1 resultado para National identity and writing
em Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (3)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (13)
- Aston University Research Archive (20)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (6)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (43)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (36)
- Brock University, Canada (9)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (61)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (4)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (10)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (10)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (8)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (7)
- Digital Archives@Colby (5)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (25)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (6)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (24)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (3)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (3)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (9)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (9)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (16)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (6)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (6)
- Repositorio Institucional UNISALLE - Colombia (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (9)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo España (2)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (8)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (6)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (33)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (21)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (193)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (98)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (6)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
To evaluate the use of optical and nonoptical aids during reading and writing activities in individuals with acquired low vision. This study was performed using descriptive and cross-sectional surveys. The data collection instrument was created with structured questions that were developed from an exploratory study and a previous test based on interviews, and it evaluated the following variables: personal characteristics, use of optical and nonoptical aids, and activities that required the use of optical and nonoptical aids. The study population included 30 subjects with acquired low vision and visual acuities of 20/200-20/400. Most subjects reported the use of some optical aids (60.0%). Of these 60.0%, the majority (83.3%) cited spectacles as the most widely used optical aid. The majority (63.3%) of subjects also reported the use of nonoptical aids, the most frequent ones being letter magnification (68.4%), followed by bringing the objects closer to the eyes (57.8%). Subjects often used more than one nonoptical aid. The majority of participants reported the use of optical and nonoptical aids during reading activities, highlighting the use of spectacles, magnifying glasses, and letter magnification; however, even after the use of these aids, we found that the subjects often needed to read the text more than once to understand it. During writing activities, all subjects reported the use of optical aids, while most stated that they did not use nonoptical aids for such activities.