1 resultado para Government accounting
em Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (4)
- Aquatic Commons (16)
- Archive of European Integration (43)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (7)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (2)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (19)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (8)
- Carolina Law Scholarship Repository (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (102)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (5)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (16)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (2)
- Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco - Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (7)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (5)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (181)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (374)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de El Salvador (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (7)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (3)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (12)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (7)
- University of Michigan (77)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (1)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (7)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
This article examines the impact of presidential approval and individual minister profiles on minister turnover. It claims that, in order to prioritize sustainable policy performance and cabinet loyalty, government chiefs protect and remove technocrats, partisans, and outsider ministers conditional on government approval. The study offers an operational definition of minister profiles that relies on fuzzy-set measures of technical expertise and political affiliation, and tests the hypotheses using survival analysis with an original dataset for the Argentine case (1983–2011). The findings show that popular presidents are likely to protect experts more than partisan ministers, but not outsiders.