1 resultado para Lloyd George, David (1863-1945)
em Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (6)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (3)
- Aquatic Commons (32)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (12)
- Aston University Research Archive (3)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (7)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (22)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (6)
- Bioline International (1)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (7)
- Boston University Digital Common (13)
- Brock University, Canada (13)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (3)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (97)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (3)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (9)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (5)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (7)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (45)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Harvard University (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (18)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (9)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (10)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (7)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (7)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (240)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (100)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (3)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (7)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (30)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- University of Michigan (179)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (1)
- University of Washington (5)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (6)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
G.H. Mead (1863-1931) oriented much of his intellectual efforts around three unavoidable questions for anyone living in a modern society: how are selfhood, knowledge, and politics understood and organized in such a society? Modern individuals continually seek answers to questions although nobody has ever come up with a definitive answer to them. Modernity, in other words, confronts us with inevitable problematics that fundamentally shape the way in which we think about certain topics. For the purposes of my discussion of Mead, I focus upon three of these modern problematics: science, selfhood, and democratic politics. But before I discuss Mead’s treatment of these problem areas, allow me to briefly situate Mead as a pragmatist in relation to Dewey and James within pragmatism.