1 resultado para Records retention
em Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (7)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (3)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (44)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (27)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (6)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (82)
- Boston University Digital Common (3)
- Brock University, Canada (43)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (16)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (66)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (24)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (91)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (4)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (16)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (104)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (36)
- Digital Howard @ Howard University | Howard University Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (8)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (14)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (10)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (19)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (5)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (35)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (75)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (92)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (110)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (6)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Michigan (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
This article examines the impact of presidential approval and individual minister profiles on minister turnover. It claims that, in order to prioritize sustainable policy performance and cabinet loyalty, government chiefs protect and remove technocrats, partisans, and outsider ministers conditional on government approval. The study offers an operational definition of minister profiles that relies on fuzzy-set measures of technical expertise and political affiliation, and tests the hypotheses using survival analysis with an original dataset for the Argentine case (1983–2011). The findings show that popular presidents are likely to protect experts more than partisan ministers, but not outsiders.