1 resultado para Origin and destination traffic surveys.
em Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (5)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (13)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (3)
- Archive of European Integration (10)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (2)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (20)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (34)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (3)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (7)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (63)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (45)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (10)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (22)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (33)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (12)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (5)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (23)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Helvia: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Córdoba (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (3)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (58)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (7)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (30)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (7)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (1)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (3)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (62)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (11)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (35)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (8)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (12)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (6)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (5)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (74)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (10)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (207)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (15)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
To evaluate the use of optical and nonoptical aids during reading and writing activities in individuals with acquired low vision. This study was performed using descriptive and cross-sectional surveys. The data collection instrument was created with structured questions that were developed from an exploratory study and a previous test based on interviews, and it evaluated the following variables: personal characteristics, use of optical and nonoptical aids, and activities that required the use of optical and nonoptical aids. The study population included 30 subjects with acquired low vision and visual acuities of 20/200-20/400. Most subjects reported the use of some optical aids (60.0%). Of these 60.0%, the majority (83.3%) cited spectacles as the most widely used optical aid. The majority (63.3%) of subjects also reported the use of nonoptical aids, the most frequent ones being letter magnification (68.4%), followed by bringing the objects closer to the eyes (57.8%). Subjects often used more than one nonoptical aid. The majority of participants reported the use of optical and nonoptical aids during reading activities, highlighting the use of spectacles, magnifying glasses, and letter magnification; however, even after the use of these aids, we found that the subjects often needed to read the text more than once to understand it. During writing activities, all subjects reported the use of optical aids, while most stated that they did not use nonoptical aids for such activities.