1 resultado para machine learning,twitter,language processing,COVID
em Reposit
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Repository Napier (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (2)
- Aberdeen University (8)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (43)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (86)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (37)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (8)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (28)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (19)
- Brock University, Canada (7)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (9)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (33)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (3)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (12)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (51)
- CUNY Academic Works (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (14)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (4)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (29)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (8)
- Duke University (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco - Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (33)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (4)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (14)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Open University Netherlands (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (5)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (15)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (1)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (3)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (27)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (24)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (3)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo Uruguai (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (14)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (32)
- Universidade do Minho (20)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (4)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (6)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (75)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (58)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (36)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (7)
- University of Washington (14)
Resumo:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of machine learning classifiers (MLCs) for glaucoma diagnosis using Spectral Domain OCT (SD-OCT) and standard automated perimetry (SAP). METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study. Sixty two glaucoma patients and 48 healthy individuals were included. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination, achromatic standard automated perimetry (SAP) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) imaging with SD-OCT (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, California). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were obtained for all SD-OCT parameters and global indices of SAP. Subsequently, the following MLCs were tested using parameters from the SD-OCT and SAP: Bagging (BAG), Naive-Bayes (NB), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Radial Basis Function (RBF), Random Forest (RAN), Ensemble Selection (ENS), Classification Tree (CTREE), Ada Boost M1(ADA),Support Vector Machine Linear (SVML) and Support Vector Machine Gaussian (SVMG). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (aROC) obtained for isolated SAP and OCT parameters were compared with MLCs using OCT+SAP data. RESULTS: Combining OCT and SAP data, MLCs' aROCs varied from 0.777(CTREE) to 0.946 (RAN).The best OCT+SAP aROC obtained with RAN (0.946) was significantly larger the best single OCT parameter (p<0.05), but was not significantly different from the aROC obtained with the best single SAP parameter (p=0.19). CONCLUSION: Machine learning classifiers trained on OCT and SAP data can successfully discriminate between healthy and glaucomatous eyes. The combination of OCT and SAP measurements improved the diagnostic accuracy compared with OCT data alone.