorjattua mallia. Nämä positiiviset kumulatiiviset epänormaalit tuotot eivät kuitenkaan olleet tilastollisesti merkitseviä. Tutkimuksessa todettiin myös se, että osakemarkkinat eivät reagoi tilastollisesti merkittävästi merkintäoikeusanti-ilmoituspäivänä. Suunnattujen osakeantien osalta havaittiin tilastollisesti merkitseviä (10 % merkitsevyystasolla) negatiivisia kumulatiivisia epänormaaleja tuottoja. Lisäksi todettiin, että osakemarkkinat eivät reagoi tilastollisesti merkittävästi suunnattuna osakeanti-ilmoituspäivänä. Suunnattujen osakeantien osalta havaittiin myös informaation vuotamista markkinoille 11 päivää ennen suunnattua osakeanti-ilmoitusta.

Abnormal Returns of Dividend Announcements during a Boom and a Recession. Empirical Evidence from U.S. from the years of 2000 - 2002 and 2005 - 2007, including Finnish Extra Dividends

This study examines the short time price effect of dividend announcements during a boom and a recession. The data being used here is gathered from the years of 2000 - 2002 when it was a recession after the techno bubble burst and from the years 2005 - 2007 when investors experienced large capital gains all around the world. The data consists of dividend increases and intact observations. The aim is to find out differences in abnormal returns between a boom and a recession. Second, the study examines differences between different dividend yield brackets. Third, Finnish extra dividends, mainly being delivered to shareholders in 2004 are included to the empirical test. Generally stated, the aim is to find out do investors respect dividends more during a recession than a boom and can this be proved by using dividend yield brackets. The empirical results from U.S shows that the abnormal returns of dividend increase announcements during the recession in the beginning of this decade were larger than during the boom. Thus, investors seem to respect dividend increases more when stock prices are falling. Substantial abnormal returns of dividend increases during the time period of 2005 - 2007 could not be found. The results from the overall samples state that the abnormal returns during the recession were positively slightly higher than during the boom. No clear and strong evidence was found between different dividend yield brackets. In Finland, there were substantial abnormal returns on the announcement day of the extra dividends. Thus, indicating that investors saw the extra dividends as a good thing for shareholders' value. This paper is mostly in line with the theory that investors respect dividends more during bad times than good times.