1 resultado para George, Ed Don
em Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (35)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (5)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (19)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (11)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (8)
- Biblioteca Digital Loyola - Universidad de Deusto (3)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (10)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (8)
- Boston University Digital Common (7)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (9)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (2)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (23)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (9)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (65)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (4)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (8)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (14)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (117)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (145)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (2)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (27)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- University of Michigan (360)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (2)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
G.H. Mead (1863-1931) oriented much of his intellectual efforts around three unavoidable questions for anyone living in a modern society: how are selfhood, knowledge, and politics understood and organized in such a society? Modern individuals continually seek answers to questions although nobody has ever come up with a definitive answer to them. Modernity, in other words, confronts us with inevitable problematics that fundamentally shape the way in which we think about certain topics. For the purposes of my discussion of Mead, I focus upon three of these modern problematics: science, selfhood, and democratic politics. But before I discuss Mead’s treatment of these problem areas, allow me to briefly situate Mead as a pragmatist in relation to Dewey and James within pragmatism.